[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 215 (Friday, December 18, 2020)]
[Senate]
[Page S7650]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                   National Defense Authorization Act

  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I am sorry I didn't come to the floor 
quickly enough to wish my friend Jim Inhofe and his wife the best. He 
is one of the real contributors in the U.S. Senate and has been for 
years. He is a special individual. He decided to take an interest in 
the continent of Africa. I don't know that there is another Senator who 
knows as much about that continent as he does. He has been there so 
many times. His stories, many of them, relate to countries that few 
people have heard of. He has made a special point to understand that 
continent, the people on it, in addition to his responsibilities 
serving the State of Oklahoma and, of course, now, as chairman of the 
Armed Services Committee, his responsibility for funding the Department 
of Defense. He and our Democratic colleague, Senator Jack Reed of Rhode 
Island, have done a remarkable bipartisan job on that Defense 
authorization, let me add.
  I sincerely hope that the President will sign that bill. His 
objections to it have nothing to do with the military or defense of our 
country. They relate to issues which are thorny, political issues that 
shouldn't slow down these critical programs.
  This authorization bill comes at an exceptional time. We have been 
learning over the last few weeks about a massive cyber security breach 
of our government, probably by the Russians. It has all the earmarks 
and fingerprints of Vladimir Putin project to compromise our national 
security and to create chaos whenever possible. We learned of it 4 
years ago in the 2016 election, when every intelligence agency of our 
government agreed that the Russians were meddling in our election and 
doing their best to subvert the will of the American people.
  We made strong statements in opposition to it, and we took action. 
Some of it has been publicly reported, and some of it has been 
disclosed to Members of Congress in a classified setting.
  We were successful in thwarting their efforts in the 2018 election. I 
want to salute all of those who were responsible for that effort. In 
2020, I believe the same can be said. We will know more as we sift 
through the evidence.
  This latest disclosure is really troubling. We believe that beginning 
in March of this year, the Russians started compromising our cyber 
security network in many different ways. Every day there is a new 
disclosure of another agency that reports that they have somehow 
wheedled their way into this important, critical information. How much 
they know, what they have gained, how much they have compromised us, we 
don't know yet. It certainly is unnerving, and it deserves a very 
thorough--thorough--investigation as to how we failed.
  You see, the United States was not taking anything for granted. We 
were literally spending billions--billions--of dollars for the safety 
of the security systems. We knew that included in those systems was 
information which is essential for the protection of the United States. 
To think that has been compromised at the hands of one of our 
implacable foes is certainly unnerving. I believe we should initiate a 
thorough and complete investigation, let the chips fall where they may, 
establish where we have failed from a technology viewpoint, and if any 
individuals are responsible, that they be held accountable.
  At the same time, I have to say that I join the Presiding Officer in 
commenting on one particular aspect of this that I just can't 
understand. The White House has been virtually silent as all of these 
facts have unfolded by the day. I cannot understand that--why the 
Commander in Chief of the United States of America has not spoken out 
forcefully against the Russians for their involvement in this cyber 
security breach, why he has not likened this to a virtual invasion of 
the United States when it comes to our own national security. I believe 
that we should have been firm from the beginning and honest with the 
American people, as well, about the nature of this threat. Instead, 
this President has been silent.
  I recall not that long ago, a few months ago, we disclosed--we found 
evidence that the Russians were offering bounties on the heads of 
American soldiers in Afghanistan. It is an outrageous and unthinkable 
act. Yet the White House was silent, refused to respond to what I 
know--because I have seen it--was credible evidence that this was 
linked directly to Moscow and the operatives of the Russian Government. 
The attempted assassination of Navalny, the dissident in Russia, has 
been well documented. Yet, again, our White House, our President are 
silent. I don't understand it.
  I am hopeful that the new President, Joe Biden, when he takes office 
January 20, will make it a priority to establish a new understanding 
and relationship with Vladimir Putin. The United States cannot be a 
victim of Putin over and over again without speaking out--and more. I 
am counting on Joe Biden to do that. I believe he will. He is a 
realist. I know he wants peace in the world, and I do, too, but we also 
must defend this country. The men and women in uniform who risk their 
lives every single day should be our highest priority.
  I am heartened by Joe Biden's closing that he is using in all of his 
public speeches now. He, of course, says it more artfully than I will, 
but he calls on God to bless America but also God to keep our troops 
safe. I am sure it has special meaning to him since the death of his 
son Beau is a reminder of the sacrifices that not only the men and 
women in uniform but their families make for us every single day. I 
hope that continues to be the watchword of his administration.