[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 99 (Tuesday, June 8, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3969-S3970]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Judicial Nominations
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, one of the major responsibilities of the
Senate Judiciary Committee, which I chair, is the selection of judges
to serve our Nation. It is important not only because it is a question
of measuring their standards of integrity, honesty, and judgment but
also because these are lifetime appointments. Literally, the women and
men who are chosen for these slots will have an impact on the future of
America in their courts which could last for many years and decades.
That is why we are careful with the Biden administration to not only
bring good nominees before the Committee but to make certain they bring
the necessary qualities.
This week, the Senate will consider several of President Biden's
judicial nominees. I believe they understand the role of a judge in our
system. They will bring much needed experiential and demographic
diversity to our Nation's courts.
I have tried throughout my career, and many others like me have
tried, to choose men and women for the bench who will reflect the
diversity of America. The face of justice is often as important as the
fact of justice, and if people appearing before our courts feel that
there is at least a chance for success based on the background and
experience of a judge, I think it is a positive thing.
Given the background of these judges in trying cases, arguing
appeals, and issuing rulings from the bench, I believe, and the
committee agreed, that these judicial nominees are ready for service.
Today, I would like to speak in support of two of them: Julien Neals,
nominated to the District Court of New Jersey, and Regina Rodriguez,
nominated to the District Court of Colorado.
New Jersey is really in desperate need of Federal judges. They are
facing a judicial emergency. In each of the States' six judicial
vacancies, they have been designated as a judicial emergency status by
the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.
Today, we can begin to address this judicial emergency by finally
confirming Julien Neals to the U.S. District Court for the District of
New Jersey. He is an extraordinary public servant. He has served the
people of the State of New Jersey for decades. As an expert in
municipal law, he handled several legal disputes that were tried to
verdict, judgment, or final decision, including multiple--multiple--
jury trials. He was the chief judge of the Newark Municipal Court. He
presided over 6,000 cases in that capacity.
He received a unanimous rating of ``well qualified'' from the
American Bar Association. He has the strong support of his home State
Senators, Senators Cory Booker and Bob Menendez. He has received broad
bipartisan support in the Judiciary Committee, with five Republicans
joining all the Democrats in supporting his nomination.
I urge my colleagues to support him.
This week, the Senate will also consider the nomination of Regina
Rodriguez to be a judge in the District Court of Colorado. What a life
story she brings. Ms. Rodriguez is the daughter of a Japanese-American
mother, whose family was interned during World War II, and a Mexican-
American father who was one of the first Hispanic coaches in the
National Football League. Her father's job as a coach took the family
across the country.
Although Ms. Rodriguez was born in Colorado, she spent several of her
formative years in my home State of Illinois. When she was 17 years
old, Ms. Rodriguez thought she might want to be a lawyer, so she put on
her best suit, as she says, and knocked on doors in Macomb, IL, until
she found a lawyer who said: ``Come on in. I'll show you the ropes.''
Lucky for us, Ms. Rodriguez held on to that passion that first
developed when she was a teenager. Over the past 30 years, she has
served as a talented litigator who has tried 35 cases to verdict.
She has a range of experience in government and the private sector.
In the public sector, she served as an assistant U.S. attorney and rose
to become the first Latina Chief of the Civil Division of the U.S.
Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado. In private practice,
she represented a broad array of clients, from individuals to Fortune
500 firms. During her tenure as a litigator, Ms. Rodriguez has
demonstrated that she understands the importance of applying the law to
the facts in a fair manner. She has represented plaintiffs, defendants,
government, and those who have sued the government. As a woman of
color, she has risen as a partner in several leading law firms--no mean
feat.
Ms. Rodriguez has taken out time from her demanding schedule to
mentor young attorneys, just as that lawyer in Macomb, IL, did for her.
She has received a unanimous ``well qualified'' rating from the
American Bar Association, as well as positive
[[Page S3970]]
blue slips from both Senators Bennet and Hickenlooper. Her nomination
is also supported by the National Asian Pacific American Bar
Association, the Latinas First Foundation, and the Colorado Lawyers
Committee.
She has earned support across the aisle. On May 20, Ms. Rodriguez was
voted out of the committee by a vote of 17 to 5, with the support of
six of my Republican colleagues.
When confirmed, she will be the first Asian-American judge to serve
not only in the District of Colorado but in the entire Tenth Circuit.
Her historic, well-deserved confirmation will bring our Federal
judiciary closer to reflecting the lives and experiences of all
Americans. I urge my colleagues to join me in voting for Ms.
Rodriguez's nomination.
The judicial nominees we are voting on this week illustrate something
that is substantial and profound. They illustrate that President Joe
Biden is dedicated to appointing legal experts with outstanding
credentials and a wealth of experience.
During his first several months in office, President Biden has
nominated public servants who will bring to the bench a variety of
professional perspectives and personal experiences. Too often, those
things have been missing in previous nominees. By confirming judges who
reflect the experience of all Americans and who demonstrate fealty to
the rule of law, we can continue building a justice system that works
for everyone.
Over the last 4 years, we have seen a concerted effort on the
Republican side to fill vacancies. They broke records, in some
respects, in the number of nominees that they brought before the Senate
for approval. Some of the records are not ones to be proud of, from my
perspective, and 10 of the nominees who were submitted for
consideration during the last 4 years before the Senate Judiciary
Committee were found unqualified by the American Bar Association.
Nevertheless, most of them made it to the bench in lifetime
appointments.
Many nominees came before us, of the Trump administration, who were
seeking lifetime appointments to become a trial judge and had no
personal experience in a courtroom. It is hard to imagine that anyone
would be thrust into that situation and expected to perform as a
professional. Imagine, if you will, the parties to those lawsuits, many
of whom stake their lives and reputations on the outcome, to find a
judge who couldn't find their way through the Code of Civil Procedure
if they were forced to. That, unfortunately, was the standard that was
used. As long as these nominees in the past had the blessing of the so-
called Federalist Society, that was good enough for many of my
Republican colleagues.
Joe Biden is really responding to that by suggesting nominees who
meet much higher standards. I want to work with the Biden
administration to continue in that tradition, so at the end of the day
we can fill the vacancies with women and men who are not only competent
and honest but have the integrity and experience, both legal and
otherwise, to serve our Nation for the rest of their lives, should they
choose, in these judicial capacities.
I commend these two nominees who passed out of our committee with a
strong bipartisan votes. To my colleagues on the floor today, I hope
they will join me in supporting them.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so
ordered.