[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2021)]
[House]
[Pages H143-H147]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                              {time}  2230

  Mr. DAVIDSON. Mr. Speaker, I thank the Vice President for his 
excellent leadership, for his professionalism, and, frankly, for his 
faithfulness to our Constitution.
  Not only would it be an abuse of the 25th Amendment for Mike Pence to 
invoke it to make a political statement, it is clearly not our role in 
Congress to do what we are doing here tonight or what is proposed to be 
done by the majority.
  Speaker Pelosi claims that President Trump incited the mob that 
attacked the Capitol at a rally. As Mr. McClintock spoke earlier, he 
read the President's statement. He encouraged people to come peaceably 
and patriotically.
  The Washington Post is reporting something that I would hope that our 
chairman of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence would know 
about. The FBI report warned of war at the Capitol the day before the 
attack on our Capitol. I am curious how someone proposes that the 
President incited the mob at a rally the day before the rally.
  Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record the article.

               [From The Washington Post, Jan. 12, 2021]

 FBI Report Warned of `War' at Capitol, Contradicting Claims There Was 
                   No Indication of Looming Violence

                 (By Devlin Barrett and Matt Zapotosky)

       A day before rioters stormed Congress, an FBI office in 
     Virginia issued an explicit warning that extremists were 
     preparing to travel to Washington to commit violence and 
     ``war,'' according to an internal document reviewed by The 
     Washington Post that contradicts a senior official's 
     declaration the bureau had no intelligence indicating anyone 
     at last week's demonstrations in support of President Trump 
     planned to do harm.
       A situational information report approved for release the 
     day before the U.S. Capitol riot painted a dire portrait of 
     dangerous plans, including individuals sharing a map of the 
     complex's tunnels, and possible rally points for would-be 
     conspirators to meet in Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts 
     and South Carolina and head in groups to Washington.
       ``As of 5 January 2021, FBI Norfolk received information 
     indicating calls for violence in response to `unlawful 
     lockdowns' to begin on 6 January 2021 in Washington, D.C.,'' 
     the document says. ``An online thread discussed specific 
     calls for violence to include stating `Be ready to fight. 
     Congress needs to hear glass breaking, doors being kicked in, 
     and blood from their BLM and Pantifa slave soldiers being 
     spilled. Get violent. Stop calling this a march, or rally, or 
     a protest. Go there ready for war. We get our President or we 
     die. NOTHING else will achieve this goal.''
       BLM is probably a reference to the Black Lives Matter 
     movement for racial justice. Pantifa is a derogatory term for 
     antifa, a far-left anti-fascist movement whose adherents 
     sometimes engage in violent clashes with right-wing 
     extremists.
       Yet even with that information in hand, the report's 
     unidentified author expressed concern that the FBI might be 
     encroaching on free-speech rights.
       The warning is the starkest evidence yet of the sizable 
     intelligence failure that preceded the mayhem, which claimed 
     the lives of five people, although one law enforcement 
     official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid 
     disciplinary action, said the failure was not one of 
     intelligence but of acting on the intelligence.
       At the FBI office in Norfolk, the report was written within 
     45 minutes of receiving the information, officials said, and 
     shared with counterparts in Washington.
       The head of the FBI's Washington Field Office, Steven 
     D'Antuono, told reporters on Friday that the agency did not 
     have intelligence suggesting the pro-Trump rally would be 
     anything more than a lawful demonstration. During a news 
     conference Tuesday, held after The Post's initial publication 
     of this report, he said the alarming Jan. 5 intelligence 
     document was shared ``with all our law enforcement partners'' 
     through the joint terrorism task force, which includes the 
     U.S. Capitol Police, the U.S. Park Police, D.C. police, and 
     other federal and local agencies.
       He suggested there was not a great deal for law enforcement 
     to do with the information because the FBI at that time did 
     not know who made the comments. ``That was a thread on a 
     message board that was not attributable to an individual 
     person,'' D'Antuono said Tuesday.
       D'Antuono did not say what, if anything, the FBI or other 
     agencies did differently as a result of that information. Nor 
     did he explain why he told reporters on Friday that there had 
     been no such intelligence.
       Steven Sund, who resigned as Capitol Police chief, said in 
     an interview Tuesday that he never received nor was made 
     aware of the FBI's field bulletin, insisting he and others 
     would have taken the warning seriously had it been shared.
       ``I did not have that information, nor was that information 
     taken into consideration in our security planning,'' Sund 
     said.
       Since the riot, agents and prosecutors have been intent on 
     tracking down and arresting the most violent participants in 
     the mob, in part because there is already significant online 
     discussion of new potential clashes for Sunday and again on 
     Jan. 20, when President-elect Joe Biden is set to take the 
     oath of office.
       Michael R. Sherwin, the acting U.S. attorney for D.C., said 
     there would be a strike force of prosecutors looking to file 
     charges of seditious conspiracy where the evidence merited 
     it.

[[Page H144]]

       The Jan. 5 FBI report notes that the information represents 
     the view of the FBI's Norfolk office, is not to be shared 
     outside law enforcement circles, that it is not ``finally 
     evaluated intelligence,'' and that agencies receiving it 
     ``are requested not to take action based on this raw 
     reporting without prior coordination with the FBI.''
       Multiple law enforcement officials have said privately in 
     recent days that the level of violence exhibited at the 
     Capitol has led to difficult discussions within the FBI and 
     other agencies about race, terrorism and whether 
     investigators failed to register the degree of danger because 
     the overwhelming majority of the participants at the rally 
     were White conservatives fiercely loyal to Trump.
       ``Individuals/Organizations named in this [situational 
     information report] have been identified as participating in 
     activities that are protected by the First Amendment to the 
     U.S. Constitution,'' the document says. ``Their inclusion 
     here is not intended to associate the protected activity with 
     criminality or a threat to national security, or to infer 
     that such protected activity itself violates federal law.
       ``However,'' it continues, ``based on known intelligence 
     and/or specific historical observations, it is possible the 
     protected activity could invite a violent reaction towards 
     the subject individual or others in retaliation or with the 
     goal of stopping the protected activity from occurring in the 
     first instance. In the event no violent reaction occurs, FBI 
     policy and federal law dictates that no further record be 
     made of the protected activity.''
       The document notes that one online comment advised, ``if 
     Antifa or BLM get violent, leave them dead in the street,'' 
     while another said they need ``people on standby to provide 
     supplies, including water and medical, to the front lines. 
     The individual also discussed the need to evacuate 
     noncombatants and wounded to medical care.''
       On Jan. 6, a large, angry crowd of people who had attended 
     a rally nearby marched to the Capitol, smashing windows and 
     breaking doors to get inside. One woman in the mob was shot 
     and killed by Capitol Police; officials said three other in 
     the crowd had medical emergencies and died. A Capitol Police 
     officer died after suffering injuries.
       The FBI said in a statement that its ``standard practice is 
     to not comment on specific intelligence products,'' but added 
     that FBI field offices ``routinely share information with 
     their local law enforcement partners to assist in protecting 
     the communities they serve.''
       For weeks leading up to the event, FBI officials discounted 
     any suggestion that the activities of Trump supporters upset 
     about the scheduled certification of Biden's election win 
     could be a security threat on a scale with the racial-justice 
     demonstrations that followed the police killing of George 
     Floyd in Minneapolis in May.
       While the nation's capital is one of the most heavily 
     guarded cities on the planet, local and federal law 
     enforcement agencies sought to take a low-key approach to 
     last week's event, publicly and privately expressing concerns 
     that they did not want to repeat last year's ugly clashes 
     between protesters and police.
       Some law enforcement officials took the view that 
     protesters who support Trump are generally known for over-
     the-top rhetoric but not much violence, and therefore the 
     event did not pose a particularly serious risk, according to 
     people familiar with the security discussions leading up to 
     Jan. 6.
       Even so, there were warning signs, though none as stark as 
     the one from the FBI's Norfolk office.
       FBI agents had in the weeks before the Trump rally visited 
     suspected far-right extremists, hoping to glean whether they 
     had violent intentions, said a person familiar with the 
     matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the 
     law enforcement activity. It was not immediately clear who 
     was visited or if the FBI was specifically tracking anyone 
     who would later be charged criminally. These visits were 
     first reported Sunday by NBC News.
       In addition, in the days leading up to the demonstrations, 
     some Capitol Hill staffers were told by supervisors to not 
     come in to work that day, if possible, because it seemed the 
     danger level would be higher than many previous protests, 
     according to a person familiar with the warning who spoke on 
     the condition of anonymity to discuss the matter. Capitol 
     Police did not take the kind of extra precautions, such as 
     frozen zones and hardened barriers, that are typically used 
     for major events near the Capitol.
       Federal agents are on high alert as the inauguration nears, 
     with authorities bracing for possible violence not just in 
     Washington but also nationwide, officials said.
       The FBI recently issued a different memo saying that 
     ``armed protests'' were being planned ``at all 50 state 
     capitols'' and in D.C. in the run-up to the inauguration, 
     according to an official familiar with the matter, speaking 
     on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive law 
     enforcement matter.
       The memo--first reported by ABC News and later confirmed by 
     The Post--is a raw intelligence product, compiling 
     information gathered by the bureau and several other 
     government agencies, the official familiar with the matter 
     said. Some of it is unverified, and the threat probably will 
     differ significantly from place to place, the official said.
       But the information it highlights to law enforcement is 
     nonetheless troubling--including that there was data 
     suggesting people might storm government offices or stage an 
     uprising were Trump to be removed from office, the official 
     said.
       In a statement, the FBI declined to comment specifically on 
     the memo about state capitols but said: ``Our efforts are 
     focused on identifying, investigating, and disrupting 
     individuals that are inciting violence and engaging in 
     criminal activity. As we do in normal course of business, we 
     are gathering information to identify any potential threats 
     and are sharing that information with our partners.
       ``The FBI respects The rights of individuals to peacefully 
     exercise their First Amendment rights,'' it said. ``Our focus 
     is not on peaceful protesters, but on those threatening their 
     safety and the safety of other citizens with violence and 
     destruction of property.''

  Mr. DAVIDSON. Others are reporting a timeline that has the breach out 
of sync as well, but that highlights the importance. There is far too 
little that we know about this attack on our Capitol.
  Here is what we do know. No one has defended this attack on our 
Capitol. On the contrary, we are missing--willfully missing, in my 
opinion--a moment of extreme unity in our Nation, just like what was 
willfully done earlier this year.
  At a time of great political and partisan division, even seething 
anger, one thing all Americans seem to agree on is that these attacks 
were wrong. The President condemned them. He discouraged violence, not 
just on January 6 but on other days throughout the year as he talked 
about law and order and as he talked about something that we finally 
seem to agree on, that there is a clear distinction between the 
Constitution's First Amendment protection of the right to assemble 
peaceably and riots, criminal, unlawful riots.
  There is a distinction between rioters and protesters. Frankly, it 
took us months to agree on that as a body in Congress, but the people 
of the United States of America agreed to it. They understood it.
  I encourage my colleagues across the political spectrum, the Members 
of Congress gathered here together today and tomorrow, to stand united 
and move forward with the agreement our country had, that this was 
wrong.
  Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 45 seconds to Mr. Espaillat from New 
York.
  Mr. ESPAILLAT. Mr. Speaker, we have all known it for a while now, but 
this past week it has become undeniably clear: Donald J. Trump is 
unfit.
  To the Secretaries of Agriculture, Defense, Commerce, Education, and 
Transportation: He is unfit.
  To the Secretaries of Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, 
Housing, Interior, and Labor: He is unfit.
  To the Attorney General: He is unfit.
  To the Vice President of the United States: He summons his goons. 
They shut their hoods and came with their racist Confederate flag to 
assassinate him, to assassinate the Vice President.
  He is unfit. Invoke the 25th Amendment. If not, we will impeach him 
tomorrow.
  Mr. JORDAN. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 45 seconds to the gentleman from 
Illinois (Mr. Danny K. Davis).
  Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, after listening to all 
that I have heard this evening, I still have the faith and belief that 
we can come together as a unit.
  I was reading my Bible the other day and saw that it said: Come and 
let us reason together. Otherwise, we shall all be destroyed by the 
edge of the sword.
  I say to my colleagues: Let's reason together. You cannot erase truth 
with a lie. You cannot pretend that what has happened did not happen. 
Yes, we ought to have a President, but it is time for this one to go.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge passage of this resolution and agree 
wholeheartedly.
  Mr. JORDAN. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 45 seconds to the distinguished 
gentleman from California (Mr. Thompson).
  Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, the President of the United 
States instigated an attack against our democracy.
  For months, he ginned up his supporters with lies about our election 
and incited them to violence. On the 6th of January, he unleashed a mob 
on the Capitol.

[[Page H145]]

  The President must be held accountable for this vile attack. He knew 
what he was doing, and now, five people are dead.
  Congress will not be intimidated. America will not succumb to mob 
rule.
  The Vice President can initiate removal of a President who is unfit 
for office, and this President is unfit. He must be removed.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge a ``yes'' vote on this resolution, and I urge a 
``yes'' vote on impeachment tomorrow.
  Mr. JORDAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, what happened at the Capitol on January 6 was as wrong 
as wrong can be. It is not what America is about, and we condemn this 
violence. We commend the men and women of the Capitol Police for their 
bravery, and we mourn the loss of those lives that were taken last 
week.
  Republicans have been consistent. We condemn the violence last 
summer; we condemn the violence last week. Democrats have been 
consistent about one thing: their endless quest to overturn the 2016 
election. They are still trying to overturn the 2016 election after the 
2020 election. This has been an obsession with the Democrats.
  In the first round, the first impeachment was based on the anonymous 
whistleblower. The majority tried to remove the President from office 
based on a guy whom we weren't allowed to see, know who he or she was, 
and couldn't cross-examine; who was an anonymous whistleblower with no 
firsthand knowledge; who was biased against the President; and who 
worked, interestingly enough, for Joe Biden.
  So continuing this quest is not, as has been said so many times on 
the floor tonight, what the country needs. It is not what the country 
needs, particularly after the year the country has lived through.
  I hope we will not vote for this, that this thing will go down, and I 
urge my colleagues to vote against the resolution sponsored by the 
gentleman from Maryland.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 30 seconds to the gentleman from 
Georgia (Mr.   David Scott), who is the distinguished chairman of the 
Agriculture Committee.
  Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, what we are discussing 
tonight isn't about us. It is about the will of the American people.
  They are brokenhearted. They are crying. And they are discouraged.
  An overwhelming number of American people want this President out of 
office now. This is why we have to do it now. We have to heal the 
wound. The longer the President is over there, the more we are tearing 
the heart and soul out of the American people. Let us do it now.

  Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Ms. LEE of California. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this 
resolution. I thank our Speaker for scheduling this, and Rep. Raskin 
for his leadership and deep knowledge of our Constitution.
  I speak today with sadness in my heart but purpose in my bones. This 
Congress must take action to remove Donald Trump from office as soon as 
possible, for the clear and present danger he poses to our Democracy, 
our national security, and to the American people.
  Last Wednesday, we saw Donald Trump incite a violent and deadly 
insurrection at our U.S. Capitol in an attempt to reverse the results 
of a free and fair election. The risk that he might do so again in the 
next week is why he cannot be trusted for another minute as commander 
in chief, overseeing the nuclear codes and the U.S. Military.
  The fastest way to protect our republic from Donald Trump is for the 
Vice President and the cabinet to take action under the 25th Amendment. 
I implore them to do so. But if they do not, my colleagues and I stand 
ready to defend our democracy from Donald Trump.
  Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of H. Res. 21, 
calling on Vice President Pence to invoke his powers under the 25th 
Amendment. We are in the midst of a national emergency and President 
Trump must be removed from office immediately, before any further 
damage to this Capitol--or to our Republic--can be done.
  Last week's violent attack on the Capitol took root more than 5 years 
ago when Donald Trump first descended the escalator at Trump Tower to 
announce his run for President.
  The hateful rhetoric, baseless accusations, and contempt for the 
democratic process were all on display that day. Later, they formed the 
foundation of his presidency. Last week, they reached a violent 
crescendo.
  After losing his bid for reelection--in decisive fashion--President 
Trump embarked on a campaign of misinformation aimed at delegitimizing 
the results of a free and fair election. When this failed, he tried to 
intimidate local election officials into reversing the results. When 
those brave public servants refused to do his bidding, he made one 
final desperate attempt to hold onto power by attacking the 
constitutionally mandated process of counting and certifying the 
electoral votes in a Joint Session of Congress.
  Although the President had willing volunteers to join him, Vice 
President Pence refused to exceed his limited authority and reject the 
results of the election. That is when the President unleashed his 
supporters to storm the Capitol. And the result--an armed 
insurrection--left in its wake lost lives, property destroyed, 
desecration of hallowed ground, and physical and emotional scars that 
may never fully heal.
  Vice President Pence upheld his constitutional duty and his oath of 
office that day. It is time for him to do so once more.
  Under the 25th Amendment, the Vice President, along with a majority 
of the members of the Cabinet, may inform Congress ``that the President 
is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office,'' upon 
which ``the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and 
duties of the office as Acting President.''
  This is not a step to be taken lightly--but it is the step that must 
be taken today.
  The President is clearly incapacitated and unable to exercise the 
powers of the presidency to protect the United States, as witnessed by 
the attack on the Capitol itself. Rather than immediately calling for 
an end to the violence and calling on his supporters to withdraw, the 
President waited several hours before releasing a half-hearted video 
that also expressed his ``love'' for the rioters who were ``special 
people''. All the while, he continued his efforts to subvert the 
election, seeking Senators who would object to the certification of as 
many as ten states' electoral votes, without a shred of evidence that 
there was any reason to doubt their authenticity.
  And reports indicate that the threat that our country faced on 
January 6th--from a president who would do anything to hold onto 
power--is ongoing. It is a national crisis. It demands immediate 
action.
  I thank the Gentleman from Maryland, Mr. Raskin--a constitutional 
scholar and a valuable member of the Judiciary Committee--for bringing 
forward this important resolution, and I call upon the Vice President 
to do his constitutional duty and to protect the American people from 
one more day of a dangerous presidency.
  Mr. MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in 
support of the resolution urging Vice President Pence and the Cabinet 
to remove President Trump from office.
  In the interest of full disclosure, I want to make it clear that I've 
always thought that President Trump was unstable and unfit to hold the 
highest office in the land. But since the election, I believe that his 
actions have become more erratic and angry and dangerous.
  He has developed an alternative worldview with no basis in reality in 
which he won more votes than Joe Biden, but the election was `stolen' 
from him. I suspect that he may actually believe that.
  But the facts are clear. The 2020 Presidential election was one of 
the most open and transparent elections in our nation's history 
according to election officials and observers, both Republican and 
Democratic. The FBI said that it found no evidence of widespread voter 
fraud. The Attorney General, chosen by the President, said that there 
was no evidence of widespread voter fraud. And the chairman of the 
bipartisan U.S. Election Assistance Commission said that there was no 
evidence of widespread voter fraud.
  Nevertheless, Donald Trump has widely repeated this message in 
speeches and over social media in the months before and after the 
election, which has led to its widespread acceptance by thousands and 
perhaps millions of Americans.
  In August, for example, he said ``the only way we're going to lose 
this election is if the election is rigged. Remember that. It's the 
only way we're going to lose this election.''
  Subsequently, he said ``This is a case where they're trying to steal 
an election . . . . They're trying to rig an election, and we can't let 
that happen.''
  After the election, he said, ``If you count the legal votes, I easily 
win. If you count the illegal votes, they can try to steal the election 
from us.''
  And on Christmas Eve, he wrote on Facebook, in all capital letters, 
``VOTER FRAUD IS NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY, IT IS A FACT!!!''
  What's even more disturbing is that his actions have displayed a 
similar unhinged quality. On election night, for example, he urged

[[Page H146]]

his supporters to harass workers counting votes in Arizona and 
Michigan. He had his campaign file over 60 lawsuits challenging the 
election processes in a number of states, nearly all of which were 
rejected by state and federal courts--including several which were 
rejected by the Supreme Court, He called Republican members of the 
Wayne County Board of Canvassers in Michigan and pressured them to 
derail the certification of the state's election results. More 
recently, he called Georgia elections officials and pressured them to 
``find votes'' to overturn the presidential election results in 
Georgia. And just last week, he reportedly ignored requests to mobilize 
the National Guard in the midst of the attack on the U.S. Capitol.
  I believe that his false, misleading claims over an extended period 
of time, culminating in his speech on the morning of January 6--
repeated and validated on conservative cable shows and social media--is 
the root cause of the assault on the Capitol last week.
  President Trump has spent months and months undermining the American 
people's faith in the November presidential election. I believe part of 
it may be a coping mechanism for him because he's totally unwilling to 
accept that he was defeated by someone else. But I also believe that 
parts of it are criminal and a deliberate, lengthy effort to undermine 
and overturn what are, by all credible accounts, legitimate election 
results in order to stay in office.
  Regardless of the motivation for his actions, the President currently 
appears to be unstable, unfit, and unable to carry out his duties as 
President of the United States. Moreover, his instability raises 
concerns for many, myself included, that in his last few days in 
office, he might take some dangerous action or pursue some policy that 
will harm the American people in a significant way.
  This man currently controls the entire federal government, including 
the U.S. military, and he has the U.S. nuclear codes at his fingertips.
  I fear for our nation as long as he remains in office under these 
circumstances.
  That's why I'm supporting this resolution today to urge Vice 
President Pence, and a majority of the Cabinet to remove him from 
office as soon as humanly possible. I believe that the future of our 
nation may be at stake.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. All time for debate has expired.
  Pursuant to House Resolution 38, the previous question is ordered on 
the resolution and on the preamble, as amended.
  The question is on adoption of the resolution.
  The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that 
the ayes appeared to have it.
  Mr. JORDAN. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 
8, the yeas and nays are ordered.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 223, 
nays 205, not voting 5, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 14]

                               YEAS--223

     Adams
     Aguilar
     Allred
     Auchincloss
     Axne
     Barragan
     Bass
     Beatty
     Bera
     Beyer
     Bishop (GA)
     Blumenauer
     Blunt Rochester
     Bonamici
     Bourdeaux
     Bowman
     Boyle, Brendan F.
     Brown
     Brownley
     Bush
     Bustos
     Butterfield
     Carbajal
     Cardenas
     Carson
     Cartwright
     Case
     Casten
     Castor (FL)
     Castro (TX)
     Chu
     Cicilline
     Clark (MA)
     Clarke (NY)
     Cleaver
     Clyburn
     Cohen
     Connolly
     Cooper
     Correa
     Costa
     Courtney
     Craig
     Crist
     Crow
     Cuellar
     Davids (KS)
     Davis, Danny K.
     Dean
     DeFazio
     DeGette
     DeLauro
     DelBene
     Delgado
     Demings
     DeSaulnier
     Deutch
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Doyle, Michael F.
     Escobar
     Eshoo
     Espaillat
     Evans
     Fletcher
     Foster
     Frankel, Lois
     Fudge
     Gallego
     Garamendi
     Garcia (IL)
     Garcia (TX)
     Golden
     Gomez
     Gonzalez, Vicente
     Gottheimer
     Green, Al (TX)
     Grijalva
     Haaland
     Harder (CA)
     Hastings
     Hayes
     Higgins (NY)
     Himes
     Horsford
     Houlahan
     Hoyer
     Huffman
     Jackson Lee
     Jacobs (CA)
     Jayapal
     Jeffries
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson (TX)
     Jones
     Kahele
     Kaptur
     Keating
     Kelly (IL)
     Khanna
     Kildee
     Kilmer
     Kim (NJ)
     Kind
     Kinzinger
     Kirkpatrick
     Krishnamoorthi
     Kuster
     Lamb
     Langevin
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Lawrence
     Lawson (FL)
     Lee (CA)
     Lee (NV)
     Leger Fernandez
     Levin (CA)
     Levin (MI)
     Lieu
     Lofgren
     Lowenthal
     Luria
     Lynch
     Malinowski
     Maloney, Carolyn B.
     Maloney, Sean
     Manning
     Matsui
     McBath
     McCollum
     McEachin
     McGovern
     McNerney
     Meeks
     Meng
     Mfume
     Moore (WI)
     Morelle
     Moulton
     Mrvan
     Murphy (FL)
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Neal
     Neguse
     Newman
     Norcross
     O'Halleran
     Ocasio-Cortez
     Omar
     Pallone
     Panetta
     Pappas
     Pascrell
     Payne
     Pelosi
     Perlmutter
     Peters
     Phillips
     Pingree
     Pocan
     Porter
     Pressley
     Price (NC)
     Quigley
     Raskin
     Rice (NY)
     Richmond
     Ross
     Roybal-Allard
     Ruiz
     Ruppersberger
     Rush
     Ryan
     Sanchez
     Sarbanes
     Scanlon
     Schakowsky
     Schiff
     Schneider
     Schrader
     Schrier
     Scott (VA)
     Scott, David
     Sewell
     Sherman
     Sherrill
     Sires
     Slotkin
     Smith (WA)
     Soto
     Spanberger
     Speier
     Stanton
     Stevens
     Strickland
     Suozzi
     Swalwell
     Takano
     Thompson (CA)
     Thompson (MS)
     Titus
     Tlaib
     Tonko
     Torres (CA)
     Torres (NY)
     Trahan
     Trone
     Underwood
     Vargas
     Veasey
     Vela
     Velazquez
     Wasserman Schultz
     Waters
     Watson Coleman
     Welch
     Wexton
     Wild
     Williams (GA)
     Wilson (FL)
     Yarmuth

                               NAYS--205

     Aderholt
     Allen
     Amodei
     Armstrong
     Arrington
     Babin
     Bacon
     Baird
     Balderson
     Banks
     Barr
     Bentz
     Bergman
     Bice (OK)
     Biggs
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (NC)
     Boebert
     Bost
     Brady
     Brooks
     Buchanan
     Buck
     Bucshon
     Budd
     Burchett
     Burgess
     Calvert
     Cammack
     Carl
     Carter (GA)
     Carter (TX)
     Cawthorn
     Chabot
     Cheney
     Cline
     Cloud
     Clyde
     Cole
     Comer
     Crawford
     Curtis
     Davidson
     Davis, Rodney
     DesJarlais
     Diaz-Balart
     Donalds
     Duncan
     Dunn
     Emmer
     Estes
     Fallon
     Feenstra
     Ferguson
     Fischbach
     Fitzgerald
     Fitzpatrick
     Fleischmann
     Fortenberry
     Foxx
     Franklin, C. Scott
     Fulcher
     Gaetz
     Gallagher
     Garbarino
     Garcia (CA)
     Gibbs
     Gimenez
     Gohmert
     Gonzales, Tony
     Gonzalez (OH)
     Good (VA)
     Gooden (TX)
     Gosar
     Graves (LA)
     Graves (MO)
     Green (TN)
     Greene (GA)
     Griffith
     Grothman
     Guest
     Guthrie
     Hagedorn
     Harris
     Harshbarger
     Hartzler
     Hern
     Herrell
     Herrera Beutler
     Hice (GA)
     Higgins (LA)
     Hill
     Hinson
     Hollingsworth
     Hudson
     Huizenga
     Issa
     Jackson
     Jacobs (NY)
     Johnson (LA)
     Johnson (OH)
     Johnson (SD)
     Jordan
     Joyce (OH)
     Joyce (PA)
     Katko
     Keller
     Kelly (MS)
     Kelly (PA)
     Kim (CA)
     Kustoff
     LaHood
     LaMalfa
     Lamborn
     Latta
     LaTurner
     Lesko
     Long
     Loudermilk
     Lucas
     Luetkemeyer
     Mace
     Malliotakis
     Mann
     Massie
     Mast
     McCarthy
     McCaul
     McClain
     McClintock
     McHenry
     McKinley
     Meijer
     Meuser
     Miller (IL)
     Miller (WV)
     Miller-Meeks
     Moolenaar
     Mooney
     Moore (AL)
     Moore (UT)
     Mullin
     Nehls
     Newhouse
     Norman
     Nunes
     Obernolte
     Owens
     Palazzo
     Palmer
     Pence
     Perry
     Pfluger
     Posey
     Reed
     Reschenthaler
     Rice (SC)
     Rodgers (WA)
     Rogers (AL)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rose
     Rosendale
     Rouzer
     Roy
     Rutherford
     Salazar
     Scalise
     Schweikert
     Scott, Austin
     Sessions
     Simpson
     Smith (MO)
     Smith (NE)
     Smith (NJ)
     Smucker
     Spartz
     Stauber
     Stefanik
     Steil
     Steube
     Stewart
     Stivers
     Taylor
     Thompson (PA)
     Tiffany
     Timmons
     Turner
     Upton
     Valadao
     Van Drew
     Van Duyne
     Wagner
     Walberg
     Walorski
     Waltz
     Weber (TX)
     Wenstrup
     Westerman
     Williams (TX)
     Wilson (SC)
     Wittman
     Womack
     Wright
     Young
     Zeldin

                             NOT VOTING--5

     Crenshaw
     Granger
     Murphy (NC)
     Steel
     Webster (FL)

                              {time}  2324

  So the resolution was agreed to.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.


                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

  Mr. CRENSHAW. Mr. Speaker, had I been present, I would have voted 
``nay'' on rollcall No. 12, ``nay'' on rollcall No. 13, and ``nay'' on 
rollcall No. 14.


    MEMBERS RECORDED PURSUANT TO HOUSE RESOLUTION 8, 117TH CONGRESS

     Adams (Brown)
     Axne (Stevens)
     Baird (Bucshon)
     Bergman (Walberg)
     Bilirakis (Fortenberry)
     Bishop (GA) (Butterfield)
     Blumenauer (Beyer)
     Bonamici (Clark (MA))
     Boyle, Brendan F. (Jeffries)
     Buchanan (Cammack)
     Cardenas (Gallego)
     Carson (Underwood)
     Costa (Correa)
     DeSaulnier (Matsui)
     DesJarlais (Kustoff)
     Deutch (Rice (NY))
     Dingell (Stevens)
     Doyle, Michael F. (Cartwright)
     Eshoo (Thompson (CA))
     Fleischmann (Kustoff)
     Fletcher (Allred)
     Frankel, Lois (Clark (MA))
     Gonzalez (OH) (Joyce (OH))
     Grijalva (Garcia (IL))
     Hastings (Wasserman Schultz)
     Jayapal (Raskin)
     Johnson (TX) (Jeffries)
     Jones (Jacobs (CA))
     Kaptur (Stevens)
     Kirkpatrick (Gallego)
     Kuster (Pingree)
     Lamborn (Walberg)
     Langevin (Lynch)
     LaTurner (Mann)
     Lawson (FL) (Evans)
     Lee (NV) (Stevens)
     Leger Fernandez (Davids (KS))
     Lieu (Beyer)
     Lowenthal (Beyer)
     McEachin (Wexton)
     McNerney (Huffman)
     Nadler (Jeffries)
     Napolitano (Correa)
     Ocasio-Cortez (Tlaib)
     Pascrell (Pallone)
     Payne (Wasserman Schultz)
     Peters (Beyer)
     Porter (Wexton)
     Pressley (Garcia (IL))
     Richmond (Butterfield)
     Rush (Underwood)
     Schneider (Sherrill)

[[Page H147]]


     Sires (Pallone)
     Smith (WA) (Courtney)
     Strickland (Kilmer)
     Thompson (MS) (Butterfield)
     Titus (Connolly)
     Tonko (Pallone)
     Vela (Gomez)
     Walorski (Banks)
     Watson Coleman (Pallone)
     Wild (Scanlon)
     Wilson (FL) (Hayes)
     Young (Malliotakis)

                          ____________________