[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 39 (Tuesday, March 2, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Page S985]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Whistleblower Program
Mr. GRASSLEY. Mr. President, I want to compliment that the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission operates a highly successful whistleblower
program. As one of the Senators who led the effort to establish that
whistleblower program back in 2010, I am proud of what this program has
accomplished.
Since the Commission issued its first whistleblower award in 2014,
whistleblowers have helped the Agency root out waste, fraud, and abuse
in the commodities trading industry and has recovered nearly $950
million. That is a very good reason to compliment the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission. That is a lot of restitution for harmed investors.
It is also a lot of money going to the U.S. Treasury and to the
American taxpayers.
Now, if Congress doesn't act quickly, all of that progress could come
to a swift and sudden halt.
Several months ago, the Commission contacted my office to tell me
that its whistleblower program is facing the prospect of a sudden cash
shortage--one that could require it to furlough staff and even close
down its operations.
The reason for this potential shortage isn't that the whistleblower
program has wasted or mismanaged funds or that it hasn't been doing its
job. It is just the exact opposite. Whistleblowers have been
approaching the Commission to report actionable claims of wrongdoing in
far greater numbers than before, and its whistleblower program has
grown at a much faster rate than Congress expected when we created it
in 2010.
Last year, the Commission issued a single whistleblower award for
approximately $9 million. In the past, it has given out awards for as
much as $30 million. Remember, this is money given out to find out
about fraud so people can be punished, bringing money into the Federal
Treasury.
As a result of these successes, in the near future the Commission
faces the possibility of having to pay out several large whistleblower
awards in close succession. Now, if that happens, the whistleblower
program could run short of having the cash on hand that it needs to pay
these awards and other office operating expenses. Again, this is not an
issue of bad management. It just means that the program works better
than we thought when we enacted it in 2010.
By law, the Commission is only allowed to keep a certain amount of
cash on hand to pay out awards, and that amount is capped under
existing law at $100 million. Because Congress expected the program to
remain relatively small, which it has not, it set the cap for the
Consumer Protection Fund lower than the cap it has set for larger
whistleblower programs, such as the one at the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
The Consumer Protection Fund is also used to pay the operating
expenses of the Whistleblower Office--in other words, the employees
that follow up on these fraudulent claims.
Increasing the cap will ensure that the Commission can keep enough of
the proceeds from the fines it collects on hand to pay whistleblower
awards and also to ensure that the program itself doesn't run out of
money.
In 2019, I introduced the Whistleblower Programs Improvement Act,
which increased the cap on the fund and made several additional
improvements to the program, including provisions that would allow the
Commission greater flexibility to share information with law
enforcement.
I did this because I realized that as the awards became bigger and
more frequent, it was only a matter of time before the Commission would
run into trouble. A year later, my prediction came true, and the
Commission itself notified me of their impending money problems--those
same money problems I am talking about.
I introduced a bipartisan bill, along with Senators Hassan, Ernst,
and Baldwin, in December, just a few months ago, to quickly address
this problem. I worked with then-Chairman Roberts and then-Ranking
Member Stabenow to include language that would have made the most
critical updates for the program in last year's omnibus. These updates
would have ensured that the Whistleblower Office could keep enough
funds on hand to pay upcoming whistleblower awards and continue to fund
the operation and to pay for staff.
What often happens around here is that this effort, unfortunately,
also hit a roadblock, and the language wasn't included by the House of
Representatives. Now, 2 months have passed since then and a matter that
was already urgent in December has become even more critical right now.
The Commission told my office they have now completely stopped work
on four cases, and these four cases potentially would have large
awards. And if they get these large awards, it could bankrupt the fund.
It is now a conflict of interest for staff who are still paid to even
work on those cases because they know if they were to approve the large
awards, it could mean putting themselves out of a job. That is totally
unacceptable. Whistleblowers shouldn't have to wait just because
Congress has been dragging its feet on this issue. That is why I
reintroduced my bill and ask my colleagues to support this legislation
to fix the cap and to protect this very successful whistleblower
program.
This is a stand-alone bill, a very short and simple bill. It
increases the cap on the Customer Protection Fund from $100 million to
$150 million and requires that funds needed for the operating expenses
of the Whistleblower Office be held in a separate account to ensure
that the Whistleblower Office will have the resources it needs to
continue employment of staff while the amount in the Customer
Protection Fund builds to a higher level.
Allowing this successful Whistleblower Office to close simply because
it is doing its job--a job well done--is unacceptable to me, and I hope
it is unacceptable to the other 99 Members of this Congress. We ought
to be able to get this bill passed quickly so that we can keep this
successful whistleblower program going to protect the customers. It
ought to be unacceptable, then, to every Member of this Congress. It is
important that we act now to ensure that this doesn't happen. That is
why I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this
bipartisan legislation.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Indiana.