[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 24, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1738-S1739]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                   Unanimous Consent Request--S. 948

  Mr. SCOTT of Florida. Madam President, I rise today to discuss 
another issue in the Democrats' massive COVID spending bill that we 
need to fix.
  My Democratic colleagues want to keep spending into oblivion, taking 
our national debt to $30 trillion. This would be bad enough on its own, 
but tucked into the bloated spending package were new tax hikes on 
self-employed individuals.
  President Biden and the Democrats didn't talk about it, and they 
certainly aren't talking about it as they travel the Nation to brag 
about their bad bill.
  Democrats are quietly raising taxes, hoping the American people don't 
notice. The $1.9 trillion so-called American Rescue Plan Act, of which 
less than 10 percent went to actually help fight COVID and 1 percent to 
vaccines, had several tax increases and burdensome reporting 
requirements, including one that significantly impacts the gig 
workers--those who have been severely impacted by the coronavirus 
pandemic.
  Starting in 2022, this bill requires many contractors with gig 
economy companies like Uber, DoorDash, Airbnb, and Lyft to file 1099 
forms when they previously would not have. The new requirement 
dramatically lowers the annual 1099 reporting threshold from $20,000 
and 200 transactions to just $600 and eliminates the transaction 
minimum.
  In late February, before the Democrats rushed their spending bill 
through Congress on a purely partisan basis, a coalition of groups 
wrote to Speaker Pelosi and Leader Schumer, asking that this onerous 
new provision, which has nothing to do with addressing the coronavirus 
crisis, be removed or at least reconsidered. The letter was signed by 
groups such as the Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council, the 
National Asian American Chamber of Commerce, National Association for 
the Self-Employed, United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, and the 
National Association of Women Business Owners.
  After receiving such a letter, one would think that Democrats would 
want to reconsider. Raising taxes and reporting requirements in the 
midst of a pandemic? This is never good policy, but I can't think of 
any worse timing. Of course, Democrats kept the provision buried deep 
within the bill, hoping the American public wouldn't notice.
  The Democrats' new reporting requirements are effectively a tax hike 
and will ultimately hurt low- and middle-income contractors, the self-
employed, and freelancers, many of whom have been devastated by the 
pandemic,

[[Page S1739]]

while Federal and State Governments will collect billions more in 
income tax revenue.
  My Democratic colleagues want the American public to believe this is 
about catching tax cheats. And, to be clear, any attempt to evade taxes 
and defraud the public by not following the law should be condemned, 
and Congress should appropriately address it. However, a massive new 
reporting requirement of gig workers, many just trying to make ends 
meet in the midst of this pandemic, is not about catching tax fraud. It 
is about punishing the self-employed and raising revenues for the 
Democrats' massive spending plans.
  It wasn't that long ago that President Biden promised that he 
wouldn't raise taxes on anyone making under $400,000. Obviously, that 
was not true. But this isn't the first time Democrats have tried to 
quietly increase taxes and saddle the self-employed with new 
requirements like this. They did it with ObamaCare when they required 
businesses to send 1099 forms for all purchases of goods and services 
over $600 annually. They quickly learned how unpopular and harmful this 
provision was, and they quickly repealed it. The Obama administration 
even praised the repeal as a ``big win'' for the self-employed. I guess 
some never learn.
  What I am proposing is very simple. It is what the Democrats 
supported in 2011 when they repealed this bad tax increase in 
ObamaCare.
  Today, I want to remove this new reporting requirement and simply 
reinstate the previous law back into U.S. code.
  Increasing reporting requirements on our gig workers will create new 
and unexpected challenges for independent, self-employed workers and 
entrepreneurs, who are already facing an incredible burden created by 
the coronavirus.
  Increasing costs and regulations on already struggling Americans is 
wrong, and I hope all of my colleagues will join me today and repeal 
this bad policy.
  Madam President, as if in legislative session, I ask unanimous 
consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of S. 
948, introduced earlier today. I further ask that the bill be 
considered read a third time and passed and that the motion to 
reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  Mr. WYDEN. Reserving the right to object.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The senior Senator from Oregon.
  Mr. WYDEN. Madam President, the Senator from Florida claims to be 
looking out for gig workers and freelancers. The reality is very 
different.
  What is in the bill, which the Senator from Florida apparently 
opposes, is a way to make sure that these workers can get the 
information they need to help meet their existing tax obligations. 
Without this information, for example, workers may lose out on benefits 
that would help them pay rent and buy groceries. They could 
inadvertently lose out on important tax benefits, like the earned 
income tax credit. The rescue plan, of course, expands the earned tax 
credit. We want to make sure that every eligible worker can get that 
financial help.
  Finally, without reporting, workers might jeopardize the size of 
their future Social Security benefits, putting their retirement 
security at risk.
  So what the Senator from Florida is up to here would deprive American 
entrepreneurs of the information they need to keep business records, 
comply with tax requirements, and claim important Federal benefits. For 
these reasons, I strongly object to this request for unanimous consent.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard.
  The junior Senator from Florida.
  Mr. SCOTT of Florida. Madam President, that sounded good, but this is 
clearly a tax increase. It is a massive tax increase, and it is a 
massive new reporting requirement on already struggling Americans. Our 
focus ought to be on helping support American workers, especially these 
gig economy workers who have been hurt so badly.
  I am disappointed my colleague wants to increase costs and 
regulations on American families. What is strange is that my colleague 
from Oregon voted to repeal this bad provision when Democrats added it 
to ObamaCare. So what is crazy is, why is he OK today with raising 
taxes on the American people now? This is all part of the Democrats' 
tax-and-spend agenda, and it is just the beginning.
  Let's remember, with the last spending bill the Democrats passed, we 
will have $30 trillion of debt. As Governor of Florida, I worked so 
that we cut taxes 100 times, and we paid off a third of our State debt.
  We have to think that way here. How can we grow this economy and 
reduce the costs for Americans, not increase the costs to Americans? 
These bad types of policies will ruin our economy and a shot at the 
American dream, which we all believe in.
  I am going to fight every day to get the government out of the way 
and make sure that doesn't happen.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The junior Senator from Florida.
  Mr. SCOTT of Florida. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. LEE. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. LEE. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that at the 
conclusion of my remarks, I be allowed to present an excerpt of my 
speech in Spanish. I will provide transcripts both in English and in 
Spanish of those paragraphs.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.