[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 90 (Monday, May 24, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Page S3318]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                                 CHINA

  Mr. McCONNELL. Now, Madam President, on another matter, last week, a 
bipartisan majority of Senators voted to proceed to floor debate about 
our Nation's long-term competition with China.
  There is no disagreement that the People's Republic's strategic 
capabilities and its growing influence beyond the Indo-Pacific pose a 
singular challenge to American strength and security. There is robust 
debate about the right ways to address this challenge.
  The legislation before us arrived on the floor incomplete, and it 
spans a number of huge issues that occupy multiple committees' 
jurisdictions. It is a prime example of a bill that needs a thorough, 
bipartisan amendment process here in the Senate. So far, we have had a 
few votes on important amendments. There are a lot more that need 
consideration, and we should not close debate on this bill until those 
amendments are addressed.
  Unfortunately, during one important vote last week, our Democratic 
colleagues sent a telling signal. They voted down Ranking Member Inhofe 
and Vice Chairman Shelby's amendment to make sure that the real 
backbone of our competition with China--the resources we allocate to 
our Armed Forces and national defense--was not neglected.
  Make no mistake, supply chains, espionage, intellectual property--
those are all important topics, but all the policy tweaks in the world 
would not amount to much help if we lose our military edge with respect 
to China. Soft power isn't much good without the hard power to back it 
up.
  The Chinese Communist Party appears to understand this quite clearly. 
According to one watchdog, it has increased military investment by 76 
percent over the last decade. China has increased its military spending 
by 76 percent over the last decade. The same data show that our own 
U.S. defense spending fell 10 percent over that period, thanks to the 
approach of the last Democratic administration, and now President Biden 
has signaled that he wants to cut defense spending after inflation--
exactly the wrong approach.
  No serious strategy for our competition with massive foreign powers 
could leave the U.S. Armed Forces, their tools, and their resources out 
of the conversation in a meaningful way. I hope and expect we will have 
a number of further votes on important amendments before there would be 
any attempt to shut off debate on this wide-ranging measure.

                          ____________________