[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 15, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4528-S4529]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE INVESTIGATION
Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, last Friday, the New York Times reported
that during the Trump administration, the Justice Department issued
subpoenas involving Members of Congress, their staff, and family
members, even a minor family member. It is highly unusual for the
Justice Department to investigate Members of Congress. The reason it is
unusual is clear: Our Founders created three separate branches of the
Federal Government with a separation of powers so that each branch
could serve as a check and balance on the other and no branch would
have too much power.
When the Justice Department investigates a Member of Congress,
typically, it is for corruption charges. That is understandable, but
that is not what happened here. This was an investigation into a leak
of information. And the use of subpoenas to investigate Members of
Congress is extremely strange territory.
These concerns are heightened when the President has publicly
attacked those same Members of Congress. That is what former President
Trump did when he repeatedly and without any evidence accused
Representative Adam Schiff about leaking information about Russian
election interference.
These reports and the reports that journalists and even Trump's own
White House Counsel were included in the Justice Department's so-called
leak investigation raise serious questions about the Justice Department
and its former leaders.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has a constitutional responsibility to
oversee the Department of Justice on behalf of the American people, so
yesterday our committee sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick
Garland asking for more information. But yesterday Senator McConnell,
the Republican minority leader in the Senate, came to the floor and
warned us off. He warned the Judiciary Committee against exercising our
statutory oversight responsibility because it could become ``a partisan
circus.'' This came on the heels of Senator McConnell's personal veto
of a bipartisan Commission to investigate the deadly January 6 mob
attack on the U.S. Capitol. But now the minority leader is warning us
against even looking into the targeting of Trump's perceived political
enemies by the Justice Department. The minority leader claimed that the
Senate does not need to look into this matter because--get this--the
Department of Justice inspector general has already announced he would
investigate. That is a pretty decent argument if you have no memory
whatsoever.
For over 13 months during the last Congress, under a Republican
majority, the Senate Judiciary Committee conducted an extensive
oversight investigation into the FBI's opening of the Crossfire
Hurricane investigation even though the Department of Justice inspector
general had already investigated it. The Department of Justice
inspector general had already completed a 19-month investigation of so-
called Crossfire Hurricane involving over 100 witnesses and reviewing
over a million documents.
That wasn't good enough for the Republican majority. They persisted
in conducting a committee investigation nevertheless even though the
inspector general's investigation concluded that Crossfire Hurricane
had a proper basis
[[Page S4529]]
and that anti-Trump bias did not affect the FBI's work on Crossfire
Hurricane. Those are the very issues the Republican majority reexamined
in their own investigation. In that instance, the Department of Justice
inspector general satisfied all the criteria of an inspection, an
investigation, and yet the Republicans rejected it and proceeded
forward.
In this case, the Republican leader in the Senate is arguing that the
work of the inspector general should be enough--quite a difference.
Throughout the course of that investigation, the Senate Judiciary
Committee held extensive hearings, but it wasn't enough.
The Republican-led Senate Judiciary Committee was so focused on
investigating a conspiracy theory about Obama that they didn't hold a
single hearing on the Trump administration's Department of Justice in 4
years. If they had, maybe they would have discovered this latest
revelation rather than the New York Times.
Senator McConnell did not warn the Judiciary Committee that the DOJ
inspector general's investigation was sufficient or that its
investigation into Crossfire Hurricane would become a partisan circus.
He saw it completely differently in those days.
Importantly, it seems the minority leader does not speak for his
entire caucus. Yesterday the minority whip said: ``Obviously this
warrants further review and investigation,'' and he ``assume[s] the
committee will work through that.'' I hope that other Republican
Members of the Chamber join the minority whip to call for further
investigation. Congress's place in our constitutional order is too
important to simply look the other way.
____________________