[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 209 (Thursday, December 10, 2020)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7417-S7418]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN LATINO ACT
Mr. ROBERTS. Mr. President, I rise to engage in a colloquy with the
distinguished chairman of the Senate Rules Committee and the senior
Senator from Texas with regard to a commitment made between all of us
here.
This commitment is related to the [consideration] of H.R. 2420,
National Museum of the American Latino Act, previously reported out of
the Rules Committee on December 3, and championed by Senator Cornyn.
As chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition. and
Forestry and having spearheaded the effort to design and build the
Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial, I appreciate the goal of this
legislation, but also the challenges getting the effort across the goal
line.
H.R. 2420 has an honorable cause: to build a museum that focuses on
the legacy of the Latino people, one that is embedded in the history of
the United States. The purpose of the National Museum of the American
Latino is to serve as the premier location for people to learn about
Latino contributions to life, art, history, and culture in the United
States.
I support such an effort. However, I raise one issue with the
legislation, that the U.S. Department of Agriculture's historic main
headquarters building is specified in the bill as a potential location
for the museum.
USDA has been headquartered at the location on the National Mall
since 1868. The main building was renamed in 1995 in honor of one of
the longest serving members of Congress, Jaime L. Whitten of
Mississippi. I had the pleasure to serve with Chairman Whitten in the
House.
USDA provides leadership on issues related to food, agriculture,
rural development, and nutrition. The work of the Department benefits
residents in our rural communities and supports agriculture production
that feeds hundreds of millions of Americans and others throughout
theworld.
The legacy of the Latino people is intertwined with the communities
that USDA serves in rural and urban America.
I appreciate the efforts of the Commission to Study the Potential
Creation of a National Museum of the American Latino. Having recently
completed the decades-long endeavor to establish Ike's memorial, I am
sympathetic to the desire to establish a tribute in our Nation's
Capitol. It is not an easy process, and there will undoubtedly be
challenges along the way.
Attempting to relocate the historic headquarters of one of the
largest Federal agencies which serves all Americans is a hurdle that
can be avoided.
So I encourage the board of trustees of the National Museum of the
American Latino and the board of regents of the Smithsonian
Institution, who are responsible for choosing the site location of the
museum, to work through their processes as they finalize a location.
And as they do so, I encourage them to appreciate USDA's mission and
constituency when they make hard decisions and consider the expense of
relocating USDA.
I am pleased that we have come to a compact with regard to the
location for this museum, that we agree here to encourage the board of
trustees and the board regents to break ground on a fresh location,
rather than a historic site of a Department that has served and will
continue to serve our Nation's farmers, ranchers, growers, and other
rural stakeholders.
I now yield to my friend, Mr. Blunt, the senior Senator from Missouri
and chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, to offer his perspective.
Mr. BLUNT. Thank you, Chairman Roberts. I was pleased the Rules
Committee favorably approved H.R. 2420, the National Museum of the
American Latino Act, earlier this month.
There is no doubt the stories of the American Latino are important
and must be told more fully than they have been in the past. I want to
commend Senators Cornyn and Menendez on their diligent efforts to get
here. I know it has been a long road.
In order to keep this legislation moving forward, I agree with
Chairman Roberts on the need to state for the record the importance of
the U.S. Department of Agriculture's historic main headquarters.
While that building is listed in the bill as a potential location for
the museum, the Senate recognizes the extreme imposition this would
place on the Department and the people it serves.
As a member of the Appropriations Subcommittee for Agriculture--and
that subcommittee's former ranking member--I couldn't agree more with
Chairman Roberts that the work of the USDA is crucially important to
Missouri, to Kansas, to the Nation, and the international community as
well. Clearly, that work would be disrupted if the USDA and its staff
were forced to relocate.
I join Chairman Roberts in encouraging the Smithsonian's board of
regents to recognize the role and expanse of the USDA when selecting a
location for the museum and to look for a more appropriate site for the
museum.
I now yield to the Senior Senator from Texas, an early champion of
this legislation, for his remarks.
Mr. CORNYN. Thank you to the senior Senator from Kansas for his
leadership over the years and his attention to this bill. I also thank
the chairman for holding a hearing and passing this important bill out
of his committee.
I know some of our colleagues have concerns about the museum
location,
[[Page S7418]]
and I can assure them, Congress will have a voice in the site of the
museum. Before construction can begin, congressional committees will be
consulted on site selection, as detailed in the bill.
The Smithsonian board of regents, which will select the site, is
chaired by Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts and comprises multiple
members of Congress, including three sitting Senators, as well as the
Vice President.
Congress will also need to appropriate funds, a de facto ratification
or rejection of the site selected by the Smithsonian board of regents.
I intend there will be open lines of communication between members of
Congress and the Smithsonian board of regents as they undertake this
significant project.
It has been estimated if we pass this bill today, the doors to a new
museum would not open for at least a decade and more likely not until
2034--so I am eager to get the process moving.
Mr. ROBERTS. Mr. President, I appreciate the work of my colleagues
for raising the issue of the site of National Museum of the American
Latino and for helping to find agreement.
I thank Chairman Blunt and Senator Cornyn for their commitment. I
also thank many of our colleagues who helped us reach this solution
today.
____________________