[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 20, 2021)]
[House]
[Page H1962]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
REMAINING FOCUSED ON INFRASTRUCTURE
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Florida (Mr. Bilirakis) for 5 minutes.
Mr. BILIRAKIS. Madam Speaker, I recently met with local and State
leaders about the infrastructure needs of our community, which are
significant. There is widespread agreement that an investment in our
Nation's infrastructure is needed to alleviate traffic, improve
flooding conditions, and address other safety concerns.
Imagine my disappointment, Madam Speaker, to learn that less than 10
percent of President Biden's $2 trillion infrastructure package will be
spent on roads and bridges. Also of concern, less than 2 percent of the
package is allocated for waterways, locks, dams, ports, and airports,
which are all very important to the State of Florida; and less than 50
percent is allocated for much-needed broadband expansion, which would
help to address the digital divide in our country.
These traditional infrastructure projects, coupled with
infrastructure investments that are linked to our Nation's security,
such as safeguarding our energy grid, water systems, and other critical
assets from cyber and other attacks, are the types of projects my
constituents want to see funded.
Unfortunately, President Biden is using the guise of infrastructure
spending, which enjoys relatively high support among Americans--it is
really a bipartisan issue--to push highly partisan and unpopular policy
proposals, such as the Green New Deal. Many of these policies will hurt
American consumers and workers.
The vast majority of spending in the bill consists of non-
infrastructure expenditures. For example, the bill contains $400
billion in expansion of Medicaid; $213 billion in spending for housing
initiatives; $100 billion of additional funding for schools, without
any type of requirement for them to reopen; $50 billion for a new
office at the U.S. Department of Commerce; $35 billion for climate
science; and $10 billion for a new ``Civilian Climate Corps.''
Adding insult to injury, Madam Speaker, this astronomical spending
plan would be funded through tax increases. This current proposal fails
to address our Nation's most critical infrastructure needs and falls
short of meeting my constituents' expectations.
We can do better, Madam Speaker, if we work together. My constituents
want their elected officials to work together to get things done,
improving opportunities for our families and our community. They do not
want to see us use our time in Washington to play political games.
Please be assured I will remain focused on this paramount objective.
____________________