[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 12 (Thursday, January 21, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S92-S94]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TRIBUTE TO TEAM INHOFE
Mr. INHOFE. Madam President, we recently said goodbye to a lot of
really good, hard-working men and women from the previous
administration, and I want to highlight a few of them.
We refer to them--some of my friends and some of my enemies refer to
them as the ``Inhofe mafia.'' It comes from the committees that I have
chaired, both the Armed Services Committee as well as the Environment
and Public Works Committee. But anyway, they are really a great bunch
of people.
I am going to start with Andrew Wheeler. Andrew Wheeler was with me
for a number of years--14 years--before he became the Director of the
EPA. Here is a guy who was nominated to be the Administrator. At that
time, I said that there is no one in America who is as qualified as
Andrew Wheeler for this job. The first job he had out of law school was
with the EPA. When he was nominated to be Administrator, I kind of gave
his whole life history.
All of my Senate colleagues know Andy and have known him for a long
period of time--Democrats and Republicans. He has worked for me in the
Senate as well as becoming one of my ``has-beens,'' as we refer to
people who used to be with me and are still my good friends.
Andy started in my personal office as chief counsel and went on to
serve as the staff director and chief counsel during my time as
chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee. He has decades
of experience and is one of the most skilled energy and environmental
policy experts I have ever come in contact with, and I am immensely
proud of what he has been able to accomplish throughout his career, but
particularly as EPA Administrator.
Andy understood that the EPA's mission is to implement the laws that
are passed by Congress for the American people. The EPA's job is not to
legislate. A lot of people think that. That is our job, to legislate,
and then he carries it out, and he did really just a great job with
that.
Contrary to what many on the left say Republicans want, we do want
clean air and clean water and clean land, and Andy proved that he could
accomplish that without burdensome overregulation. During his time at
the EPA, he spearheaded a number of the rules and deregulatory actions
that brought important relief to American job creators while protecting
our environment.
He rolled back the economy standards on cars that were created to try
to force Americans to drive vehicles they don't want to drive and that
they can't afford. In its replacement, Andy developed the SAFE vehicles
rule, which expands consumer choice and lowers the price of vehicles.
Andy also repealed and replaced the waters of the United States rule,
or WOTUS. On the WOTUS rule, if you talk to any of the agricultural
groups--I am talking about the Farm Bureau and other agricultural
groups--they would say that was the rule we really had to do something
about. States like mine don't need Washington bureaucrats imposing
their radical regulations like WOTUS on people who know the waters
better than they do. It is not an overstatement when I say that this
was probably the greatest regulatory burden facing Oklahoma's farmers,
landowners, and ranchers during the Obama administration. I was proud
to see WOTUS repealed by the navigable waters protection rule, which
provided a clean and lawful definition of waters of the United States
and doesn't try to overregulate the arid parts of the State.
Oklahoma is an arid State. If you go out to the western part of
Oklahoma, the panhandle of Oklahoma, it is really arid. If you take
that regulation out of the hands of the States and give it to the
Federal Government, there is always a concern by our farmers and
ranchers in Oklahoma and across the Nation that they would turn these
arid areas into wetlands.
Another of the regulatory overhauls accomplished by Andy was for the
affordable clean energy or the ACE rule that replaced the illegal Clean
Power Plan, which regulated emissions of coal-fired powerplants. I had
long been critical of the Clean Power Plan and led the charge against
it in the Senate.
[[Page S93]]
Like most of that era of the rules, it was a Federal power grab, and it
would have sent Americans' electricity bills soaring, and we all knew
that. But we made it history when we repealed and replaced the Clean
Power Plan with the ACE rule. It was good. Not only did this rule help
Americans' electricity costs be affordable, it is expected to benefit
the environment as well.
Just last month, the EPA finalized another big rule that requires EPA
to prepare a cost-benefit analysis before coming up with new
regulations. How is that at all unreasonable? Americans shake their
heads, and they wonder why we would pass things that don't have any
kind of a cost-benefit analysis. What is it going to cost? What kind of
sacrifices are we going to have to make? Well, we put that into effect,
and I think it is something people are very thankful for.
Throughout his tenure, Andy has been focused on what is in the best
interests of the taxpayers and not just the Washington bureaucrats.
That is clear with this rule and countless others.
You know, one of the good things about Andy, as I already mentioned,
is that he knows more about the process than anybody else does--more
about the EPA. He has always been a star, and he started at the bottom.
When he was first put into that office and was confirmed as EPA
director, he gave a speech over at the EPA. He didn't know I was there.
I went over there to hear it. He had 300 people at the EPA all
listening to him and looking at him and saying: There is room at the
top for me. Here is a guy who started at the very bottom and ended up
as director of the EPA. It didn't go unnoticed. Everybody realized
that.
So I would ask unanimous consent to have printed in the Record an E&E
News article from July 2018, which details a number of the former staff
people and their backgrounds
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
[July 6, 2018]
`Brave New World' as Team Inhofe Takes Over
(By Robin Bravender)
It's official: Alumni of the best-known climate skeptic in
Congress are leading EPA.
Former aides to Sen. Jim lnhofe (R-Okla.) have helped shape
President Trump's energy policy agenda since even before he
was elected. Many of them quickly landed top spots at EPA and
in the White House, and Inhofe alumnus Ryan Jackson helped
shepherd Scott Pruitt through the confirmation process before
becoming his chief of staff at the agency last year.
But now an ex-Inhofe staffer is taking the reins as Pruitt
leaves under a cloud of controversies.
Andrew Wheeler, who steps in as EPA's chief on Monday, was
staff director and chief counsel to Inhofe on the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee for much of the George
W. Bush administration.
Jackson, a longtime friend of Wheeler, is expected to
remain as EPA's chief of staff after Pruitt's exit. Jackson--
a native Oklahoman--was an Inhofe aide who worked as EPW
staff director and Inhofe's chief of staff.
Brittany Bolen became the acting head of EPA's policy shop
after Samantha Dravis left earlier this year. Bolen was
Republican counsel to Inhofe on the EPW Committee. Daisy
Letendre, a communications adviser in the policy office, was
Inhofe's communications director.
And former Inhofe counsel Mandy Gunasekara is now principal
deputy assistant administrator in EPA's air office.
Republicans and some energy industry lobbyists say Inhofe's
alumni network brings deep policy knowledge to EPA and is
well-positioned to bring calm to an agency that has been
mired in controversies under Pruitt.
``With these Inhofe staff, you get all of the Pruitt policy
and none of the Pruitt baggage,'' said an energy lobbyist and
former congressional staffer.
It makes sense that ex-Inhofe aides would populate EPA
under a Republican administration, the lobbyist said, given
Inhofe's long tenure as the top Republican on the Senate
committee charged with overseeing the agency. ``He has hired
a lot of smart people to work for him who were goqd and have
gone on to do various other things,'' the lobbyist said.
Those staffers have a history of working closely with
Democrats on Capitol Hill, that person added: ``I think that
the Democrat staff and members believe that Inhofe and the
Inhofe staffers treated them fairly when they were up
there.''
They also share an appreciation for process, said Matt
Dempsey, Inhofe's former communications director.
He expects his former colleagues to take a ``back to
basics'' approach at EPA. ``It's not necessarily a political
agenda, but it's a policy-based agenda,'' he said.
That contrasts with how many people viewed Pruitt, who was
widely thought to be trying to use EPA as a stepping stool to
reach higher political office.
Under Wheeler, ``the whole tone is going to be different,''
the energy lobbyist said. ``People are going to perceive that
Andy is going to spend his time on policy and not thinking
about whether he's the next senator from Oklahoma.''
But as Republicans and many in industry are celebrating the
rise of the Inhofe crowd at EPA, some on the left are furious
that disciples of the Senate's most vocal climate change
skeptic--famous for throwing a snowball on the Senate floor
to try to disprove global warming--are leading the agency
tasked with protecting the environment.
``It is a brave new world of pro-fossil-fuel ideologues who
seem not to care about anything but industry profits, the
rest of the country be damned,'' said Bill Snape, an attorney
at the Center for Biological Diversity. ``We're all getting
hit in the head by the snowball at this point. It's obviously
disturbing'.''
Mr. INHOFE. Madam President, at the top of the list was my chief of
staff, Ryan Jackson. Like Andy, Ryan also went on to be my staff
director of the EPW Committee, Environment and Public Works, where he
helped negotiate bipartisan bills for highway, water, and
infrastructure to environmental bills like TSCA. Remember, that was the
one that had the chemical regulations. In his role he helped me
negotiate with former California Senator Barbara Boxer.
This is kind of interesting. I think the Presiding Officer would find
this to be interesting. Barbara Boxer and I--for many, many years,
every time the Republicans were in the majority, I was the chairman of
that committee, and she was the ranking member. Every time the
Democrats were in control, she was the chairman, and I was the ranking
member. So we worked together, and we accomplished more. I won't
divulge where the meeting is, but there is a meeting that Republicans
have historically had at 12:15 p.m. on a Tuesday with all the members
of the committees, the chairmen. We would talk about what we have done,
and when it was my turn, I would say: Now from the committee that
actually gets things done. That was Barbara Boxer and I. No two people
could be further apart philosophically than Barbara Boxer and I, yet we
were able to do that with the help of Ryan Jackson.
I actually hired him when he was still in college. He left my office
early 2017 to go to work as Chief of Staff at the EPA, where he was a
central player in the implementation of the last administration's
policies.
In February, he left the EPA, which was when Mandy Gunasekara took
office as chief of staff. Mandy worked for me in the EPW Committee for
several years as the majority counsel. In that role she helped me craft
air and other policy priorities. While at the EPA, she has been
instrumental in advancing priorities like the ACE rule that I mentioned
earlier. She is a skilled and devoted public servant, and I am proud of
all that she has done to advance policies that benefit all Americans.
A number of others of what I refer to as my ``has-beens'' have served
at the EPA over the last 4 years. Susan Bodine was the chief counsel on
EPW and went on to serve as Assistant Administrator in the Office of
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance.
Brittany Bolen was counsel for the EPW, Environment and Public Works
Committee, and went on to serve as Associate Administrator for the
Office of Policy.
Byron Brown was senior counsel at the EPW and went on to serve as
Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy.
Then there is Daisy Letendre. She was communications director in my
office and went on to serve as a Senior Advisor in the Office of
Policy.
So I am proud of all my ``has-beens'' and the big impact that they
have had on our country. We are grateful for their service, past and
present--especially that of Andrew Wheeler and Ryan Jackson. I say to
our friends Wheeler and Jackson: Thank you and good luck in your next
endeavors. You did great work.
Let me just mention one last thing. I urge the Biden administration
not to repeal a lot of the rules and regulations and deregulation
initiatives that gave us the economy that was unprecedented during the
time before the pandemic set in. It would be devastating to our
country, which is already trying to recover from the pandemic. Now is
not
[[Page S94]]
the time to impose costly new regulations on Americans and the job
creators in this country. Everyone knows that this pandemic has wreaked
havoc on our economy, and I am certain that, had we not had the virus,
we would have broken even more economic records than we already had.
Prior to the pandemic, we had the best economy of our life. We set
records, with small business optimism reaching the highest level on
record in its 45-year history and unemployment hitting a 50-year low of
3.5 percent. We have always said in the past that full employment is 4
percent. We brought it down that entire year, and in February of 2020
it was down to 3.5 percent. It never had happened before. The median
household income rose to a record high in 2019, the highest since 1967.
The wealth of American families rose. That is an indicator. It rose to
the highest level in history. So these good things were happening, and
I would urge this administration not to repeal some of these
regulations. Repealing some of these regulations would simply reverse
gains like these.
I urge the Biden administration to work with me and others to reach
compromises on regulations that would benefit all Americans. That seems
to be pretty reasonable, and I think that is a good program to do.
Let's give it a try. OK?
With that, I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. SCHUMER. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________