[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 90 (Monday, May 24, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3317-S3318]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                    NOMINATION OF KRISTEN M. CLARKE

  Mr. McCONNELL. On a completely different matter, when President 
Biden's nominees have been qualified and mainstream, they received 
bipartisan cooperation. But the President's choice to head a key 
Division at the Department of Justice as an Assistant Attorney General 
failed to even advance out of the committee.
  The Democratic leader had to reach into the Judiciary Committee and 
rescue the nomination of Kristen Clarke. Our colleagues on the 
committee did not give her a favorable recommendation. That is because 
of a long history of statements that placed the nominee on, frankly, 
the far-left fringe of the political spectrum.
  If our Democratic colleagues have their way, a couple of days from 
now, the American people will have an Assistant Attorney General who 
argued publicly just last year that ``we must invest less in police.'' 
She used that exact phrase three times in one essay.
  Violent crimes shot up dramatically in 2020. One survey of 30-plus 
major American cities found that the murder rate jumped 30 percent last 
year alone. Other estimates have found even larger increases. Experts 
say 2020 saw the largest 1-year rise in homicides that America has ever 
seen as far back as we have recorded these kinds of statistics.
  Early data from this year suggests that 2021 may even be worse, but, 
apparently, the President's response to this violent crimewave is to 
have a proponent of defunding the police help run the Department of 
Justice.

[[Page S3318]]

  Adequate policing is not an enemy of civil rights. Among other 
things, a recent study by multiple university professors confirmed that 
more cops lead to fewer murders:

       Larger police forces save lives, and the lives saved are 
     disproportionately Black lives.

  Police funding isn't the only important issue where the nominee's 
judgment has missed the mark.
  Three years ago, when the then-Attorney General was standing up a 
task force on religious liberty, Ms. Clarke said this was designed ``to 
make it easier for people to use religion to mask their discriminatory 
goals''--an incredibly out-of-touch, far-left statement.
  Finally, we are currently watching an alarming spike in anti-Semitic 
attacks and violence across our country. I introduced new legislation 
on Friday, with Senator Cotton, to confront anti-Semitism head-on, but 
as a Harvard undergraduate, Ms. Clarke invited, welcomed, introduced, 
and then defended a famously anti-Semitic guest speaker who had 
authored a book literally entitled--now listen to this--``The Jewish 
Onslaught.''
  The nominee has stated recently that she regrets that decision. 
Goodness, I would certainly hope so.
  Yet she also claims that her op-ed from just last year, which 
asserted three times--three times--that we must invest less in police, 
was not actually suggesting that we invest less in police.
  This is not the right nominee for a crucial post at a crucial time so 
I would urge colleagues to vote no this week.

                          ____________________