[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 207 (Tuesday, December 8, 2020)] [House] [Pages H6935-H6984] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2020 Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (S. 1811) to make technical corrections to the America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018, and for other purposes, as amended. The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows: S. 1811 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources Development Act of 2020''. (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Secretary defined. TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 101. Budgetary treatment expansion and adjustment for the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund. Sec. 102. Authorization of appropriations for navigation. Sec. 103. Annual report to Congress on the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund. Sec. 104. Additional measures at donor ports and energy transfer ports. Sec. 105. Construction of water resources development projects by non- Federal interests. [[Page H6936]] Sec. 106. Coast Guard anchorages. Sec. 107. State contribution of funds for certain operation and maintenance costs. Sec. 108. Great Lakes confined disposal facilities. Sec. 109. Inland waterway projects. Sec. 110. Implementation of water resources principles and requirements. Sec. 111. Resiliency planning assistance. Sec. 112. Project consultation. Sec. 113. Review of resiliency assessments. Sec. 114. Small flood control projects. Sec. 115. Flood Protection Projects. Sec. 116. Feasibility studies; review of natural and nature-based features. Sec. 117. Federal interest determination. Sec. 118. Pilot programs on the formulation of Corps of Engineers projects in rural communities and economically disadvantaged communities. Sec. 119. Permanent measures to reduce emergency flood fighting needs for communities subject to repetitive flooding. Sec. 120. Emergency response to natural disasters. Sec. 121. Cost and benefit feasibility assessment. Sec. 122. Expediting repairs and recovery from flooding. Sec. 123. Review of Corps of Engineers assets. Sec. 124. Sense of Congress on multipurpose projects. Sec. 125. Beneficial use of dredged material; dredged material management plans. Sec. 126. Aquatic ecosystem restoration for anadromous fish. Sec. 127. Annual report to Congress on water resources infrastructure. Sec. 128. Harmful algal bloom demonstration program. Sec. 129. Missouri River interception-rearing complex construction. Sec. 130. Materials, services, and funds for repair, restoration, or rehabilitation of projects. Sec. 131. Levee safety. Sec. 132. National Dam Safety Program. Sec. 133. Rehabilitation of Corps of Engineers constructed pump stations. Sec. 134. Non-Federal Project Implementation Pilot Program. Sec. 135. Cost sharing provisions for territories and Indian Tribes. Sec. 136. Review of contracting policies. Sec. 137. Criteria for funding environmental infrastructure projects. Sec. 138. Aging infrastructure. Sec. 139. Uniformity of notification systems. Sec. 140. Coastal storm damage reduction contracts. Sec. 141. Dam remediation for ecosystem restoration. Sec. 142. Levee accreditation process; levee certifications. Sec. 143. Project partnership agreement. Sec. 144. Acceptance of funds for harbor dredging. Sec. 145. Replacement capacity. Sec. 146. Reviewing hydropower at Corps of Engineers facilities. Sec. 147. Repair and restoration of embankments. Sec. 148. Coastal mapping. Sec. 149. Interim risk reduction measures. Sec. 150. Maintenance dredging permits. Sec. 151. High water-low water preparedness. Sec. 152. Treatment of certain benefits and costs. Sec. 153. Lease deviations. Sec. 154. Sense of Congress on Arctic deep draft port development. Sec. 155. Small water storage projects. Sec. 156. Planning Assistance to States. Sec. 157. Forecast-informed reservoir operations. Sec. 158. Data for water allocation, supply, and demand. Sec. 159. Inland waterways pilot program. Sec. 160. Definition of economically disadvantaged community. Sec. 161. Studies of water resources development projects by non- Federal interests. Sec. 162. Leveraging Federal infrastructure for increased water supply. Sec. 163. Sense of Congress on removal of unauthorized, manmade, flammable materials on Corps property. Sec. 164. Enhanced development program. Sec. 165. Continuing authority programs. TITLE II--STUDIES AND REPORTS Sec. 201. Authorization of proposed feasibility studies. Sec. 202. Expedited completions. Sec. 203. Expedited modifications of existing feasibility studies. Sec. 204. Assistance to non-Federal sponsors; feasibility analysis. Sec. 205. Selma, Alabama. Sec. 206. Report on Corps of Engineers facilities in Appalachia. Sec. 207. Additional studies under North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study. Sec. 208. South Atlantic coastal study. Sec. 209. Comprehensive study of the Sacramento River, Yolo Bypass, California. Sec. 210. Lake Okeechobee regulation schedule, Florida. Sec. 211. Great Lakes coastal resiliency study. Sec. 212. Report on the status of restoration in the Louisiana coastal area. Sec. 213. Lower Mississippi River comprehensive management study. Sec. 214. Upper Mississippi River Comprehensive Plan. Sec. 215. Upper Missouri River Basin mainstem dam fish loss research. Sec. 216. Lower and Upper Missouri River Comprehensive Flood Protection. Sec. 217. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River and Rye Harbor, New Hampshire. Sec. 218. Cougar and Detroit Dams, Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Sec. 219. Port Orford, Oregon. Sec. 220. Wilson Creek and Sloan Creek, Fairview, Texas. Sec. 221. Study on water supply and water conservation at water resources development projects. Sec. 222. Report to Congress on authorized studies and projects. Sec. 223. Completion of reports and materials. Sec. 224. Emergency flooding protection for lakes. Sec. 225. Report on debris removal. Sec. 226. Report on antecedent hydrologic conditions. Sec. 227. Subsurface drain systems research and development. Sec. 228. Report on corrosion prevention activities. Sec. 229. Annual reporting on dissemination of information. Sec. 230. Report on benefits calculation for flood control structures. TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS Sec. 301. Deauthorization of inactive projects. Sec. 302. Abandoned and inactive noncoal mine restoration. Sec. 303. Tribal partnership program. Sec. 304. Lakes program. Sec. 305. Rehabilitation of Corps of Engineers constructed dams. Sec. 306. Chesapeake Bay Environmental Restoration and Protection Program. Sec. 307. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program. Sec. 308. Upper Mississippi River protection. Sec. 309. Theodore Ship Channel, Mobile, Alabama. Sec. 310. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Sec. 311. Ouachita and Black Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana. Sec. 312. Lake Isabella, California. Sec. 313. Lower San Joaquin River flood control project. Sec. 314. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California. Sec. 315. San Diego River and Mission Bay, San Diego County, California. Sec. 316. San Francisco, California, Waterfront Area. Sec. 317. Western Pacific Interceptor Canal, Sacramento River, California. Sec. 318. Rio Grande Environmental Management Program, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas. Sec. 319. New London Harbor Waterfront Channel, Connecticut. Sec. 320. Wilmington Harbor, Delaware. Sec. 321. Wilmington Harbor South Disposal Area, Delaware. Sec. 322. Washington Harbor, District of Columbia. Sec. 323. Big Cypress Seminole Indian Reservation Water Conservation Plan, Florida. Sec. 324. Central Everglades, Florida. Sec. 325. Miami River, Florida. Sec. 326. Julian Keen, Jr. Lock and Dam, Moore Haven, Florida. Sec. 327. Taylor Creek Reservoir and Levee L-73 (Section 1), Upper St. Johns River Basin, Florida. Sec. 328. Extinguishment of flowage easements, Rough River Lake, Kentucky. Sec. 329. Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana. Sec. 330. Camden Harbor, Maine. Sec. 331. Cape Porpoise Harbor, Maine, anchorage area designation. Sec. 332. Baltimore, Maryland. Sec. 333. Thad Cochran Lock and Dam, Amory, Mississippi. Sec. 334. Missouri river reservoir sediment management. Sec. 335. Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Sec. 336. Rahway flood risk management feasibility study, New Jersey. Sec. 337. San Juan-Chama project; Abiquiu Dam, New Mexico. Sec. 338. Flushing Bay and Creek Federal Navigation Channel, New York. Sec. 339. Rush River and Lower Branch Rush River, North Dakota. Sec. 340. Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, Rhode Island and Connecticut. Sec. 341. Harris County, Texas. Sec. 342. Cap Sante Waterway, Washington. Sec. 343. Local government reservoir permit review. Sec. 344. Project modifications for improvement of environment. Sec. 345. Aquatic ecosystem restoration. Sec. 346. Surplus water contracts and water storage agreements. Sec. 347. No wake zones in navigation channels. Sec. 348. Limitation on contract execution in the Arkansas River Basin. Sec. 349. Waiver of non-Federal share of damages related to certain contract claims. [[Page H6937]] Sec. 350. Reduced pricing for certain water supply storage. Sec. 351. Flood control and other purposes. Sec. 352. Additional assistance for critical projects. Sec. 353. Project modification authorizations. Sec. 354. Completion of maintenance and repair activities. Sec. 355. Project reauthorizations. Sec. 356. Conveyances. Sec. 357. Lake Eufaula advisory committee. Sec. 358. Repeal of Missouri River Task Force, North Dakota. Sec. 359. Repeal of Missouri River Task Force, South Dakota. Sec. 360. Conforming amendments. TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE Sec. 401. Project authorizations. Sec. 402. Special rules. Sec. 403. Authorization of projects based on feasibility studies prepared by non-Federal interests. TITLE V--OTHER MATTERS Sec. 501. Update on Invasive Species Policy Guidance. Sec. 502. Aquatic invasive species research. Sec. 503. Terrestrial noxious weed control pilot program. Sec. 504. Invasive species risk assessment, prioritization, and management. Sec. 505. Invasive species mitigation and reduction. Sec. 506. Aquatic invasive species prevention. Sec. 507. Invasive species in alpine lakes pilot program. Sec. 508. Murder hornet eradication pilot program. Sec. 509. Asian carp prevention and control pilot program. Sec. 510. Invasive species in noncontiguous States and territories pilot program. Sec. 511. Soil moisture and snowpack monitoring. Sec. 512. Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation. Sec. 513. Determination of budgetary effects. SEC. 2. SECRETARY DEFINED. In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Army. TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS SEC. 101. BUDGETARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR THE HARBOR MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND. (a) In General.--Section 14003 of division B of the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136) is amended to read as follows: ``Sec. 14003. Section 251(b)(2) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901(b)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following: `` `(H) Harbor maintenance activities.--If, for any fiscal year, appropriations for the Construction, Mississippi River and Tributaries, and Operation and Maintenance accounts of the Corps of Engineers are enacted that are derived from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund established under section 9505(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and that the Congress designates in statute as being for harbor operations and maintenance activities, then the adjustment for that fiscal year shall be the total of such appropriations that are derived from such Fund and designated as being for harbor operations and maintenance activities, but shall not exceed the sum of-- `` `(i) the amount deposited into the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund in the fiscal year that is two years prior to the fiscal year for which the adjustment is being made; and `` `(ii) $2,000,000,000. `` `(I) Certain harbor maintenance activities.--If, for any of fiscal years 2021 through 2030, appropriations for the Operation and Maintenance account of the Corps of Engineers are enacted that the Congress designates in statute as being to carry out subsection (c) of section 2106 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2238c), then the adjustment for that fiscal year shall be the total of such appropriations for that fiscal year designated as being to carry out such subsection, but shall not exceed-- `` `(i) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2021; `` `(ii) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2022; `` `(iii) $56,000,000 for fiscal year 2023; `` `(iv) $58,000,000 for fiscal year 2024; `` `(v) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; `` `(vi) $62,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; `` `(vii) $64,000,000 for fiscal year 2027; `` `(viii) $66,000,000 for fiscal year 2028; `` `(ix) $68,000,000 for fiscal year 2029; and `` `(x) $70,000,000 for fiscal year 2030.'.''. (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136). SEC. 102. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NAVIGATION. (a) Authorization.-- (1) In general.--In carrying out subsection (c) of section 210 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238), for each fiscal year, of the funds made available under such section (including funds appropriated from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund), the Secretary is authorized to make expenditures to pay for operation and maintenance costs of the harbors and inland harbors referred to in subsection (a)(2) of such section, to the extent there are identifiable operations and maintenance needs, of-- (A) not less than 15 percent of such funds for emerging harbor projects, including eligible breakwater and jetty needs at such harbor projects; (B) not less than 13 percent of such funds for projects that are located within the Great Lakes Navigation System; (C) 12 percent of such funds for expanded uses carried out at donor ports and energy transfer ports, of which-- (i) \1/3\ shall be provided to energy transfer ports; and (ii) \2/3\ shall be provided to donor ports; (D) not less than 17 percent of such funds for projects that are assigned to commercial strategic seaports; and (E) any remaining funds for operation and maintenance costs of any harbor or inland harbor referred to in such subsection (a)(2) based on an equitable allocation of such funds among such harbors and inland harbors, in accordance with subsection (c)(1) of such section 210. (2) Definitions.--In this subsection: (A) Commercial strategic seaport.--The term ``commercial strategic seaport'' means a commercial harbor supporting the coordination of efficient port operations during peacetime and national defense emergencies that is designated as strategic through the National Port Readiness Network. (B) Donor port; energy transfer port.--The terms ``donor port'' and ``energy transfer port'' have the meanings given those terms in section 2106 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2238c). (C) Emerging harbor project; great lakes navigation system.--The terms ``emerging harbor project'' and ``Great Lakes Navigation System'' have the meanings given those terms in section 210 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238). (3) Effective date.--This subsection shall take effect on October 1, 2022. (b) Additional Uses.-- (1) Operation and maintenance of harbor projects.--Section 210(c)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238(c)(3)) is amended-- (A) by striking ``Notwithstanding'' and inserting the following: ``(A) Allocation.--Notwithstanding''; and (B) by adding at the end the following: ``(B) Additional uses at emerging harbors.-- ``(i) Uses.--In each fiscal year, the Secretary may use not more than $5,000,000 of funds allocated for emerging harbor projects under paragraph (1) to pay for the costs of up to 10 projects for maintenance dredging of a marina or berthing area, in an emerging harbor, that includes an area that is located adjacent to, or is accessible by, a Federal navigation project, subject to clauses (ii) and (iii) of this subparagraph. ``(ii) Eligible emerging harbors.--The Secretary may use funds as authorized under clause (i) at an emerging harbor that-- ``(I) supports commercial activities, including commercial fishing operations, commercial fish processing operations, recreational and sport fishing, and commercial boat yards; or ``(II) supports activities of the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating. ``(iii) Cost-sharing requirements.--The Secretary shall require a non-Federal interest to contribute not less than 25 percent of the costs for maintenance dredging of that portion of a maintenance dredging project described in clause (i) that is located outside of the Federal navigation project, which may be provided as an in-kind contribution, including through the use of dredge equipment owned by non-Federal interest to carry out such activities.''. (2) Assessment of harbors and inland harbors.--Section 210(e)(2)(A)(ii) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238(e)(2)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting ``uses described in subsection (c)(3)(B) and'' after ``costs for''. (3) Definitions.--Section 210(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238(f)) is amended-- (A) by striking paragraph (6); (B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (5) as paragraphs (4) through (6), respectively; (C) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following: ``(2) Emerging harbor.--The term `emerging harbor' means a harbor or inland harbor referred to in subsection (a)(2) that transits less than 1,000,000 tons of cargo annually. ``(3) Emerging harbor project.--The term `emerging harbor project' means a project that is assigned to an emerging harbor.''; and (D) in paragraph (4) (as so redesignated), by adding at the end the following: ``(C) An in-water improvement, if the improvement-- ``(i) is for the seismic reinforcement of a wharf or other berthing structure, or the repair or replacement of a deteriorating wharf or other berthing structure, at a port facility; ``(ii) benefits commercial navigation at the harbor; and ``(iii) is located in, or adjacent to, a berth that is accessible to a Federal navigation project. ``(D) An activity to maintain slope stability at a berth in a harbor that is accessible to a Federal navigation project if such activity benefits commercial navigation at the harbor.''. [[Page H6938]] SEC. 103. ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE HARBOR MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND. Section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (26 U.S.C. 9505 note; 106 Stat. 4851) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a)-- (A) by striking ``and annually thereafter,'' and inserting ``and annually thereafter concurrent with the submission of the President's annual budget request to Congress,''; and (B) by striking ``Public Works and Transportation'' and inserting ``Transportation and Infrastructure''; and (2) in subsection (b)(1) by adding at the end the following: ``(D) A description of the expected expenditures from the trust fund to meet the needs of navigation for the fiscal year of the budget request.''. SEC. 104. ADDITIONAL MEASURES AT DONOR PORTS AND ENERGY TRANSFER PORTS. (a) Interim Authorization.--Section 2106(f) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2238c(f)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``2020'' and inserting ``2022''; and (2) by striking paragraph (3). (b) In General.-- (1) Definitions.--Section 2106(a) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2238c(a)) is amended-- (A) in paragraph (3)(A)-- (i) by amending clause (ii) to read as follows: ``(ii) at which the total amount of harbor maintenance taxes collected (including the estimated taxes related to domestic cargo and cruise passengers) comprise not less than $15,000,000 annually of the total funding of the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund on an average annual basis for the previous 3 fiscal years;''; (ii) in clause (iii)-- (I) by inserting ``(including the estimated taxes related to domestic cargo and cruise passengers)'' after ``taxes collected''; and (II) by striking ``5 fiscal years'' and inserting ``3 fiscal years''; and (iii) in clause (iv), by striking ``in fiscal year 2012'' and inserting ``on an average annual basis for the previous 3 fiscal years''; (B) in paragraph (5)(B), by striking ``in fiscal year 2012'' each place it appears and inserting ``on an average annual basis for the previous 3 fiscal years''; (C) by redesignating paragraph (8) as paragraph (9) and inserting after paragraph (7) the following: ``(8) Harbor maintenance trust fund.--The term `Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund' means the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund established by section 9505 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.''; and (D) in paragraph (9), as so redesignated-- (i) by amending subparagraph (B) to read as follows: ``(B) at which the total amount of harbor maintenance taxes collected (including the estimated taxes related to domestic cargo and cruise passengers) comprise annually more than $5,000,000 but less than $15,000,000 of the total funding of the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund on an average annual basis for the previous 3 fiscal years;''; (ii) in subparagraph (C)-- (I) by inserting ``(including the estimated taxes related to domestic cargo and cruise passengers)'' after ``taxes collected''; and (II) by striking ``5 fiscal years'' and inserting ``3 fiscal years''; and (iii) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``in fiscal year 2012'' and inserting ``on an average annual basis for the previous 3 fiscal years''. (2) Report to congress; authorization of appropriations.-- Section 2106 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2238c) is amended-- (A) by striking subsection (e) and redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and (B) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows: ``(1) In general.--There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section-- ``(A) $56,000,000 for fiscal year 2023; ``(B) $58,000,000 for fiscal year 2024; ``(C) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; ``(D) $62,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; ``(E) $64,000,000 for fiscal year 2027; ``(F) $66,000,000 for fiscal year 2028; ``(G) $68,000,000 for fiscal year 2029; and ``(H) $70,000,000 for fiscal year 2030.''. (3) Effective date.--The amendments made by this subsection shall take effect on October 1, 2022. SEC. 105. CONSTRUCTION OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS. (a) Studies and Engineering.--Section 204(c)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2232(c)(1)) is amended by striking ``under subsection (b)'' and inserting ``under this section''. (b) Assumption of Maintenance of a Locally Preferred Plan.--Section 204(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2232(f)) is amended to read as follows: ``(f) Operation and Maintenance.-- ``(1) Assumption of maintenance.--Whenever a non-Federal interest carries out improvements to a federally authorized harbor or inland harbor, the Secretary shall be responsible for operation and maintenance in accordance with section 101(b) if-- ``(A) before construction of the improvements-- ``(i) the Secretary determines that the improvements are feasible and consistent with the purposes of this title; and ``(ii) the Secretary and the non-Federal interest execute a written agreement relating to operation and maintenance of the improvements; ``(B) the Secretary certifies that the project or separable element of the project is constructed in accordance with applicable permits and appropriate engineering and design standards; and ``(C) the Secretary does not find that the project or separable element is no longer feasible. ``(2) Federal financial participation in the costs of a locally preferred plan.--In the case of improvements determined by the Secretary pursuant to paragraph (1)(A)(i) to deviate from the national economic development plan, the Secretary shall be responsible for all operation and maintenance costs of such improvements, as described in section 101(b), including costs in excess of the costs of the national economic development plan, if the Secretary determines that the improvements satisfy the requirements of paragraph (1).''. (c) Report.--A non-Federal interest may submit to the Secretary a report on improvements to a federally authorized harbor or inland harbor to be carried out by the non-Federal interest, containing any information necessary for the Secretary determine whether the improvements satisfy the requirements of section 204(f)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2232), including-- (1) the economic justification for the improvements; (2) details of the project improvement plan and design; (3) proposed arrangements for the work to be performed; and (4) documents relating to any applicable permits required for the project improvements. (d) Project Studies Subject to Independent Peer Review.-- The Secretary shall not be required to subject a project study for a project with a cost of less than $200,000,000, which the Secretary determines satisfies the requirements of section 204(f)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2232), to independent peer review under section 2034(a)(3)(A)(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2343(a)(3)(A)(i)). SEC. 106. COAST GUARD ANCHORAGES. The Secretary may perform dredging at Federal expense within and adjacent to anchorages established by the Coast Guard pursuant to existing authorities. SEC. 107. STATE CONTRIBUTION OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS. In carrying out eligible operations and maintenance activities within the Great Lakes Navigation System pursuant to section 210 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238) in a State that has implemented any additional State limitation on the disposal of dredged material in the open waters of such State, the Secretary may, pursuant to section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h), receive from such State, and expend, such funds as may be contributed by the State to cover the additional costs for operations and maintenance activities for a harbor or inland harbor within such State that result from such limitation. SEC. 108. GREAT LAKES CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITIES. (a) Mitigation.--The Secretary may relocate access to the Port of Cleveland confined disposal facility, owned or operated by a non-Federal interest, in which material dredged by the Corps of Engineers is placed. (b) Cost-Share.--The cost to relocate access to the confined disposal facility described in subsection (a) shall be shared in accordance with the cost share applicable to operation and maintenance of the Federal navigation project from which material placed in the confined disposal facility is dredged. (c) Termination.--The authority provided under this section shall terminate on December 31, 2024. SEC. 109. INLAND WATERWAY PROJECTS. Notwithstanding section 102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2212), for a project for navigation on the inland waterways receiving a construction appropriation during any of fiscal years 2021 through 2031, 35 percent of the costs of construction of the project shall be paid from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund until such construction of the project is complete. SEC. 110. IMPLEMENTATION OF WATER RESOURCES PRINCIPLES AND REQUIREMENTS. (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue final agency-specific procedures necessary to implement the principles and requirements and the interagency guidelines. (b) Development of Future Water Resources Development Projects.--The procedures required by subsection (a) shall ensure that the Secretary, in the formulation of future water resources development projects-- (1) develops such projects in accordance with-- (A) the guiding principles established by the principles and requirements; and (B) the national water resources planning policy established by section 2031(a) of the [[Page H6939]] Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 1962- 3(a)); and (2) fully identifies and analyzes national economic development benefits, regional economic development benefits, environmental quality benefits, and other societal effects. (c) Review and Update.--Every 5 years, the Secretary shall review and, where appropriate, revise the procedures required by subsection (a). (d) Public Review, Notice, and Comment.--In issuing, reviewing, and revising the procedures required by this section, the Secretary shall-- (1) provide notice to interested non-Federal stakeholders of the Secretary's intent to revise the procedures; (2) provide opportunities for interested non-Federal stakeholders to engage with, and provide input and recommendations to, the Secretary on the revision of the procedures; and (3) solicit and consider public and expert comments. (e) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Interagency guidelines.--The term ``interagency guidelines'' means the interagency guidelines contained in the document finalized by the Council on Environmental Quality pursuant to section 2031 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 1962-3) in December 2014, to implement the principles and requirements. (2) Principles and requirements.--The term ``principles and requirements'' means the principles and requirements contained in the document prepared by the Council on Environmental Quality pursuant to section 2031 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 1962-3), entitled ``Principles and Requirements for Federal Investments in Water Resources'', and dated March 2013. SEC. 111. RESILIENCY PLANNING ASSISTANCE. (a) In General.--Section 206(a) of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a(a)) is amended by inserting ``, to avoid repetitive flooding impacts, to anticipate, prepare, and adapt to changing climatic conditions and extreme weather events, and to withstand, respond to, and recover rapidly from disruption due to the flood hazards'' after ``in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard''. (b) Prioritizing Flood Risk Resiliency Technical Assistance.--In carrying out section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a), the Secretary shall prioritize the provision of technical assistance to support flood risk resiliency planning efforts of economically disadvantaged communities or communities subject to repetitive flooding. SEC. 112. PROJECT CONSULTATION. (a) Reports Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit the following reports: (1) The report required under section 1214 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3809). (2) The report required under section 1120(a)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1643). (b) Environmental Justice Updates.-- (1) In general.--In the formulation of water development resources projects, the Secretary shall comply with any existing Executive order regarding environmental justice in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act to address any disproportionate and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority communities, low-income communities, and Indian Tribes. (2) Update.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall review, and shall update, where appropriate, any policies, regulations, and guidance of the Corps of Engineers necessary to implement any Executive order described in paragraph (1) with respect to water resources development projects. (3) Requirements.--In updating the policies, regulations, or guidance under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall-- (A) provide notice to interested non-Federal stakeholders, including representatives of minority communities, low-income communities, and Indian Tribes; (B) provide opportunities for interested stakeholders to comment on potential updates of policies, regulations, or guidance; (C) consider the recommendations from the reports submitted under subsection (a); and (D) promote the meaningful involvement of minority communities, low-income communities, and Indian Tribes. (c) Community Engagement.--In carrying out a water resources development project, the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable-- (1) promote the meaningful involvement of minority communities, low-income communities, and Indian Tribes; (2) provide guidance and technical assistance to such communities or Tribes to increase understanding of the project development and implementation activities, regulations, and policies of the Corps of Engineers; and (3) cooperate with State, Tribal, and local governments with respect to activities carried out pursuant to this subsection. (d) Tribal Lands and Consultation.--In carrying out water resources development projects, the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable and in accordance with the Tribal Consultation Policy affirmed and formalized by the Secretary on November 1, 2012 (or a successor policy)-- (1) promote meaningful involvement with Indian Tribes specifically on any Tribal lands near or adjacent to any water resources development projects, for purposes of identifying lands of ancestral, cultural, or religious importance; (2) consult with Indian Tribes specifically on any Tribal areas near or adjacent to any water resources development projects, for purposes of identifying lands, waters, and other resources critical to the livelihood of the Indian Tribes; and (3) cooperate with Indian Tribes to avoid, or otherwise find alternate solutions with respect to, such areas. SEC. 113. REVIEW OF RESILIENCY ASSESSMENTS. (a) Resiliency Assessment.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, and in conjunction with the development of procedures under section 110 of this Act, the Secretary is directed to review, and where appropriate, revise the existing planning guidance documents and regulations of the Corps of Engineers on the assessment of the effects of sea level rise or inland flooding on future water resources development projects to ensure that such guidance documents and regulations are based on the best available, peer-reviewed science and data on the current and future effects of sea level rise or inland flooding on relevant communities. (2) Coordination.--In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall-- (A) coordinate the review with the Engineer Research and Development Center, other Federal and State agencies, and other relevant entities; and (B) to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, utilize data provided to the Secretary by such agencies. (b) Assessment of Benefits From Addressing Sea Level Rise and Inland Flooding Resiliency in Feasibility Reports.-- (1) In general.--Upon the request of a non-Federal interest, in carrying out a feasibility study for a project for flood risk mitigation, hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, or ecosystem restoration under section 905 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282), the Secretary shall consider whether the need for the project is predicated upon or exacerbated by conditions related to sea level rise or inland flooding. (2) Addressing sea level rise and inland flooding resiliency benefits.--To the maximum extent practicable, in carrying out a study pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary shall document the potential effects of sea level rise or inland flooding on the project, and the expected benefits of the project relating to sea level rise or inland flooding, during the 50-year period after the date of completion of the project. SEC. 114. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is amended by inserting ``, and projects that use natural features or nature-based features (as those terms are defined in section 1184(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a))),'' after ``nonstructural projects''. SEC. 115. FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. (a) General Considerations.--Section 73(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (33 U.S.C. 701b-11(a)) is amended by striking ``including'' and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following: ``, with a view toward formulating the most economically, socially, and environmentally acceptable means of reducing or preventing flood damage, including-- ``(1) floodproofing of structures, including through elevation; ``(2) floodplain regulation; ``(3) acquisition of floodplain land for recreational, fish and wildlife, and other public purposes; ``(4) relocation; and ``(5) the use of a feature described in section 1184(a) of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a)).''. (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 103(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213) is amended-- (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Nonstructural Flood Control Projects'' and inserting ``Projects Using Nonstructural, Natural, or Nature-Based Features''; and (2) in paragraph (1)-- (A) by striking ``nonstructural flood control measures'' and inserting ``a flood risk management or hurricane and storm damage risk reduction measure using a nonstructural feature, or a natural feature or nature-based feature (as those terms are defined in section 1184(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a))),''; and (B) by striking ``cash during construction of the project'' and inserting ``cash during construction for a nonstructural feature if the costs of land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material disposal areas, and relocations for such feature are estimated to exceed 35 percent''. SEC. 116. FEASIBILITY STUDIES; REVIEW OF NATURAL AND NATURE- BASED FEATURES. (a) Technical Correction.--Section 1149(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2282 note; 132 Stat. 3787) is amended by striking ``natural infrastructure alternatives'' and inserting ``natural feature or nature- based feature alternatives (as such terms are defined in section 1184 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (32 U.S.C. 2289a))''. (b) Summary of Analysis.--To the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary shall include in each feasibility report developed [[Page H6940]] under section 905 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282) for a project that contains a flood risk management or hurricane and storm damage risk reduction element, a summary of the natural feature or nature-based feature alternatives, along with their long-term costs and benefits, that were evaluated in the development of the feasibility report, and, if such alternatives were not included in the recommended plan, an explanation of why such alternatives were not included in the recommended plan. SEC. 117. FEDERAL INTEREST DETERMINATION. Section 905 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282) is amended by inserting after subsection (a) the following: ``(b) Federal Interest Determination.-- ``(1) In general.-- ``(A) Economically disadvantaged communities.--In preparing a feasibility report under subsection (a) for a study that will benefit an economically disadvantaged community, upon request by the non-Federal interest for the study, the Secretary shall first determine the Federal interest in carrying out the study and the projects that may be proposed in the study. ``(B) Other communities.-- ``(i) Authorization.--In preparing a feasibility report under subsection (a) for a study that will benefit a covered community, upon request by the non-Federal interest for the study, the Secretary may, with respect to not more than 3 studies in each fiscal year, first determine the Federal interest in carrying out the study and the projects that may be proposed in the study. ``(ii) Covered communities.--In this subparagraph, the term `covered community' means a community that-- ``(I) is not an economically disadvantaged community; and ``(II) the Secretary finds has a compelling need for the Secretary to make a determination under clause (i). ``(2) Cost share.--The costs of a determination under paragraph (1)-- ``(A) shall be at Federal expense; and ``(B) shall not exceed $200,000. ``(3) Deadline.--A determination under paragraph (1) shall be completed by not later than 120 days after the date on which funds are made available to the Secretary to carry out the determination. ``(4) Treatment.-- ``(A) Timing.--The period during which a determination is being completed under paragraph (1) for a study shall not be included for purposes of the deadline to complete a final feasibility report under section 1001(a)(1) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c(a)(1)). ``(B) Cost.--The cost of a determination under paragraph (1) shall not be included for purposes of the maximum Federal cost under section 1001(a)(2) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c(a)(2)). ``(5) Report to non-federal interest.--If, based on a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary determines that a study or project is not in the Federal interest because the project will not result, or is unlikely to result, in a recommended plan that will produce national economic development benefits greater than cost, but may result in a technically sound and environmentally acceptable plan that is otherwise consistent with section 904 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2281), the Secretary shall issue a report to the non-Federal interest with recommendations on how the non-Federal interest might modify the proposal such that the project could be in the Federal interest and feasible.''. SEC. 118. PILOT PROGRAMS ON THE FORMULATION OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS PROJECTS IN RURAL COMMUNITIES AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES. (a) In General.--The Secretary shall establish and implement pilot programs, in accordance with this section, to evaluate opportunities to address the flood risk management and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction needs of rural communities and economically disadvantaged communities. (b) Economically Disadvantaged Community Flood Protection and Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction Study Pilot Program.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish and implement a pilot program to carry out feasibility studies, in accordance with this subsection, for flood risk management and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction projects for economically disadvantaged communities, in coordination with non-Federal interests. (2) Participation in pilot program.--In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall-- (A) publish a notice in the Federal Register that requests from non-Federal interests proposals for the potential feasibility study of a flood risk management project or hurricane and storm damage risk reduction project for an economically disadvantaged community; (B) upon request of a non-Federal interest for such a project, provide technical assistance to such non-Federal interest in the formulation of a proposal for a potential feasibility study to be submitted to the Secretary under the pilot program; and (C) review such proposals and select 10 feasibility studies for such projects to be carried out by the Secretary, in coordination with the non-Federal interest, under this pilot program. (3) Selection criteria.--In selecting a feasibility study under paragraph (2)(C), the Secretary shall consider whether-- (A) the percentage of people living in poverty in the county or counties (or county-equivalent entity or entities) in which the project is located is greater than the percentage of people living in poverty in the State, based on census bureau data; (B) the percentage of families with income above the poverty threshold but below the average household income in the county or counties (or county-equivalent entity or entities) in which the project is located is greater than such percentage for the State, based on census bureau data; (C) the percentage of the population that identifies as belonging to a minority or indigenous group in the county or counties (or county-equivalent entity or entities) in which the project is located is greater than the average such percentage in the State, based on census bureau data; and (D) the project is addressing flooding or hurricane or storm damage effects that have a disproportionate impact on a rural community, a minority community, or an Indian Tribe. (4) Administration.--Notwithstanding the requirements of section 105(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215), the Federal share of the cost of a feasibility study carried out under the pilot program shall be 100 percent. (5) Study requirements.--Feasibility studies carried out under this subsection shall, to the maximum extent practicable, incorporate natural features or nature-based features (as such terms are defined in section 1184 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a)), or a combination of such features and nonstructural features, that avoid or reduce at least 50 percent of flood or storm damages in one or more of the alternatives included in the final alternatives evaluated. (6) Notification.--The Secretary shall notify the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate of the selection of each feasibility study under the pilot program. (7) Completion.--Upon completion of a feasibility report for a feasibility study selected to be carried out under this subsection, the Secretary shall transmit the report to Congress for authorization, and shall include the report in the next annual report submitted under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d). (c) Pilot Program for the Recommendation of Flood Protection and Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction Projects in Rural Communities and Economically Disadvantaged Communities.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish and implement a pilot program to evaluate, and make recommendations to Congress on, flood risk management projects and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction projects in rural communities or economically disadvantaged communities, without demonstrating that each project is justified solely by national economic development benefits. (2) Considerations.--In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary may make a recommendation to Congress on up to 10 projects, without demonstrating that the project is justified solely by national economic development benefits, if the Secretary determines that-- (A) the community to be served by the project is an economically disadvantaged community or a rural community; (B) the long-term life safety, economic viability, and environmental sustainability of the community would be threatened without the project; and (C) the project is consistent with the requirements of section 1 of the Flood Control Act of 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a). (3) Consistency.--In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall ensure that project recommendations are consistent with the principles and requirements and the interagency guidelines, as such terms are defined in section 110 of this Act, including the consideration of quantifiable monetary and nonmonetary benefits of the project. (4) Prioritization.--The Secretary may give equivalent budgetary consideration and priority to projects recommended under this subsection. (d) Geographic Diversity.--In selecting feasibility studies under subsection (b)(2)(C) or in making project recommendations under subsection (c), the Secretary shall consider the geographic diversity among proposed projects. (e) Report.--Not later than 5 years and 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make publicly available, a report detailing the results of the pilot programs carried out under this section, including-- (1) a description of proposals received from non-Federal interests pursuant to subsection (b)(2)(A); (2) a description of technical assistance provided to non- Federal interests under subsection (b)(2)(B); [[Page H6941]] (3) a description of proposals selected under subsection (b)(2)(C) and criteria used to select such proposals; (4) a description of the projects evaluated or recommended by the Secretary under subsection (c); (5) a description of the quantifiable monetary and nonmonetary benefits associated with the projects recommended under subsection (c); and (6) any recommendations to Congress on how the Secretary can address the flood risk management and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction needs of economically disadvantaged communities. (f) State Defined.--In this section, the term ``State'' means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, and each of the commonwealths, territories, and possessions of the United States. (g) Sunset.--The authority to commence a feasibility study under subsection (b), and the authority make a recommendation under subsection (c), shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 119. PERMANENT MEASURES TO REDUCE EMERGENCY FLOOD FIGHTING NEEDS FOR COMMUNITIES SUBJECT TO REPETITIVE FLOODING. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Affected community.--The term ``affected community'' means a legally constituted public body (as that term is used in section 221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b))-- (A) with jurisdiction over an area that has been subject to flooding in two or more events in any 10-year period; and (B) that has received emergency flood-fighting assistance, including construction of temporary barriers by the Secretary, under section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n) with respect to such flood events. (2) Natural feature; nature-based feature.--The terms ``natural feature'' and ``nature-based feature'' have the meanings given those terms in section 1184 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a). (b) Program.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a program to study, design, and construct water resources development projects through measures involving, among other things, strengthening, raising, extending, realigning, or otherwise modifying existing flood control works, designing new works, and incorporating natural features, nature-based features, or nonstructural features, as appropriate to provide flood and coastal storm risk management to affected communities. (2) Considerations.--In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practical, review and, where appropriate, incorporate natural features or nature- based features, or a combination of such features and nonstructural features, that avoid or reduce at least 50 percent of flood or storm damages in one or more of the alternatives included in the final alternatives evaluated. (3) Construction.-- (A) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a project described in paragraph (1) without further congressional authorization if-- (i) the Secretary determines that the project-- (I) is advisable to reduce the risk of flooding for an affected community; and (II) produces benefits that are in excess of the estimated costs; and (ii) the Federal share of the cost of the construction does not exceed $17,500,000. (B) Specific authorization.--If the Federal share of the cost of a project described in paragraph (1) exceeds $17,500,000, the Secretary shall submit the project recommendation to Congress for authorization prior to construction, and shall include the project recommendation in the next annual report submitted under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014. (C) Financing.-- (i) Contributions.--If, based on a study carried out pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary determines that a project described in paragraph (1) will not produce benefits greater than cost, the Secretary shall allow the affected community to pay, or provide contributions equal to, an amount sufficient to make the remaining costs of design and construction of the project equal to the estimated value of the benefits of the project. (ii) Effect on non-federal share.--Amounts provided by an affected community under clause (i) shall be in addition to any payments or contributions the affected community is required to provide toward the remaining costs of design and construction of the project under section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213). (4) Ability to pay.-- (A) In general.--Any cost-sharing agreement for a project entered into pursuant to this section shall be subject to the ability of the affected community to pay. (B) Determination.--The ability of any affected community to pay shall be determined by the Secretary in accordance with procedures established by the Secretary. (C) Effect of reduction.--Any reduction in the non-Federal share of the cost of a project described in paragraph (1) as a result of a determination under this paragraph shall not be included in the Federal share for purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (3). SEC. 120. EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO NATURAL DISASTERS. Section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a)-- (A) in paragraph (2)(B)-- (i) in clause (i)(I), by inserting ``, or provide contributions equal to,'' after ``pay''; and (ii) in clause (ii)-- (I) in the heading, by inserting ``and contributions'' after ``of payments''; (II) by inserting ``or contributions'' after ``Non-Federal payments''; and (III) by inserting ``or contributions'' after ``non-Federal payments''; and (B) by adding at the end the following: ``(5) Feasibility study.-- ``(A) Determination.--Not later than 180 days after receiving, from a non-Federal sponsor of a project to repair or rehabilitate a flood control work described in paragraph (1), a request to initiate a feasibility study to further modify the relevant flood control work to provide for an increased level of protection, the Secretary shall provide to the non-Federal sponsor a written decision on whether the Secretary has the authority under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a) to undertake the requested feasibility study. ``(B) Recommendation.--If the Secretary determines under subparagraph (B) that the Secretary does not have the authority to undertake the requested feasibility study, the Secretary shall include the request for a feasibility study in the annual report submitted under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014.''; and (2) in subsection (c)-- (A) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Levee Owners Manual'' and inserting ``Eligibility''; (B) in paragraph (1), in the heading, by striking ``In general'' and inserting ``Levee owner's manual''; (C) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively, and inserting after paragraph (1) the following: ``(2) Compliance.-- ``(A) In general.--Notwithstanding the status of compliance of a non-Federal interest with the requirements of a levee owner's manual described in paragraph (1), or with any other eligibility requirement established by the Secretary related to the maintenance and upkeep responsibilities of the non- Federal interest, the Secretary shall consider the non- Federal interest to be eligible for repair and rehabilitation assistance under this section if the non-Federal interest-- ``(i) enters into a written agreement with the Secretary that identifies any items of deferred or inadequate maintenance and upkeep identified by the Secretary prior to the natural disaster; and ``(ii) pays, during performance of the repair and rehabilitation work, all costs to address-- ``(I) any items of deferred or inadequate maintenance and upkeep identified by the Secretary; and ``(II) any repair or rehabilitation work necessary to address damage the Secretary attributes to such deferred or inadequate maintenance or upkeep. ``(B) Eligibility.--The Secretary may only enter into one agreement under subparagraph (A) with any non-Federal interest. ``(C) Sunset.--The authority of the Secretary to enter into agreements under paragraph (2) shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this paragraph.''; and (D) in paragraph (3) (as so redesignated), by striking ``this subsection'' and inserting ``paragraph (1)''. SEC. 121. COST AND BENEFIT FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT. Section 1161(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 701n note) is amended-- (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1)-- (A) by striking the ``three fiscal years preceding'' and inserting ``five fiscal years preceding''; and (B) by striking ``last day of the third fiscal year'' and inserting ``last day of the fifth fiscal year''; (2) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``, or provide contributions equal to,'' before ``an amount sufficient''; and (3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following: ``(2) the Secretary determines that the damage to the structure was not as a result of negligent operation or maintenance.''. SEC. 122. EXPEDITING REPAIRS AND RECOVERY FROM FLOODING. (a) In General.--To the maximum extent practicable, during the 5-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prioritize and expedite the processing of applications for permits under section 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403), and section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and permissions under section 14 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 408), to complete repairs, reconstruction (including improvements), and upgrades to flood control infrastructure damaged by flooding events during calendar years 2017 through 2020, including flooding events caused by ice jams. (b) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this section affects any obligation to comply with the requirements of any Federal law, including-- (1) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); [[Page H6942]] (2) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.); and (3) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). SEC. 123. REVIEW OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS ASSETS. Section 6002 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1349) is amended to read as follows: ``SEC. 6002. REVIEW OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS ASSETS. ``(a) Assessment.--The Secretary shall conduct an assessment of projects constructed by the Secretary for which the Secretary continues to have financial or operational responsibility. ``(b) Inventory.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020, the Secretary shall, based on the assessment carried out under subsection (a), develop an inventory of projects or portions of projects-- ``(1) that are not needed for the missions of the Corps of Engineers; ``(2) the modification of which, including though the use of structural features, nonstructural features, or natural features or nature-based features (as those terms are defined in section 1184(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a)), could improve the sustainable operations of the project, or reduce operation and maintenance costs for the project; or ``(3) that are no longer having project purposes adequately met by the Corps of Engineers, because of deferment of maintenance or other challenges, and the divestment of which to a non-Federal entity could better meet the local and regional needs for operation and maintenance. ``(c) Criteria.--In conducting the assessment under subsection (a) and developing the inventory under subsection (b), the Secretary shall use the following criteria: ``(1) The extent to which the project aligns with the current missions of the Corps of Engineers. ``(2) The economic and environmental impacts of the project on existing communities in the vicinity of the project. ``(3) The extent to which the divestment or modification of the project could reduce operation and maintenance costs of the Corps of Engineers. ``(4) The extent to which the divestment or modification of the project is in the public interest. ``(5) The extent to which investment of additional Federal resources in the project proposed for divestment or modification, including investment needed to bring the project to a good state of repair, is in the public interest. ``(6) The extent to which the authorized purpose of the project is no longer being met. ``(d) Recommendations of Non-Federal Interests.--A non- Federal interest for a project may recommend that the Secretary include such project in the assessment or inventory required under this section. ``(e) Report to Congress.-- ``(1) In general.--Upon completion of the inventory required by subsection (b), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and make publicly available, a report containing the findings of the Secretary with respect to the assessment and inventory required under this section. ``(2) Inclusion.--The Secretary shall list in an appendix any recommendation of a non-Federal interest made with respect to a project under subsection (d) that the Secretary determines not to include in the inventory developed under subsection (b), based on the criteria in subsection (c), including information about the request and the reasons for the Secretary's determination.''. SEC. 124. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS. It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary, in coordination with non-Federal interests, should maximize the development, evaluation, and recommendation of project alternatives for future water resources development projects that produce multiple project benefits, such as navigation, flood risk management, and ecosystem restoration benefits, including through the use of natural or nature-based features and the beneficial use of dredged material. SEC. 125. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL; DREDGED MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS. (a) National Policy on the Beneficial Use of Dredged Material.-- (1) In general.--It is the policy of the United States for the Corps of Engineers to maximize the beneficial use, in an environmentally acceptable manner, of suitable dredged material obtained from the construction or operation and maintenance of water resources development projects. (2) Placement of dredged materials.-- (A) In general.--In evaluating the placement of dredged material obtained from the construction or operation and maintenance of water resources development projects, the Secretary shall consider-- (i) the suitability of the dredged material for a full range of beneficial uses; and (ii) the economic and environmental benefits, efficiencies, and impacts (including the effects on living coral) of using the dredged material for beneficial uses, including, in the case of beneficial use activities that involve more than one water resources development project, the benefits, efficiencies, and impacts that result from the combined activities. (B) Calculation of federal standard.-- (i) Determination.--The economic benefits and efficiencies from the beneficial use of dredged material considered by the Secretary under subparagraph (A) shall be included in any determination relating to the ``Federal standard'' by the Secretary under section 335.7 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, for the placement or disposal of such material. (ii) Reports.--The Secretary shall submit to Congress-- (I) a report detailing the method and all of the factors utilized by the Corps of Engineers to determine the Federal standard referred to in clause (i); and (II) for each evaluation under subparagraph (A), a report displaying the calculations for economic and environmental benefits and efficiencies from the beneficial use of dredged material (including, where appropriate, the utilization of alternative dredging equipment and dredging disposal methods) considered by the Secretary under such subparagraph for the placement or disposal of such material. (C) Selection of dredged material disposal method for certain purposes.--Section 204(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326(d)) is amended-- (i) in paragraph (1)-- (I) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ``In developing'' and all that follows through ``the non- Federal interest,'' and inserting ``At the request of the non-Federal interest for a water resources development project involving the disposal of dredged material, the Secretary, using funds appropriated for construction or operation and maintenance of the project, may select''; and (II) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``flood and storm damage and flood reduction benefits'' and inserting ``hurricane and storm or flood risk reduction benefits''; and (ii) by adding at the end the following: ``(5) Selection of dredged material disposal method for certain purposes.--Activities carried out under this subsection-- ``(A) shall be carried out using amounts appropriated for construction or operation and maintenance of the project involving the disposal of the dredged material; and ``(B) shall not carried out using amounts made available under subsection (g).''. (b) Beneficial Use of Dredged Material.-- (1) Pilot program projects.--Section 1122 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2326 note) is amended-- (A) in subsection (a)-- (i) in paragraph (6), by striking ``; and'' and inserting a semicolon; (ii) in paragraph (7)(C), by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; and''; and (iii) by adding at the end the following: ``(8) recovering lost storage capacity in reservoirs due to sediment accumulation, if the project also has a purpose described in any of paragraphs (1) through (7).''; (B) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``20'' and inserting ``35''; and (C) in subsection (g), by striking ``20'' and inserting ``35''. (2) Sense of congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary, in selecting projects for the beneficial use of dredged materials under section 1122 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2326 note), should ensure the thorough evaluation of project submissions from rural, small, and economically disadvantaged communities. (3) Project selection.--In selecting projects for the beneficial use of dredged materials under section 1122 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2326 note), the Secretary shall prioritize the selection of at least one project for the utilization of thin layer placement of dredged fine and coarse grain sediment and at least one project for recovering lost storage capacity in reservoirs due to sediment accumulation authorized by subsection (a)(8) of such section, to the extent that a non-Federal interest has submitted an application for such project purposes that otherwise meets the requirements of such section. (4) Temporary easements.--Section 1148 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2326 note) is amended-- (A) in subsection (a)-- (i) by striking ``grant'' and inserting ``approve''; and (ii) by striking ``granting'' and inserting ``approving''; and (B) in subsection (b), by striking ``grants'' and inserting ``approves''. (c) Five-Year Regional Dredged Material Management Plans.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the District Commander of each district of the Corps of Engineers that obtains dredged material through the construction or operation and maintenance of a water resources development project shall, at Federal expense, develop and submit to the Secretary a 5-year dredged material management plan in coordination with relevant State agencies and stakeholders. (2) Scope.--Each plan developed under this subsection shall include-- (A) a dredged material budget for each watershed or littoral system within the district; (B) an estimate of the amount of dredged material likely to be obtained through the construction or operation and maintenance [[Page H6943]] of all water resources development projects projected to be carried out within the district during the 5-year period following submission of the plan, and the estimated timing for obtaining such dredged material; (C) an identification of potential water resources development projects projected to be carried out within the district during such 5-year period that are suitable for, or that require, the placement of dredged material, and an estimate of the amount of dredged material placement capacity of such projects; (D) an evaluation of-- (i) the suitability of the dredged material for a full range of beneficial uses; and (ii) the economic and environmental benefits, efficiencies, and impacts (including the effects on living coral) of using the dredged material for beneficial uses, including, in the case of beneficial use activities that involve more than one water resources development project, the benefits, efficiencies, and impacts that result from the combined activities; (E) the district-wide goals for beneficial use of the dredged material, including any expected cost savings from aligning and coordinating multiple projects (including projects across Corps districts) in the use of the dredged material; and (F) a description of potential beneficial use projects identified through stakeholder solicitation and coordination. (3) Public comment.--In developing each plan under this subsection, each District Commander shall provide notice and an opportunity for public comment, including a solicitation for stakeholders to identify beneficial use projects, in order to ensure, to the extent practicable, that beneficial use of dredged material is not foregone in a particular fiscal year or dredging cycle. (4) Public availability.--Upon submission of each plan to the Secretary under this subsection, each District Commander shall make the plan publicly available, including on a publicly available website. (5) Transmission to congress.--As soon as practicable after receiving a plan under subsection (a), the Secretary shall transmit the plan to Congress. (6) Regional sediment management plans.--A plan developed under this section-- (A) shall be in addition to regional sediment management plans prepared under section 204(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326(a)); and (B) shall not be subject to the limitations in section 204(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326(g)). (d) Dredge Pilot Program.-- (1) Revisions.--Section 1111 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2326 note) is amended-- (A) in subsection (a), by striking ``for the operation and maintenance of harbors and inland harbors'' and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following: ``for the operation and maintenance of-- ``(1) harbors and inland harbors referred to in section 210(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238(a)(2)); or ``(2) inland and intracoastal waterways of the United States described in section 206 of the Inland Waterways Revenue Act of 1978 (33 U.S.C. 1804).''; and (B) in subsection (b), by striking ``or inland harbors'' and inserting ``, inland harbors, or inland or intracoastal waterways''. (2) Coordination with existing authorities.--The Secretary may carry out the dredge pilot program authorized by section 1111 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2326 note) in coordination with Federal regional dredge demonstration programs in effect on the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 126. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION FOR ANADROMOUS FISH. (a) Anadromous Fish Habitat and Passage.--Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following: ``(3) Anadromous fish habitat and passage.-- ``(A) Measures.--A project under this section may include measures to improve habitat or passage for anadromous fish, including-- ``(i) installing fish bypass structures on small water diversions; ``(ii) modifying tide gates; and ``(iii) restoring or reconnecting floodplains and wetlands that are important for anadromous fish habitat or passage. ``(B) Benefits.--A project that includes measures under this paragraph shall be formulated to maximize benefits for the anadromous fish species benefitted by the project.''; and (2) by adding at the end the following: ``(g) Prioritization.--The Secretary shall give projects that include measures described in subsection (a)(3) equal priority for implementation as other projects under this section.''. SEC. 127. ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS ON WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE. (a) In General.--Section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) is amended-- (1) in subsection (c)-- (A) in paragraph (1)-- (i) in subparagraph (B)(ii)(III), by inserting ``, regional, or local'' after ``national''; and (ii) by adding at the end the following: ``(D) Modifications of projects carried out pursuant to continuing authority programs.-- ``(i) In general.--With respect to a project being carried out pursuant to a continuing authority program for which a proposed modification is necessary because the project is projected to exceed, in the coming fiscal year, the maximum Federal cost of the project, the Secretary shall include a proposed modification in the annual report if the proposed modification will result in completion of construction the project and the justification for the modification is not the result of a change in the scope of the project. ``(ii) Inclusion.--For each proposed modification included in an annual report under clause (i), the Secretary shall include in the annual report-- ``(I) a justification of why the modification is necessary; ``(II) an estimate of the total cost and timeline required to complete construction of the project; and ``(III) an indication of continued support by the non- Federal interest and the financial ability of the non-Federal interest to provide the required cost-share. ``(iii) Definition.--For the purposes of this subparagraph, the term `continuing authority program' means any of-- ``(I) section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r); ``(II) section 3 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g); ``(III) section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577); ``(IV) section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i); ``(V) section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326); ``(VI) section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s); ``(VII) section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330); ``(VIII) section 2 of the Act of August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g); and ``(IX) section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a).''; and (B) in paragraph (4)(B)-- (i) in clause (i), by striking ``and'' at the end; (ii) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and (iii) by inserting after clause (i) the following: ``(ii) the Secretary shall not include proposals in the appendix of the annual report that otherwise meet the criteria for inclusion in the annual report solely on the basis that the proposals are for the purposes of navigation, flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, or municipal or agricultural water supply; and''; and (2) in subsection (g)(5), by striking ``if authorized'' and all that follows through ``2016''. (b) Over-Budget Cap Programs.--For any project carried out under a continuing authority program, as such term is defined in section 7001(c)(1)(D) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d)), for which the Secretary is required to include a proposed modification in an annual report under such section 7001(c)(1)(D), the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, inform the non- Federal interest of the process for carrying out the project pursuant to section 105 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215) and whether the Secretary has the authority to complete a feasibility study for the project. (c) Annual Report on Status of Feasibility Studies.-- Concurrent with each report submitted under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that provides for an accounting of all outstanding feasibility studies being conducted by the Secretary, including, for each such study, its length, cost, and expected completion date. SEC. 128. HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOM DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM. (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a demonstration program to determine the causes of, and implement measures to effectively detect, prevent, treat, and eliminate, harmful algal blooms associated with water resources development projects. (b) Consultation; Use of Existing Data and Program Authorities.--In carrying out the demonstration program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall-- (1) consult with the heads of appropriate Federal and State agencies; and (2) make maximum use of existing Federal and State data and ongoing programs and activities of Federal and State agencies, including the activities of the Secretary carried out through the Engineer Research and Development Center pursuant to section 1109 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 610 note). (c) Focus Areas.--In carrying out the demonstration program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall undertake program activities related to harmful algal blooms in the Great Lakes, the tidal and inland waters of the State of New Jersey, the coastal and tidal waters of the State of Louisiana, the waterways of the counties that comprise the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, the Allegheny Reservoir Watershed, New York, and Lake Okeechobee, Florida. [[Page H6944]] (d) Additional Focus Areas.--In addition to the areas described in subsection (c), in carrying out the demonstration program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall undertake program activities related to harmful algal blooms at any Federal reservoir located in the Upper Missouri River Basin or the North Platte River Basin, at the request and expense of another Federal agency. (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $25,000,000 to carry out this section. Such sums shall remain available until expended. SEC. 129. MISSOURI RIVER INTERCEPTION-REARING COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION. (a) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the effects of any interception-rearing complex constructed on the Missouri River on-- (1) flood risk management and navigation; and (2) the population recovery of the pallid sturgeon, including baseline population counts. (b) No Additional IRC Construction.--The Secretary may not authorize construction of an interception-rearing complex on the Missouri River until the Secretary-- (1) submits the report required by subsection (a); (2) acting through the Engineer Research and Development Center, conducts further research on interception-rearing complex design, including any effects on existing flows, flood risk management, and navigation; and (3) develops a plan-- (A) to repair dikes and revetments that are affecting flood risk and bank erosion; and (B) to establish, repair, or improve water control structures at the headworks of constructed shallow water habitat side-channels. (c) Future IRC Construction.-- (1) Public comment.--The Secretary shall provide an opportunity for comment from the public and the Governor of each affected State on any proposals to construct an interception-rearing complex after the date of enactment of this Act. (2) Period.--The public comment period required by paragraph (1) shall be not less than 90 days for each proposal to construct an interception-rearing complex on the Missouri River. SEC. 130. MATERIALS, SERVICES, AND FUNDS FOR REPAIR, RESTORATION, OR REHABILITATION OF PROJECTS. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Covered area.--The term ``covered area'' means an area-- (A) for which the Governor of a State has requested a determination that an emergency exists; or (B) covered by an emergency or major disaster declaration declared under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.). (2) Emergency period.--The term ``emergency period'' means-- (A) with respect to a covered area described in paragraph (1)(A), the period during which the Secretary determines an emergency exists; and (B) with respect to a covered area described in paragraph (1)(B), the period during which the applicable declaration is in effect. (b) In General.--In any covered area, the Secretary is authorized to accept and use materials, services, and funds, during the emergency period, from a non-Federal interest or private entity to repair, restore, or rehabilitate a federally authorized water resources development project, and to provide reimbursement to such non-Federal interest or private entity for such materials, services, and funds, in the Secretary's sole discretion, and subject to the availability of appropriations, if the Secretary determines that reimbursement is in the public interest. (c) Additional Requirement.--The Secretary may only reimburse for the use of materials or services accepted under this section if such materials or services meet the Secretary's specifications and comply with all applicable laws and regulations that would apply if such materials and services were acquired by the Secretary, including sections 3141 through 3148 and 3701 through 3708 of title 40, United States Code, section 8302 of title 41, United States Code, and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. (d) Agreements.-- (1) In general.--Prior to the acceptance of materials, services, or funds under this section, the Secretary and the non-Federal interest or private entity shall enter into an agreement that specifies-- (A) the non-Federal interest or private entity shall hold and save the United States free from any and all damages that arise from use of materials or services of the non-Federal interest or private entity, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (B) the non-Federal interest or private entity shall certify that the materials or services comply with all applicable laws and regulations under subsection (c); and (C) any other term or condition required by the Secretary. (2) Exception.--If an agreement under paragraph (1) was not entered prior to materials or services being contributed, a non-Federal interest or private entity shall enter into an agreement with the Secretary that-- (A) specifies the value, as determined by the Secretary, of those materials or services contributed and eligible for reimbursement; and (B) ensures that the materials or services comply with subsection (c) and paragraph (1). SEC. 131. LEVEE SAFETY. Section 9004 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3303) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(d) Identification of Deficiencies.-- ``(1) In general.--For each levee included in an inventory established under subsection (b) or for which the Secretary has conducted a review under subsection (c), the Secretary shall-- ``(A) identify the specific engineering and maintenance deficiencies, if any; and ``(B) describe the recommended remedies to correct each deficiency identified under subparagraph (A), and, if requested by owner of a non-Federal levee, the associated costs of those remedies. ``(2) Consultation.--In identifying deficiencies and describing remedies for a levee under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consult with relevant non-Federal interests, including by providing an opportunity for comment by those non-Federal interests.''. SEC. 132. NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM. (a) Definitions.--Section 2 of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (4)-- (A) in subparagraph (A)-- (i) by striking clause (iii) and inserting the following: ``(iii) has an emergency action plan that-- ``(I) is approved by the relevant State dam safety agency; or ``(II) is in conformance with State law and pending approval by the relevant State dam safety agency;''; and (ii) by striking clause (iv) and inserting the following: ``(iv) fails to meet minimum dam safety standards of the State in which the dam is located, as determined by the State; and ``(v) poses an unacceptable risk to the public, as determined by the Administrator, in consultation with the Board.''; and (B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting ``under a hydropower project with an authorized installed capacity of greater than 1.5 megawatts'' after ``dam''; and (2) in paragraph (10)-- (A) in the heading, by striking ``Non-federal sponsor'' and inserting ``Eligible subrecipient''; and (B) by striking ``The term `non-Federal sponsor' '' and inserting ``The term `eligible subrecipient' ''. (b) Rehabilitation of High Hazard Potential Dams.-- (1) Establishment of program.--Section 8A(a) of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2(a)) is amended by striking ``to non-Federal sponsors'' and inserting ``to States with dam safety programs''. (2) Eligible activities.--Section 8A(b) of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2(b)) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``for a project may be used for'' and inserting ``to a State may be used by the State to award grants to eligible subrecipients for''. (3) Award of grants.--Section 8A(c) of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2(c)) is amended-- (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``non-Federal sponsor'' and inserting ``State''; and (B) in paragraph (2)-- (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``an eligible high hazard potential dam to a non-Federal sponsor'' and inserting ``eligible high hazard potential dams to a State''; (ii) in subparagraph (B)-- (I) in the subparagraph heading, by striking ``Project grant'' and inserting ``Grant''; (II) by striking ``project grant agreement with the non- Federal sponsor'' and inserting ``grant agreement with the State''; and (III) by striking ``project,'' and inserting ``projects for which the grant is awarded,''; (iii) by amending subparagraph (C) to read as follows: ``(C) Grant assurance.--As part of a grant agreement under subparagraph (B), the Administrator shall require that each eligible subrecipient to which the State awards a grant under this section provides an assurance, with respect to the dam to be rehabilitated by the eligible subrecipient, that the dam owner will carry out a plan for maintenance of the dam during the expected life of the dam.''; and (iv) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``A grant provided under this section shall not exceed'' and inserting ``A State may not award a grant to an eligible subrecipient under this section that exceeds, for any 1 dam,''. (4) Requirements.--Section 8A(d) of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2(d)) is amended-- (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``to an eligible subrecipient'' after ``this section''; (B) in paragraph (2)-- (i) in the paragraph heading, by striking ``Non-federal sponsor'' and inserting ``Eligible subrecipient''; (ii) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ``the non-Federal sponsor shall'' and inserting ``an eligible subrecipient shall, with respect to the dam to be rehabilitated by the eligible subrecipient''; (iii) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows: ``(A) demonstrate that the community in which the dam is located participates in, and [[Page H6945]] complies with, all applicable Federal flood insurance programs, including demonstrating that such community is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program, and is not on probation, suspended, or withdrawn from such Program;''; (iv) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``have'' and inserting ``beginning not later than 2 years after the date on which the Administrator publishes criteria for hazard mitigation plans under paragraph (3), demonstrate that the Tribal or local government with jurisdiction over the area in which the dam is located has''; and (v) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``50-year period'' and inserting ``expected life of the dam''; and (C) by adding at the end the following: ``(3) Hazard mitigation plan criteria.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the Administrator, in consultation with the Board, shall publish criteria for hazard mitigation plans required under paragraph (2)(B).''. (5) Floodplain management plans.--Section 8A(e) of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2(e)) is amended-- (A) in paragraph (1)-- (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ``the non-Federal sponsor'' and inserting ``an eligible subrecipient''; and (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``1 year'' and inserting ``2 years'' each place it appears; and (B) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following: ``(3) Plan criteria and technical support.--The Administrator, in consultation with the Board, shall provide criteria, and may provide technical support, for the development and implementation of floodplain management plans prepared under this subsection.''. (6) Contractual requirements.--Section 8A(i)(1) of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2(i)(1)) is amended by striking ``a non-Federal sponsor'' and inserting ``an eligible subrecipient''. SEC. 133. REHABILITATION OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTED PUMP STATIONS. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Eligible pump station.--The term ``eligible pump station'' means a pump station-- (A) constructed, in whole or in part, by the Corps of Engineers for flood risk management purposes; (B) that the Secretary has identified as having a major deficiency; and (C) the failure of which the Secretary has determined would impair the function of a flood risk management project constructed by the Corps of Engineers. (2) Rehabilitation.-- (A) In general.--The term ``rehabilitation'', with respect to an eligible pump station, means to address a major deficiency of the eligible pump station caused by long-term degradation of the foundation, construction materials, or engineering systems or components of the eligible pump station. (B) Inclusions.--The term ``rehabilitation'', with respect to an eligible pump station, includes-- (i) the incorporation into the eligible pump station of-- (I) current design standards; (II) efficiency improvements; and (III) associated drainage; and (ii) increasing the capacity of the eligible pump station, subject to the condition that the increase shall-- (I) significantly decrease the risk of loss of life and property damage; or (II) decrease total lifecycle rehabilitation costs for the eligible pump station. (b) Authorization.--The Secretary may carry out rehabilitation of an eligible pump station, if the Secretary determines that the rehabilitation is feasible. (c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal interest for the eligible pump station shall-- (1) provide 35 percent of the cost of rehabilitation of an eligible pump station carried out under this section; and (2) provide all land, easements, rights-of-way, and necessary relocations associated with the rehabilitation described in subparagraph (A), at no cost to the Federal Government. (d) Agreement Required.--The rehabilitation of an eligible pump station pursuant to this section shall be initiated only after a non-Federal interest has entered into a binding agreement with the Secretary-- (1) to pay the non-Federal share of the costs of rehabilitation under subsection (c); and (2) to pay 100 percent of the operation and maintenance costs of the rehabilitated eligible pump station, in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Secretary. (e) Treatment.--The rehabilitation of an eligible pump station pursuant to this section shall not be considered to be a separable element of the associated flood risk management project constructed by the Corps of Engineers. (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $60,000,000, to remain available until expended. SEC. 134. NON-FEDERAL PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PILOT PROGRAM. (a) Reauthorization; Implementation Guidance.--Section 1043(b) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (7), by striking ``the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``September 30, 2026''; (2) in paragraph (8), by striking ``2023'' and inserting ``2026''; and (3) by adding at the end the following: ``(9) Implementation guidance.-- ``(A) In general.--Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary shall issue guidance for the implementation of the pilot program that, to the extent practicable, identifies-- ``(i) the metrics for measuring the success of the pilot program; ``(ii) a process for identifying future projects to participate in the pilot program; ``(iii) measures to address the risks of a non-Federal interest constructing projects under the pilot program, including which entity bears the risk for projects that fail to meet the Corps of Engineers standards for design or quality; ``(iv) the laws and regulations that a non-Federal interest must follow in carrying out a project under the pilot program; and ``(v) which entity bears the risk in the event that a project carried out under the pilot program fails to be carried out in accordance with the project authorization or this subsection. ``(B) New project partnership agreements.--The Secretary may not enter into a project partnership agreement under this subsection during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this paragraph and ending on the date on which the Secretary issues the guidance under subparagraph (A).''. (b) Non-Federal Project Implementation for Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan Projects.-- (1) In general.--In carrying out the pilot program authorized under section 1043(b) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note), the Secretary is authorized to include a project authorized to be implemented by, or in accordance with, section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000, in accordance with such section 1043(b). (2) Eligibility.--In the case of a project described in paragraph (1) for which the non-Federal interest has initiated construction in compliance with authorities governing the provision of in-kind contributions for such project, the Secretary shall take into account the value of any in-kind contributions carried out by the non-Federal interest for such project prior to the date of execution of the project partnership agreement under section 1043(b) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 when determining the non-Federal share of the costs to complete construction of the project. (3) Guidance.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, and in accordance with the guidance issued under section 1043(b)(9) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (as added by this section), the Secretary shall issue any additional guidance that the Secretary determines necessary for the implementation of this subsection. SEC. 135. COST SHARING PROVISIONS FOR TERRITORIES AND INDIAN TRIBES. Section 1156(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2310(b)) is amended by striking ``for inflation'' and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting ``on an annual basis for inflation.''. SEC. 136. REVIEW OF CONTRACTING POLICIES. (a) Review of Contractual Agreements.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall complete a review of the policies, guidelines, and regulations of the Corps of Engineers for the development of contractual agreements between the Secretary and non-Federal interests and utilities associated with the construction of water resources development projects. (2) Report.--Not later than 90 days after completing the review under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make publicly available, a report that includes-- (A) a summary of the results of the review; and (B) public guidance on best practices for a non-Federal interest to use when writing or developing contractual agreements with the Secretary and utilities. (3) Provision of guidance.--The Secretary shall provide the best practices guidance included under paragraph (2)(A) to non-Federal interests prior to the development of contractual agreements with such non-Federal interests. (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary should maximize use of nonprice tradeoff procedures in competitive acquisitions for carrying out emergency work in an area with respect to which the President has declared a major disaster under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. SEC. 137. CRITERIA FOR FUNDING ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop specific criteria for the evaluation and ranking of individual environmental assistance projects authorized by Congress (including projects authorized pursuant to environmental assistance programs) for the Secretary to carry out. (b) Minimum Criteria.--For the purposes of carrying out this section, the Secretary shall evaluate, at a minimum-- [[Page H6946]] (1) the nature and extent of the positive and negative local economic impacts of the project, including-- (A) the benefits of the project to the local economy; (B) the extent to which the project will enhance local development; (C) the number of jobs that will be directly created by the project; and (D) the ability of the non-Federal interest to pay the applicable non-Federal share of the cost of the project; (2) the demographics of the location in which the project is to be carried out, including whether the project serves-- (A) a rural community; or (B) an economically disadvantaged community, including an economically disadvantaged minority community; (3) the amount of appropriations a project has received; (4) the funding capability of the Corps of Engineers with respect to the project; (5) whether the project could be carried out under other Federal authorities at an equivalent cost to the non-Federal interest; and (6) any other criteria that the Secretary considers to be appropriate. (c) Inclusion in Guidance.--The Secretary shall include the criteria developed under subsection (a) in the annual Civil Works Direct Program Development Policy Guidance of the Secretary. (d) Report to Congress.--For fiscal year 2022, and biennially thereafter, in conjunction with the President's annual budget submission to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives a report that identifies the Secretary's ranking of individual environmental assistance projects authorized by Congress for the Secretary to carry out, in accordance with the criteria developed under this section. SEC. 138. AGING INFRASTRUCTURE. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Aging infrastructure.--The term ``aging infrastructure'' means a water resources development project of the Corps of Engineers, or any other water resources, water storage, or irrigation project of another Federal agency, that is greater than 75 years old. (2) Enhanced inspection.--The term ``enhanced inspection'' means an inspection that uses current or innovative technology, including Light Detection and Ranging (commonly known as ``LiDAR''), ground penetrating radar, subsurface imaging, or subsurface geophysical techniques, to detect whether the features of the aging infrastructure are structurally sound and can operate as intended, or are at risk of failure. (b) Contracts for Enhanced Inspection.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out enhanced inspections of aging infrastructure, pursuant to a contract with the owner or operator of the aging infrastructure. (2) Certain circumstances.--Subject to the availability of appropriations, or funds available pursuant to subsection (d), the Secretary shall enter into a contract described in paragraph (1), if-- (A) the owner or operator of the aging infrastructure requests that the Secretary carry out the enhanced inspections; and (B) the inspection is at the full expense of such owner or operator. (c) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not require a non- Federal entity associated with a project under the jurisdiction of another Federal agency to carry out corrective or remedial actions in response to an enhanced inspection carried out under this section. (d) Funding.--The Secretary is authorized to accept funds from an owner or operator of aging infrastructure, and may use such funds to carry out an enhanced inspection pursuant to a contract entered into with such owner or operator under this section. SEC. 139. UNIFORMITY OF NOTIFICATION SYSTEMS. (a) Inventory.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete an inventory of all systems used by the Corps of Engineers for external communication and notification with respect to projects, initiatives, and facilities of the Corps of Engineers. (b) Uniform Plan.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop a plan for the uniformity of such communication and notification systems for projects, initiatives, and facilities of the Corps of Engineers. (2) Inclusions.--The plan developed under paragraph (1) shall-- (A) provide access to information in all forms practicable, including through email, text messages, news programs and websites, radio, and other forms of notification; (B) establish a notification system for any projects, initiatives, or facilities of the Corps of Engineers that do not have a notification system; (C) streamline existing communication and notification systems to improve the strength and uniformity of those systems; and (D) emphasize the necessity of timeliness in notification systems and ensure that the methods of notification can transmit information in a timely manner. (3) Implementation.-- (A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (B), not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete the implementation of the plan developed under paragraph (1). (B) Emergency management notification.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall implement the provisions of the plan developed under paragraph (1) relating to emergency management notifications. (4) Savings provision.--Nothing in this section authorizes the elimination of any existing communication or notification system used by the Corps of Engineers. SEC. 140. COASTAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION CONTRACTS. For any project for coastal storm damage reduction, the Secretary may seek input from a non-Federal interest for a project that may be affected by the timing of the coastal storm damage reduction activities under the project, in order to minimize, to the maximum extent practicable, any negative effects resulting from the timing of those activities. SEC. 141. DAM REMEDIATION FOR ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION. Section 542(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2671; 121 Stat. 1150) is amended-- (1) in subparagraph (F), by striking ``or'' at the end; (2) by redesignating subparagraph (G) as subparagraph (H); and (3) by inserting after subparagraph (F) the following: ``(G) measures to restore, protect, and preserve an ecosystem affected by a dam (including by the rehabilitation or modification of a dam)-- ``(i) that has been constructed, in whole or in part, by the Corps of Engineers for flood control purposes; ``(ii) for which construction was completed before 1940; ``(iii) that is classified as `high hazard potential' by the State dam safety agency of the State in which the dam is located; and ``(iv) that is operated by a non-Federal entity; or''. SEC. 142. LEVEE ACCREDITATION PROCESS; LEVEE CERTIFICATIONS. (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the process developed by the Flood Protection Structure Accreditation Task Force established under section 100226 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (42 U.S.C. 4101 note) should not be limited to levee systems in the inspection of completed works program of the Corps of Engineers, but should apply equally to federally owned levee systems operated by the Secretary, including federally owned levee systems operated by the Secretary as part of a reservoir project. (b) Levee Certifications.--Section 3014 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (42 U.S.C. 4131) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a)-- (A) in paragraph (1)-- (i) by striking ``under the inspection of completed works program'' and inserting ``for levee systems under the levee safety and dam safety programs''; and (ii) by striking ``and'' at the end; (B) in paragraph (2)-- (i) by striking ``activities under the inspection of completed works program of the Corps of Engineers'' and inserting ``the activities referred to in paragraph (1)''; (ii) by striking ``chapter 1'' and inserting ``chapter I''; and (iii) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; and''; and (C) by adding at the end the following: ``(3) in the case of a levee system that is operated and maintained by the Corps of Engineers, to the maximum extent practicable, cooperate with local governments seeking a levee accreditation decision for the levee to provide information necessary to support the accreditation decision in a timely manner.''; and (2) in paragraph (b)(3), by adding at the end the following: ``(C) Contributed funds.--Notwithstanding subparagraph (B), a non-Federal interest may fund up to 100 percent of the cost of any activity carried out under this subsection.''. SEC. 143. PROJECT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT. Section 103(j)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(j)(1)) is amended-- (1) by striking ``Any project'' and inserting the following: ``(A) In general.--Any project''; and (2) by adding at the end the following: ``(B) Inclusion.--An agreement under subparagraph (A) shall include a brief description and estimation of the anticipated operations, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation costs of the non-Federal interest for the project.''. SEC. 144. ACCEPTANCE OF FUNDS FOR HARBOR DREDGING. The Secretary is authorized, in accordance with section 5 of Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h), to accept and expend funds contributed by a State or other non-Federal interest-- (1) to dredge a non-Federal harbor or channel, or a marina or berthing area located adjacent to, or accessible by, such harbor or channel; or (2) to provide technical assistance related to the planning and design of dredging activities described in paragraph (1). [[Page H6947]] SEC. 145. REPLACEMENT CAPACITY. Section 217(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2326a(a)) is amended-- (1) in the subsection heading, by inserting ``or Replacement Capacity'' after ``Additional Capacity''; (2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following: ``(1) Provided by secretary.-- ``(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), at the request of a non-Federal interest with respect to a project, the Secretary may-- ``(i) provide additional capacity at a dredged material disposal facility constructed by the Secretary beyond the capacity that would be required for project purposes; or ``(ii) permit the use of dredged material disposal facility capacity required for project purposes by the non-Federal interest if the Secretary determines that replacement capacity can be constructed at the facility or another facility or site before such capacity is needed for project purposes. ``(B) Agreement.--Before the Secretary takes an action under subparagraph (A), the non-Federal interest shall agree to pay-- ``(i) all costs associated with the construction of the additional capacity or replacement capacity in advance of construction of such capacity; and ``(ii) in the case of use by a non-Federal interest of dredged material disposal capacity required for project purposes under subparagraph (A)(ii), any increase in the cost of operation and maintenance of the project that the Secretary determines results from the use of the project capacity by the non-Federal interest in advance of each cycle of dredging. ``(C) Credit.--In the event the Secretary determines that the cost to operate or maintain the project decreases as a result of use by the non-Federal interest of dredged material disposal capacity required for project purposes under subparagraph (A)(ii), the Secretary, at the request of the non-Federal interest, shall credit the amount of the decrease toward any cash contribution of the non-Federal interest required thereafter for construction, operation, or maintenance of the project, or of another navigation project.''; (3) in paragraph (2), in the first sentence, by inserting ``under paragraph (1)(A)(i)'' after ``additional capacity''; and (4) by adding at the end the following: ``(3) Special rule for designation of replacement capacity facility or site.-- ``(A) In general.--Subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines to be necessary or advisable, an agreement under paragraph (1)(B) for use permitted under paragraph (1)(A)(ii) shall reserve to the non-Federal interest-- ``(i) the right to submit to the Secretary for approval at a later date an alternative to the facility or site designated in the agreement for construction of replacement capacity; and ``(ii) the right to construct the replacement capacity at the alternative facility or site at the expense of the non- Federal interest. ``(B) Requirement.--The Secretary shall not reject a site for the construction of replacement capacity under paragraph (1)(A)(ii) that is submitted by the non-Federal interest for approval by the Secretary before the date of execution of the agreement under paragraph (1)(B), or thereafter, unless the Secretary-- ``(i) determines that the site is environmentally unacceptable, geographically unacceptable, or technically unsound; and ``(ii) provides a written basis for the determination under clause (i) to the non-Federal interest. ``(4) Public comment.--The Secretary shall afford the public an opportunity to comment on the determinations required under this subsection for a use permitted under paragraph (1)(A)(ii).''. SEC. 146. REVIEWING HYDROPOWER AT CORPS OF ENGINEERS FACILITIES. Section 1008 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2321b) is amended-- (1) by striking ``civil works'' each place it appears and inserting ``water resources development''; and (2) by adding at the end the following: ``(c) Reviewing Hydropower at Corps of Engineers Facilities.-- ``(1) Definition of eligible non-federal interest.--In this subsection, the term `eligible non-Federal interest' means a non-Federal interest that owns or operates an existing non- Federal hydropower facility at a Corps of Engineers water resources development project. ``(2) Evaluation.-- ``(A) In general.--On the written request of an eligible non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall conduct an evaluation to consider operational changes at the applicable project to facilitate production of non-Federal hydropower, consistent with authorized project purposes. The Secretary shall solicit input from interested stakeholders as part of the evaluation. ``(B) Deadline.--Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary receives a written request under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall provide to the non- Federal interest a written response to inform the non-Federal interest-- ``(i) that the Secretary has approved the request to conduct an evaluation; or ``(ii) of any additional information necessary for the Secretary to approve the request to conduct an evaluation. ``(3) Operational changes.--An operational change referred to in paragraph (2)(A) may include-- ``(A) changes to seasonal pool levels; ``(B) modifying releases from the project; and ``(C) other changes included in the written request submitted under that paragraph that enhance the usage of the project to facilitate production of non-Federal hydropower, consistent with authorized project purposes. ``(4) Cost share.--The eligible non-Federal interest shall pay 100 percent of the costs associated with an evaluation under this subsection, including the costs to prepare the report under paragraph (6). ``(5) Deadline.--The Secretary shall complete an evaluation under this subsection by the date that is not later than 1 year after the date on which the Secretary begins the evaluation. ``(6) Report.--On completion of an evaluation under this subsection, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the effects of the operational changes proposed by the non-Federal interest and examined in the evaluation on the authorized purposes of the project, including a description of any negative impacts of the proposed operational changes on the authorized purposes of the project, or on any Federal project located in the same basin. ``(7) Savings provision.--Nothing in this subsection-- ``(A) affects the authorized purposes of a Corps of Engineers water resources development project; ``(B) affects existing authorities of the Corps of Engineers, including authorities with respect to navigation, flood damage reduction, environmental protection and restoration, water supply and conservation, and other related purposes; or ``(C) authorizes the Secretary to make any operational changes to a Corps of Engineers water resources development project.''. SEC. 147. REPAIR AND RESTORATION OF EMBANKMENTS. (a) In General.--At the request of a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall assess the cause of damage to, or the failure of, an embankment that is adjacent to the shoreline of a reservoir project owned and operated by the Secretary for which such damage or failure to the embankment has adversely affected a roadway that the Secretary has relocated for construction of the reservoir. (b) Repair and Restoration Activities.--If, based on the assessment carried out under subsection (a), the Secretary determines that the cause of the damage to, or the failure of, the embankment is the direct result of the design or operation of the reservoir by the Secretary, the Secretary is authorized to participate in the repair or restoration of such embankment. (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $10,000,000 to carry out this section. SEC. 148. COASTAL MAPPING. Section 516 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2326b) is amended-- (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following: ``(g) Coastal Mapping.--The Secretary shall develop and carry out a plan for the recurring mapping of coastlines that are experiencing rapid change, including such coastlines in-- ``(1) Alaska; ``(2) Hawaii; and ``(3) any territory or possession of the United States.''; and (3) in subsection (h) (as so redesignated), by adding at the end the following: ``(3) Coastal mapping.--In addition to amounts made available under paragraph (1), there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out subsection (g) with respect to Alaska, Hawaii, and the territories and possessions of the United States, $10,000,000, to remain available until expended.''. SEC. 149. INTERIM RISK REDUCTION MEASURES. (a) In General.--In the case of any interim risk reduction measure for dam safety purposes that was evaluated in a final environmental assessment completed during the period beginning on March 18, 2019, and ending on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall carry out a reevaluation of the measure in a timely manner if the final environmental assessment did not consider in detail at least-- (1) 1 operational water control plan change alternative; (2) 1 action alternative other than an operational water control plan change; and (3) the no action alternative. (b) Coordination.--A reevaluation carried out under subsection (a) shall include consideration of the alternatives described in such subsection, which shall be developed in coordination with Federal agencies, States, Indian Tribes, units of local government, and other non- Federal interests that have existing water obligations that would be directly affected by implementation of an interim risk reduction measure that is the subject of the reevaluation. (c) Implementation Prior to Reevaluation.--Nothing in this section prohibits the [[Page H6948]] Secretary from implementing an interim risk reduction measure for which a reevaluation is required under subsection (a) prior to the completion of the reevaluation under subsection (a). SEC. 150. MAINTENANCE DREDGING PERMITS. (a) In General.--The Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, prioritize the reissuance of any regional general permit for maintenance dredging that expires prior to May 1, 2021, and shall use best efforts to ensure such reissuance prior to expiration of such a regional general permit for maintenance dredging. (b) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this section affects any obligation to comply with the requirements of any Federal law, including-- (1) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); (2) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.); and (3) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). SEC. 151. HIGH WATER-LOW WATER PREPAREDNESS. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Bypass.--The term ``bypass'' means an alternate water route adjacent to a lock and dam on a Federal inland waterway system that can be used for commercial navigation during high water conditions. (2) Emergency condition.--The term ``emergency condition'' means-- (A) unsafe conditions on a Federal inland waterway system that prevent the operation of commercial vessels, resulting from a major change in water level or flows; (B) an obstruction in a Federal inland waterway system, including silt, sediment, rock formation, or a shallow channel; (C) an impaired or inoperable Federal lock and dam; or (D) any other condition determined appropriate by the Secretary. (b) Emergency Determination.--The Secretary, in consultation with the District Commanders responsible for maintaining any Federal inland waterway system, the users of the waterway system, and the Coast Guard, may make a determination that an emergency condition exists on the waterway system. (c) Emergency Mitigation Project.-- (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and the availability of appropriations, and in accordance with all applicable Federal requirements, the Secretary may carry out an emergency mitigation project on a Federal inland waterway system with respect to which the Secretary has determined that an emergency condition exists under subsection (b), or on a bypass of such system, to remedy that emergency condition. (2) Deadline.--An emergency mitigation project under paragraph (1) shall-- (A) be initiated by not later than 60 days after the date on which the Secretary makes the applicable determination under subsection (b); and (B) to the maximum extent practicable, be completed by not later than 1 year after the date on which the Secretary makes such determination. (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2024, to remain available until expended. SEC. 152. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN BENEFITS AND COSTS. (a) In General.--In the case of a flood risk management project that incidentally generates seismic safety benefits in regions of moderate or high seismic hazard, for the purpose of a benefit-cost analysis for the project, the Secretary shall not include in that analysis any additional design and construction costs resulting from addressing seismic concerns. (b) Savings Provision.--Except with respect to the benefit- cost analysis, the additional costs referred to in subsection (a) shall be-- (1) included in the total project cost; and (2) subject to cost-share requirements otherwise applicable to the project. SEC. 153. LEASE DEVIATIONS. (a) Definition of Covered Lease Deviation.--In this section, the term ``covered lease deviation'' means a change in terms from the existing lease that requires approval from the Secretary for a lease-- (1) of Federal land within the State of Oklahoma that is associated with a water resources development project, under-- (A) section 2667 of title 10, United States Code; or (B) section 4 of the Act of December 22, 1944 (16 U.S.C. 460d); and (2) with respect to which the lessee is in good standing. (b) Deadline.--In the case of a request for a covered lease deviation-- (1) the Division Commander of the Southwestern Division shall-- (A) notify the Secretary of the request via electronic means by not later than 24 hours after receiving the request; and (B) by not later than 10 business days after the date on which the Division Commander notifies the Secretary under subparagraph (A)-- (i) make a determination approving, denying, or requesting a modification to the request; and (ii) provide to the Secretary the determination under clause (i); and (2) if the Division Commander does not make a determination under paragraph (1)(B), the Secretary shall make a determination approving, denying, or requesting a modification to the request by not later than 10 business days after the date on which the deadline described in paragraph (1)(B) expires. (c) Notification.--If the Secretary does not make a determination under subsection (b)(2) by the deadline described in that subsection, the Secretary shall submit a notification of the failure to make a determination with respect to the covered lease deviation, including the reason for the failure and a description of any outstanding issues, to-- (1) the entity seeking the covered lease deviation; (2) the members of the Oklahoma congressional delegation; (3) the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate; and (4) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives. SEC. 154. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON ARCTIC DEEP DRAFT PORT DEVELOPMENT. It is the sense of Congress that-- (1) the Arctic, as defined in section 112 of the Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-373), is a region of strategic importance to the national security and maritime transportation interests of the United States; (2) there is a compelling national, regional, Alaska Native, and private sector need for permanent maritime transportation infrastructure development and for a presence in the Arctic by the United States to assert national security interests and to support and facilitate search and rescue, shipping safety, economic development, oil spill prevention and response, subsistence and commercial fishing, the establishment of ports of refuge, Arctic research, and maritime law enforcement; (3) the Government of the Russian Federation has prioritized the development of Arctic maritime transportation capabilities and has made significant investments in military infrastructure in the Arctic, including the construction or refurbishment of 16 deepwater ports in the region; (4) is a serious concern that the closest United States strategic seaports to the Arctic are the Port of Anchorage and the Port of Tacoma, located approximately 1,500 nautical miles and 2,400 nautical miles away from the Arctic, respectively, and approximately 1,900 nautical miles and 2,800 nautical miles, respectively, from Utiagvik, Alaska; and (5) it is in the national interest to enhance existing, and develop, maritime transportation infrastructure in the Arctic, including an Arctic deep draft strategic seaport in Alaska, that would allow the Coast Guard and the Navy each to perform their respective statutory duties and functions on a permanent basis with minimal mission interruption. SEC. 155. SMALL WATER STORAGE PROJECTS. (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a program to study and construct new, or enlarge existing, small water storage projects, in partnership with a non-Federal interest. (b) Requirements.--To be eligible to participate in the program under this section, a small water storage project shall-- (1) in the case of a new small water storage project, have a water storage capacity of not less than 2,000 acre-feet and not more than 30,000 acre-feet; (2) in the case of an enlargement of an existing small water storage project, be for an enlargement of not less than 1,000 acre-feet and not more than 30,000 acre-feet; (3) provide-- (A) flood risk management benefits; (B) ecological benefits; or (C) water management, water conservation, or water supply; and (4) be-- (A) economically justified, environmentally acceptable, and technically feasible; or (B) in the case of a project providing ecological benefits, cost-effective with respect to such benefits. (c) Scope.--In carrying out the program under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to a small water storage project located in a State with a population of less than 1,000,000. (d) Expedited Projects.--For the 10-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall expedite small water storage projects under this section for which applicable Federal permitting requirements have been completed. (e) Use of Data.--In conducting a study under this section, to the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary shall-- (1) as the Secretary determines appropriate, consider and utilize any applicable hydrologic, economic, or environmental data that is prepared for a small water storage project under State law as the documentation, or part of the documentation, required to complete State water plans or other State planning documents relating to water resources management; and (2) consider information developed by the non-Federal interest in relation to another study, to the extent the Secretary determines such information is applicable, appropriate, or otherwise authorized by law. (f) Cost Share.-- (1) Study.--The Federal share of the cost of a study conducted under this section shall be-- (A) 100 percent for costs not to exceed $100,000; and [[Page H6949]] (B) 50 percent for any costs above $100,000. (2) Construction.--A small water storage project carried out under this section shall be subject to the cost-sharing requirements applicable to projects under section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213), including-- (A) municipal and industrial water supply: 100 percent non- Federal; (B) agricultural water supply: 35 percent non-Federal; and (C) recreation, including recreational navigation: 50 percent of separable costs and, in the case of any harbor or inland harbor or channel project, 50 percent of joint and separable costs allocated to recreational navigation. (g) OMRRR Responsibility.--The costs of operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement and rehabilitation for a small water storage project constructed under this section shall be the responsibility of the non-Federal interest. (h) Individual Project Limit.--Not more than $65,000,000 in Federal funds may be made available to a small water storage project under this section. (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $130,000,000 annually through fiscal year 2030. SEC. 156. PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES. In carrying out section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16), the Secretary shall provide equal priority for all mission areas of the Corps of Engineers, including water supply and water conservation. SEC. 157. FORECAST-INFORMED RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. Section 1222 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (128 Stat. 3811) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(c) Additional Utilization of Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations.-- ``(1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on any additional opportunities identified for utilizing forecast-informed reservoir operations across the United States, including an assessment of the viability of forecast-informed reservoir operations in the Upper Missouri River Basin and the North Platte River Basin. ``(2) Forecast-informed reservoir operations.-- ``(A) Authorization.--If the Secretary determines, and includes in the report submitted under paragraph (1), that forecast-informed reservoir operations are viable at a reservoir in the Upper Missouri River Basin or the North Platte River Basin, including a reservoir for which the Secretary has flood control responsibilities under section 7 of the Act of December 22, 1944 (33 U.S.C. 709), the Secretary is authorized to carry out forecast-informed reservoir operations at such reservoir. ``(B) Requirement.--Subject to the availability of appropriations, if the Secretary determines, and includes in the report submitted under paragraph (1), that forecast- informed reservoir operations are viable in the Upper Missouri River Basin or the North Platte River Basin, the Secretary shall carry out forecast-informed reservoir operations at not fewer than one reservoir in such basin.''. SEC. 158. DATA FOR WATER ALLOCATION, SUPPLY, AND DEMAND. (a) Study on Data for Water Allocation, Supply, and Demand.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary shall offer to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a study on the ability of Federal agencies to coordinate with other Federal agencies, State and local agencies, Indian Tribes, communities, universities, consortiums, councils, and other relevant entities with expertise in water resources to facilitate and coordinate the sharing among such entities of water allocation, supply, and demand data, including-- (A) any catalogs of such data; (B) definitions of any commonly used terms relating to water allocation, supply, and demand; and (C) a description of any common standards used by those entities. (2) Report.--If the National Academy of Sciences enters into an agreement under paragraph (1), to the maximum extent practicable, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the National Academy of Sciences shall submit to Congress a report that includes-- (A) the results of the study under paragraph (1); (B) recommendations for ways to streamline and make cost- effective methods for Federal agencies to coordinate interstate sharing of data, including recommendations for the development of a publicly accessible, internet-based platform that can allow entities described in paragraph (1) to communicate and coordinate ongoing data collection efforts relating to water allocation, supply, and demand, and share best practices relating to those efforts; and (C) a recommendation as to an appropriate Federal entity that should-- (i) serve as the lead coordinator for the sharing of data relating to water allocation, supply, and demand; and (ii) host and manage the internet-based platform described in subparagraph (B). (b) Data Transparency.--The Secretary shall prioritize making publicly available water resources data in the custody of the Corps of Engineers, as authorized by section 2017 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2342). (c) Funding.--From amounts otherwise appropriated or made available to the Secretary, the Secretary may make available to the National Academy of Sciences not more than $3,900,000, to be used for the review of information provided by the Corps of Engineers for purposes of a study under subsection (a). The Secretary may accept funds from another Federal agency and make such funds available to the National Academy of Sciences, to be used for the review of information provided by such agency for purposes of a study under subsection (a). SEC. 159. INLAND WATERWAYS PILOT PROGRAM. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Authorized project.--The term ``authorized project'' means a federally authorized water resources development project for navigation on the inland waterways. (2) Modernization activities.--The term ``modernization activities'' means construction or major rehabilitation activities for any authorized project. (3) Non-federal interest.--The term ``non-Federal interest'' means any public body described in section 221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)). (b) Authorization of Pilot Program.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a pilot program for modernization activities on the inland waterways system. (c) Implementation.-- (1) In general.--In carrying out the pilot program under this section, the Secretary may-- (A) accept and expend funds provided by a non-Federal interest to carry out, for an authorized project (or a separable element of an authorized project), modernization activities for such project; or (B) coordinate with the non-Federal interest in order to allow the non-Federal interest to carry out, for an authorized project (or a separable element of an authorized project), such modernization activities. (2) Number.--The Secretary shall select not more than 2 authorized projects to participate in the pilot program under paragraph (1). (3) Conditions.--Before carrying out modernization activities pursuant to paragraph (1)(B), a non-Federal interest shall-- (A) obtain any permit or approval required in connection with such activities under Federal or State law that would be required if the Secretary were to carry out such activities; and (B) ensure that a final environmental impact statement or environmental assessment, as appropriate, for such activities has been filed pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. (4) Monitoring.--For any modernization activities carried out by the non-Federal interest pursuant to this section, the Secretary shall regularly monitor and audit such activities to ensure that-- (A) the modernization activities are carried out in accordance with this section; and (B) the cost of the modernization activities is reasonable. (5) Requirements.--The requirements of section 3142 of title 40, United States Code shall apply to any modernization activities undertaken under or pursuant to this section, either by the Secretary or the non-Federal interest. (d) Agreements.-- (1) Activities carried out by non-federal interest.-- (A) In general.-- (i) Written agreement.--Before a non-Federal interest initiates modernization activities for an authorized project pursuant to this subsection (c)(1)(B), the non-Federal interest shall enter into a written agreement with the Secretary, under section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), that requires the modernization activities to be carried out in accordance with-- (I) a plan approved by the Secretary; and (II) any other terms and conditions specified by the Secretary in the agreement. (ii) Requirements.--A written agreement under clause (i) shall provide that the non-Federal interest shall comply with the same legal and technical requirements that would apply if the modernization activities were carried out by the Secretary, including all mitigation required to offset environmental impacts of the activities, as determined by the Secretary. (B) Alignment with ongoing activities.--A written agreement under subparagraph (A) shall include provisions that, to the maximum extent practicable, align modernization activities under this section with ongoing operations and maintenance activities for the applicable authorized project. (C) Indemnification.--As part of a written agreement under subparagraph (A), the non-Federal interest shall agree to hold and save the United States free from liability for any and all damage that arises from the modernization activities carried out by the non-Federal interest pursuant to this section. (2) Activities carried out by secretary.--For modernization activities to be carried out by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (c)(1)(A), the non-Federal interest shall enter into a written agreement with the Secretary, containing such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate. (e) Reimbursement.-- [[Page H6950]] (1) Authorization.--Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary may reimburse a non-Federal interest for the costs of modernization activities carried out by the non-Federal interest pursuant to an agreement entered into under subsection (d), or for funds provided to the Secretary under subsection (c)(1)(A), if-- (A) the non-Federal interest complies with the agreement entered into under subsection (d); and (B) with respect to modernization activities carried out by the non-Federal interest pursuant to the agreement, the Secretary determines that the non-Federal interest complied with all applicable Federal requirements in carrying out the modernization activities. (2) Limitation.--The Secretary may only reimburse a non- Federal interest under paragraph (1) for costs of construction that would otherwise be paid from amounts appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury pursuant to section 102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2212). (f) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section-- (1) affects the responsibility of the Secretary for the operations and maintenance of the inland waterway system, as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act, including the responsibility of the Secretary for the operations and maintenance costs for any covered project after the modernization activities are completed pursuant to this section; (2) prohibits or prevents the use of Federal funds for operations and maintenance of the inland waterway system or any authorized project within the inland waterway system; or (3) prohibits or prevents the use of Federal funds for construction or major rehabilitation activities within the inland waterway system or for any authorized project within the inland waterway system. (g) Notification.--If a non-Federal interest notifies the Secretary that the non-Federal interest intends to carry out modernization activities for an authorized project, or separable element thereof, pursuant to this section, the Secretary shall provide written notice to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives concerning the intent of the non-Federal interest. (h) Sunset.-- (1) In general.--The authority of the Secretary to enter into an agreement under this section shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act. (2) Reimbursement eligibility.--The termination of authority under paragraph (1) shall not extinguish the eligibility of a non-Federal interest to seek reimbursement under subsection (e). SEC. 160. DEFINITION OF ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY. (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidance defining the term ``economically disadvantaged community'' for the purposes of this Act and the amendments made by this Act. (b) Considerations.--In defining the term ``economically disadvantaged community'' under subsection (a), the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, utilize the criteria under paragraph (1) or (2) of section 301(a) of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3161), to the extent that such criteria are applicable in relation to the development of water resources development projects. (c) Public Comment.--In developing the guidance under subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide notice and an opportunity for public comment. SEC. 161. STUDIES OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS. (a) In General.--Section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a)-- (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``, or, upon the written approval of the Secretary that the modifications are consistent with the authorized purposes of the project, undertake a feasibility study on modifications to a water resources development project constructed by the Corps of Engineers,'' after ``water resources development project''; and (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``for feasibility studies'' and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting ``for the formulation of feasibility studies of water resources development projects undertaken by non- Federal interests to-- ``(A) ensure that any feasibility study with respect to which the Secretary submits an assessment to Congress under subsection (c) complies with all of the requirements that would apply to a feasibility study undertaken by the Secretary; and ``(B) provide sufficient information for the formulation of the studies, including processes and procedures related to reviews and assistance under subsection (e).''; (2) in subsection (b)-- (A) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the following: ``(1) In general.--The Secretary''; and (B) by adding at the end the following: ``(2) Timing.--The Secretary may not submit to Congress an assessment of a feasibility study under this section until such time as the Secretary-- ``(A) determines that the feasibility study complies with all of the requirements that would apply to a feasibility study undertaken by the Secretary; and ``(B) completes all of the Federal analyses, reviews, and compliance processes under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), that would be required with respect to the proposed project if the Secretary had undertaken the feasibility study. ``(3) Initiation of review.-- ``(A) Request.-- ``(i) Submission.--The non-Federal interest may submit to the Secretary a request that the Secretary initiate the analyses, reviews, and compliance processes described in paragraph (2)(B) with respect to the proposed project prior to the non-Federal interest's submission of a feasibility study under subsection (a)(1). ``(ii) Effect.--Receipt by the Secretary of a request submitted under clause (i) shall be considered the receipt of a proposal or application that will lead to a major Federal action that is subject to the requirements of section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)) that would be required if the Secretary were to undertake the feasibility study. ``(B) Deadline.--Not later than 10 days after the Secretary receives a request under this paragraph, the Secretary shall begin the required analyses, reviews, and compliance processes. ``(4) Notification.--Upon receipt of a request under paragraph (3), the Secretary shall notify the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate of the request and a timeline for completion of the required analyses, reviews, and compliance processes. ``(5) Status updates.--Not later than 30 days after receiving a request under paragraph (3), and every 30 days thereafter until the Secretary submits an assessment under subsection (c) for the applicable feasibility study, the Secretary shall notify the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and the non- Federal interest of the status of the Secretary's required analyses, reviews, and compliance processes.''; and (3) in subsection (c)(1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)-- (A) by striking ``after the date of receipt of a feasibility study of a project under subsection (a)(1)'' and insert ``after the completion of review of a feasibility study under subsection (b)''; and (B) by striking ``a report'' and inserting ``an assessment''. (b) Deadline.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue revised guidelines under section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231) to implement the amendments made by this section. (c) Hold Harmless.-- (1) One-year window.--The amendments made by this section shall not apply to any feasibility study submitted to the Secretary under section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231) during the one-year period prior to the date of enactment of this section. (2) 2020 projects.--The amendments made by this section shall not apply to any project authorized by section 403 of this Act. SEC. 162. LEVERAGING FEDERAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR INCREASED WATER SUPPLY. Section 1118(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (43 U.S.C. 390b-2(i)) is amended-- (1) by striking ``The Secretary may'' and inserting the following: ``(1) Contributed funds for corps projects.--The Secretary may''; and (2) by adding at the end the following: ``(2) Contributed funds for other federal reservoir projects.--The Secretary is authorized to receive and expend funds from a non-Federal interest to formulate, review, or revise operational documents, pursuant to a proposal submitted in accordance subsection (a), for any reservoir for which the Secretary is authorized to prescribe regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control or navigation pursuant to section 7 of the Act of December 22, 1944 (33 U.S.C. 709).''. SEC. 163. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON REMOVAL OF UNAUTHORIZED, MANMADE, FLAMMABLE MATERIALS ON CORPS PROPERTY. It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary should, using existing authorities, prioritize the removal, from facilities and lands of the Corps of Engineers in regions that are urban and arid, of materials that are manmade, flammable, unauthorized to be present, and determined by the Secretary to pose a fire risk that is a threat to public safety. SEC. 164. ENHANCED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. (a) In General.--The Secretary shall review the master plan and shoreline management plan for any lake described in section 3134 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1142; 130 Stat. 1671) for the purpose of identifying structures or other improvements that are owned by the Secretary and are suitable for enhanced development, if-- [[Page H6951]] (1) the master plan and shoreline management plan of the lake have been updated since January 1, 2013; and (2) the applicable district office of the Corps of Engineers has received a written request for such a review from any entity. (b) Definition of Enhanced Development.--In this section, the term ``enhanced development'' means the use, for non- water-dependent commercial or hospitality industry purposes or for residential or recreational purposes, of an existing structure or other improvement. (c) Divestment Authority.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall-- (1) submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report that identifies-- (A) any structure or other improvement owned by the Secretary that-- (i) has been identified as suitable for enhanced development pursuant to subsection (a); (ii) the Secretary determines the divestment of which would not adversely affect the Corps of Engineers operation of the lake at which the structure or other improvement is located; and (iii) a non-Federal interest has offered to purchase from the Secretary; and (B) the fair market value of any structure or other improvement identified under subparagraph (A); and (2) develop a plan to divest any structure or other improvement identified under paragraph (1)(A), at fair market value, to the applicable non-Federal interest. SEC. 165. CONTINUING AUTHORITY PROGRAMS. (a) Pilot Program for Continuing Authority Projects in Small or Disadvantaged Communities.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall implement a pilot program, in accordance with this subsection, for carrying out a project under a continuing authority program for an economically disadvantaged community. (2) Participation in pilot program.--In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall-- (A) publish a notice in the Federal Register that requests non-Federal interest proposals for a project under a continuing authority program for an economically disadvantaged community; and (B) review such proposals and select a total of 10 projects, taking into consideration geographic diversity among the selected projects. (3) Cost share.--Notwithstanding the cost share authorized for the applicable continuing authority program, the Federal share of the cost of a project selected under paragraph (2) shall be 100 percent. (4) Sunset.--The authority to commence pursuant to this subsection a project selected under paragraph (2) shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act. (5) Continuing authority program defined.--In this subsection, the term ``continuing authority program'' has the meaning given that term in section 7001(c)(1)(D) of Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d). (b) Authorizations of Appropriations.-- (1) Emergency streambank and shoreline protection.-- Notwithstanding section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out such section $25,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024. (2) Storm and hurricane restoration and impact minimization program.--Notwithstanding section 3(c) of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g(c)), there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out such section $38,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024. (3) Small river and harbor improvement projects.-- Notwithstanding section 107(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(a)), there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out such section $63,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024. (4) Regional sediment management.--Notwithstanding section 204(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326(g)), there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out such section $63,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024. (5) Small flood control projects.--Notwithstanding section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out such section $69,250,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024. (6) Aquatic ecosystem restoration.--Notwithstanding section 206(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330(f)), there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out such section $63,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024. (7) Removal of obstructions; clearing channels.-- Notwithstanding section 2 of the Act of August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g), there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out such section $8,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024. (8) Project modifications for improvement of environment.-- Notwithstanding section 1135(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(h)), there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out such section $50,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024. TITLE II--STUDIES AND REPORTS SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPOSED FEASIBILITY STUDIES. (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct a feasibility study for the following projects for water resources development and conservation and other purposes, as identified in the reports titled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development'' submitted to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by Congress: (1) Sulphur river, arkansas and texas.--Project for ecosystem restoration, Sulphur River, Arkansas and Texas. (2) Cable creek, california.--Project for flood risk management, water supply, and related benefits, Cable Creek, California. (3) Oroville dam, california.--Project for dam safety improvements, Oroville Dam, California. (4) Rio hondo channel, california.--Project for ecosystem restoration, Rio Hondo Channel, San Gabriel River, California. (5) Shingle creek and kissimmee river, florida.--Project for ecosystem restoration and water storage, Shingle Creek and Kissimmee River, Osceola County, Florida. (6) St. john's river and lake jesup, florida.--Project for ecosystem restoration, St. John's River and Lake Jesup, Florida. (7) Chicago area waterways system, illinois.--Project for ecosystem restoration, recreation, and other purposes, Illinois River, Chicago River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, Little Calumet River, and other waterways in the vicinity of Chicago, Illinois. (8) Fox river, illinois.--Project for flood risk management, Fox River, Illinois. (9) Lower missouri river, kansas.--Project for bank stabilization and navigation, Lower Missouri River, Sioux City, Kansas. (10) Tangipahoa parish, louisiana.--Project for flood risk management, Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana. (11) Newbury and newburyport, massachusetts.--Project for coastal storm risk management, Newbury and Newburyport, Massachusetts. (12) Escatawpa river basin, mississippi.--Project for flood risk management and ecosystem restoration, Escatawpa River, Jackson County, Mississippi. (13) Long beach, bay st. louis and mississippi sound, mississippi.--Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction and flood risk management, Long Beach, Bay St. Louis and Mississippi Sound, Mississippi. (14) Tallahoma and tallahala creeks, mississippi.--Project for flood risk management, Leaf River, Jones County, Mississippi. (15) Lower missouri river, missouri.--Project for navigation, Lower Missouri River, Missouri. (16) Lower osage river basin, missouri.--Project for ecosystem restoration, Lower Osage River Basin, Missouri. (17) Wyatt, missouri.--Project for flood risk management, P. Fields Pump Station, Wyatt, Missouri. (18) Upper basin and stony brook (green brook sub-basin), raritan river basin, new jersey.--Reevaluation of the Upper Basin and Stony Brook portions of the project for flood control, Green Brook Sub-basin, Raritan River Basin, New Jersey, authorized by section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4119), including the evaluation of nonstructural measures to achieve the project purpose. (19) Wading river creek, new york.--Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, flood risk management, navigation, and ecosystem restoration, Wading River Creek, New York. (20) Lower columbia river basin (turning basin), oregon and washington.--Project to improve and add turning basins for the project for navigation, Columbia River Channel, Oregon and Washington, authorized by section 101(b)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 280). (21) Williamsport, pennsylvania.--Project for flood risk management and levee rehabilitation, greater Williamsport, Pennsylvania. (22) City of charleston, south carolina.--Project for tidal- and inland-related flood risk management, Charleston, South Carolina. (23) Chocolate bayou, texas.--Project for flood risk management, Chocolate Bayou, Texas. (24) Houston-galveston, texas.--Project for navigation, Houston-Galveston, Texas. (25) Port arthur and orange county, texas.--Project for flood risk management, Port Arthur and Orange County, Texas, including construction of improvements to interior drainage. (26) Port of victoria, texas.--Project for flood risk management, Port of Victoria, Texas. (27) Virginia beach and vicinity, virginia and north carolina.--Project for coastal storm risk management, Virginia Beach and vicinity, Virginia and North Carolina. (b) Special Rule.--The Secretary shall consider any study carried out by the Secretary to formulate the project for flood risk management, Port Arthur and Orange County, Texas, identified in subsection (a)(25) to be a continuation of the study carried out for Sabine Pass to Galveston Bay, Texas, authorized by a resolution of the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, approved June 23, 2004, and funded by title IV of division B of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, under the heading ``CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL-- DEPARTMENT OF [[Page H6952]] THE ARMY--CONSTRUCTION'' (Public Law 115-123; 132 Stat. 76). SEC. 202. EXPEDITED COMPLETIONS. (a) Feasibility Reports.--The Secretary shall expedite the completion of a feasibility study for each of the following projects, and if the Secretary determines that the project is justified in a completed report, may proceed directly to preconstruction planning, engineering, and design of the project: (1) Project for navigation, Florence, Alabama. (2) Project to modify the project for navigation, Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, and Tennessee. (3) Project for shoreline stabilization, Aunu`u Harbor, American Samoa. (4) Project for shoreline stabilization, Tutuila Island, American Samoa. (5) Project for flood risk management, Lower Santa Cruz River, Arizona. (6) Project for flood risk management, Rio de Flag, Arizona. (7) Project for flood risk management, Tonto Creek, Gila River, Arizona. (8) Project for flood control, water conservation, and related purposes, Coyote Valley Dam, California. (9) Project for shoreline stabilization, Del Mar Bluffs, San Diego County, California, carried out pursuant to the resolution of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives adopted on April 22, 1999 (docket number 2598). (10) Project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, Del Rosa Channel, city of San Bernardino, California. (11) Project for flood risk management, Lower Cache Creek, California. (12) Project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, Mission-Zanja Channel, cities of San Bernardino and Redlands, California. (13) Project for flood risk management, Napa, California. (14) Project for shoreline protection, Oceanside, California, authorized pursuant to section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2636; 121 Stat. 1176). (15) Project for ecosystem restoration and water conservation, Prado Basin, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties, California. (16) Project for water conservation and water supply, Redbank and Fancher Creeks, California. (17) Project for coastal storm damage reduction, San Diego County shoreline, California. (18) Project to modify the project for navigation, San Francisco Bay to Stockton, California. (19) Project for flood risk management, San Francisquito Creek, California. (20) Project to modify the Seven Oaks Dam, California, portion of the project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem, California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113; 101 Stat. 1329-111; 104 Stat. 4611; 110 Stat. 3713; 121 Stat. 1115), to include water conservation as an authorized purpose. (21) Project for coastal storm damage reduction, Southern California. (22) Project for water storage, Halligan Dam, Colorado. (23) Project for flood risk management, East Hartford Levee System, Connecticut. (24) Project for flood risk management, Fairfield and New Haven Counties, Connecticut. (25) Project for navigation, Guilford Harbor and Sluice Channel, Connecticut. (26) Project for flood risk management, Hartford Levee System, Connecticut. (27) Project for ecosystem restoration, Central and Southern Florida Project Canal 111 (C-111), South Dade County, Florida. (28) Project for ecosystem restoration, Lake Okeechobee, Florida. (29) Project for ecosystem restoration, Western Everglades, Florida. (30) Project for flood risk management, Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii. (31) Project for flood risk management, Wailupe Stream, Oahu, Hawaii. (32) Project for flood risk management, Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii, being carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s). (33) Project for comprehensive hurricane and storm damage risk reduction and shoreline erosion protection, Chicago, Illinois, authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664; 113 Stat. 302). (34) Project for flood risk management, Wheaton, DuPage County, Illinois. (35) Project for flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, and recreation, Blue River Basin, Kansas City, Kansas, carried out pursuant to the resolution of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives adopted on September 24, 2008 (docket number 2803). (36) Project for flood control, Amite River and Tributaries east of the Mississippi River, Louisiana. (37) Project for coastal storm risk management, Upper Barataria Basin, Louisiana. (38) Project for navigation, Kent Narrows and Chester River, Queen Anne's County, Maryland. (39) Project to replace the Bourne and Sagamore Bridges, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. (40) Project for flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, and recreation, Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota, carried out pursuant to the resolution of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives adopted on September 25, 2002 (docket number 2705). (41) Project to deepen the project for navigation, Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4094). (42) Project for navigation, Shark River, New Jersey. (43) Project for navigation, Goldsmith Inlet, New York. (44) Project for navigation, Lake Montauk Harbor, New York. (45) Project for rehabilitation of Lock E-32, Erie Canal, Pittsford, New York. (46) Project for navigation and shoreline stabilization, Reel Point Preserve, New York, carried out pursuant to the resolution of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives adopted on May 2, 2007 (docket number 2775). (47) Project for flood risk management, Rondout Creek- Wallkill River Watershed, New York, carried out pursuant to the resolution of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives adopted on May 2, 2007 (docket number 2776). (48) Project for ecosystem restoration and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Spring Creek South (Howard Beach), Queens, New York. (49) Project for ecosystem restoration, Hood River at the confluence with the Columbia River, Oregon. (50) Project to resolve increased silting and shoaling adjacent to the Federal channel, Port of Bandon, Coquille River, Oregon. (51) Project for flood control, 42nd Street Levee, Springfield, Oregon, being carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s). (52) Project for construction of Tribal housing authorized by title IV of Public Law 100-581 (102 Stat. 2944), Oregon and Washington. (53) Project for flood risk management, Dorchester County, South Carolina. (54) Project for navigation, Georgetown Harbor, South Carolina. (55) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. (56) Project to modify the projects for navigation and other purposes, Old Hickory Lock and Dam and the Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir, Cumberland River, Tennessee, authorized by the Act of July 24, 1946 (chapter 595, 60 Stat. 636), to add flood risk management as an authorized purpose. (57) Project for flood risk management, Buffalo Bayou, Texas. (58) Project for flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, water supply, and related purposes, Lower Rio Grande River, Cameron County, Texas, carried out pursuant to the resolution of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives adopted on May 21, 2003 (docket number 2710). (59) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction and shoreline erosion protection, Bolongo Bay, St. Thomas, United States Virgin Islands. (60) Project for water supply and ecosystem restoration, Howard Hanson Dam, Washington. (61) Project for ecosystem restoration, Puget Sound, Washington. (62) Project for navigation, Seattle Harbor, Washington. (63) Project for navigation, Tacoma Harbor, Washington. (64) Project for dam safety remediation, Bluestone Dam, West Virginia. (65) Project to modify the project for navigation, Milwaukee Harbor, Wisconsin. (b) Post-authorization Change Reports.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of a post-authorization change report for the following projects: (1) Project for ecosystem restoration, Tres Rios, Arizona. (2) Project for flood risk management, Des Moines Levee System, including Birdland Park Levee, Des Moines and Raccoon Rivers, Des Moines, Iowa. (c) Watershed and River Basin Assessments.--The Secretary shall expedite the completion of an assessment under section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a) for the following: (1) Kansas River Basin, Kansas. (2) Merrimack River Basin, Massachusetts. (3) Pascagoula River Basin, Mississippi. (4) Tuscarawas River Basin, Ohio. (5) Lower Fox River Basin, Wisconsin. (6) Upper Fox River Basin and Wolf River Basin, Wisconsin. (d) Disposition Studies.--The Secretary shall expedite the completion of a disposition study, carried out under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a), for the project for Salinas Reservoir (Santa Margarita Lake), California. (e) Reallocation Studies.--The Secretary shall expedite the completion of a study for the reallocation of water supply storage, carried out in accordance with section 301 of the Water Supply Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b), for the following: (1) Aquilla Lake, Texas. (2) Lake Whitney, Texas. (f) Economic Reevaluation Report.--The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the economic reevaluation report for the navigation and sustainability program carried out pursuant to title VIII of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 652 note). [[Page H6953]] SEC. 203. EXPEDITED MODIFICATIONS OF EXISTING FEASIBILITY STUDIES. (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the following feasibility studies, as modified by this section, and if the Secretary determines that a project that is the subject of the feasibility study is justified in a completed report, may proceed directly to preconstruction planning, engineering, and design of the project: (1) San francisco bay, california.--The study for flood risk reduction authorized by section 142 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2930), is modified to authorize the Secretary to-- (A) investigate the ocean shoreline of San Mateo, San Francisco, and Marin Counties for the purposes of providing flood protection against tidal and fluvial flooding; (B) with respect to the bay and ocean shorelines of San Mateo, San Francisco, and Marin Counties, investigate measures to adapt to rising sea levels; and (C) with respect to the bay and ocean shorelines, and streams running to the bay and ocean shorelines, of San Mateo, San Francisco, and Marin Counties, investigate the effects of proposed flood protection and other measures or improvements on-- (i) the local economy; (ii) habitat restoration, enhancement, or expansion efforts or opportunities; (iii) public infrastructure protection and improvement; (iv) stormwater runoff capacity and control measures, including those that may mitigate flooding; (v) erosion of beaches and coasts; and (vi) any other measures or improvements relevant to adapting to rising sea levels. (2) Sacramento river, southern sutter county, california.-- The study for flood control and allied purposes for the Sacramento River Basin, authorized by section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1197), is modified to authorize the Secretary to conduct a study for flood risk management, southern Sutter County between the Sacramento River and Sutter Bypass, California. (3) Salton sea, california.--In carrying out the program to implement projects to restore the Salton Sea, California, authorized by section 3032 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1113; 130 Stat. 1677), the Secretary is authorized to carry out a study for the construction of a perimeter lake, or a northern or southern subset thereof, for the Salton Sea, California. (4) New york and new jersey harbor and tributaries, new york and new jersey.--The study for flood and storm damage reduction for the New York and New Jersey Harbor and Tributaries project, authorized by the Act of June 15, 1955 (chapter 140, 69 Stat. 132), and being carried out pursuant to the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public Law 113-2), is modified to require the Secretary to-- (A) evaluate and address the impacts of low-frequency precipitation and sea-level rise on the study area; (B) consult with affected communities; and (C) ensure the study is carried out in accordance with section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c). (b) Considerations.--Where appropriate, the Secretary may use the authority provided by section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a) to carry out this section. SEC. 204. ASSISTANCE TO NON-FEDERAL SPONSORS; FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS. (a) Assistance to Non-Federal Sponsors.-- (1) In general.--Subject to the availability of appropriations, during the period during which a non-Federal interest may submit a proposal to be considered for inclusion in an annual report pursuant to section 7001(b) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d(b)), the Secretary is authorized to provide assistance in accordance with section 1104(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2282d note) to the non- Federal interest of a project proposal described in paragraph (2). (2) Project proposals described.--A project proposal referred to in paragraph (1) is a proposal for any of the following: (A) A feasibility study for a fish passage for ecosystem restoration, Lower Alabama River, Alabama. (B) A feasibility study for dredged material disposal management activities, Port of Florence, Alabama. (C) A feasibility study for a project for flood risk management, Sikorsky Memorial Airport, Bridgeport, Connecticut. (D) A feasibility study for a project to design and construct the Naugatuck River Greenway Trail, a multiuse trail on Federal land between Torrington and Derby, Connecticut. (E) A feasibility study for a project for coastal and flood risk management, Stratford, Connecticut. (F) A feasibility study for projects for flood risk management, Woodbridge, Connecticut. (G) The project for flood risk management, Bloomington, Indiana. (H) The project for flood risk management, Gary, Indiana. (I) Modification of the project for beach erosion and hurricane protection, Grand Isle, Louisiana, to include periodic beach nourishment. (J) A feasibility study for a project for flood risk management, Cataouatche Subbasin area of the west bank of Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. (K) A feasibility study for projects for flood risk management and storm damage reduction in the Hoey's Basin area of the east bank of Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, including a study of the ``pump to the river'' concept. (L) A feasibility study for a project for flood risk management, Hoosic River, Massachusetts. (M) Modification of the project for navigation, River Rouge, Michigan. (N) A project to extend dredging of the South Haven Harbor, Michigan, to include the former turning basin. (O) Modification of the project for flood risk management, Upper Rouge River, Wayne County, Michigan. (P) A project for aquatic and riparian ecosystem restoration, Line Creek, Riverside, Missouri. (Q) A feasibility study for projects for ecosystem restoration, Bangert Island, St. Charles, Missouri, related to channels and aquatic habitats. (R) A study of the resiliency of the Allegheny Reservoir, New York, in consultation with the Seneca Nation. (S) A feasibility study for the rehabilitation of the tainter gates and guard gate, Caughdenoy Dam, New York, including an evaluation of the rehabilitation work necessary to extend the service life of those structures, such as-- (i) improvements to the hydraulic efficiency of the gate systems; (ii) improvements to the concrete foundation and gate support structures; and (iii) any other improvements the Secretary determines to be necessary. (T) A project for repairs to the West Pier and West Barrier Bar, Little Sodus Bay Harbor, Cayuga County, New York. (U) A project for repair of a sheet pile wall and east breakwater, Great Sodus Bay, New York. (V) A feasibility study for the project for navigation, Port of Oswego, New York. (W) A feasibility study for potential projects for the rehabilitation of the Glens Falls Feeder Canal, which begins at the Feeder Dam intersection with the Hudson River in Queensbury, New York, and runs to the confluence of the Old Champlain Canal in Kingsbury, New York. (X) A feasibility study to determine whether the purchase of additional flood easements, changes in lake level management, additional levee infrastructure, or implementation of other flood risk management or containment mechanisms in the Arkansas River Basin, Oklahoma, would benefit local communities by reducing flood risks around water resources development projects of the Corps of Engineers in a range of different flood scenarios. (Y) A feasibility study on increasing the frequency and depth of dredging assistance from the Corps of Engineers at the Port of Astoria, located at the mouth of the Columbia River, Oregon. (b) Feasibility Analysis.-- (1) In general.--Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary is authorized to review a project proposal described in paragraph (2) and issue a report to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives on whether a modification to the project that is the subject of the proposal is necessary and recommended to carry out the authorized purposes of such project. (2) Project proposals described.--A project proposal referred to in paragraph (1) is a proposal to modify any of the following: (A) The project for environmental infrastructure, City of Sheffield, Alabama, authorized pursuant to section 219(f)(78) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1258; 130 Stat. 1687). (B) The project for environmental infrastructure, Calaveras County, California, under section 219(f)(86) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1259). (C) The project for environmental infrastructure, Charlotte County, Florida, authorized by section 219(f)(121) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1261). (D) The Mississippi River and Tributaries project authorized by the first section of the Act of May 15, 1928 (33 U.S.C. 702a), to include the portion of the Ouachita River Levee System at and below Monroe, Louisiana, to Caldwell Parish, Louisiana. (E) The project for environmental infrastructure, Central New Mexico, authorized by section 593 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 380; 119 Stat. 2255). (F) The project for environmental infrastructure, Village of Whitehall, New York, authorized pursuant to section 542 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2671; 121 Stat. 1150). (G) The project for environmental infrastructure, Ohio and North Dakota, authorized by section 594 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 383; 121 Stat. 1140; 121 Stat. 1944). (H) The project for flood risk management and water supply, Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Oklahoma, authorized by section 4 of the Act of June 28, 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat. 1218), to modify water storage to provide for a sufficient quantity of water supply storage space in the inactive [[Page H6954]] pool storage to support the fishery downstream from Tenkiller Reservoir. (I) The project for environmental infrastructure, Athens, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(254) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). (J) The project for environmental infrastructure, Blaine, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(255) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). (K) The project for environmental infrastructure, Claiborne County, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(256) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). (L) The project for environmental infrastructure, Giles County, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(257) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). (M) The project for environmental infrastructure, Grainger County, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(258) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). (N) The project for environmental infrastructure, Hamilton County, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(259) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). (O) The project for environmental infrastructure, Harrogate, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(260) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). (P) The project for environmental infrastructure, Johnson County, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(261) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). (Q) The project for environmental infrastructure, Knoxville, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(262) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). (R) The project for environmental infrastructure, Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(264) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1268). (S) The project for environmental infrastructure, Nashville, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(263) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). (T) The project for environmental infrastructure, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(265) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1268). (U) The project for environmental infrastructure, Plateau Utility District, Morgan County, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(266) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1268). (V) The authorized funding level for critical restoration projects, Lake Champlain watershed, Vermont and New York, authorized by section 542 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2671; 121 Stat. 1150). (W) The project for environmental infrastructure, Eastern Shore and Southwest Virginia, authorized by section 219(f)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1255). SEC. 205. SELMA, ALABAMA. Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that-- (1) provides an update on the study for flood risk management and riverbank stabilization, Selma, Alabama, authorized by resolutions of the Committees on Public Works and Rivers and Harbors of the House of Representatives on June 7, 1961, and April 28, 1936, respectively, the completion of which the Secretary was required to expedite by section 1203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3803); and (2) identifies project alternatives necessary to-- (A) assure the preservation of cultural and historic values associated with national historic landmarks within the study area; and (B) provide flood risk management for economically disadvantaged communities within the study area. SEC. 206. REPORT ON CORPS OF ENGINEERS FACILITIES IN APPALACHIA. (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in collaboration with the Appalachian Regional Commission established by section 14301(a) of title 40, United States Code, shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report that identifies each Corps of Engineers facility that-- (1) is located within a distressed county or an at-risk county (as designated by the Appalachian Regional Commission pursuant to subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 14526(a)(1), of title 40, United States Code), including in counties that are experiencing high unemployment or job loss; and (2) could be improved for purposes of economic development, recreation, or other uses. (b) Hydropower Facilities.-- (1) Identification of potential hydropower development.-- The Secretary shall include in the report submitted under subsection (a) the identification of any existing nonpowered dams, located within a distressed county or an at-risk county, with the potential to be used to test, evaluate, pilot, demonstrate, or deploy hydropower or energy storage technologies. (2) Information.--In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary may use any information developed pursuant to section 1206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3806). (3) Coordination.--In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall coordinate with any relevant National Laboratories. SEC. 207. ADDITIONAL STUDIES UNDER NORTH ATLANTIC COAST COMPREHENSIVE STUDY. (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a study to determine the feasibility of a project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction for any major metropolitan area located in the study area for the comprehensive study authorized under the heading ``Department of the Army--Corps of Engineers--Civil--Investigations'' under the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public Law 113-2) that was not included in a high-risk focus area identified in the study. (b) Treatment.--A study carried out under subsection (a) shall be considered to be a continuation of the comprehensive study described in that subsection. SEC. 208. SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL STUDY. Section 1204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1685) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(d) Annual Reports.--Not later than 180 days after the enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020, and not less frequently than annually thereafter until 2025, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the status of the study under subsection (a), on a State-by-State basis, including information on the engagement of the Corps of Engineers with non-Federal interests, including detailed lists of all meetings and decision outcomes associated with those engagements.''. SEC. 209. COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER, YOLO BYPASS, CALIFORNIA. (a) Comprehensive Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study of the Sacramento River in the vicinity of the Yolo Bypass System, California, to identify actions to be undertaken by the Secretary for the comprehensive management of the Yolo Bypass System for the purposes of flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, water supply, hydropower, and recreation. (b) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.-- (1) Consultation.--In conducting the comprehensive study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with the Governor of the State of California, applicable Federal, State, and local agencies, non-Federal interests, the Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough Partnership, and other stakeholders. (2) Use of existing data and prior studies.--To the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, the Secretary may-- (A) make use of existing data provided to the Secretary by the entities identified in paragraph (1); and (B) incorporate-- (i) relevant information from prior studies and projects carried out by the Secretary within the study area; and (ii) the latest technical data and scientific approaches to changing hydrologic and climatic conditions. (c) Recommendations.-- (1) In general.--In conducting the comprehensive study under subsection (a), the Secretary may develop a recommendation to Congress for-- (A) the construction of a water resources development project; (B) the structural or operational modification of an existing water resources development project; (C) additional monitoring of, or adaptive management measures to carry out with respect to, existing water resources development projects, to respond to changing hydrologic and climatic conditions; or (D) geographic areas within the Yolo Bypass System for additional study by the Secretary. (2) Additional considerations.--Any feasibility study carried out pursuant to a recommendation under paragraph (1)(D) shall be considered to be a continuation of the comprehensive study authorized under subsection (a). (d) Completion of Study; Report to Congress.--Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report detailing-- (1) the results of the comprehensive study conducted under subsection (a), including any recommendations developed under subsection (c); (2) any additional, site-specific areas within the Yolo Bypass System where additional study for flood risk management or ecosystem restoration projects is recommended by the Secretary; and (3) any interim actions relating to existing water resources development projects undertaken by the Secretary during the study period. [[Page H6955]] (e) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Yolo bypass system.--The term ``Yolo Bypass System'' means the system of weirs, levees, bypass structures, and other water resources development projects in California's Sacramento River Valley, extending from the Fremont Weir near Woodland, California, to the Sacramento River near Rio Vista, California, authorized pursuant to section 2 of the Act of March 1, 1917 (chapter 144; 39 Stat. 949). (2) Yolo bypass and cache slough partnership.--The term ``Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough Partnership'' means the group of parties to the Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough Memorandum of Understanding, effective May 2016, regarding collaboration and cooperation in the Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough region. SEC. 210. LAKE OKEECHOBEE REGULATION SCHEDULE, FLORIDA. (a) In General.--In carrying out the review of the Lake Okeechobee regulation schedule pursuant to section 1106 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3773), the Secretary shall-- (1) evaluate the implications of prohibiting releases from Lake Okeechobee through the S-308 and S-80 lock and dam structures, and evaluate separately the implications of prohibiting high volume releases through the S-77, S-78, and S-79 lock and dam structures, on the operation of the lake in accordance with authorized purposes and seek to minimize unnecessary releases to coastal estuaries; and (2) to the maximum extent practicable, coordinate with the ongoing efforts of Federal and State agencies responsible for monitoring, forecasting, and notification of cyanobacteria levels in Lake Okeechobee. (b) Monthly Report.--Each month, the Secretary shall make public a report, which may be based on the Water Management Daily Operational Reports, disclosing the volumes of water deliveries to or discharges from Lake Okeechobee & Vicinity, Water Conservation Area I, Water Conservation Area II, Water Conservation Area III, East Coast Canals, and the South Dade Conveyance. Such report shall be aggregated and reported in a format designed for the general public, using maps or other widely understood communication tools. (c) Effect.--In carrying out the evaluation under subsection (a)(1), nothing shall be construed to authorize any new purpose for the management of Lake Okeechobee or authorize the Secretary to affect any existing authorized purpose, including flood protection and management of Lake Okeechobee to provide water supply for all authorized users. SEC. 211. GREAT LAKES COASTAL RESILIENCY STUDY. (a) In General.--In carrying out the comprehensive assessment of water resources needs for the Great Lakes System under section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a), as required by section 1219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3811), the Secretary shall-- (1) taking into account recent high lake levels within the Great Lakes, assess and make recommendations to Congress on-- (A) coastal storm and flood risk management measures, including measures that use natural features and nature-based features, as those terms are defined in section 1184 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a); (B) operation and maintenance of the Great Lakes Navigation System, as such term is defined in section 210 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238); (C) ecosystem protection and restoration; (D) the prevention and control of invasive species and the effects of invasive species; and (E) recreation associated with water resources development projects; (2) prioritize actions necessary to protect critical public infrastructure, communities, and critical natural or cultural resources; and (3) to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, utilize existing data provided to the Secretary by Federal and State agencies, Indian Tribes, and other stakeholders, including data obtained through other Federal programs. (b) Recommendations; Additional Study.-- (1) In general.--In carrying out the comprehensive assessment described in subsection (a), the Secretary may make a recommendation to Congress for-- (A) the construction of a water resources development project; (B) the structural or operational modification of an existing water resources development project; (C) additional monitoring of, or adaptive management measures to carry out with respect to, existing water resources development projects, to respond to changing hydrologic and climatic conditions; or (D) geographic areas within the Great Lakes System for additional study by the Secretary. (2) Focus areas.--In addition to carrying out subsection (a), to contribute to the comprehensive assessment described in such subsection, the Secretary is authorized to conduct feasibility studies for-- (A) the project for coastal storm resiliency, Lake Ontario shoreline, New York; and (B) the project for coastal storm resiliency, Chicago shoreline, Illinois. (3) Additional considerations.--Any feasibility study carried out pursuant to this subsection, including pursuant to a recommendation under paragraph (1)(D), shall be considered to be a continuation of the comprehensive assessment described in subsection (a). (c) Exemption From Maximum Study Cost and Duration Limitations.--Section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c) shall not apply to any study recommended under subsection (b)(1)(D) or carried out pursuant to subsection (b)(2). SEC. 212. REPORT ON THE STATUS OF RESTORATION IN THE LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA. Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task Force established by section 7004 of Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1272) shall submit to Congress a report that summarizes the activities and recommendations of the Task Force, including-- (1) policies, strategies, plans, programs, projects, and activities undertaken for addressing conservation, protection, restoration, and maintenance of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem; and (2) financial participation by each agency represented on the Task Force in conserving, protecting, restoring, and maintaining the coastal Louisiana ecosystem. SEC. 213. LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT STUDY. (a) Comprehensive Study.-- (1) Purpose.--The Secretary, in collaboration with the heads of other relevant Federal agencies and pursuant to subsection (d)(1)(A), shall conduct a comprehensive study of the Lower Mississippi River basin, from Cape Girardeau, Missouri, to the Gulf of Mexico, to identify recommendations of actions to be undertaken by the Secretary, under existing authorities or after congressional authorization, for the comprehensive management of the basin for the purposes of-- (A) hurricane and storm damage reduction, flood risk management, structural and nonstructural flood control, and floodplain management strategies; (B) navigation; (C) ecosystem and environmental restoration; (D) water supply; (E) hydropower production; (F) recreation; and (G) other purposes as determined by the Secretary. (2) Development.--In conducting the comprehensive study under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall investigate-- (A) the construction of new water resources development projects; (B) structural and operational modifications to completed water resources development projects within the study area; (C) projects proposed in the comprehensive coastal protection master plan entitled ``Louisiana's Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast'', prepared by the State of Louisiana and accepted by the Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority (including any subsequent amendments or revisions), including-- (i) Ama sediment diversion; (ii) Union freshwater diversion; (iii) increase Atchafalaya flow to Terrebonne; and (iv) Manchac Landbridge diversion; (D) natural features and nature-based features, including levee setbacks and instream and floodplain restoration; (E) fish and wildlife habitat resources, including in the Mississippi Sound Estuary, the Lake Pontchartrain Basin, the Breton Sound, the Barataria Basin, the Terrebonne Basin, the Atchafalaya Basin, the Vermilion-Teche Basin, and other outlets of the Mississippi River and Tributaries project; (F) mitigation of adverse impacts from operations of flood control structures to the Mississippi Sound Estuary, the Lake Pontchartrain Basin, the Breton Sound, the Barataria Basin, the Atchafalaya Basin, and other outlets of the Mississippi River and Tributaries project; (G) the effects of dredging and river-bottom elevation changes on drainage efficiency; (H) the economic impacts of existing practices, including such impacts on coastal resources; (I) monitoring requirements, including as near-real time monitoring as practicable, and adaptive management measures to respond to changing conditions over time; (J) the division of responsibilities among the Federal Government and non-Federal interests with respect to the purposes described in paragraph (1); and (K) other matters, as determined by the Secretary. (b) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--In conducting the comprehensive study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with applicable Federal, State, and local agencies, Indian Tribes, non-Federal interests, and other stakeholders, and, to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, make use of existing data provided to the Secretary by such entities or from any relevant multistate monitoring programs. (c) Recommendations.--In conducting the comprehensive study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall develop actionable recommendations to Congress, including for-- [[Page H6956]] (1) the construction of new water resources development projects to improve the maximum effective river resource use and control; (2) the structural or operational modification of completed water resources development projects; (3) such additional monitoring of, or adaptive management measures to carry out with respect to, completed water resources development projects, to respond to changing conditions; (4) improving the efficiency of operational and maintenance dredging within the study area; (5) whether changes are necessary to the Mississippi River and Tributaries project within the study area; (6) other Federal and non-Federal action, where appropriate; and (7) follow-up studies and data collection and monitoring to be carried out by the relevant Federal or State agency. (d) Completion of Study; Report to Congress.-- (1) Annual reports.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter until the final report under paragraph (2) is submitted, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report detailing-- (A) any interim actions relating to water resources development projects within the study area undertaken by the Secretary under existing authority; and (B) any recommendations developed under subsection (c). (2) Final report.--Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a final report detailing the results of the comprehensive study required by this section, including the recommendations developed under subsection (c). (3) Application of certain requirements.--Section 1001(a) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c(a)) shall not apply to the study carried out by the Secretary under this section. (e) Further Analysis.-- (1) In general.--In conducting the comprehensive study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall carry out activities in geographic areas that warrant additional analysis by the Corps of Engineers, including feasibility studies. (2) Treatment.--A feasibility study carried out under paragraph (1) shall be considered to be a continuation of the comprehensive study conducted under subsection (a). (f) Requirements.--The comprehensive study conducted under subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with the authorities for the Mississippi River and Tributaries project. (g) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Mississippi river and tributaries project.--The term ``Mississippi River and Tributaries project'' means the Mississippi River and Tributaries project authorized by the first section of the Act of May 15, 1928 (33 U.S.C. 702a). (2) Natural feature; nature-based feature.--The terms ``natural feature'' and ``nature-based feature'' have the meanings given those terms in section 1184 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a). (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000, to remain available until expended. (i) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this section shall delay or interfere with, or be construed as grounds for enjoining construction of, authorized projects within the study area. SEC. 214. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. (a) Assessment.--The Secretary shall conduct an assessment of the water resources needs of the Upper Mississippi River under section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a). (b) Requirements.--The Secretary shall carry out the assessment under subsection (a) in accordance with the requirements in section 1206(b) of Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1686). SEC. 215. UPPER MISSOURI RIVER BASIN MAINSTEM DAM FISH LOSS RESEARCH. (a) In General.--Pursuant to section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16), the Secretary shall conduct research on the management of fish losses through the mainstem dams of the Missouri River Basin during periods of high flow. (b) Contents.--The research conducted under subsection (a) shall include an examination of-- (1) the effects of high flow rates through Upper Missouri River Basin mainstem dam outlet works on fish passage; (2) options used by other Corps of Engineers district offices to mitigate fish losses through dams; and (3) the feasibility of implementing fish loss mitigation options in the Upper Missouri River Basin mainstem dams, based on similar ongoing studies. (c) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report recommending a plan to address fish losses through mainstem dams in the Upper Missouri River Basin. SEC. 216. LOWER AND UPPER MISSOURI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD PROTECTION. (a) Additional Studies for Lower Missouri River Basin.-- (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), upon the request of the non-Federal interest for the Lower Missouri Basin study, the Secretary shall expand the scope of such study to investigate and provide recommendations relating to-- (A) modifications to projects in Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, and Missouri authorized under the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (authorized by section 9(b) of the Act of December 22, 1944 (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 891)) and the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation project (authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (chapter 19, 59 Stat. 19)), including modifications to the authorized purposes of such projects to further flood risk management and resiliency; and (B) modifications to non-Federal, publicly owned levees in the Lower Missouri River Basin. (2) Exception.--If the Secretary determines that expanding the scope of the Lower Missouri Basin study as provided in paragraph (1) is not practicable, and the non-Federal interest for such study concurs in such determination, the Secretary shall carry out such additional studies as are necessary to investigate the modifications described in paragraph (1). (3) Continuation of lower missouri basin study.--The following studies shall be considered a continuation of the Lower Missouri Basin study: (A) Any additional study carried out under paragraph (2). (B) Any study recommended to be carried out in a report that the Chief of Engineers prepares for the Lower Missouri Basin study. (C) Any study recommended to be carried out in a report that the Chief of Engineers prepares for an additional study carried out under paragraph (2). (D) Any study spun off from the Lower Missouri Basin study before the completion of such study. (E) Any study spun off from an additional study carried out under paragraph (2) before the completion of such additional study. (4) Reliance on existing information.--In carrying out any study described in or authorized by this subsection, the Secretary, to the extent practicable, shall rely on existing data and analysis, including data and analysis prepared under section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16). (5) Consideration; consultation.--In developing recommendations under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall-- (A) consider the use of-- (i) structural and nonstructural measures, including the setting back of levees and removing structures from areas of recurring flood vulnerability, where advantageous, to reduce flood risk and damages in the Lower Missouri River Basin; and (ii) where such features are locally acceptable, natural features or nature-based features (as such terms are defined in section 1184 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a); and (B) consult with applicable Federal and State agencies, Indian Tribes, and other stakeholders within the Lower Missouri River Basin and solicit public comment on such recommendations. (6) Exemption from maximum study cost and duration limitations.--Section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c) shall not apply to the Lower Missouri Basin study or any study described in paragraph (3). (7) Preconstruction, engineering, and design.--Upon completion of a study authorized by this subsection, if the Secretary determines that a recommended project, or modification to a project described in paragraph (1), is justified, the Secretary may proceed directly to preconstruction planning, engineering, and design of the project or modification. (8) Technical assistance.-- (A) In general.--For the provision of technical assistance to support small communities and economically disadvantaged communities in the planning and design of flood risk management and flood risk resiliency projects in the Lower Missouri River Basin, for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2026, there are authorized to be appropriated-- (i) $2,000,000 to carry out section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a), in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to carry out such section; and (ii) $2,000,000 to carry out section 22(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16), in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to carry out such section. (B) Conditions.-- (i) Limitations not applicable.--The limitations on the use of funds in section 206(d) of the Flood Control Act of 1960 and section 22(c)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 shall not apply to the amounts authorized to be appropriated by subparagraph (A). (ii) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this paragraph restricts the authority of the [[Page H6957]] Secretary to use any funds otherwise appropriated to carry out section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 or section 22(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 to provide technical assistance described in subparagraph (A). (9) Completion of study; report to congress.--Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report detailing-- (A) the results of the study authorized by this subsection; (B) any additional, site-specific areas within the Lower Missouri River Basin for which additional study for flood risk management projects is recommended by the Secretary; and (C) any interim actions relating to existing water resources development projects in the Lower Missouri River Basin undertaken by the Secretary during the study period. (10) Definitions.--In this subsection: (A) Lower missouri basin study.--The term ``Lower Missouri Basin study'' means the Lower Missouri Basin Flood Risk and Resiliency Study, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, and Missouri, authorized pursuant to section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a). (B) Small community.--The term ``small community'' means a local government that serves a population of less than 15,000. (b) Upper Missouri River Basin Comprehensive Study.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary, in collaboration with the heads of other relevant Federal agencies, shall conduct a comprehensive study to address flood risk in areas affected by severe flooding in 2019 along the Upper Missouri River, including an examination of-- (A) the use of structural and nonstructural flood control and floodplain management strategies, including the consideration of natural features or nature-based features (as such terms are defined in section 1184 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a); (B) continued operation and maintenance of the navigation project; (C) management of bank caving and erosion; (D) maintenance of water supply; (E) fish and wildlife habitat management; (F) recreation needs; (G) environmental restoration needs; (H) the division of responsibilities of the Federal Government and non-Federal interests with respect to Missouri River flooding; (I) the roles and responsibilities of Federal agencies with respect to Missouri River flooding; and (J) any other related matters, as determined by the Secretary. (2) Recommendations.--In conducting the study under this subsection, the Secretary may develop recommendations to Congress for-- (A) the construction of a water resources development project; (B) the structural or operational modification of an existing water resources development project; (C) such additional monitoring of, or adaptive management measures to carry out with respect to, existing water resources development projects, to respond to changing conditions; (D) geographic areas within the Upper Missouri River basin for additional study by the Secretary; (E) management plans and actions to be carried out by the responsible Federal agencies to reduce flood risk and improve resiliency; (F) any necessary changes to the general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin under section 4 of the Act of June 28, 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat. 1218; 58 Stat. 891); and (G) follow-up studies for problem areas for which data or current technology does not allow immediate solutions. (3) Completion of study; report to congress.--Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that-- (A) contains the results of the comprehensive study required by this subsection, including any recommendations developed under paragraph (2); (B) addresses-- (i) the potential for the transfer of flood risk between and within the Upper and Lower Missouri River basins with respect to any changes recommended pursuant to paragraph (2)(F); (ii) adverse impacts to navigation and other authorized purposes of the applicable Missouri River project with respect to any changes recommended under paragraph (2)(F); and (iii) whether there are opportunities for increased non- Federal management in the Upper Missouri River Basin; (C) recognizes-- (i) the interest and rights of States in-- (I) determining the development of watersheds within the borders of the State; and (II) water utilization and control; and (ii) the primary responsibilities of States and local interests in developing water supplies for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other purposes; and (D) describes any interim actions relating to existing water resources development projects in the Upper Missouri River Basin undertaken by the Secretary during the study period. (4) Consultation.--In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall consult with applicable Federal and State agencies, Indian Tribes, and other stakeholders within the Upper Missouri River Basin and solicit public comment. (5) Reliance on existing information.--In carrying out any study described in or authorized by this subsection, the Secretary, to the extent practicable, shall rely on existing data and analysis, including data and analysis prepared under section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16). (6) Exemption from maximum study cost and duration limitations.--Section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c) shall not apply to the comprehensive study carried out under this section or any feasibility study described in paragraph (7). (7) Additional considerations.--Any feasibility study carried out pursuant to a recommendation included in the report submitted under this subsection shall be considered to be a continuation of the comprehensive study required under paragraph (1). (8) Definition.--In this subsection, the term ``Missouri River project'' means a project constructed as part of-- (A) the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (authorized by section 9(b) of the Act of December 22, 1944 (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 891)), located in the States of Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, or South Dakota; (B) the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation project (authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (chapter 19, 59 Stat. 19)); or (C) a non-Federal, publicly owned levee system located within the Upper Missouri River Basin. (c) Coordination.--Upon completion of the studies under subsections (a) and (b), the Secretary shall develop a strategy that, to the maximum extent practicable, coordinates and aligns the results of such studies. SEC. 217. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER AND RYE HARBOR, NEW HAMPSHIRE. (a) Requirement to Expedite.--The Secretary shall expedite authorized activities to address the impacts of shoaling affecting the project for navigation, Rye Harbor, New Hampshire, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 480). (b) Status Update.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a written status update regarding-- (1) the activities required to be expedited under subsection (a); and (2) the project for navigation, Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1173), as required to be expedited under section 1317 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3823). SEC. 218. COUGAR AND DETROIT DAMS, WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON. (a) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make publicly available, a report providing an initial analysis of deauthorizing hydropower as a project purpose at the Cougar and Detroit Dams project. (b) Contents.--The Secretary shall include in the report submitted under subsection (a)-- (1) a description of the potential effects of deauthorizing hydropower as a project purpose at the Cougar and Detroit Dams project on-- (A) the operation of the project, including with respect to the other authorized purposes of the project; (B) compliance of the project with the Endangered Species Act; (C) costs that would be attributed to other authorized purposes of the project, including costs relating to compliance with such Act; and (D) other ongoing studies in the Willamette River Basin; and (2) identification of any further research needed. (c) Project Defined.--In this section, the terms ``Cougar and Detroit Dams project'' and ``project'' mean the Cougar Dam and Reservoir project and Detroit Dam and Reservoir project, Willamette River Basin, Oregon, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 179), and facilities that operate in conjunction with the main Detroit Dam facility, including the Big Cliff re-regulating dam. SEC. 219. PORT ORFORD, OREGON. Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, at Federal expense, submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a summary report on the research completed and data gathered by the date of enactment of this Act with regards to the configuration of a breakwater for the project for navigation, Port Orford, Oregon, authorized by section 117 of the River and Harbor [[Page H6958]] Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1822; 106 Stat. 4809), for the purposes of addressing shoaling issues to minimize long-term maintenance costs. SEC. 220. WILSON CREEK AND SLOAN CREEK, FAIRVIEW, TEXAS. Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a written status update regarding efforts to address flooding along Wilson Creek and Sloan Creek in the City of Fairview, Texas. SEC. 221. STUDY ON WATER SUPPLY AND WATER CONSERVATION AT WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. (a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of the Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that analyzes the benefits and consequences of including water supply and water conservation as a primary mission of the Corps of Engineers in carrying out water resources development projects. (b) Inclusion.--The Secretary shall include in the report submitted under subsection (a)-- (1) a description of existing water resources development projects with water supply or water conservation as authorized purposes, and the extent to which such projects are utilized for such purposes; (2) a description of existing water resources development projects with respect to which-- (A) water supply or water conservation could be added as a project purpose, including those with respect to which a non- Federal interest has expressed an interest in adding water supply or water conservation as a project purpose; and (B) such a purpose could be accommodated while maintaining existing authorized purposes; (3) a description of ongoing water resources development project studies the authorizations for which include authorization for the Secretary to study the feasibility of carrying out the project with a purpose of water supply or water conservation; (4) an analysis of how adding water supply and water conservation as a primary mission of the Corps of Engineers would affect the ability of the Secretary to carry out future water resources development projects; and (5) any recommendations of the Secretary relating to including water supply and water conservation as a primary mission of the Corps of Engineers. SEC. 222. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON AUTHORIZED STUDIES AND PROJECTS. (a) In General.--Not later than February 1 of each year, the Secretary shall develop and submit to Congress an annual report, to be entitled ``Report to Congress on Authorized Water Resources Development Projects and Studies'', that identifies-- (1) ongoing or new feasibility studies, authorized within the previous 20 years, for which a Report of the Chief of Engineers has not been issued; (2) authorized feasibility studies for projects in the preconstruction, engineering and design phase; (3) ongoing or new water resources development projects authorized for construction within the previous 20 years; and (4) authorized and constructed water resources development projects the Secretary has the responsibility to operate or maintain. (b) Contents.-- (1) Inclusions.-- (A) Criteria.--The Secretary shall include in each report submitted under this section only a feasibility study or water resources development project-- (i) that has been authorized by Congress to be carried out by the Secretary and does not require any additional congressional authorization to be carried out; (ii) that the Secretary has the capability to carry out if funds are appropriated for such study or project under any of the ``Investigations'', ``Construction'', ``Operation and Maintenance'', or ``Mississippi River and Tributaries'' appropriations accounts for the Corps of Engineers; and (iii) for which a non-Federal interest-- (I) in the case of a study or a project other than a project for which funds may be appropriated for operation and maintenance, has entered into a feasibility cost-sharing agreement, design agreement, or project partnership agreement with the Corps of Engineers, or has informed the Secretary that the non-Federal interest has the financial capability to enter into such an agreement within 1 year; and (II) demonstrates the legal and financial capability to satisfy the requirements for local cooperation with respect to the study or project. (B) Description of benefits.-- (i) Description.--The Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, describe in each report submitted under this section the benefits, as described in clause (ii), of each feasibility study and water resources development project included in the report. (ii) Benefits.--The benefits referred to in clause (i) are benefits to-- (I) the protection of human life and property; (II) improvement to transportation; (III) the national, regional, or local economy; (IV) the environment; or (V) the national security interests of the United States. (2) Transparency.--The Secretary shall include in each report submitted under this section, for each feasibility study and water resources development project included in the report-- (A) the name of the associated non-Federal interest, including the name of any non-Federal interest that has contributed, or is expected to contribute, a non-Federal share of the cost of the study or project; (B) the purpose of the study or project; (C) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the Federal, non-Federal, and total costs of the study or project, including, to the extent practicable, the fully funded capability of the Corps of Engineers for-- (i) the 3 fiscal years following the fiscal year in which the report is submitted, in the case of a feasibility study; and (ii) the 5 fiscal years following the fiscal year in which the report is submitted, in the case of a water resources development project; and (D) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the monetary and nonmonetary benefits of the study or project. (3) Certification.--The Secretary shall include in each report submitted under this section a certification stating that each feasibility study or water resources development project included in the report meets the criteria described in paragraph (1)(A). (4) Omissions.-- (A) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not omit from a report submitted under this section a study or project that otherwise meets the criteria for inclusion in the report solely on the basis of a policy of the Secretary. (B) Appendix.--If the Secretary omits from a report submitted under this section a study or project that otherwise meets the criteria for inclusion in the report, the Secretary shall include with the report an appendix that lists the name of the study or project and reason for its omission. (c) Submission to Congress; Publication.-- (1) Submission to congress.--The Secretary may submit a report under this section in conjunction with the submission of the annual report under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d). (2) Publication.--On submission of each report under this section, the Secretary shall make the report publicly available, including through publication on the internet. (d) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Non-federal interest.--The term ``non-Federal interest'' has the meaning given that term in section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b). (2) Water resources development project.--The term ``water resources development project'' includes a separable element of a project, a project under an environmental infrastructure assistance program, and a project the authorized purposes of which include water supply. SEC. 223. COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND MATERIALS. (a) In General.--Using available appropriations, not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall complete and submit to Congress the following materials: (1) The report required by section 1211 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3808). (2) Implementation guidance for the amendments made by section 1176 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1673). (3) Implementation guidance for the amendments made by section 3029(a) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1305). (4) Any other report or other material required to be submitted to Congress by any of the following Acts (including by amendments made by such Acts) that has not been so submitted by the date of enactment of this section: (A) The Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-121). (B) The Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (Public Law 114-322). (C) The Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (Public Law 115-270). (b) Use of Existing Data.--To the extent practicable and appropriate, the Secretary shall use existing data in completing any materials described in subsection (a). (c) Failure To Submit.--If the Secretary fails to submit materials as required by this section, the Secretary shall immediately inform the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, in writing, of the specific reasons for such failure and a timeline for submission of the delinquent materials. (d) Implementation Guidance.--The Secretary shall expeditiously issue any guidance necessary to implement any provision of this Act, including any amendments made by this Act, in accordance with section 1105 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2202). SEC. 224. EMERGENCY FLOODING PROTECTION FOR LAKES. The Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the extent to which section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n), applies to lakes, including lakes with the flow of a slow-moving river, including, if applicable, recommendations for legislative changes to ensure that such lakes are eligible for the program carried out pursuant to such section. [[Page H6959]] SEC. 225. REPORT ON DEBRIS REMOVAL. Section 1210 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3808) is amended to read as follows: ``SEC. 1210. REPORT ON DEBRIS REMOVAL. ``(a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020, the Secretary shall submit to Congress and make publicly available a report that describes-- ``(1) the extent to which, during the 10 fiscal years prior to such date of enactment, the Secretary has carried out section 3 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a); ``(2) how the Secretary has evaluated potential work to be carried out under that section; and ``(3) the extent to which the Secretary plans to start, continue, or complete debris removal activities in the 3 years following submission of the report. ``(b) Focus Areas.--The Secretary shall include in the report submitted under subsection (a)-- ``(1) identification of the debris removal activities to be started, continued, or completed during the first fiscal year following the date of enactment of this subsection within the boundaries of the North Atlantic Division of the Corps of Engineers; ``(2) the estimated total costs and completion dates for such activities; and ``(3) identification of the non-Federal interest associated with such activities.''. SEC. 226. REPORT ON ANTECEDENT HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS. (a) Report.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the use by the Corps of Engineers since 2010 of data relating to antecedent hydrologic conditions in the Missouri River Basin (including soil moisture conditions, frost depths, snowpack, and streamflow conditions) in-- (A) conducting Missouri River mainstem reservoir operations under the Missouri River Master Manual; (B) developing related annual operating plans; and (C) performing seasonal, monthly, and daily operations. (2) Inclusions.--The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include-- (A) a review of-- (i) the approach of the Corps of Engineers to forecasting basin runoff in developing annual operating plans of the Corps of Engineers; (ii) the assessment of existing and alternative algorithms that could improve basin runoff forecasting; (iii) the approach of the Corps of Engineers for reservoir releases in the winter, spring, summer, and fall, based on basin runoff forecasts; (iv) the technical report of the Corps of Engineers entitled ``Long-Term Runoff Forecasting'', dated February, 2017; (v) the use by the Corps of Engineers of data from Federal and State entities in basin runoff forecasts; and (vi) the use by the Corps of Engineers of advanced data collection, including through the use of unmanned aerial systems, forecasting, and modeling; (B) findings and recommendations on how to best incorporate antecedent basin conditions in annual operating plans and Missouri River mainstem reservoir operations; and (C) the results of the peer review conducted under subsection (b). (b) Peer Review.--The Secretary shall seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences or a similar independent scientific and technical advisory organization to establish a panel of experts to conduct a peer review of the report to be submitted under subsection (a). (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary-- (1) $5,000,000 to carry out subsection (a); and (2) $5,000,000 to carry out subsection (b). SEC. 227. SUBSURFACE DRAIN SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary, acting through the Director of the Engineer Research and Development Center and, where appropriate, in consultation with other Federal agencies, shall carry out research and development activities relating to the use of subsurface drain systems as-- (1) a flood risk-reduction measure; or (2) a coastal storm risk-reduction measure. SEC. 228. REPORT ON CORROSION PREVENTION ACTIVITIES. Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make publicly available, a report that describes-- (1) the extent to which the Secretary has carried out section 1033 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2350); (2) the extent to which the Secretary has incorporated corrosion prevention activities (as defined in such section) at water resources development projects constructed or maintained by the Secretary since the date of enactment of such section; and (3) in instances where the Secretary has not incorporated corrosion prevention activities at such water resources development projects since such date, an explanation as to why such corrosion prevention activities have not been incorporated. SEC. 229. ANNUAL REPORTING ON DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION. Section 1104(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2282d note) is amended-- (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively, and indenting appropriately; (2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) (as so redesignated), by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the following: ``(1) In general.--The Secretary''; and (3) by adding at the end the following: ``(2) Annual reporting.--Not less frequently than annually, the Secretary shall provide to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a written update on the progress of the implementation of paragraph (1), including a description of each education and outreach action the Secretary is taking to implement that paragraph. ``(3) Guidance; compliance.--The Secretary shall-- ``(A) issue guidance on the uniform implementation by each district of the Corps of Engineers of the process for submitting proposals under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d); and ``(B) each year, ensure compliance with the guidance issued under subparagraph (A).''. SEC. 230. REPORT ON BENEFITS CALCULATION FOR FLOOD CONTROL STRUCTURES. Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the extent to which flood insurance premium reductions that result from implementation of a flood risk management project, including structural elements, nonstructural elements, or natural features or nature-based features, are included in the calculation of the benefits of the project by the Corps of Engineers. TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS SEC. 301. DEAUTHORIZATION OF INACTIVE PROJECTS. (a) Purposes.--The purposes of this section are-- (1) to identify water resources development projects authorized by Congress that are no longer viable for construction due to-- (A) a lack of local support; (B) a lack of available Federal or non-Federal resources; or (C) an authorizing purpose that is no longer relevant or feasible; (2) to create an expedited and definitive process for Congress to deauthorize water resources development projects that are no longer viable for construction; and (3) to allow the continued authorization of water resources development projects that are viable for construction. (b) Proposed Deauthorization List.-- (1) Preliminary list of projects.-- (A) In general.--The Secretary shall develop a preliminary list of each water resources development project, or separable element of a project, authorized for construction before November 8, 2007, for which-- (i) planning, design, or construction was not initiated before the date of enactment of this Act; or (ii) planning, design, or construction was initiated before the date of enactment of this Act, but for which no funds, Federal or non-Federal, were obligated for planning, design, or construction of the project or separable element of the project during the current fiscal year or any of the 10 preceding fiscal years. (B) Use of comprehensive construction backlog and operation and maintenance report.--The Secretary may develop the preliminary list from the comprehensive construction backlog and operation and maintenance reports developed pursuant to section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a). (C) Exclusions.--The Secretary shall not include on the preliminary list-- (i) an environmental infrastructure assistance project authorized to be carried out by the Secretary (including a project authorized pursuant to an environmental assistance program); or (ii) a project or separable element of a project authorized as part of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan described in section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680). (2) Preparation of proposed deauthorization list.-- (A) Deauthorization amount.--The Secretary shall prepare a proposed list of projects for deauthorization comprised of a subset of projects and separable elements identified on the preliminary list developed under paragraph (1) that have, in the aggregate, an estimated Federal cost to complete that is at least $10,000,000,000. (B) Determination of federal cost to complete.--For purposes of subparagraph (A), the Federal cost to complete shall take into account any allowances authorized by section 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280), as applied [[Page H6960]] to the most recent project schedule and cost estimate. (C) Inclusion of deauthorization of antiquated projects.-- The Secretary shall reduce the amount identified for deauthorization under paragraph (2)(A) by an amount equivalent to the estimated current value of each project, or separable element of a project, that is deauthorized by subsection (f). (3) Sequencing of projects.-- (A) In general.--The Secretary shall identify projects and separable elements for inclusion on the proposed list of projects for deauthorization under paragraph (2) according to the order in which the projects and separable elements were authorized, beginning with the earliest authorized projects and separable elements and ending with the latest project or separable element necessary to meet the aggregate amount under paragraph (2)(A). (B) Factors to consider.--The Secretary may identify projects and separable elements in an order other than that established by subparagraph (A) if the Secretary determines, on a case-by-case basis, that a project or separable element is critical for interests of the United States, based on the possible impact of the project or separable element on public health and safety, the national economy, or the environment. (4) Public comment and consultation.-- (A) In general.--The Secretary shall solicit comments from the public and the Governors of each applicable State on the proposed deauthorization list prepared under paragraph (2)(A). (B) Comment period.--The public comment period shall be 90 days. (5) Preparation of final deauthorization list.-- (A) In general.--The Secretary shall prepare a final deauthorization list by-- (i) considering any comments received under paragraph (4); and (ii) revising the proposed deauthorization list prepared under paragraph (2)(A) as the Secretary determines necessary to respond to such comments. (B) Appendix.--The Secretary shall include as part of the final deauthorization list an appendix that-- (i) identifies each project or separable element on the proposed deauthorization list that is not included on the final deauthorization list; and (ii) describes the reasons why the project or separable element is not included on the final deauthorization list. (c) Submission of Final Deauthorization List to Congress for Congressional Review; Publication.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the close of the comment period under subsection (b)(4), the Secretary shall-- (A) submit the final deauthorization list and appendix prepared under subsection (b)(5) to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate; and (B) publish the final deauthorization list and appendix in the Federal Register. (2) Exclusions.--The Secretary shall not include in the final deauthorization list submitted under paragraph (1) any project or separable element with respect to which Federal funds for planning, design, or construction are obligated after the development of the preliminary list under subsection (b)(1)(A) but prior to the submission of the final deauthorization list under paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection. (d) Deauthorization; Congressional Review.-- (1) In general.--After the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on the date of publication of the final deauthorization list and appendix under subsection (c)(1)(B), a project or separable element of a project identified in the final deauthorization list is hereby deauthorized, unless Congress passes a joint resolution disapproving the final deauthorization list prior to the end of such period. (2) Non-federal contributions.-- (A) In general.--A project or separable element of a project identified in the final deauthorization list under subsection (c) shall not be deauthorized under this subsection if, before the expiration of the 2-year period referred to in paragraph (1), the non-Federal interest for the project or separable element of the project provides sufficient funds to complete the project or separable element of the project. (B) Treatment of projects.--Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), each project and separable element of a project identified in the final deauthorization list shall be treated as deauthorized for purposes of the aggregate deauthorization amount specified in subsection (b)(2)(A). (3) Projects identified in appendix.--A project or separable element of a project identified in the appendix to the final deauthorization list shall remain subject to future deauthorization by Congress. (e) Special Rules.-- (1) Post-authorization studies.--A project or separable element of a project may not be identified on the proposed deauthorization list developed under subsection (b), or the final deauthorization list developed under subsection (c), if the project or separable element received funding for a post- authorization study during the current fiscal year or any of the 10 preceding fiscal years. (2) Treatment of project modifications.--For purposes of this section, if an authorized water resources development project or separable element of the project has been modified by an Act of Congress, the date of the authorization of the project or separable element shall be deemed to be the date of the most recent such modification. (f) Deauthorization of Antiquated Projects.-- (1) In general.--Any water resources development project, or separable element of a project, authorized for construction prior to November 17, 1986, for which construction has not been initiated prior to the date of enactment of this Act, or for which funds have not been obligated for construction in the 10-year period prior to the date of enactment of this Act, is hereby deauthorized. (2) Identification.--Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that identifies-- (A) the name of each project, or separable element of a project, deauthorized by paragraph (1); and (B) the estimated current value of each such project or separable element of a project. (g) Economic and Environmental Review of Inactive Water Resources Development Projects.--The Secretary or the non- Federal interest may not carry out any authorized water resources development project, or separable element of such project, for which construction has not been initiated in the 20-year period following the date of the authorization of such project or separable element, until-- (1) the Secretary provides to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a post-authorization change report that updates the economic and environmental analysis of the project or separable element; and (2) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate take appropriate action to address any modifications to the economic and environmental analysis for the project or separable element of the project contained in the post-authorization change report. (h) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Post-authorization change report.--The term ``post- authorization change report'' has the meaning given such term in section 1132(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2282e). (2) Post-authorization study.--The term ``post- authorization study'' means-- (A) a feasibility report developed under section 905 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282); (B) a feasibility study, as defined in section 105(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(d)); or (C) a review conducted under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a), including an initial appraisal that-- (i) demonstrates a Federal interest; and (ii) requires additional analysis for the project or separable element. SEC. 302. ABANDONED AND INACTIVE NONCOAL MINE RESTORATION. Section 560(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2336(f)) is amended by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$30,000,000''. SEC. 303. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM. Section 203(b)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269) is amended by striking ``$12,500,000'' each place it appears and inserting ``$18,500,000''. SEC. 304. LAKES PROGRAM. Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662, 100 Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295; 121 Stat. 1076) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (27), by striking ``and'' at the end; (2) in paragraph (28), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (3) by adding at the end the following: ``(29) Ellis Pond and Guild Pond, Norwood, Massachusetts; and ``(30) Memorial Pond, Walpole, Massachusetts.''. SEC. 305. REHABILITATION OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTED DAMS. Section 1177 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 467f-2 note) is amended-- (1) in subsection (e), by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting ``$60,000,000''; and (2) in subsection (f), by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting ``$60,000,000''. SEC. 306. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION PROGRAM. (a) In General.--Section 510 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303, 110 Stat. 3759; 121 Stat. 1202; 128 Stat. 1317) is amended-- (1) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i) and inserting after subsection (g) the following: ``(h) Project Cap.--The total cost of a project carried out under this section may not exceed $15,000,000.''; and (2) in subsection (i) (as so redesignated), by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting ``$90,000,000''. (b) Outreach and Training.--The Secretary shall conduct public outreach and [[Page H6961]] workshops for non-Federal interests to provide information on the Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection program established under section 510 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, including how to participate in the program. SEC. 307. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Section 1103(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``$22,750,000'' and inserting ``$40,000,000''; and (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ``$10,420,000'' and inserting ``$15,000,000''. SEC. 308. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER PROTECTION. Section 2010(e) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1270; 132 Stat. 3812) is amended by striking ``the Act of October 15, 1940 (33 U.S.C. 701h-1)'' and inserting ``section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h)''. SEC. 309. THEODORE SHIP CHANNEL, MOBILE, ALABAMA. (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Theodore Ship Channel, Mobile Harbor, Alabama, authorized by section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5), is revised to incorporate into the project the 40-foot-deep, 1,320-foot- wide, and approximately 1,468.5-foot-long access channel, extending north from stations 257+25 and 273+25 from the Theodore Channel, that was constructed for the former Naval Station Mobile, as a substitute for the authorized but unconstructed 40-foot-deep, 300-foot-wide, and 1,200-foot- long anchorage basin in the same location, to serve the public terminal that replaced the former Naval Station Mobile as obligated under the authorizations for the project. (b) Treatment.--The Secretary shall-- (1) consider construction of the access channel described in subsection (a) to be complete; and (2) assume maintenance of the access channel described in subsection (a) for so long as the terminal described in subsection (a) remains publicly owned. SEC. 310. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM. Any Federal funds, regardless of the account from which the funds were provided, used to carry out construction of the modification to the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, authorized in section 136 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2004 (117 Stat. 1842), shall be considered by the Secretary as initiating construction of the project such that future funds will not require a new investment decision. SEC. 311. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA. The project for navigation, Ouachita and Black Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 481), is modified to include water supply as an authorized purpose. SEC. 312. LAKE ISABELLA, CALIFORNIA. (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary, when evaluating alternative locations for construction of a permanent Isabella Lake Visitor Center by the Corps of Engineers to replace the facility impacted by the Isabella Dam safety modification project, should afford substantial weight to the site preference of the local community. (b) Authority.--The Secretary may acquire such interests in real property as the Secretary determines necessary or advisable to support construction of the Isabella Dam safety modification project. (c) Transfer.--The Secretary may transfer any real property interests acquired under subsection (b) to any other Federal agency or department without reimbursement. (d) Isabella Dam Safety Modification Project Defined.--In this section, the term ``Isabella Dam safety modification project'' means the dam safety modification project at the Isabella Reservoir in the San Joaquin Valley, California (authorized by Act of December 22, 1944 (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 901)), including the component of the project relating to construction a visitor center facility. SEC. 313. LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT. The Secretary shall align the schedules of, and maximize complimentary efforts, minimize duplicative practices, and ensure coordination and information sharing with respect to-- (1) the project for flood risk management, Lower San Joaquin River, authorized by section 1401(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3836); and (2) the second phase of the feasibility study for the Lower San Joaquin River project for flood risk management, authorized for expedited completion by section 1203(a)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act 2018 (132 Stat. 3803). SEC. 314. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA, CALIFORNIA. The portion of project for flood control, Sacramento River, California, authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 1, 1917 (chapter 144, 39 Stat. 949; 103 Stat. 649; 110 Stat. 3709; 112 Stat. 1841; 113 Stat. 299), consisting of a riverbed gradient restoration facility at the Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District Intake, is no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 315. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. The portion of the project for flood control and navigation, San Diego River and Mission Bay, San Diego County, California, authorized by the Act of July 24, 1946 (chapter 595, 60 Stat. 636), identified in the National Levee Database established under section 9004 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3303) as the San Diego River 3 segment and consisting of a 785-foot-long segment of the right bank levee from Station 209+41.75 to its end at Station 217+26.75, as described in construction plans dated August 30, 1951, is no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 316. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT AREA. (a) In General.--Section 114 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 59h) is amended to read as follows: ``SEC. 114. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT AREA. ``(a) Area To Be Declared Nonnavigable.--The following area is declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States: All of that portion of the City and County of San Francisco, California, lying shoreward of a line beginning at the intersection of the southerly right of way line of Earl Street prolongation with the Pierhead United States Government Pierhead line, the Pierhead line as defined in the State of California Harbor and Navigation Code Section 1770, as amended in 1961; thence northerly along said Pierhead line to its intersection with a line parallel with and distant 10 feet easterly from, the existing easterly boundary line of Pier 30-32; thence northerly along said parallel line and its northerly prolongation, to a point of intersection with a line parallel with, and distant 10 feet northerly from, the existing northerly boundary of Pier 30-32; thence westerly along last said parallel line to its intersection with said Pierhead line; thence northerly along said Pierhead line, to the intersection of the easterly right of way line of Van Ness Avenue, formerly Marlette Street, prolongation to the Pierhead line. ``(b) Requirement That Area Be Improved.--The declaration of nonnavigability under subsection (a) applies only to those parts of the area described in subsection (a) that are or will be bulkheaded, filled, or otherwise occupied or covered by permanent structures and does not affect the applicability of any Federal statute or regulation that relates to filling of navigable waters or to other regulated activities within the area described in subsection (a), including sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401, 403), section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. ``(c) Inclusion of Embarcadero Historic District.--Congress finds and declares that the area described in subsection (a) contains the seawall, piers, and wharves that comprise the Embarcadero Historic District listed on the National Register of Historic Places on May 12, 2006.''. (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 5052 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 59h-1) is repealed. SEC. 317. WESTERN PACIFIC INTERCEPTOR CANAL, SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA. The portion of the project for flood protection on the Sacramento River, authorized by section 2 of the of March 1, 1917 (chapter 144, 39 Stat. 949; 45 Stat. 539; 50 Stat. 877; 55 Stat. 647; 80 Stat. 1422), consisting of the portion of the levee from G.P.S. coordinate N2147673.584 E6690904.187 to N2147908.413 E6689057.060 associated with the Western Pacific Interceptor Canal, is no longer authorized beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. SEC. 318. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, AND TEXAS. Section 5056(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-114, 121 Stat. 1213; 128 Stat. 1314) is amended by striking ``2019'' and inserting ``2029''. SEC. 319. NEW LONDON HARBOR WATERFRONT CHANNEL, CONNECTICUT. (a) In General.--The portion of the project for navigation, New London Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Act of June 13, 1902 (chapter 1079, 32 Stat. 333), described in subsection (b) is no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. (b) Area Described.--The area referred to in subsection (a) is generally the portion between and around the 2 piers at the State Pier in New London, specifically the area-- (1) beginning at a point N691263.78, E1181259.26; (2) running N 3501'50.75'' W about 955.59 feet to a point N692046.26, E1180710.74; (3) running N 5458'06.78'' E about 100.00 feet to a point N692103.66, E1180792.62; (4) running S 3501'50.75'' E about 989.8 feet to a point N691293.17, E1181360.78; and (5) running S 7351'15.45'' W about 105.69 feet to the point described in paragraph (1). SEC. 320. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DELAWARE. It is the sense of Congress that the Corps of Engineers should maintain the annual maintenance dredging for Wilmington Harbor, Delaware, authorized by the Act of June 3, 1896 (chapter 314, 29 Stat. 207). SEC. 321. WILMINGTON HARBOR SOUTH DISPOSAL AREA, DELAWARE. (a) Finding.--For the purposes of applying section 217(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2326a(b)) to the Wilmington Harbor South Disposal Area, Delaware, the Secretary shall find that the standard has been met for the Edgemoor expansion of the Port of Wilmington, Delaware. [[Page H6962]] (b) Use.--Any use of the Wilmington Harbor South Disposal Area permitted by the Secretary under section 217(b) for the Edgemoor Expansion of the Port of Wilmington shall not otherwise reduce the availability of capacity, in dredged material disposal facilities under the jurisdiction of the Secretary that were constructed before the date of enactment of this Act, for operation and maintenance of-- (1) the Delaware River Mainstem and Channel Deepening project, Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, authorized by section 101(6) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802); or (2) the Delaware River, Philadelphia to the Sea, project, Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, authorized by the Act of June 25, 1910 (chapter 382, 36 Stat. 637; 46 Stat. 921; 52 Stat. 803; 59 Stat. 14; 68 Stat. 1249; 72 Stat. 297). (c) Fee.--The Secretary shall impose on the non-Federal interest for the Edgemoor Expansion of the Port of Wilmington a fee, under section 217(b)(1)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2326a(b)(1)(B)), to recover capital, operation, and maintenance costs associated with any use by the non-Federal interest of capacity in the Wilmington Harbor South Disposal Area permitted by the Secretary under section 217(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. (d) Agreement to Pay.--In accordance with section 217(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2326a(a)), if, to accommodate the dredged materials from operation and maintenance of the Edgemoor Expansion of the Port of Wilmington, the Secretary provides additional capacity at the Wilmington Harbor South Disposal Area, the non-Federal interest for the Edgemoor Expansion of the Port of Wilmington shall agree to pay, during the period of construction, all costs associated with the construction of the additional capacity. SEC. 322. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the project for navigation, Washington Harbor, District of Columbia, authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935 (chapter 831, 49 Stat. 1031), is modified to reduce, in part, the authorized dimensions of the project, such that the remaining authorized dimensions are as follows: (1) A 200-foot-wide, 12-foot-deep channel with a center line beginning at a point East 1,317,064.30 and North 440,373.32, thence to a point East 1,316,474.30 and North 440,028.31, thence to a point East 1,315,584.30 and North 439,388.30, thence to a point East 1,315,259.31 and North 438,908.30. (2) A 200- to 300-foot-wide, 12-foot-deep transition area, with a center line beginning at a point East 1,315,259.31 and North 438,908.30 to a point East 1,315,044.31 and North 438,748.30. (3) A 300-foot-wide, 15-foot-deep channel with a centerline beginning a point East 1,315,044.31 and North 438,748.30, thence to a point East 1,314,105.31 and North 438,124.79, thence to a point East 1,311,973.30 and North 438,807.78, thence to a point East 1,311,369.73 and North 438,577.42, thence to a point East 1,311,015.73 and North 438,197.57, thence to a point East 1,309,713.47 and North 435,678.91. (4) A 300- to 400-foot-wide, 15- to 24-foot-deep transition area, with a center line beginning at a point East 1,309,713.47 and North 435,678.91 to a point East 1,307,709.33 and North 434,488.25. (5) A 400-foot-wide, 24-foot-deep channel with a centerline beginning at a point East 1,307,709.33 and North 434,488.25, thence to a point East 1,307,459.33 and North 434,173.25, thence to a point East 1,306,476.82 and North 432,351.28, thence to a point East 1,306,209.79 and North 431,460.21, thence to a point at the end of the channel near Hains Point East 1,305,997.63 and North 429,978.31. SEC. 323. BIG CYPRESS SEMINOLE INDIAN RESERVATION WATER CONSERVATION PLAN, FLORIDA. (a) In General.--The project for ecosystem restoration, Big Cypress Seminole Indian Reservation Water Conservation Plan, Florida, authorized pursuant to section 528 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3767), is no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. (b) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this section affects the responsibility of the Secretary to pay any damages awarded by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, or by a court of competent jurisdiction, to a contractor relating to the adjudication of claims arising from construction of the project described in subsection (a). SEC. 324. CENTRAL EVERGLADES, FLORIDA. The project for ecosystem restoration, Central Everglades, authorized by section 1401(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1713), is modified to include the project for ecosystem restoration, Central and Southern Florida, Everglades Agricultural Area, authorized by section 1308 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3819), and to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project, as so combined, at a total combined cost of $4,362,091,000. SEC. 325. MIAMI RIVER, FLORIDA. The portion of the project for navigation, Miami River, Florida, authorized by the Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 925; 59 Stat. 16; 74 Stat. 481; 100 Stat. 4257), beginning at the existing railroad bascule bridge and extending approximately 1,000 linear feet upstream to an existing salinity barrier and flood control structure, is no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 326. JULIAN KEEN, JR. LOCK AND DAM, MOORE HAVEN, FLORIDA. (a) Designation.--The Moore Haven Lock and Dam, Moore Haven, Florida, authorized pursuant to the Act of July 3, 1930 (chapter 847, 46 Stat. 925; 49 Stat. 1032), shall be known and designated as the ``Julian Keen, Jr. Lock and Dam''. (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Lock and Dam referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Julian Keen, Jr. Lock and Dam''. SEC. 327. TAYLOR CREEK RESERVOIR AND LEVEE L-73 (SECTION 1), UPPER ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA. The portions of the project for flood control and other purposes, Central and Southern Florida, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1176), consisting of the Taylor Creek Reservoir and Levee L-73, Section 1, within the Upper St. Johns River Basin, Florida, are no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 328. EXTINGUISHMENT OF FLOWAGE EASEMENTS, ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KENTUCKY. (a) In General.--Subject to the availability of appropriations and on request of the landowner, the Secretary shall extinguish any flowage easement or portion of a flowage easement held by the United States on developed land of the landowner at Rough River Lake, Kentucky-- (1) that is above 534 feet mean sea level; and (2) for which the Secretary determines the flowage easement or portion of the flowage easement is not required to address backwater effects. (b) No Liability.--The United States shall not be liable for any damages to property or injuries to persons from flooding that may be attributable to the operation and maintenance of Rough River Dam, Kentucky, on land that was encumbered by a flowage easement extinguished under subsection (a). (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available until expended. SEC. 329. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LOUISIANA. Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on plans to modify the Calcasieu River and Pass Dredged Material Management Plan and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (November 22, 2010 DMMP/SEIS) to allow for the expansion of Dredged Material Placement Facilities (DMPFs) 17, 19, 22, D, and E to the lakeside foreshore rock boundaries during planned rehabilitation of these facilities. SEC. 330. CAMDEN HARBOR, MAINE. (a) In General.--The portions of the project for navigation, Camden Harbor, Maine, described in subsection (b) are no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. (b) Portions Described.--The portions referred to in subsection (a) are the following: (1) The portion of the 10-foot-deep inner harbor area, authorized by the first section of the Act of March 3, 1873 (chapter 233, 17 Stat. 565; 25 Stat. 400), approximately 50,621.75 square feet in area-- (A) starting at a point with coordinates N197,640.07, E837,851.71; (B) thence running S8443' 23.94''W about 381.51 feet to a point with coordinates N197,604.98, E837,471.82; (C) thence running N4347' 51.43''W about 270.26 feet to a point with coordinates N197,800.05, E837,284.77; (D) thence running S5902' 26.62''E about 219.18 feet to a point with coordinates N197,687.30, E837,472.72; (E) thence running S8150' 09.76''E about 144.70 feet to a point with coordinates N197,666.75, E837,615.96; (F) thence running N5727' 07.42''E about 317.32 feet to a point with coordinates N197,866.52, E837,928.96; and (G) thence running S1850' 04.48''W about 239.27 feet to the point described in subparagraph (A). (2) The portion of the 14-foot-deep outer harbor area, authorized by the first section of the Act of August 11, 1888 (25 Stat. 400; 32 Stat. 331), approximately 222,015.94 square feet in area-- (A) starting at a point with coordinates N197,640.07, E837,851.71; (B) thence running N1850' 04.48''E about 239.27 feet to a point with coordinates N197,866.53, E837,928.96; (C) thence running N5828' 51.05''E about 308.48 feet to a point with coordinates N198,027.79, E838,191.93; (D) thence running N8420' 01.88''E about 370.06 feet to a point with coordinates N198,064.33, E838,560.18; (E) thence running S0532' 03.42''E about 357.31 feet to a point with coordinates N197,708.68, E838,594.64; and (F) thence running S8443' 23.94''W about 746.08 feet to the point described in subparagraph (A). SEC. 331. CAPE PORPOISE HARBOR, MAINE, ANCHORAGE AREA DESIGNATION. (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Cape Porpoise Harbor, Maine, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor [[Page H6963]] Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1172), is modified to designate the portion of the project described in subsection (b) as a 6- foot-deep anchorage. (b) Portion Described.--The portion of the project referred to in subsection (a) is the approximately 192,235.63 square foot area consisting of the 100-foot-wide and 6-foot-deep channel located within the inner harbor-- (1) starting at a point with coordinates N 194,175.13, E 2,882,011.74; (2) thence running N3346' 08.14''W about 914.57 feet to a point with coordinates N 194,935.40, E 2,881,503.38; (3) thence running N1241' 09.78''W about 1,026.40 feet to a point with coordinates N 195,936.74, E 2,881,277.97; (4) thence running N7718' 50.22''E about 100.00 feet to a point with coordinates N 195,958.70, E 2,881,375.53; (5) thence running S1241' 09.78''E about 1,007.79 feet to a point with coordinates N 194,975.52, E 2,881,596.85; (6) thence running S3346' 08.14''E about 895.96 feet to a point with coordinates N 194,230.72, E 2,882,094.86; and (7) thence running S5613' 51.86''W about 100.00 feet to the point described in paragraph (1). SEC. 332. BALTIMORE, MARYLAND. The Secretary is authorized, in accordance with section 5 of Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h), to accept funds contributed by a non-Federal interest for dredging on irregular cycles of the Baltimore Inner Harbor Approach Channel, Baltimore Harbor and Channels Federal navigation project, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 297). SEC. 333. THAD COCHRAN LOCK AND DAM, AMORY, MISSISSIPPI. (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that Thad Cochran, whose selfless determination and tireless work, while serving as a congressman and United States Senator from Mississippi for 45 years, contributed greatly to the realization and success of the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. (b) Designation.--The navigation lock known as the ``Amory Lock'', located at mile 371 on the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Mississippi, and the dam associated with such lock, shall be known and designated as the ``Thad Cochran Lock and Dam''. (c) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the lock and dam referred to in subsection (b) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thad Cochran Lock and Dam''. SEC. 334. MISSOURI RIVER RESERVOIR SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT. Section 1179(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1675; 132 Stat. 3782) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (3)-- (A) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``project purposes, including'' before ``storage capacity''; and (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``preliminary''; (2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (9) as paragraphs (6) through (11), respectively; and (4) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following: ``(4) Justification.--In determining the economic justification of a sediment management plan under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall-- ``(A) measure and include flooding, erosion, and accretion damages both upstream and downstream of the reservoir that are likely to occur as a result of sediment management within the reservoir compared to the damages that are likely to occur if the sediment management plan is not implemented; and ``(B) include lifecycle costs and a 100-year period of analysis. ``(5) Implementation.--As part of a sediment management plan under paragraph (2), and in accordance with paragraph (10), the Secretary may carry out sediment removal activities at reservoirs owned and operated by the Secretary in the Upper Missouri River Basin, or at reservoirs for which the Secretary has flood control responsibilities under section 7 of the Act of December 22, 1944 (33 U.S.C. 709), in the Upper Missouri River Basin, in accordance with section 602 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295; 121 Stat. 1076) as if those reservoirs were listed in subsection (a) of that section.''. SEC. 335. PORTSMOUTH, NEW HAMPSHIRE. The Secretary shall expedite the activities required to be carried out under section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) regarding the use of improvement dredging of the Portsmouth Federal navigation project in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, carried out pursuant to section 3 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), as a source of clean beach fill material to reinforce the stone revetment at Nantasket Beach, Hull, Massachusetts. SEC. 336. RAHWAY FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY, NEW JERSEY. The Secretary shall-- (1) nullify the determination of the North Atlantic Division of the Corps of Engineers that further activities to carry out the feasibility study for a project for flood risk management, Rahway, New Jersey, authorized by the resolution of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives adopted on March 24, 1998 (docket number 2548), is not warranted; (2) identify an acceptable alternative to the project described in paragraph (1) that could receive Federal support; and (3) carry out, and expedite the completion of, a feasibility study for the acceptable alternative identified under paragraph (2). SEC. 337. SAN JUAN-CHAMA PROJECT; ABIQUIU DAM, NEW MEXICO. (a) Abiquiu Reservoir.--Section 5(b) of Public Law 97-140 (43 U.S.C. 620a note) is amended by striking ``a total of two hundred thousand acre-feet of''. (b) Water Storage at Abiquiu Dam, New Mexico.--Section 1 of Public Law 100-522 (43 U.S.C. 620a note) is amended-- (1) by striking ``200,000 acre-feet of''; (2) by inserting ``and San Juan-Chama project'' after ``Rio Grande system''; and (3) by striking ``, in lieu of the water storage authorized by section 5 of Public Law 97-140, to the extent that contracting entities under section 5 of Public Law 97-140 no longer require such storage''. (c) Water Storage.--The Secretary shall-- (1) store up to elevation 6230.00 NGVD29 at Abiquiu Dam, New Mexico, to the extent that the necessary real property interests have been acquired by any entity requesting such storage; and (2) amend the March 20, 1986, contract between the United States of America and the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority (assigned by the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico to the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority) for water storage space in Abiquiu Reservoir to allow for storage by the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority of San Juan-Chama project water or native Rio Grande system water up to elevation 6230.00 NGVD29. (d) Storage Agreements With Users Other Than the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority.--The Secretary shall-- (1) retain or enter into new agreements with entities for a proportionate allocation of 29,100 acre-feet of storage space pursuant to section 5 of Public Law 97-140; and (2) amend or enter into new storage agreements for storage of San Juan-Chama project water or native Rio Grande system water up to the space allocated for each entity's proportionate share of San Juan-Chama water. (e) Operations Documents.--The Secretary shall amend or revise any existing operations documents, including the Water Control Manual or operations plan for Abiquiu Reservoir, as necessary to meet the requirements of this section. (f) Limitations.--In carrying out this section, the following limitations shall apply: (1) The storage of native Rio Grande system water shall be subject to the provisions of the Rio Grande Compact and the resolutions of the Rio Grande Compact Commission. (2) The storage of native Rio Grande system water shall only be authorized to the extent that the necessary water ownership and storage rights have been acquired by the entity requesting such storage. (3) The storage of native Rio Grande system water or San- Juan Chama project water shall not interfere with the authorized purposes of the Abiquiu Dam and Reservoir project. (4) Each user of storage space, regardless of source of water, shall pay for any increase in costs attributable to storage of that user's water. SEC. 338. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK FEDERAL NAVIGATION CHANNEL, NEW YORK. (a) In General.--The portion of the project for navigation, Flushing Bay and Creek, New York, authorized by the first section of the Act of March 3, 1905 (chapter 1482, 33 Stat. 1120; 52 Stat. 803; 76 Stat. 1174), described in subsection (b) is no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. (b) Portion Described.--The portion referred to in subsection (a) is the portion from river mile 2.5 to river mile 2.9, as bounded by-- (1) the coordinates of-- (A) Latitude North 40 45' 45.61'' Longitude West 73 50' 20.19''; (B) Latitude North 40 45' 47.02'' Longitude West 73 50' 10.80''; (C) Latitude North 40 45' 26.71'' Longitude West 73 50' 10.85''; and (D) Latitude North 40 45' 26.72'' Longitude West 73 50' 10.96''; and (2) the New York Long Island State Plane (US Survey Feet, NAD-83), as follows: (A) Easting x1028866.501 Northing y217179.294; (B) Easting x1029588.853 Northing y217322.675; (C) Easting x1029588.853 Northing y215267.486; and (D) Easting x1028964.587 Northing y215267.486. SEC. 339. RUSH RIVER AND LOWER BRANCH RUSH RIVER, NORTH DAKOTA. (a) In General.--The portion of the comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Red River of the North drainage basin, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Minnesota, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1177; 64 Stat. 176), consisting of clearing and rectification of the channel from mile 28.3 near Amenia to the mouth of the Rush River, known as Cass County Drain No. 12, is no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. (b) Lower Branch Rush River.--The project for flood control, Lower Branch Rush River, North Dakota, carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), known as Cass County Drain No. 2, is no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. [[Page H6964]] SEC. 340. PAWCATUCK RIVER, LITTLE NARRAGANSETT BAY AND WATCH HILL COVE, RHODE ISLAND AND CONNECTICUT. Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, that portion of the project for navigation, Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, Rhode Island and Connecticut, authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (chapter 19, 59 Stat. 13), consisting of a 10-foot-deep, 16-acre anchorage area in Watch Hill Cove is no longer authorized. SEC. 341. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Section 575 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3789; 113 Stat. 311; 121 Stat. 1253) is repealed. SEC. 342. CAP SANTE WATERWAY, WASHINGTON. Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the project for navigation, Cap Sante Waterway and Navigation Channel, Skagit County, Washington, authorized by the Act of March 2, 1919 (chapter 95, 40 Stat. 1285), is modified to deauthorize the portion of the project consisting of an approximately 334,434-foot area of the Federal channel within Anacortes Harbor inside and directly adjacent to the Federal breakwater and training wall structure, starting at a point with coordinates N557015.552, E1210819.619, thence running S88 13'2.06''E approximately 200 feet to a point with coordinates N557009.330, E1211019.522, thence running S01 46'58.08''W approximately 578 feet to a point with coordinates N556431.405, E1211001.534, thence running S49 49'50.23''W approximately 69 feet to a point with coordinates N556387.076, E1210949.002, thence running S51 53'0.25''E approximately 35 feet to a point with coordinates N556365.662, E1210976.316, thence running S49 38'58.48''W approximately 112 feet to a point with coordinates N556292.989, E1210890.775, thence running N88 13'1.87''W approximately 109 feet to a point with coordinates N556296.367, E1210782.226, thence running S46 46'58.97''W approximately 141 feet to a point with coordinates N556199.527, E1210679.164, thence running N88 13'1.77''W approximately 700 feet to a point with coordinates N556221.305, E1209979.502, thence running N01 46'58.08''E approximately 250 feet to a point with coordinates N556471.184, E1209987.280, thence running S88 13'1.77''E approximately 815 feet to a point with coordinates N556445.828, E1210801.886, thence running N01 46'58.08''E approximately 570 feet to the point of origin. SEC. 343. LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESERVOIR PERMIT REVIEW. Section 1119(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2347 note) is amended by striking ``owned or operated by the Secretary''. SEC. 344. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT. Section 1203(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3805) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``For fiscal years 2019 and 2020'' and inserting ``Until September 30, 2024''. SEC. 345. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION. For fiscal years 2021 through 2024, in carrying out section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), the Secretary shall give priority to a project to restore and protect an aquatic ecosystem or estuary that-- (1) is located in the South Platte River Basin; (2) is located on a body of water that is identified by the applicable State pursuant to section 303(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1313(d)) as being impaired; (3) has the potential to provide flood risk management and recreational benefits in addition to ecosystem restoration benefits; and (4) is located in a city with a population of 80,000 or less. SEC. 346. SURPLUS WATER CONTRACTS AND WATER STORAGE AGREEMENTS. Section 1046(c)(3) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1254; 132 Stat. 3784) is amended by striking ``12'' and inserting ``16''. SEC. 347. NO WAKE ZONES IN NAVIGATION CHANNELS. Section 1149 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 1223 note) amended-- (1) by striking ``recreational'' in each place it appears and inserting ``covered''; and (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: ``(c) Definitions.--In this section: ``(1) Covered navigation channel.--The term `covered navigation channel' means a navigation channel that-- ``(A) is federally marked or maintained; ``(B) is part of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; and ``(C) is adjacent to a marina. ``(2) Covered vessel.--The term `covered vessel' means a recreational vessel or an uninspected passenger vessel, as such terms are defined in section 2101 of title 46, United States Code.''. SEC. 348. LIMITATION ON CONTRACT EXECUTION IN THE ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN. (a) Definition of Covered Contract.--In this section, the term ``covered contract'' means a contract between any local governmental entity and the Secretary for water supply storage in a Federal or non-Federal hydropower lake within the Arkansas River Basin. (b) Limitation.--For any new covered contract for a hydropower lake that is entered into during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2022, a local governmental entity shall not pay more than 110 percent of the initial principal cost for the acre-feet being sought for the new covered contract for that hydropower lake. SEC. 349. WAIVER OF NON-FEDERAL SHARE OF DAMAGES RELATED TO CERTAIN CONTRACT CLAIMS. In a case in which the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals or other court of competent jurisdiction has rendered a decision during the period beginning on December 1, 2017, and ending on December 31, 2022, awarding damages to a contractor relating to the adjudication of claims arising from the construction of an authorized water resources development project, notwithstanding the terms of the Project Partnership Agreement, the Secretary shall waive payment of the share of the non-Federal interest of those damages, including attorney's fees, if-- (1)(A) the contracting officer was instructed by the Corps of Engineers to modify the terms of the contract or terminate the contract; and (B) the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals or other court of competent jurisdiction determined that the failure of the contracting officer to timely take the action described in subparagraph (A) was a material breach of the contract that resulted in damages to the contractor awarded by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals or the court, as applicable; or (2) the claims arose from construction of a project deauthorized under this title. SEC. 350. REDUCED PRICING FOR CERTAIN WATER SUPPLY STORAGE. Section 322 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2324) is amended-- (1) in subsection (b), by striking ``2,000,000'' and inserting ``3,000,000''; and (2) in subsection (g)-- (A) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; or''; (B) by striking ``means a community'' and inserting the following: ``means-- ``(1) a community''; and (C) by adding at the end the following: ``(2) a regional water system that serves a population of less than 100,000, for which the per capita income is less than the per capita income of not less than 50 percent of the counties in the United States.''. SEC. 351. FLOOD CONTROL AND OTHER PURPOSES. Section 103(k) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213) is amended-- (1) by striking ``Except as'' and inserting the following: ``(1) In general.--Except as''; and (2) by adding at the end the following: ``(2) Renegotiation of terms.-- ``(A) In general.--At the request of a non-Federal interest, the Secretary and the non-Federal interest may renegotiate the terms and conditions of an eligible deferred payment, including-- ``(i) permitting the non-Federal contribution to be made without interest, pursuant to paragraph (1); ``(ii) recalculation of the interest rate; ``(iii) full or partial forgiveness of interest accrued during the period of construction; and ``(iv) a credit against construction interest for a non- Federal investment that benefits the completion or performance of the project or separable element. ``(B) Eligible deferred payment.--An eligible deferred payment agreement under subparagraph (A) is an agreement for which-- ``(i) the non-Federal contribution was made with interest; ``(ii) the period of project construction exceeds 10 years from the execution of a project partnership agreement or appropriation of funds; and ``(iii) the construction interest exceeds $45,000,000. ``(3) Credit for non-federal contribution.-- ``(A) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to credit any costs incurred by the non-Federal interest (including in- kind contributions) to remedy a design or construction deficiency of a covered project or separable element toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the covered project, if the Secretary determines the remedy to be integral to the completion or performance of the covered project. ``(B) Credit of costs.--If the non-Federal interest incurs costs or in-kind contributions for a project to remedy a design or construction deficiency of a project or separable element which has a 100 percent Federal cost share, and the Secretary determines the remedy to be integral to the completion or performance of the project, the Secretary is authorized to credit such costs to any interest accrued on a deferred non-Federal contribution. ``(4) Treatment of pre-payment.--Notwithstanding a deferred payment agreement with a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall accept, without interest of any type, the repayment of a non-Federal contribution for any eligible deferred payment described in paragraph (2)(B) for which-- ``(A) the non-Federal interest makes a payment of at least $200 million for that eligible deferred payment agreement on or before September 30, 2021; and ``(B) the non-Federal interest repays the remaining principal by September 30, 2023.''. [[Page H6965]] SEC. 352. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS. (a) Consistency With Reports.--Congress finds that the project modifications described in this section are in accordance with the reports submitted to Congress by the Secretary under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d), titled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development'', or have otherwise been reviewed by Congress. (b) Modifications.-- (1) Sacramento area, california.--Section 219(f)(23) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 117 Stat. 1840) is amended to read as follows: ``(23) Sacramento area, california.--$45,000,000 for regional water conservation, recycling, reliability, and resiliency projects in Placer, El Dorado, and Sacramento Counties and the San Juan Suburban Water District, California.''. (2) South perris, california.--Section 219(f)(52) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000''. (3) Madison and st. clair counties, illinois.--Section 219(f)(55) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting ``$45,000,000''. (4) Southern and eastern kentucky.--Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3773; 113 Stat. 348; 117 Stat. 142; 121 Stat. 1226) is amended-- (A) in subsection (g), by inserting ``Boyd, Carter, Elliott, Lincoln,'' after ``Lee,''; and (B) in subsection (h), by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting ``$100,000,000''. (5) Desoto county, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(30) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 119 Stat. 282; 119 Stat. 2257; 122 Stat. 1623) is amended by striking ``$75,000,000'' and inserting ``$130,000,000''. (6) Jackson county, mississippi.--Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 1494; 121 Stat. 1258) is amended-- (A) in subsection (c)(5), by striking ``water supply and'' and inserting ``water supply, projects for stormwater and drainage systems, and''; and (B) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ``$32,500,000'' and inserting ``$57,500,000''. (7) St. louis, missouri.--Section 219(f)(32) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 337; 121 Stat. 1233) is amended by striking ``$35,000,000'' and inserting ``$70,000,000''. (8) Midwest city, oklahoma.--Section 219(f)(231) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1266) is amended by striking ``$2,000,000'' and inserting ``$5,000,000''. (9) South central pennsylvania.--Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845; 109 Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 310; 117 Stat. 142; 121 Stat. 1146) is amended-- (A) in subsection (g)(1), by striking ``$200,000,000'' and inserting ``$400,000,000''; and (B) in subsection (h)(2), by inserting ``Beaver, Jefferson,'' after ``Washington,''. (10) Lakes marion and moultrie, south carolina.--Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 117 Stat. 1838; 130 Stat. 1677; 132 Stat. 3818) is amended by striking ``$89,550,000'' and inserting ``$110,000,000''. (11) El paso county, texas.--Section 219(f)(269) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1268) is amended by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``$75,000,000''. (12) Western rural water.--Section 595 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 1836; 118 Stat. 440; 121 Stat. 1219; 123 Stat. 2851; 128 Stat. 1316; 130 Stat. 1681) is amended-- (A) by striking the section heading and inserting ``western rural water.''; (B) in subsection (b), by inserting ``Arizona,'' before ``rural Idaho''; (C) in subsection (c), by inserting ``Arizona,'' before ``Idaho''; and (D) in subsection (i), by striking ``for the period beginning with fiscal year 2001, $435,000,000, to remain available until expended.'' and inserting the following: ``, to remain available until expended-- ``(1) for the period beginning with fiscal year 2001, $435,000,000 for Idaho, Montana, rural Nevada, New Mexico, rural Utah, and Wyoming; and ``(2) $150,000,000 for Arizona.''. (13) Central west virginia.--Section 571(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 371; 121 Stat. 1257) is amended by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$100,000,000''. (14) Southern west virginia.--Section 340(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856; 110 Stat. 3727; 113 Stat. 320) is amended by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting ``$120,000,000''. (c) Lowell Creek Tunnel, Seward, Alaska.--Section 5032(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-114, 121 Stat. 1205) is amended by striking ``15'' and inserting ``20''. (d) Cape Arundel Disposal Site, Maine.--Section 1312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3821) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2021'' and inserting ``September 30, 2024''. SEC. 353. PROJECT MODIFICATION AUTHORIZATIONS. (a) Water Supply.--The following project modifications for water supply, as identified in the report entitled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development'' dated February 2019, and submitted to Congress on June 3, 2019, pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by Congress, are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the recommendations included in such report pursuant to section 301(c) of the Water Supply Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b(c)) and as follows: (1) Clarence cannon dam and mark twain lake project, salt river, missouri.-- (A) In general.--The project for Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Lake Project, Salt River, Missouri, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1189; 79 Stat. 1089; 95 Stat. 1684), is modified to release 5,600 acre-feet of future use water supply storage to the Federal Government under water supply contract No. DACW43-88-C-0036, and future financial obligations for such volume of storage. (B) Relief of certain obligations.--Upon execution of the amendment required by subparagraph (C), the State of Missouri shall be relieved of the obligation to pay the percentage of the annual operation and maintenance expense, the percentage of major replacement cost, and the percentage of major rehabilitation costs, of the joint use facilities of the project described in subparagraph (A), that are attributable to water supply storage space not being used by the State during the period before the State commences use of the storage space. (C) Amendment to contract.--The Secretary shall amend Water Supply Contract No. DACW43-88-C-0036, dated March 10, 1988, between the United States and the State of Missouri, to implement the modifications required under subparagraphs (A) and (B). (2) City of plattsburg.-- (A) In general.--The project for Smithville Lake, Missouri, authorized pursuant to section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1080), is modified to release the City of Plattsburg, Missouri, from-- (i) 8,850 acre-feet of future water supply storage contracts; and (ii) future financial obligations for the volume of storage described in clause (i). (B) Amendment to contract.--The Secretary shall amend water supply contract No. DACW41-73-C-0008, between the United States and the State of Missouri, to implement the modifications under subparagraph (A). (3) City of smithville.-- (A) In general.--The project for Smithville Lake, Missouri, authorized pursuant to section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1080), is modified to release the City of Smithville, Missouri, from-- (i) 6,000 acre-feet of future water supply storage contracts; and (ii) future financial obligations for the volume of storage described in clause (i). (B) Amendment to contract.--The Secretary shall amend water supply contract No. DACW-41-73-C-0007, between the United States and the State of Missouri, to implement the modifications under subparagraph (A). (b) Flood Risk Management.--The following project modifications for flood risk management, as identified in a report entitled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development'', and submitted to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by Congress, are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary: (1) Modification of the project for flood risk management, lower Mississippi River, authorized by the Act of May 15, 1928 (chapter 569, 45 Stat. 534), to incorporate the Wolf River Backwater and Nonconnah Creek levee systems into the project, authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (chapter 688, 49 Stat. 1575; 50 Stat. 881), subject to the determination of the Secretary that such systems meet all requirements applicable to such project. (2) Modification of the project for flood risk management, Red River below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas, authorized by the Act of June 28, 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat. 1219), to incorporate the Cherokee Park Levee into the project, subject to the determination of the Secretary that such levee meets all requirements applicable to such project. SEC. 354. COMPLETION OF MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR ACTIVITIES. (a) Expedited Completions.-- (1) Upper snake river basin.--The Secretary shall expedite, in coordination with State, Tribal, and local authorities, the completion of maintenance and repair activities for those elements of the levee systems in the Upper Snake River Basin, authorized pursuant to the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 179), that are operated and maintained by the Secretary. (2) Lower missouri river basin.--The Secretary shall expedite, in coordination with State and local authorities and stakeholders, the completion of maintenance and repair activities for those elements of the levee systems in the Lower Missouri River Basin, authorized pursuant to the Pick- Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (authorized by section 9(b) of the Act of December 22, 1944 (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 891)) or the Missouri [[Page H6966]] River Bank Stabilization and Navigation project (authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (chapter 19, 59 Stat. 19)), that are operated and maintained by the Secretary. (3) Coos bay north jetty system, oregon.--The Secretary shall expedite, in coordination with State and local authorities and stakeholders, the completion of maintenance and repair activities for those elements of the Coos Bay North Jetty system, Oregon, authorized by the first section of the Act of January 21, 1927 (chapter 47, 44 Stat. 1014), that are operated and maintained by the Secretary. (4) Indian river inlet and bay, delaware.--The Secretary shall expedite, in coordination with State and local authorities, the completion of maintenance and repair activities for the elements of the project for navigation, Indian River Inlet and Bay, Delaware, authorized by the Act of August 26, 1937 (chapter 832, 50 Stat. 846), that are operated and maintained by the Secretary. (b) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this section affects the responsibility of the Secretary to comply with the requirements of any Federal law in carrying out the activities required to be expedited by this section. SEC. 355. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS. (a) In General.-- (1) Muddy river, massachusetts.--The separable elements for ecosystem restoration of the project for flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, Muddy River, Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts, authorized by section 522 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2656), and deauthorized pursuant to section 6001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1345), are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary, subject to subsection (b). (2) East chester creek, new york.--Notwithstanding section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a), the project for navigation, East Chester Creek, New York, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 164; 100 Stat. 4181), and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579(a)), is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary, subject to subsection (b). (3) Christiansted harbor, united states virgin islands.-- Notwithstanding section 1002 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4221), the portion of the project for navigation, Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 167), and deauthorized under section 1002 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4221), is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary, subject to subsection (b). (4) Charlotte amalie (st. thomas) harbor, united states virgin islands.--Notwithstanding section 1002 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4221), the portion of the project for navigation, Charlotte Amalie (St. Thomas) Harbor, St. Thomas, United States Virgin Islands, authorized by the Act of August 26, 1937 (chapter 832, 50 Stat. 850), and deauthorized under section 1002 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4221), is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary, subject to subsection (b). (b) Report to Congress.--The Secretary shall complete and submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a post- authorization change report (as such term is defined in section 1132(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2282e(d)) prior to carrying out a project identified in subsection (a). SEC. 356. CONVEYANCES. (a) Generally Applicable Provisions.-- (1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage and the legal description of any real property to be conveyed under this section shall be determined by a survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary. (2) Applicability of property screening provisions.-- Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to any conveyance under this section. (3) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance is made under this section shall be responsible for all reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate transaction and environmental documentation costs, associated with the conveyance. (4) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made under this section shall hold the United States harmless from any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or after the date of the conveyance, on the real property conveyed. The United States shall remain responsible for any liability with respect to activities carried out, before such date, on the real property conveyed. (5) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may require that any conveyance under this section be subject to such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. (b) Eufaula, Alabama.-- (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey to the City of Eufaula, Alabama, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real property described in the Department of the Army Lease No. DACW01-2-17-0747, containing 56.76 acres, more or less, and being a part of Tracts L-1268 (26.12 acres), L-1273 (13.71 acres), L-1278 (6.75 acres), and L1279 (10.36 acres) of the Walter F. George Lock and Dam and Lake project. (2) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. (3) Consideration.--The City of Eufaula, Alabama, shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less than the fair market value of the property conveyed under this subsection, as determined by the Secretary. (c) Montgomery, Alabama.-- (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey to the City of Montgomery, Alabama, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real property described in paragraph (2). (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed is the 62.38 acres of land and water under the primary jurisdiction of the Secretary in the R.E. ``Bob'' Woodruff Project Area that is covered by lease number DACW01-1-05-0037, including the parcels and structure known as ``Powder Magazine''. (3) Deadline.--To the extent practicable, the Secretary shall complete the conveyance under this subsection by not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act. (4) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the interests of the United States, to include retaining the right to inundate with water any land transferred under this subsection. (5) Consideration.--The City of Montgomery, Alabama, shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less than the fair market value of the property conveyed under this subsection, as determined by the Secretary. (d) Conveyance of Wilmington Harbor North Disposal Area, Delaware.-- (1) In general.--As soon as practicable, the Secretary shall complete the conveyance of the Wilmington Harbor North Disposal Area confined disposal facility, Delaware, to the State of Delaware. (2) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. (3) Consideration.--The State of Delaware shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less than the fair market value of the property conveyed under this subsection, as determined by the Secretary. (e) Ohio River Lock and Dam Number 52, Massac County, Illinois.-- (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey to the Massac-Metropolis Port District, Illinois, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to any real property located north of the south bank of the Ohio River in Massac County, Illinois, that is associated with the Ohio River Lock and Dam 52. (2) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. (3) Consideration.--The Massac-Metropolis Port District, Illinois, shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less than fair market value of the property conveyed under this subsection, as determined by the Secretary. (f) Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam, Minneapolis, Minnesota.-- (1) Conveyance authorized.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, upon request-- (A) convey, without consideration, to the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, or its designee, all or substantially all of the real property owned by the United States adjacent to or in the vicinity of the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam, subject to the right of the Secretary to retain any easements in such property solely to the extent necessary to continue to operate and maintain the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam; and (B) provide, without consideration, to the City or its designee-- (i) access and use rights by license, easement, or similar agreement, to any real property and structures at the site of the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam that is not conveyed under subparagraph (A); and (ii) for any such property retained by the Secretary, exclusive license or easement over such property to allow the City or its designee to construct, use, and operate amenities thereon, and to utilize such property as a comprehensive recreational, touristic, and interpretive experience. (2) Ownership and operation of lock and dam.--Ownership rights to the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam shall not be conveyed under this subsection, and the Secretary shall retain all rights to operate and maintain the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam. (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the property conveyed under this subsection is not used for a public purpose, all right, title, and interest in and to the property shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United States. (4) Upper st. anthony falls lock and dam defined.--In this subsection, the term ``Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam'' means the lock and dam located on Mississippi River Mile 853.9 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. (g) Clinton, Missouri.-- (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey to the City of Clinton, [[Page H6967]] Missouri, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real property described in paragraph (2). (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed is a tract of land situated in the S \1/2\ of Section 12 and the N \1/2\ of Section 13, Township 41 North, Range 26 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Henry County, Missouri, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the north line of said S \1/2\ of Section 12 and the easterly right-of-way of State Highway No. 13; thence easterly along the north line of said S \1/2\ to the northeast corner of the W \1/2\ NW \1/4\ NE \1/4\ SW \1/4\ of said Section 12; thence southerly along the east line of said W \1/2\ NW \1/4\ NE \1/4\ SW \1/4\ to the southeast corner thereof; thence easterly along the north line of the S \1/2\ NE \1/4\ SW \1/4\ of said Section 12 to the southwest corner of the W \1/2\ NW \1/4\ NW \1/4\ SE \1/4\ of said Section 12; thence in a northeasterly direction to the northeast corner of said W \1/2\ NW \1/4\ NW \1/4\ SE \1/4\ ; thence easterly along the north line of said S \1/2\ to the westerly right- of-way of the County Road; thence in a southeasterly and southerly direction along the westerly right-of-way of said County Road approximately 2500 feet to the center of Deer Creek; thence in a southwesterly direction along the center of said Deer Creek, approximately 3900 feet to the south line of said N \1/2\ of Section 13; thence westerly along the south line of said N \1/2\ to the easterly right-of-way line of the St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad; thence in a northwesterly direction along the easterly right-of-way of said railroad to the easterly right-of-way of said State Highway No. 13; thence in a northeasterly direction along the easterly right-of-way of said State Highway No. 13 to the point of the beginning; and including a roadway easement for ingress and egress, described as a strip of land 80 feet in width, lying 40 feet on each side of the following described line, the initial extremities of the following described strip being extended or reduced as required to exactly adjoin the boundary lines which they meet, situated in the S \1/2\ of Section 12, Township 41 North Range 26 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Henry County, Missouri, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the center of said Section 12, thence Sl24'56''W, 1265.52 feet to a point, thence N8829'02''W, 483.97 feet to the point of beginning of the strip of land herein described; thence in a northeasterly direction along a curve to the right, said curve having an initial tangent bearing of N344'4l''E, a radius of 238.73 feet and an interior angle of 6129'26'', an arc distance of 256.21 feet to a point; thence N6514'07''E 218.58 feet to a point; thence in a northeasterly direction along a curve to the left, having a radius of 674.07 feet and an interior angle of 3600'01'', an arc distance of 423.53 feet to a point; thence N2914'07''E, 417.87 feet to a point; thence northeasterly along a curve to the right, having a radius of 818.51 feet and an interior angle of 1430'01'', an arc distance of 207.15 feet to a point; thence N4344'07''E, 57.00 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of a county road, containing 2,948 acres, more or less; Excluding therefrom a tract of land situated in the S \1/2\ of said Section 12, said Township and Range, described as commencing at the center of said Section 12; thence S124'56''W, 1265.52 feet to the point of beginning of the tract of land herein described; thence N8829'02''W, 1122.50 feet; thence S143'26''W, 872.62 feet; thence S8829'02''E, 1337.36 feet; thence Nl43'26''E, 872.62 feet; thence N8829'02''W, 214.86 feet to the point of beginning, containing 26.79 acres, more or less. The above described tract contains, in the aggregate, 177.69 acres, more or less. (3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. (4) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the property conveyed under this subsection is not being used for a public purpose, all right, title, and interest in and to the property shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United States. (h) City of Clinton, Old Orchard Addition, Missouri.-- (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey to the City of Clinton, Missouri, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real property described in paragraph (2). (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed is Lot 28 in Old Orchard Addition, a subdivision of the City of Clinton, Henry County, Missouri, containing 0.36 acres, more or less, including any improvements thereon. (3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the interests of the United States, including such reservations, terms, and conditions as the Secretary determines necessary to allow the United States to operate and maintain the Harry S. Truman Reservoir Project. (4) Consideration.--The City of Clinton, Missouri, shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less than the fair market value of the property conveyed under this subsection, as determined by the Secretary. (i) Tri-County Levee District, Missouri.-- (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey to the Tri-County Levee District, Missouri, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real property described in paragraph (2). (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed is the part of Sections 1 and 12 Township 45 North Range 6 West of the 5th P.M. in Montgomery County, Missouri, described as follows: A tract of land being 60' wide and lying South and East of and adjoining the centerline of the existing levee and being described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of Section 12, thence S 87 52' 35'' E 587.4', thence S 01 29' 25'' W 453.68' to the point of the beginning; said point being in the center of the levee, thence with the centerline of the levee N 77 01' 30'' E 164.92', thence N 74 26' 55'' E 250.0', thence N 72 27' 55'' E 270.0', thence N 69 06' 10'' E 300.0', thence N 66 42' 15'' E 500.0', thence N 64 14' 30'' E 270.0', thence N 61 09' 10'' E 800.0', thence N 60 58' 15'' E 1724.45', thence leaving the centerline S 01 10' 35'' W 69.43', thence parallel with the above described centerline S 60 58' 15'' W 1689.62', thence S 61 09' 10'' W 801.71', thence S 64 14' 30'' W 272.91', thence S 66 42' 15'' W 502.55', thence S 69 06' 10'' W 303.02', thence S 72 27' 55'' W 272.8', thence S 74 26' 55'' W 252.39', thence S 77 01' 30'' W 181.75', thence leaving the South side of the levee N 01 26' 25'' E 61.96' to the point of beginning and containing 5.89 acres more or less. (3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. (4) Consideration.--The Tri-County Levee District, Missouri, shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less than the fair market value of the property conveyed under this subsection, as determined by the Secretary. (j) Judge Joseph Barker, Jr., House, Ohio.-- (1) Non-federal entity.--In this subsection, the term ``non-Federal entity'' means the Friends of Joseph Barker, Jr., House, a nonprofit organization in the State of Ohio. (2) Conveyance authorized.-- (A) In general.--Subject to paragraph (6), the Secretary shall convey to the non-Federal entity, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the property described in paragraph (3)(A). (B) Easement.--Upon conveyance of the property under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall provide to the non- Federal entity, without consideration, an easement over the property described in paragraph (3)(B) for access to the conveyed property for as long as the non-Federal entity is in legal possession of the conveyed property. (3) Descriptions of property.-- (A) In general.--The property referred to in paragraph (2)(A) is the following (as in existence on the date of enactment of this Act): (i) Judge joseph barker, jr., house.--The tract of land situated in the State of Ohio, Washington County, on the Ohio River, and being particularly bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point located on the southern right- of-way line of Ohio Route 7, a new corner to the land now or formerly owned by the United States of America; thence, leaving the right-of-way of said Route 7 and severing the land of said United States of America parallel to and approximately 10 feet easterly of the toe of the existing dredge disposal berm, southeasterly approximately 326 feet to a point prior to the current Corps of Engineers access to the dredging spoil area; thence, northeasterly approximately 480 feet paralleling the top of the slope to the riverbank side of the house and approximately 25 feet northerly therefrom; thence, northwest approximately 302 feet to a point in the southern right-of-way of Ohio Route 7; thence with the right- of-way of said Route 7, southwesterly approximately 485 feet to the point of beginning, containing approximately 3.51 acres. (ii) Road tract.--The tract of land situated in the State of Ohio, Washington County, on the Ohio River, and being particularly bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point located on the southern right-of-way line of Ohio Route 7, a new corner to the land now or formerly owned by the United States of America; thence, leaving the right-of-way of said Route 7 and severing the land of said United States of America and with the House Parcel southeasterly 25 feet; thence, northeast, running parallel to said Route 7 right-of- way, approximately 994 feet to a point of deflection; thence northeasterly 368 feet to a point beyond the existing fence corner; thence, east 140 feet to the edge of the existing Willow Island access road; thence with said access road, northwesterly approximately 62 feet to a point in the southern right-of-way of Ohio Route 7; thence with the right- of-way of said Route 7, southwesterly approximately 1,491 feet to the point of beginning, containing approximately 1 acre. (B) Easement.--The property referred to in paragraph (2)(B) is the following: The tract of land situated in the State of Ohio, Washington County, on the Ohio River, and being particularly bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point at the intersection of the southern right-of-way of Ohio Route 7 and the northeast side of the existing Willow Island access road, a new corner to the land now or formerly owned by the United States of America; thence, southwest, running with said Route 7 right-of-way, approximately 30 feet to a point on the southwest side of the existing access road, and [[Page H6968]] corner to the road tract; thence with said access road and the line of the road parcel, southeasterly approximately 62 feet to a point; thence leaving the road parcel and crossing the existing access road northeasterly approximately 30 feet to a point located on the northeast side of the existing access road; thence, northwesterly approximately 62 feet, to the point of beginning, containing approximately 0.04 acre. (4) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. (5) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the property conveyed under this subsection is not being used by the non-Federal entity for a public purpose, all right, title, and interest in and to the property shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United States. (6) Requirements.-- (A) Improvements.--The Secretary shall make such improvements and alterations to the property described in paragraph (3)(A)(i) as the Secretary, in consultation with the non-Federal entity and relevant stakeholders, determines to be appropriate to facilitate conveyance of the property and provision of the easement under this subsection, subject to the condition that the total cost of those improvements and alterations undertaken by the Secretary shall be not more than $120,000. (B) Environmental assessment.--Before making a conveyance under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall-- (i) conduct, with respect to the property to be conveyed, an assessment of the environmental condition of the property, including an investigation of any potential hazardous, toxic, or radioactive waste present on such property; and (ii) submit to the non-Federal entity a report describing the results of such assessment. (C) Refusal by non-federal entity.-- (i) In general.--Upon review by the non-Federal entity of the report under subparagraph (B), the non-Federal entity may elect to refuse the conveyance under this subsection. (ii) Election.--An election under clause (i)-- (I) shall be at the sole discretion of the non-Federal entity; and (II) shall be made by the non-Federal entity by not later than the date that is 30 days after the date of submission of the report under subparagraph (B)(ii). (D) Dredged material placement activities.--The Secretary shall-- (i) notify and coordinate with the non-Federal entity and relevant stakeholders before carrying out any dredged material placement activities associated with the property described in paragraph (3)(A) after the date on which such property is conveyed under this subsection; and (ii) in carrying out a dredged material placement activity under clause (i), act in accordance with Engineer Manual EM 1110-2-5025 (or a subsequent version of that manual). (7) Reservation of rights.--The Secretary may reserve and retain from any conveyance under this subsection a right-of- way or any other right that the Secretary determines to be necessary for the operation and maintenance of the authorized Federal channel along the Ohio River. (8) Treatment.--Conveyance to the non-Federal entity under this subsection of property described in paragraph (3)(A)(i) shall satisfy all obligations of the Secretary with respect to such property under-- (A) section 306101 of title 54, United States Code; and (B) section 306108 of title 54, United States Code, with respect to the effects on the property of dredged material placement activities carried out by the Secretary after the date of the conveyances. (9) Inapplicability.--Subtitle I of title 40, and chapter 4 of title 41, United States Code shall not apply to any conveyance or easement provided under this subsection. (k) Leaburg Fish Hatchery, Lane County, Oregon.-- (1) Conveyance authorized.--Subject to the provisions of this subsection, the Secretary shall convey, without consideration, to the State of Oregon, acting through the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real property comprising the Leaburg Fish Hatchery, consisting of approximately 21.55 acres, identified as tracts Q-1500, Q- 1501E, and 300E-1 and described in Department of the Army Lease No. DACW57-1-18-0009, together with any improvements on the property. (2) Water rights.--The Secretary may transfer to the State of Oregon, acting through the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, any water rights held by the United States that are appurtenant to the property conveyed under this subsection. (3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the interests of the United States, including a condition that all of the property conveyed under this subsection be used and maintained by the State of Oregon for the purpose of operating a fish hatchery in perpetuity. (4) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the property conveyed under this subsection is not being used or maintained by the State of Oregon for the purpose of operating a fish hatchery in perpetuity, all or any portion of the property, including any water rights transferred under this subsection, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to the United States. (5) Savings clause.--If the State of Oregon does not accept the conveyance under this subsection, the Secretary may dispose of the property, including appurtenant water rights, under subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 40, United States Code. (l) Willamette Falls Locks, Willamette River, Oregon.-- (1) Definitions.--In this section: (A) Real estate appendix.--The term ``real estate appendix'' means Appendix A of the document published by the District Commander of the Portland District of the Corps of Engineers, titled ``Willamette Falls Locks Willamette River Oregon Section 216 Disposition Study with Integrated Environmental Assessment''. (B) Receiving entity.--The term ``receiving entity'' means an entity identified by the State of Oregon, in consultation with the Willamette Falls Locks Commission, to receive the conveyance under paragraph (2). (C) Willamette falls locks project.--The term ``Willamette Falls Locks project'' means the project for navigation, Willamette Falls Locks, Willamette River, Oregon, authorized by the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 664, chapter 382). (D) Willamette falls locks report.--The term ``Willamette Falls Locks report'' means the memorandum of the Director of Civil Works with the subject ``Willamette Falls Locks (WFL), Willamette River Oregon Section 216 Disposition Study with Integrated Environmental Assessment (Study)'', dated July 11, 2019. (2) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary is authorized to convey to the receiving entity, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to any land in which the Federal Government has a property interest for the Willamette Falls Locks project, together with any improvements on the land, subject to the requirements of this subsection and in accordance with the Willamette Falls Locks report. (3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. (4) Subject to existing easements and other interests.--The conveyance of property under paragraph (2) shall be subject to all existing deed reservations, easements, rights-of-way, and leases that are in effect as of the date of the conveyance. (5) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the property conveyed under this subsection cease to be held in public ownership, all right, title, and interest in and to the property shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United States. (6) Requirements before conveyance.-- (A) Perpetual road easement.--Before making the conveyance under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall acquire a perpetual road easement from an adjacent property owner for use of an access road, which easement shall convey with the property conveyed under such paragraph. (B) Environmental compliance.--Before making the conveyance under paragraph (2), in accordance with the real estate appendix, the Secretary shall complete a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.). (C) Historic preservation.--The Secretary may enter into a memorandum of agreement with the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation that identifies actions the Secretary shall take before making the conveyance under paragraph (2). (D) Repairs.--Before making the conveyance under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall carry out repairs to address primary seismic and safety risks in accordance with the recommendations approved in the Willamette Falls Locks report. (7) Deauthorization.--Beginning on the date on which the Secretary makes the conveyance under paragraph (2), the Willamette Falls Locks project is no longer authorized. SEC. 357. LAKE EUFAULA ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Section 3133(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1141) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(5) Termination.--The committee shall terminate on the date that is 30 days after the date on which the committee submits final recommendations to the Secretary.''. SEC. 358. REPEAL OF MISSOURI RIVER TASK FORCE, NORTH DAKOTA. (a) In General.--Section 705 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2696) is repealed. (b) Conforming Amendments.-- (1) Purposes.--Section 702(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2695) is amended by inserting ``prepared under section 705(e) (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020)'' before the period at the end. (2) Definitions.--Section 703 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2695) is amended-- (A) by striking paragraphs (2) and (4); and (B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (5) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively. [[Page H6969]] SEC. 359. REPEAL OF MISSOURI RIVER TASK FORCE, SOUTH DAKOTA. (a) In General.--Section 905 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2709) is repealed. (b) Conforming Amendments.-- (1) Purposes.--Section 902(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2708) is amended by inserting ``prepared under section 905(e) (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020)'' before the period at the end. (2) Definitions.--Section 903 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2708) is amended-- (A) by striking paragraphs (2) and (4); and (B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (5) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively. SEC. 360. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. (a) Section 710 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2264), and the item relating to such section in the table of contents, are repealed. (b) Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a) is amended-- (1) in subsection (b), by striking paragraph (2) and redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2); and (2) by striking subsection (c). (c) Section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c) is amended-- (1) in subsection (d)-- (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Notwithstanding the requirements of subsection (c), the Secretary'' and inserting ``The Secretary''; (B) by striking ``subsections (a) and (c)'' each place it appears and inserting ``subsection (a)''; and (C) by striking paragraph (4); and (2) by striking subsection (c) and redesignating subsections (d) through (g) as subsections (c) through (f), respectively. (d) Section 6003 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 579c), and the item relating to such section in the table of contents, are repealed. (e) Section 1301 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 579d), and the item relating to such section in the table of contents, are repealed. (f) Section 1302 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 579c-1), and the item relating to such section in the table of contents, are repealed. (g) Section 1301 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 579d-1), and the item relating to such section in the table of contents, are repealed. (h) Section 1302 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 579c-2), and the item relating to such section in the table of contents, are repealed. TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE SEC. 401. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. The following projects for water resources development and conservation and other purposes, as identified in the reports titled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development'' submitted to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by Congress, are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in the respective reports or decision documents designated in this section: (1) Navigation.-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ C. Date of Report of A. State B. Name Chief of D. Estimated Costs Engineers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. AK Port of Nome May 29, 2020 Federal: $378,908,000 Modifications Non-Federal: $126,325,000 Total: $505,233,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2. AK St. George Harbor August 13, Federal: $147,874,000 Improvement, St. 2020 Non-Federal: $16,508,000 George Total: $164,382,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3. AK Unalaska (Dutch February 7, Federal: $26,967,000 Harbor) Channels 2020 Non-Federal: $8,989,000 Total: $35,956,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4. CT New Haven Harbor May 7, 2020 Federal: $55,250,000 Navigation Non-Federal: $19,442,000 Improvement Total: $74,692,000 Project ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5. NY, New York and New April 23, Federal: $19,550,000 NJ Jersey Harbor 2020 Non-Federal: $6,520,000 Anchorages Total: $26,070,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6. TX Gulf Intracoastal October 23, Total: $414,144,000 Waterway, Brazos 2019 River Floodgates and Colorado River Locks ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7. TX Houston Ship April 23, Federal: $625,204,000 Channel Expansion 2020 Non-Federal: $260,431,000 Channel Total: $885,635,000 Improvement Project, Harris, Chambers, and Galveston Counties ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8. TX Matagorda Ship November 15, Federal: $140,156,000 Channel 2019 Non-Federal: $80,500,000 Improvement Total: $220,656,000 Project, Port Lavaca ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9. VA Atlantic August 25, Federal: $102,755,000 Intracoastal 2020 Non-Federal: $0 Waterway, North Total: $102,755,000 Landing Bridge Replacement ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (2) Flood risk management.-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ C. Date of Report of A. State B . Name Chief of D. Estimated Costs Engineers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. AZ Little Colorado December 14, Federal: $54,260,000 River at Winslow, 2018 Non-Federal: $29,217,000 Navajo County Total: $83,477,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2. CA Westminster, East July 9, 2020 Federal: $324,905,000 Garden Grove, Non-Federal: $940,191,000 California Flood Total: $1,265,096,000 Risk Management ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Page H6970]] 3. CT, Westchester County May 7, 2020 Federal: $15,199,000 NY Streams, Byram Non-Federal: $15,199,000 River Basin, Total: $30,397,000 Fairfield County, Connecticut, and Westchester County, New York ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4. KY Louisville October 27, Federal: $122,170,000 Metropolitan 2020 Non-Federal: $65,917,000 Flood Protection Total: $188,087,000 System Reconstruction, Jefferson and Bullitt Counties ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5. ND Souris River Basin April 16, Federal: $59,582,915 Flood Risk 2019 Non-Federal: $32,364,085 Management Total: $91,947,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6. NJ Peckman River April 29, Federal: $98,137,000 Basin 2020 Non-Federal: $52,843,000 Total: $150,980,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7. NM Middle Rio Grande March 13, Federal: $201,944,451 Flood Protection, 2020 Non-Federal: $108,740,000 Bernalillo to Total: $310,684,000 Belen ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8. OK Tulsa and West- April 23, Federal: $89,311,000 Tulsa Levee 2020 Non-Federal: $48,091,000 System, Tulsa Total: $137,402,000 County ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9. PR Rio Culebrinas at August 17, Federal: $17,295,600 Aguiadilla and 2020 Non-Federal: $8,568,400 Aguada Total: $25,864,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10. PR Rio Guayanilla August 13, Federal: $103,422,000 Flood Risk 2020 Non-Federal: $55,689,000 Management, Total: $159,111,000 Guayanilla ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 11. PR Rio Grande de November 18, Federal: $9,770,000 Manati Flood Risk 2020 Non-Federal: $4,520,000 Management, Total: $14,290,000 Ciales ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12. USVI Savan Gut, St. August 24, Federal: $48,658,100 Thomas 2020 Non-Federal: $25,455,900 Total: $74,114,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13. USVI Turpentine Run, August 17, Federal: $29,817,850 St. Thomas 2020 Non-Federal: $15,311,150 Total: $45,129,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (3) Hurricane and storm damage risk reduction.-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ C. Date of Report of A. State B. Name Chief of D. Estimated Costs Engineers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. DE Delaware March 6, 2020 Initial Federal: Beneficial Use of $66,464,000 Dredged Material Initial Non-Federal: for the Delaware $35,789,000 River Total: $102,253,000 Renourishment Federal: $120,023,000 Renourishment Non-Federal: $120,023,000 Renourishment Total: $240,046,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2. NJ New Jersey April 8, 2020 Initial Federal: Beneficial Use of $84,071,000 Dredged Material Initial Non-Federal: for the Delaware $45,270,000 River Total: $129,341,000 Renourishment Federal: $85,495,000 Renourishment Non-Federal: $85,495,000 Renourishment Total: $170,990,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3. NJ Rahway River June 9, 2020 Federal: $48,322,000 Basin, New Jersey Non-Federal: $26,020,000 Coastal Storm Total: $74,342,000 Risk Management ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4. NJ Raritan Bay and August 25, Federal: $107,680,000 Sandy Hook Bay, 2020 Non-Federal: $57,981,000 Highlands Total: $165,661,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Page H6971]] 5. NY East Rockaway August 22, Initial Federal: Inlet to Rockaway 2019 $638,460,000 Inlet and Jamaica Initial Non-Federal: $0 Bay, Atlantic Total: $638,460,000 Coast of New York Renourishment Federal: $200,924,000 Renourishment Non-Federal: $200,924,000 Renourishment Total: $401,847,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6. NY Fire Island Inlet July 9, 2020 Initial Federal: to Montauk Point, $1,576,790,000 New York Initial Non-Federal: $0 Reformulation Total: $1,576,790,000 Renourishment Federal: $767,695,000 Renourishment Non-Federal: $767,695,000 Renourishment Total: $1,535,390,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7. NY Hashamomuck Cove December 9, Initial Federal: Coastal Storm 2019 $11,920,000 Risk Management Initial Non-Federal: $6,418,000 Total: $18,338,000 Renourishment Federal: $24,237,000 Renourishment Non-Federal: $24,237,000 Renourishment Total: $48,474,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8. RI Pawcatuck River December 19, Federal: $37,679,000 Coastal Storm 2018 Non-Federal: $20,289,000 Risk Management Total: $57,968,000 Project ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9. VA Norfolk Coastal February 5, Federal: $942,920,000 Storm Risk 2019 Non-Federal: $507,730,000 Management Total: $1,450,650,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (4) Flood risk management and ecosystem restoration.-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ C. Date of Report of A. State B. Name Chief of D. Estimated Costs Engineers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. CO South Platte River July 29, 2019 Federal: $344,076,000 and Tributaries, Non-Federal: $206,197,000 Adams and Denver Total: $550,273,000 Counties ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (5) Ecosystem restoration.-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ C. Date of Report of A. State B. Name Chief of D. Estimated Costs Engineers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. CA Delta Islands and December 18, Federal: $17,251,000 Levees 2018 Non-Federal: $9,289,000 Total: $26,540,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2. CA Malibu Creek November 13, Federal: $172,249,000 Ecosystem 2020 Non-Federal: $106,960,000 Restoration, Los Total: $279,209,000 Angeles and Ventura Counties ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3. CA Yuba River June 20, 2019 Federal: $66,975,000 Ecosystem Non-Federal: $36,064,000 Restoration Total: $103,039,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4. CO, Rio Grande, August 5, Federal: $16,998,000 NM, TX Environmental 2019 Non-Federal: $9,153,000 Management Total: $26,151,000 Program, Sandia Pueblo to Isleta Pueblo, New Mexico, Ecosystem Restoration ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5. FL Comprehensive April 8, 2020 Federal: $379,583,000 Everglades Non-Federal: $375,737,000 Restoration Plan, Total: $755,320,000 Loxahatchee River Watershed Restoration Project, Martin and Palm Beach Counties ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6. IA, Grand River Basin November 18, Federal: $78,876,000 MO Ecosystem 2020 Non-Federal: $42,471,000 Restoration Total: $121,347,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7. IL The Great Lakes May 23, 2019 Federal: $557,730,550 and Mississippi Non-Federal: $300,316,450 River Interbasin Total: $858,047,000 Study - Brandon Road, Will County ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Page H6972]] 8. IL South Fork of the July 9, 2020 Federal: $11,657,000 South Branch of Non-Federal: $6,277,000 the Chicago Total: $17,934,000 River, Bubbly Creek, Ecosystem Restoration ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9. MD Anacostia December 19, Federal: $25,866,750 Watershed 2018 Non-Federal: $13,928,250 Restoration, Total: $39,795,000 Prince George's County ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10. MO St. Louis November 1, Federal: $61,362,893 Riverfront- 2019 Non-Federal: $33,042,107 Meramec River Total: $94,405,000 Basin Ecosystem Restoration ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 11. NY, Hudson-Raritan May 26, 2020 Federal: $273,933,000 NJ Estuary Ecosystem Non-Federal: $147,502,000 Restoration Total: $421,435,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12. NY Hudson River November 19, Federal: $33,479,000 Habitat 2020 Non-Federal: $11,159,000 Restoration Total: $44,638,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13. TX Jefferson County September 12, Federal: $38,942,000 Ecosystem 2019 Non-Federal: $20,969,000 Restoration Total: $59,911,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (6) Water supply.-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ C. Date of Report of A. State B. Name Chief of D. Estimated Costs Engineers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. OR Willamette River December 18, Federal: $0 Basin Review 2019 Non-Federal: $0 Reallocation, Total: $0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (7) Modifications and other projects.-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ C. Date of A. State B. Name Decision D. Estimated Costs Document ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. CA San Luis Rey Flood July 24, 2020 Federal: $143,407,500 Control Project, Non-Federal: $47,802,500 San Diego County Total: $191,210,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2. FL Caloosahatchee July 24, 2020 Federal: $514,999,000 River West Basin Non-Federal: $514,999,000 Storage Reservoir Total: $1,029,998,000 (C-43 WBSR) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3. FL Central and September 15, Federal: $66,736,500 Southern Florida, 2020 Non-Federal: $66,736,500 Canal 111 (C-111) Total: $133,473,000 South Dade Project ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4. KY Kentucky Lock June 9, 2020 Total: $1,166,809,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5. NC Carolina Beach June 16, 2020 Federal: $25,125,000 Integrated Beach Non-Federal: $25,125,000 Renourishment Total: $50,250,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6. NC Wrightsville Beach July 2, 2020 Federal: $60,068,000 Non-Federal: $18,486,000 Total: $78,554,000 Renourishment Federal: $18,918,900 Renourishment Non-Federal: $10,187,100 Renourishment Total: $29,106,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7. TX Corpus Christi May 4, 2020 Federal: $406,343,000 Ship Channel, Non-Federal: $275,274,000 Deepening and Total: $681,617,000 Widening and Barge Shelves ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8. VA Atlantic October 19, Federal: $59,500,000 Intracoastal 2020 Non-Federal: $0 Waterway Deep Total: $59,500,000 Creek Bridge Replacement ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SEC. 402. SPECIAL RULES. (a) Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin Project, Brandon Road, Will County, Illinois.--The Secretary shall carry out the project for ecosystem restoration, Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin project, Brandon Road, Will County, Illinois, authorized by section 401 of this Act, substantially in accordance with the terms and conditions described in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 23, 2019, with the following modifications: (1) The Federal share of the cost of construction shall be 80 percent. [[Page H6973]] (2) The Secretary may include the addition or substitution of technologies or measures not described in the report, as the Secretary determines to be advisable. (b) East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay Reformulation, New York.--The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, Atlantic Coast of New York, authorized by section 401 of this Act, shall be considered to be a continuation of the interim response to the authorization by the House of Representatives dated September 20, 1997, and the authorization under the heading ``Department of the Army--Corps of Engineers--Civil--Construction'' under chapter 4 of title X of the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (127 Stat. 24). (c) Tulsa and West-Tulsa Levee System, Tulsa County, Oklahoma.--For the project for flood risk management, Tulsa and West-Tulsa Levee System, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, authorized by section 401 of this Act, the non-Federal contribution for the project shall be financed over a period of 30 years from the date of completion of the project, in accordance with section 103(k) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(k)). (d) Willamette River Basin Review Reallocation Study.--The Secretary shall carry out the project for water supply, Willamette River Basin Review Reallocation, Oregon, authorized by section 401 of this Act, substantially in accordance with the terms and conditions described in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated December 18, 2019, with the following modifications: (1) The Secretary shall meet the obligations of the Corps of Engineers under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 by complying with the June 2019 NMFS Willamette Basin Review Study Biological Opinion Reasonable and Prudent Alternative until such time, if any, as it is modified or replaced, in whole or in part, through the consultation process under section 7(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. (2) The Secretary may reallocate not more than 10 percent of overall storage in the joint conservation pool, as authorized by this Act and without further congressional action, if such reallocation is consistent with the ongoing consultation under section 7(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 related to Willamette Valley System operations. (3) The Secretary shall ensure that the revised reallocation is not reallocated from a single storage use, does not seriously affect authorized project purposes, and does not otherwise involve major operational changes to the project. (e) Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico.--Section 5127 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1242) is amended by striking ``$150,000,000'' and inserting ``$255,816,000''. SEC. 403. AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECTS BASED ON FEASIBILITY STUDIES PREPARED BY NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS. (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out the following projects for water resources development and conservation and other purposes, subject to subsection (b): (1) Fort pierce, st. lucie county, florida.--The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida, as described in the review assessment of the Secretary, titled ``Review Assessment of St. Lucie County, Florida Fort Pierce Shore Protection Project Section 203 Integrated Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment (June 2018)'' and dated July 2018, at a total cost of $33,107,639, and at an estimated total cost of $97,958,972 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project. (2) Baptiste collette bayou, louisiana.--The project for navigation, Baptiste Collette Bayou, Louisiana, as described in the review assessment of the Secretary, titled ``Review Assessment of Plaquemines Parish Government's Section 203 Study Baptiste Collette Bayou Navigation Channel Deepening Project Integrated Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment (January 2017, Amended April 2018)'' and dated June 2018, at a total cost of $44,920,000. (3) Houma navigation canal, louisiana.--The project for navigation, Houma Navigation Canal, Louisiana, as described in the review assessment of the Secretary, titled ``Review Assessment of Houma Navigation Canal Deepening Project Section 203 Integrated Feasibility Report and DRAFT Environmental Impact Statement (June 2018)'' and dated July 2018, at a total cost of $253,458,000. (4) Port fourchon belle pass channel, louisiana.--The project for navigation, Port Fourchon Belle Pass Channel, Louisiana, as described in the review assessment of the Secretary, titled ``Review Assessment of Port Fourchon Belle Pass Channel Deepening Project Section 203 Feasibility Study (January 2019, revised January 2020)'' and dated April 2020, at a total cost of $95,483,000. (5) Wilmington harbor, north carolina.--The project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor, North Carolina, as described in the review assessment of the Secretary, titled ``Review Assessment of Wilmington Harbor, North Carolina Navigation Improvement Project Integrated Section 203 Study & Environmental Report (February 2020)'' and dated May 2020, at a total cost of $834,093,000. (6) Chacon creek, texas.--The project for flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, and other purposes, Chacon Creek, Texas, as described in the review assessment of the Secretary, titled ``Review Assessment of Chacon Creek, Texas Section 203 Integrated Feasibility Report and DRAFT Environmental Assessment (August 2018)'' and dated September 2018, at a total cost of $51,973,000. (b) Requirements.--The Secretary may only carry out a project authorized under subsection (a)-- (1) substantially in accordance with the applicable review assessment for the project submitted by the Secretary under section 203(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as identified in subsection (a) of this section, and subject to such modifications or conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate and identifies in a final assessment that addresses the concerns, recommendations, and conditions identified by the Secretary in the applicable review assessment; and (2) after the Secretary transmits to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate such final assessment. TITLE V--OTHER MATTERS SEC. 501. UPDATE ON INVASIVE SPECIES POLICY GUIDANCE. (a) In General.--The Secretary shall periodically update the Invasive Species Policy Guidance, developed under section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610) and the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 4701 et seq.), in accordance with the most recent National Invasive Species Council Management Plan developed pursuant to Executive Order 13112. (b) Inclusion.--The Secretary may include in the updated guidance invasive species specific efforts at federally authorized water resources development projects located in-- (1) high-altitude lakes; and (2) the Tennessee and Cumberland River basins. SEC. 502. AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES RESEARCH. Section 1108 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2263a) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a)-- (A) by striking ``management'' and inserting ``prevention, management,''; and (B) by inserting ``, elodea, quagga mussels,'' after ``Asian carp''; and (2) in subsection (b)-- (A) by inserting ``or could be impacted in the future'' after ``impacted''; and (B) by striking ``Pacific'' and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting ``Pacific, Arctic, and Gulf Coasts, the Great Lakes, and reservoirs operated and maintained by the Secretary.''. SEC. 503. TERRESTRIAL NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL PILOT PROGRAM. (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a pilot program, in consultation with the Federal Interagency Committee for the Management of Noxious and Exotic Weeds, to identify and develop new and improved strategies for terrestrial noxious weed control on Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary. (b) Partnerships.--In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall act in partnership with such other individuals and entities as the Secretary determines to be appropriate. (c) Cooperative Agreements.--The Secretary may utilize cooperative agreements with county and State agencies for the implementation of the pilot program under subsection (a). (d) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report describing the new and improved strategies developed through the pilot program under subsection (a). SEC. 504. INVASIVE SPECIES RISK ASSESSMENT, PRIORITIZATION, AND MANAGEMENT. Section 528(f)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3771) is amended-- (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (I) and (J) as subparagraphs (J) and (K), respectively; (2) by inserting after subparagraph (H) the following: ``(I) shall, using existing amounts appropriated to the Task Force, develop and update, as appropriate, a priority list of invasive species that-- ``(i) reflects an assessment of ecological risk that the listed invasive species represent; ``(ii) includes populations of invasive plants and animals that-- ``(I) are significantly impacting the structure and function of ecological communities, native species, or habitat within the South Florida ecosystem; or ``(II) demonstrate a strong potential to reduce, obscure, or otherwise alter key indicators used to measure Everglades restoration progress; and ``(iii) shall be used by the Task Force and agencies and entities represented on the Task Force to focus cooperative and collaborative efforts-- ``(I) to guide applied research; ``(II) to develop innovative strategies and tools to facilitate improved management, [[Page H6974]] control, or eradication of listed invasive species; ``(III) to implement specific management, control, or eradication activities at the appropriate periodicity and intensity necessary to reduce or neutralize the impacts of listed invasive species, including the use of qualified skilled volunteers when appropriate; and ``(IV) to develop innovative strategies and tools to prevent future introductions of nonnative species;''; (3) in subparagraph (J) (as so redesignated), by striking ``ecosystem'' and inserting ``ecosystem, including the activities described in subparagraph (I)''; and (4) in clause (i) of subparagraph (K) (as so redesignated), by inserting ``, including the priority list under subparagraph (I) and the activities described in that subparagraph'' after ``Task Force''. SEC. 505. INVASIVE SPECIES MITIGATION AND REDUCTION. Section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610) is amended-- (1) in subsection (b)-- (A) in paragraph (1)-- (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ``this section $110,000,000'' and inserting ``this section (except for subsections (f) and (g)) $130,000,000''; (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end; (iii) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (iv) by adding at the end the following: ``(D) $30,000,000 shall be made available to carry out subsection (d)(1)(A)(iv); and ``(E) $10,000,000 shall be made available to carry out subsection (d)(1)(A)(v).''; (B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); (C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following: ``(2) Other programs.-- ``(A) In general.--There are authorized to be appropriated-- ``(i) $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024 to carry out subsection (f); and ``(ii) $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024 to carry out subsection (g)(2). ``(B) Invasive plant species pilot program.--There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, $10,000,000 to carry out subsection (g)(3).''; and (D) in paragraph (3) (as so redesignated), by inserting ``or (2)(A)'' after ``paragraph (1)''; (2) in subsection (d)-- (A) in the subsection heading, by inserting ``and Decontamination'' after ``Inspection''; (B) in paragraph (1)-- (i) in subparagraph (A)-- (I) in the subparagraph heading, by inserting ``and decontamination'' after ``inspection''; (II) in clause (ii), by striking ``and'' at the end; (III) in clause (iii), by striking ``Arizona River Basins.'' and inserting ``Arkansas River Basins;''; and (IV) by adding at the end the following: ``(iv) to protect the Russian River Basin, California; and ``(v) to protect basins and watersheds that adjoin an international border between the United States and Canada.''; and (ii) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: ``(B) Locations.--The Secretary shall place watercraft inspection and decontamination stations under subparagraph (A) at locations with the highest likelihood of preventing the spread of aquatic invasive species into and out of waters of the United States, as determined by the Secretary in consultation with the Governors and entities described in paragraph (3).''; (C) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ``(iii)'' and inserting ``(v)''; and (D) by striking ``watercraft inspection stations'' each place it appears and inserting ``watercraft inspection and decontamination stations''; and (3) by adding at the end the following: ``(f) Invasive Species Management Pilot Program.-- ``(1) Definition of invasive species.--In this subsection, the term `invasive species' has the meaning given the term in section 1 of Executive Order 13112 (64 Fed. Reg. 6183; relating to invasive species (February 3, 1999)) (as amended by section 2 of Executive Order 13751 (81 Fed. Reg. 88609; relating to safeguarding the Nation from the impacts of invasive species (December 5, 2016))). ``(2) Development of plans.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, shall carry out a pilot program under which the Secretary shall collaborate with States in the Upper Missouri River Basin in developing voluntary aquatic invasive species management plans to mitigate the effects of invasive species on public infrastructure facilities located on reservoirs of the Corps of Engineers in those States. ``(3) Management plan.-- ``(A) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Governor of each State in the Upper Missouri River Basin that elects to participate in the pilot program, shall prepare a management plan, or update or expand an existing plan, for each participating State that identifies public infrastructure facilities located on reservoirs of the Corps of Engineers in those States that-- ``(i) are affected by aquatic invasive species; and ``(ii) need financial and technical assistance in order to maintain operations. ``(B) Use of existing plans.--In developing a management plan under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall consider a management plan submitted by a participating State under section 1204(a) of the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 4724(a)). ``(4) Termination of authority.--The authority provided under this subsection shall terminate on September 30, 2024. ``(g) Invasive Species Prevention, Control, and Eradication.-- ``(1) Definition of invasive species.--In this subsection, the term `invasive species' has the meaning given the term in section 1 of Executive Order 13112 (64 Fed. Reg. 6183; relating to invasive species (February 3, 1999)) (as amended by section 2 of Executive Order 13751 (81 Fed. Reg. 88609; relating to safeguarding the Nation from the impacts of invasive species (December 5, 2016))). ``(2) Invasive species partnerships.-- ``(A) In general.--The Secretary may enter into partnerships with applicable States and other Federal agencies to carry out actions to prevent the introduction of, control, or eradicate, to the maximum extent practicable, invasive species that adversely impact water quantity or water quality in the Platte River Basin, the Upper Colorado River Basin, the Upper Snake River Basin, and the Upper Missouri River Basin. ``(B) Prioritization.--In selecting actions to carry out under a partnership under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall give priority to projects that are intended to control or eradicate the Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) or saltcedar (of the genus Tamarix). ``(3) Invasive plant species pilot program.-- ``(A) Definitions.--In this paragraph: ``(i) Eligible entity.--The term `eligible entity' means a partnership between or among 2 or more entities that-- ``(I) includes-- ``(aa) at least 1 flood control district; and ``(bb) at least 1 city, county, township, town, borough, parish, village, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State or Indian Tribe (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)); and ``(II) may include any other entity (such as a nonprofit organization or institution of higher education), as determined by the Secretary. ``(ii) Invasive plant species.--The term `invasive plant species' means a plant that is nonnative to the ecosystem under consideration, the introduction of which causes or is likely to cause economic harm or harm to human health. ``(B) Pilot program.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall establish a pilot program under which such Secretary shall work with eligible entities to carry out activities-- ``(i) to remove invasive plant species in riparian areas that contribute to drought conditions in-- ``(I) the Lower Colorado River Basin; ``(II) the Rio Grande River Basin; ``(III) the Texas Gulf Coast Basin; and ``(IV) the Arkansas-White-Red Basin; ``(ii) where appropriate, to replace the invasive plant species described in clause (i) with ecologically suitable native species; and ``(iii) to maintain and monitor riparian areas in which activities are carried out under clauses (i) and (ii). ``(C) Report to congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report describing the implementation of the pilot program. ``(D) Termination of authority.--The authority provided under this paragraph shall terminate on September 30, 2024. ``(4) Cost share.--The Federal share of an action carried out under a partnership under paragraph (2) or an activity carried out under the pilot program under paragraph (3) shall not exceed 80 percent of the total cost of the action or activity.''. SEC. 506. AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES PREVENTION. Section 1039(b) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (16 U.S.C. 4701 note) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1)-- (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking ``upper mississippi and ohio river basins and tributaries'' and inserting ``mississippi river and tributaries, including sub- basins''; (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``Upper Mississippi and Ohio River basins and tributaries'' and inserting ``Mississippi River and tributaries, including the 6 sub- basins of the River,''; and (C) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and the document prepared'' and all that follows through ``February 2012.'' and inserting ``the Mississippi River Basin Asian Carp Control Strategy Framework, and the Asian Carp Regional Coordinating Committee's Asian Carp Action Plan.''; and (2) in paragraph (2)-- (A) in subparagraph (A)-- (i) by striking ``December 31 of each year'' and inserting ``December 31, 2020, and biennially thereafter''; and [[Page H6975]] (ii) by striking ``Upper Mississippi and Ohio River basins and tributaries'' and inserting ``Mississippi River and tributaries, including the 6 sub-basins of the River''; and (B) in subparagraph (B)-- (i) in clause (i), by striking ``Upper Mississippi and Ohio River basins and tributaries'' and inserting ``Mississippi River and tributaries, including the 6 sub-basins of the River,''; and (ii) in clause (ii), by striking ``Upper Mississippi and Ohio River basins and tributaries'' and inserting ``Mississippi River and tributaries, including the 6 sub- basins of the River''. SEC. 507. INVASIVE SPECIES IN ALPINE LAKES PILOT PROGRAM. (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall establish a pilot program (referred to in this section as the ``pilot program'') to develop and carry out effective measures necessary to prevent, control, or eradicate aquatic invasive species in alpine lakes that are not located within a unit of the National Park System. (b) Partnerships.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall offer to enter into a partnership to carry out the pilot program with-- (1) any relevant partnering Federal agency; and (2) any relevant compact agency organized with the consent of Congress under article I, section 10 of the Constitution of the United States. (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the pilot program $25,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2022 through 2024. SEC. 508. MURDER HORNET ERADICATION PILOT PROGRAM. (a) Grant Authority.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service, and in consultation with all relevant Federal agencies, shall establish a pilot program to provide financial assistance to States for management, research, and public education activities necessary to-- (1) eradicate the Asian giant hornet; and (2) restore bee populations damaged by the Asian giant hornet. (b) Eligibility.--A State is eligible to receive financial assistance under this section if the State has demonstrated to the Secretary of the Interior sufficient need to implement measures to eradicate the Asian giant hornet. (c) Cost Sharing.-- (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the costs of activities carried out under the pilot program may not exceed 75 percent of the total costs of such activities. (2) In-kind contributions.--The non-Federal share of the costs of activities carried out under the pilot program may be provided in the form of in-kind contributions of materials or services. (d) Limitation on Administrative Expenses.--Not more than 5 percent of financial assistance provided by the Secretary of the Interior under this section may be used for administrative expenses. (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior to carry out the pilot program $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025. (f) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Asian giant hornet.--The term ``Asian giant hornet'' means a Vespa mandarinia. (2) State.--The term ``State'' means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, and the territories and insular possessions of the United States. (g) Sunset.--The authority under this section shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 509. ASIAN CARP PREVENTION AND CONTROL PILOT PROGRAM. (a) Corps of Engineers Asian Carp Prevention Pilot Program.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary, in conjunction with the Tennessee Valley Authority and other relevant Federal agencies, shall carry out an Asian carp prevention pilot program to carry out projects to manage and prevent the spread of Asian carp using innovative technologies, methods, and measures. (2) Project selection.-- (A) Location.--Each project under the pilot program shall be carried out in a river system or reservoir in the Cumberland River Watershed or Tennessee River Watershed in which Asian carp populations are expanding or have been documented. (B) Consultation.--In selecting projects to carry out under the pilot program, the Secretary shall consult with-- (i) applicable Federal, State, and local agencies; (ii) institutions of higher education; and (iii) relevant private organizations, including nonprofit organizations. (C) Limitations.-- (i) Number of projects.--The Secretary may select not more than 10 projects to carry out under the pilot program. (ii) Deadline.--Not later than September 30, 2024, the Secretary shall complete projects selected to be carried out under the pilot program. (3) Best practices.--In carrying out the pilot program, to the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary shall consider existing best practices, such as those described in the document of the Asian Carp Working Group of the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force entitled ``Management and Control Plan for Bighead, Black, Grass, and Silver Carps in the United States'' and dated November 2007. (4) Cost-share.-- (A) In general.--The Federal share of the costs of a project carried out under the program may not exceed 75 percent of the total costs of the project. (B) Operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, and repair.-- After the completion of a project under the pilot program, the Federal share of the costs for operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, and repair of the project shall be 100 percent. (5) Memorandum of agreement.--For projects carried out in reservoirs owned or managed by the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Secretary and the Tennessee Valley Authority shall execute a memorandum of agreement establishing the framework for a partnership and the terms and conditions for sharing expertise and resources. (6) Payments.--The Secretary is authorized to accept and expend funds from the Tennessee Valley Authority to complete any work under this section at a reservoir owned or managed by the Tennessee Valley Authority. (7) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and 2 years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report describing the results of the pilot program, including an analysis of the effectiveness of the innovative technologies, methods, and measures used in projects carried out under the pilot program at preventing the spread, or managing the eradicating of, Asian carp. (8) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $25,000,000, to remain available until expended. (b) Fish and Wildlife Service Asian Carp Eradication Program.-- (1) Establishment.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall establish a program to provide financial assistance to States to implement measures, including for management, research, and public education activities, necessary to eradicate the Asian carp. (2) Eligibility.--A State is eligible to receive financial assistance under this subsection if such State has demonstrated to the Secretary of the Interior sufficient need to implement measures to eradicate the Asian carp. (3) Priority.--In providing financial assistance under the program, the Secretary of the Interior shall give priority to States in the Cumberland River Watershed or the Tennessee River Watershed in which Asian carp populations are expanding or have been documented. (4) Cost sharing.-- (A) Federal share.--The Federal share of the costs of activities carried out under the program may not exceed 80 percent of the total costs of such activities. (B) In-kind contributions.--The non-Federal share of the costs of activities carried out under the program may be provided in the form of in-kind contributions of materials or services. (5) Limitation on administrative expenses.--Not more than 5 percent of financial assistance provided by the Secretary of the Interior under this subsection may be used for administrative expenses. (6) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior to carry out this subsection $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025. SEC. 510. INVASIVE SPECIES IN NONCONTIGUOUS STATES AND TERRITORIES PILOT PROGRAM. (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall establish a pilot program to carry out measures necessary to prevent, control, or eradicate invasive species in culturally significant forested watersheds in noncontiguous States and territories of the United States in which the Corps of Engineers is carrying out flood risk management projects. (b) Implementation.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, is encouraged to carry out the measures described in subsection (a) in consultation with-- (1) States, any territory or possession of the United States, and units of local government, including federally recognized Indian Tribes (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)); and (2) nonprofit organizations with knowledge of, and experience in, forested watershed management, including nonprofit organizations with a primary purpose of serving and partnering with indigenous communities. (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) $25,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2022 through 2024. SEC. 511. SOIL MOISTURE AND SNOWPACK MONITORING. (a) Installation of Network.-- (1) In general.--In accordance with the activities required under section 4003(a) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1310; 130 Stat. 1676), and to support the goals of the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017 (Public Law 115-25) and the National Integrated [[Page H6976]] Drought Information System Reauthorization Act of 2018 (Public Law 115-423), the Secretary, in coordination with the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (referred to in this section as the ``Administrator''), the Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Director of the United States Geological Survey, and the Commissioner of Reclamation, shall continue installation of a network of soil moisture and plains snowpack monitoring stations, and modification of existing stations, in the Upper Missouri River Basin. (2) Requirements.--In carrying out installation and modification activities under paragraph (1), the Secretary-- (A) may continue to enter into agreements, including cooperative agreements, with State mesonet programs for purposes of installing new stations or modifying existing stations; (B) shall transfer ownership and all responsibilities for operation and maintenance of new stations to the respective State mesonet program for the State in which the monitoring station is located on completion of installation of the station; and (C) shall establish, in consultation with the Administrator, requirements and standards for the installation of new stations and modification of existing stations to ensure seamless data integration into-- (i) the National Mesonet Program; (ii) the National Coordinated Soil Moisture Network; and (iii) other relevant networks. (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection, in addition to any other funds authorized to be appropriated for the installation of a network of soil moisture and plains snowpack monitoring stations or the modification of existing stations in the Upper Missouri River Basin, $7,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025. (b) Soil Moisture and Snowpack Monitoring Pilot Program.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall establish within the National Mesonet Program a pilot program for the acquisition and use of data generated by the network described in subsection (a). (2) Requirements.--In establishing the pilot program under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall-- (A) enter into agreements with State mesonet programs in the Upper Missouri River Basin to acquire data generated by the network described in subsection (a) that-- (i) are similar to the agreements in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act with States under the National Mesonet Program; and (ii) allow for sharing of data with other Federal agencies and with institutions engaged in federally supported research, including the United States Drought Monitor, as appropriate and feasible; (B) in coordination with the Secretary, the Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Director of the United States Geological Survey, and the Commissioner of Reclamation, gather data from the operation of the network to inform ongoing efforts of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in support of-- (i) the National Integrated Drought Information System, including the National Coordinated Soil Moisture Network; (ii) the United States Drought Monitor; (iii) the National Water Model and other relevant national modeling efforts; (iv) validation, verification, and calibration of satellite-based, in situ, and other remote sensing activities and output products; (v) flood risk and water resources monitoring initiatives by the Secretary and the Commissioner; and (vi) any other programs or initiatives the Administrator considers appropriate; (C) at the request of State mesonet programs, or as the Administrator considers appropriate, provide technical assistance to such programs under the pilot program under paragraph (1) to ensure proper data requirements; and (D) ensure an appropriate mechanism for quality control and quality assurance is employed for the data acquired under the pilot program, such as the Meteorological Assimilation Data Ingest System. (3) Study required.-- (A) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall initiate a study of the pilot program required by paragraph (1) to evaluate the data generated by the network described in subsection (a) and the applications of that data to programs and initiatives described in paragraph (2)(B). (B) Elements.--The study required by subparagraph (A) shall include an assessment of-- (i) the contribution of the soil moisture, snowpack, and other relevant data generated by the network described in subsection (a) to weather, subseasonal and seasonal, and climate forecasting products on the local, regional, and national levels; (ii) the enhancements made to the National Integrated Drought Information System, the National Water Model, and the United States Drought Monitor, and other relevant national modeling efforts, using data and derived data products generated by the network; (iii) the contribution of data generated by the network to remote sensing products and approaches; (iv) the viability of the ownership and operational structure of the network; and (v) any other matters the Administrator considers appropriate, in coordination with the Secretary, the Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Director of the United States Geological Survey, and the Commissioner of Reclamation. (4) Report required.--Not later than 4 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report-- (A) setting forth the findings of the study required by paragraph (3); and (B) making recommendations based on those findings to improve weather, subseasonal, seasonal, and climate monitoring nationally. (5) Government accountability office audit.-- (A) In general.--Not later than 60 days after the report required by paragraph (4) is submitted, the Comptroller General of the United States shall initiate an audit to evaluate that report and determine whether-- (i) the Administrator, in conducting the pilot program under paragraph (1), has utilized the relevant data generated by the network described in subsection (a) in the manner most beneficial to the programs and initiatives described in paragraph (2)(B); (ii) the acquisition agreements entered into under paragraph (2)(A) with State mesonet programs fully comply with the requirements of that paragraph; and (iii) the heads of other agencies, including the Secretary, the Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Director of the United States Geological Survey, and the Commissioner of Reclamation, are utilizing the data generated by the network to better inform and improve the missions of those agencies. (B) Report required.--Not later than 270 days after initiating the audit required by subparagraph (A), the Comptroller General shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report setting forth the findings of the audit. (6) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In this subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means-- (A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Environment and Public Works, and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives. SEC. 512. GREAT LAKES ST. LAWRENCE SEAWAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. (a) Renaming the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation.--The Act of May 13, 1954 (33 U.S.C. 981 et seq.) is amended-- (1) in section 1 (33 U.S.C. 981), by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''; and (2) in section 2(b) (33 U.S.C. 982(b)), by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''. (b) References.--Any reference to the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation in any law, regulation, document, record, Executive order, or other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation. (c) Technical and Conforming Amendments.-- (1) Title 5.--Section 5315 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''. (2) Title 18.--Section 2282B of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''. (3) Internal revenue code.--Section 9505(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 9505(a)(2)) is amended by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''. (4) Title 31.--Section 9101(3)(K) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''. (5) Water resources development act of 1986.--The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.) is amended-- (A) in section 206 (33 U.S.C. 2234), by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''; (B) in section 210(a)(1) (33 U.S.C. 2238(a)(1)), by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''; (C) in section 214(2)(B) (33 U.S.C. 2241(2)(B)), by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great [[Page H6977]] Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''; and (D) in section 1132(b) (33 U.S.C. 2309(b)), by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' each place it appears. (6) Title 46.--Title 46, United States Code, is amended-- (A) in section 2109, by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''; (B) in section 8103(g), by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''; (C) in section 8503(c), by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''; (D) in section 55112(a)(3), by striking ``St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''; (E) in section 55331(3), by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''; and (F) in section 70032, by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' each place it appears. (7) Title 49.-- (A) In general.--Title 49, United States Code, is amended-- (i) in section 110-- (I) in the heading, by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''; and (II) in subsection (a), by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''; and (ii) in section 6314(c)(2)(G), by striking ``Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation'' and inserting ``Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation''. (B) Table of sections.--The table of sections for chapter 1 of subtitle I of title 49, United States Code, is amended by amending the item relating to section 110 to read as follows: ``110. Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation.''. SEC. 513. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Oregon (Mr. DeFazio) and the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Graves) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Oregon. General Leave Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their remarks, including extraneous material on S. 1811, as amended. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Oregon? There was no objection. Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, legislation very similar to this passed the House of Representatives unanimously earlier this year. This bill will continue the bipartisan tradition restarted by Chairman Shuster in 2014 of doing a Water Resources Development Act every 2 years. It is critical. I am thankful to Ranking Member Graves, Chairwoman Grace Napolitano, and Subcommittee Ranking Member Bruce Westerman for their hard work in developing the House version and helping us negotiate with the Senate. I also thank our Senate colleagues, Committee on Environment and Public Works Chairman John Barrasso, who has pushed very hard for this bill, and Ranking Member Tom Carper, for their collaboration. Madam Speaker, this builds on the success of H.R. 7575, which, as I said, passed the House of Representatives earlier this year unanimously. It authorizes construction of 46 reports of the Chief of the Corps of Engineers. It is a record number of Chief's Reports, almost matching the number authorized in 2016 and 2018. Now, that would only be made possible by the full utilization of the harbor maintenance trust fund. For decades, since Ronald Reagan was President, we have been assessing a tiny ad valorem tax on the value of goods and containers flowing through the ports coming into the United States of America. Despite the pressing need to dredge our harbors, to authorize steps to repair jetties before they fail totally and become much more expensive to replace, for many years Congress refused to spend that full amount of money. There is now around $10 billion collected in taxes from the American people for a specific purpose for which it has not been spent. I started working on this with Bud Shuster--not Bill--Bud Shuster, his dad, back in 1996 to access the full amount of the harbor maintenance trust fund. It got out of that committee twice under Chairman Shuster. He was quite amazed it came out unanimously, including Freedom Caucus members and others, but Paul Ryan saw fit to strip it from the bill because he didn't think that we should maintain our harbors and our ports as a maritime Nation. I guess being inland, he didn't think that was so important. We now have finally gotten to that point where we are going to access the funds. There is one tiny remaining problem--since the Senate seems to be totally incapable of passing any individual pieces of legislation and doing nothing individually except judges--we are seeking to attach this to the Omnibus, Continuing Resolution, budget deal, whatever the heck you want to call it. Now, the Committee on Appropriations in the Senate has raised concerns. Even though this does not count officially against allocations on an annual basis, they are worried that somehow someone might look at them and say, Well you have got all this other money, so we are going to cut back on your regular amount of money. That is not going to happen. This need is great. This is a huge bipartisan success with agreement by harbors all around the country, large and small, emerging, developed, energy ports. It is critical to the United States of America as a maritime Nation that we get this done and we begin to do the work on a daily basis. Of our 58 largest harbors, 35 percent are at their authorized depths. That means ships go around, that means ships have to pass too close to one another in order to navigate restricted channels. It means jetties that are beginning to fail don't get fixed, and every year that they fail they become much, much more expensive to repair until the point of total failure, at which point it becomes incredibly expensive. Madam Speaker, should we access the harbor maintenance trust fund over the next 5 years at $2 billion a year, plus the expected income, we could bring all of our ports up to a state of good repair in 5 years. What the Senate staff is insisting on would stretch that out for 20 years--and actually, would stretch it out longer, because if you start doing things 18 years from now, they would have deteriorated even more and become more expensive. So they would, essentially, indefinitely put off bringing our harbors to a state of good repair because of unfounded concern. Madam Speaker, I am hopeful that common sense will prevail, if there is any such thing on the other side of Capitol Hill. I want to go back to thanking members of our committee and the staff who did great work on this bill. It is an excellent bill. It also deals with inland waterways on a cost-share basis. It deals with building in resilience to deal with climate change--even if you don't believe in it--and will use natural systems as much as possible for these needs. Chairwoman Grace Napolitano, who did not travel here today, was dogged in her support for the maintenance needs and advocacy for her large harbors. And ultimately, we came to an agreement, as I said, between all sizes of harbors around the country. Madam Speaker, I also thank my ranking member, Sam Graves. He couldn't have been a better partner in helping us deal with the other side of Capitol Hill, and Mr. Westerman for his steadfast support and importance to the final bill. Today's success would not have been possible without their great work. [[Page H6978]] There are a number of members of the committee who were particularly crucial: Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, Abby Finkenauer, Harley Rouda, Conor Lamb, Angie Craig, Chris Pappas, Antonio Delgado, Lizzie Fletcher, Greg Stanton, and Sharice Davids, all members of the committee who contributed significantly to this. And also, we did lose the language to reauthorize the Clean Water State Revolving Fund, which hasn't been reauthorized since 1987. I kind of thought it was time but, apparently, that is right now not on the radar of some people. Madam Speaker, the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) is legislation that is essential to everyday American life-supporting jobs and our economy, protecting American lives and property, and restoring and protecting our vital natural resources. The Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (WRDA 2020) modernizes and invests in our water resources infrastructure by: (1) authorizing critical, locally driven U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) projects and studies; (2) expediting the delivery of future projects; (3) increasing water storage and supply; (4) preventing, managing, and eradicating invasive species that reduce and degrade our water resources infrastructure and the environment; (5) building resiliency to increasing storm and flooding risks: (6) increasing community and Tribal involvement and engagement; and (7) addressing communities with affordability concerns. WRDA 2020 strengthens our Nation's security and economic competitiveness by deepening our ports and harbors, maintaining our inland waterways, and providing protection from dangerous flooding, while remaining committed to economically and environmentally responsible development. In WRDA bills, Congress authorizes studies and projects encompassing the key missions of the Corps, including supporting coastal and inland waterways infrastructure, effective and targeted flood protection, environmental restoration, storm damage prevention, and proactive water supply initiatives. Each of the 46 completed feasibility study reports of the Chief of Engineers (Chiefs Reports) authorized by WRDA 2020 were locally driven and cost-shared, rigorously studied, and determined by the Corps to be economically justified, technically sound, and environmentally acceptable. Since 2014, Congress has resumed the tradition of biennial consideration of WRDAs, and WRDA 2020 continues to deliver new authorities on a predictable authorization cycle to meet the water resource needs of local communities and to provide appropriate oversight of, and policy direction to, the Administration and the Corps. The transformative nature of the last three WRDA bills has provided the Corps and the non-Federal interests with new opportunities to advance projects more quickly and with greater effectiveness. WRDA 2020 builds on these changes by ensuring that future water resources development projects are developed in a resilient and more sustainable manner, by targeting increased Federal assistance to rural and economically-disadvantaged communities and Tribes that have seen challenges in implementing critical water resources infrastructure, and by modernizing the process for project development to ensure that all project benefits, including economical, regional, environmental, and other societal benefits, are considered in the formulation of future projects. Title 1 of WRDA 2020 ensures that the Corps operates and executes projects to meet our Nation's ever evolving 21st century needs. This title supports our transportation infrastructure and ensures the efficient flow of domestic and international commerce by reinstating the Federal commitment to our ports, harbors, and inland waterways. It builds on the CARES Act (Pub. L. 116-136) by unlocking funds that have already been collected from shippers for the purpose of harbor deepening and maintenance, and that have remained unspent, in the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund (HMTF) while there are unmet operation and maintenance needs at ports and harbors. In addition, this title establishes a new authorization framework for the allocation of harbor maintenance funds to ensure equitable expenditures to meet the ongoing needs of the Nation's largest ports, Commercial Strategic Seaports, Great Lakes Harbors, and emerging harbors. Title 1 also addresses critical needs to modernize our Federal inland waterway system by authorizing additional funds from the General Fund of the Treasury towards the construction of projects on the Inland Waterway System, which handles approximately half of all inland waterway freight and one-twelfth of all national freight. Further, Title 1 of WRDA 2020 ensures that future water resources development projects are designed and built with greater resiliency to address the needs of the next century. For example, this title directs the Corps to consider nature-based and natural features while developing projects, and advocates for innovation that ensures the resiliency and longevity of Corps construction. Similarly, this title recognizes the needs of communities that are currently facing repeat flooding events by providing critical assistance for the expedited consideration of permanent measures to reduce local flooding risks. Moreover, Title 1 makes policy reforms to promote stronger local- level partnerships, decisionmaking, and effective, transparent project development and implementation that will overall improve water infrastructure development. Other provisions within this title ensure the protection of all communities through wider consideration of project benefits and greater flexibility and support for populations with affordability concerns. Title 1 also helps communities respond faster to natural disasters, improves the safety of our dams and levees, addresses necessary updates to aging infrastructure, and supports critical work against invasive species and harmful algal blooms. Lastly, this title recognizes the increasing role the Corps plays in addressing the water supply and water conservation needs of local and rural communities. Title 2 of WRDA 2020 ensures continuity in addressing our water resources development needs. It authorizes feasibility studies for the development of future projects, while ensuring that studies currently underway are completed expeditiously. Title 2 also makes necessary adjustments to existing studies or projects to ensure they are forward- looking and encompass as many potential benefits to the localities as practicable. In addition, this title authorizes the analysis of regional or watershed-based systems which facilitates cohesive projects and greater end results for the systems without inadvertently segmenting out populations or sub-systems. Further, this title directs the Corps to examine and report back on various Corps internal processes and assets to identify additional opportunities for Corps expertise and improvement in work efficacy. Title 3 addresses ongoing Corps operations and opportunities to ensure efficient project delivery as well as remove outdated or duplicative Corps authorizations. Continuing in the tradition of the last three WRDAs, WRDA 2020 directs the Corps to identify approximately $10 billion in antiquated construction authorizations that can be deauthorized, which is roughly equivalent to the cost of the new Chiefs Reports authorized by this legislation. In addition, the revisions and updates to projects in Title 3, on advisement from the Corps, will keep those projects on track for delivery and maintain the effectiveness and efficiency of these Federal investments. This title also makes modifications to existing programs within the Corps to include a wider range of eligible regions for those programs and provide them with sufficient authorization levels to achieve their central purposes. Further, Title 3 deauthorizes or transfers, in part or in whole, certain projects which are no longer within the mission of the Corps or are otherwise better suited as returned to the localities. These actions maintain Corps dependability and its relationships with non- Federal sponsors and stakeholders, while alleviating superfluous lands or projects that should be returned to states and localities and removed from Corps responsibilities. Title 4 of WRDA 2020 affirms the Federal commitment to delivering water resources projects and the continued improvement of American water infrastructure. Again, this title authorizes 46 Corps projects to move to construction and makes changes to projects currently underway to guarantee their accuracy and long-term value. Projects authorized under WRDA 2020 will sustain jobs and our economic competitiveness by maintaining the flow of goods through our navigational channels and protecting American lives, land, and assets from flood or storm waters. The projects will restore and enhance our natural resources, ecosystems and environment, and prepare communities for increasingly wet or dry conditions. These essential projects will positively impact populations in all regions of the country and build smarter, more resilient infrastructure for the benefit of generations to come. Title 5 of this bill makes several changes to Corps and other Federal agency authorities related to the control of invasive species or for other purposes. Invasive species have a devastating impact on our Nation's water infrastructure, as well as on our water supply. Increasingly, the Corps is required to partner with other Federal agencies to control the spread of invasive species, both on land and in the aquatic environment. The changes made by this title include the creation of new pilot programs to address invasive species such as Asian Carp, elodea, and quagga mussels, as well as noxious weeds. This title also retains the traditional roles of the Corps and other Federal agencies in controlling the spread or managing and reducing existing invasive species. The managers of the U.S. House of Representative and the U.S. Senate for WRDA [[Page H6979]] 2020 (``the Managers'') also highlight the following sections of this legislation and other matters related to the Corps: Section 109 addresses the critical need to modernize our Federal Inland Waterway System. This section authorizes additional funds from the General Fund of the Treasury towards the construction of authorized inland waterways projects. The Managers have authorized this change to the current 50-50 cost share for inland projects to resolve the backlog in these critical projects, and intend that any inland project that received construction assistance prior to fiscal year 2030 utilize the new 75-25 cost share authorized by this section through completion of the project. The Managers also expect that this additional support will be prioritized for those projects identified by inland users as most essential in the 20-year capital development plan required under section 302(d) of WRDA 1986, including the Upper Ohio navigation system, the Navigation and Ecosystem Sustainability Program for the Upper Mississippi River, and the Three Rivers project in Southeast Arkansas. It is the intention of the Managers that current prioritization plans be followed by the Corps in its funding of inland waterway projects. Section 112 directs the Corps to ensure meaningful participation and consultation by economically disadvantaged communities and Indian Tribes in the development of future water resources projects. During formulation of WRDA 2020, the Managers heard concerns from economically disadvantaged communities and Indian Tribes of a lack of transparency and meaningful communication with these communities. Managers expect that continuous commitment to, and review of, Corps policies surrounding community engagement and tribal consultation will minimize adverse impacts to these populations, including detrimental impacts to their health, property, and livelihoods. It is the Managers' intention that the Corps complete reviews and make adjustments, if warranted, to procedures expeditiously to ameliorate concerns and avoid conflict with existing and future water resources projects. Section 125 renews the Congressional commitment to beneficial use of dredged material. While carrying out the beneficial use of dredged material pilot program pursuant to section 1122 of WRDA 2016, the Corps is directed to carry out at least one project utilizing thin layer placement of dredged fine and coarse grain sediment. This demonstration program is also authorized to be expanded to apply to recovering lost storage capacity in reservoirs due to sediment accumulation, if the project meets the other criteria within the program. The Corps is directed to carry out at least one project to recover lost storage capacity under the program as well. With this section, Managers expect the Corps to select projects that encompass a wide range of regional areas, economic status, and utilization methods. Additionally, this section further encourages the Corps to coordinate planning for the deployment of Federal and non-Federal dredges. In sequencing dredging work to benefit multiple mission sets and providing consistent navigational certainty, especially in areas of high maritime traffic in our Nation's harbors and waterways, the Managers believe proper implementation of this program will benefit the American economy and restoration efforts alike. The Managers intend this authority to be used in conjunction with the Gulf Coast Regional Dredge Demonstration Program created in P.L. 116-94, the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020. Section 161 makes changes to the study process pursuant to section 203 of WRDA 1986. As required by this section, this new policy does not apply to any project being authorized by this Act. Further these changes do not apply to any feasibility study submitted to the Corps during the one-year period prior to the date of enactment of this section, such as the Raymondville Drain Project, Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas. Subsection 201(b) states that the Corps is to consider any study carried out by the Corps for Port Arthur and Orange County, Texas, flood control project, to be a continuation of the study authorized under Sabine Pass to Galveston Bay, Texas. While subsection (a) explicitly authorizes a study for Port Arthur and Orange County, Texas, the Managers intend that nothing in subsection 201(b) will slow down the construction of the project for Sabine Pass to Galveston Bay, Texas. Section 213 directs the Corps to conduct a comprehensive study of the Lower Mississippi River. The Managers note that the Mississippi River has been at flood stage at record length and frequency in recent years. The Managers intend this study to provide reconsideration of the operations of existing assets by operating structures throughout the Lower Mississippi River holistically and, potentially, for multiple purposes per asset, as well as identifying new projects and utilizing existing Federal and non-Federal assets, such as river reintroduction projects, new or existing reservoirs, water supply projects, or other measures. In completing the study, the Managers intend for the Corps to collaborate with all levels of government, as well as with non- governmental entities to improve the management of one of the largest watersheds in the world. Section 216 includes studies for the Lower and Upper Missouri River. With a General Investigations study of the Lower Missouri River Basin already underway, the Managers intend this section to build off this existing authority and to expeditiously review both a comprehensive plan and site-specific solutions to combat flooding in communities across the Lower Missouri River Basin. While this Act specifically and preemptively waives 3x3x3 requirements, the Managers strongly encourage the Corps to complete its studies as expeditiously as possible. Section 222 requires the Corps to issue an annual report that identifies all authorized studies or projects meeting certain criteria, including local support and the Corps' capability for executing the work. The Managers expect this annual report will provide greater transparency in the Administration's development of both its annual budget and its project selection process. In completing this report, the Corps must describe specific benefits for each authorized study and authorized water resources development project included in the annual report. This section also requires the Secretary to include an appendix in the annual report that lists any submitted proposals that were not included in the annual report and a description of why the Corps determined that those proposals did not meet the criteria for inclusion. The Corps shall also make the annual report to Congress publicly available on the internet and is directed to submit the report to Congress along with its annual report pursuant to section 7001 of Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014, P.L. 113-121 (WRRDA 2014). The Managers intend for the Corps to expeditiously develop implementation guidance for the provisions contained in WRDA 2020, as well as provisions from prior WRDAs that have yet to be developed. Section 223 of WRDA 2020 directs the Corps to expeditiously complete these actions, and consistent with section 1105 of WRDA 2018, to involve stakeholders in the development of guidance materials. In addition, the Managers direct the Secretary to directly engage and consult with, and provide briefings for, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Environment on Public Works on these actions. Section 229 amends section 1104(b) of WRDA 2018 to require that the Corps provide the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives an annual written update on the Corps' implementation of non-Federal outreach requirements associated with development of section 7001 annual reports. This section also requires that the Corps issue guidance for the uniform implementation of the 7001 process by Corps districts and ensure annual compliance with that guidance. The Managers continue to be concerned with the agency's ability to consistently implement these policies nationwide. Section 310 clarifies that any Federal funds used to carry out construction of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System (MKARNS) are considered as initiating construction of the project such that future funds will not require a new start designation. With initial construction of the MKARNS completed 50 years ago, modernization of the entire channel was authorized by Congress in 2003 and funds were subsequently provided in 2004. Since that time, the 12- foot deepening project has stalled, but this section will allow construction of the project to resume without the requirement to obtain a New Start, a requirement not contemplated when the deepening project was authorized and funded. This section will ensure the project is formally considered as a project resumption for budgetary and appropriations purposes. Section 348 allows a local government entity, such as a city, with existing water supply storage in a Federal or non-Federal hydropower lake within the Arkansas Basin, to access that water supply at a cost of not more than 110 percent of initial principal cost for the acre- feet sought for a new covered contract for that lake. This section makes clear that the Managers do not expect the Corps to undertake any formal reallocation process. Rather, the Managers expect that the Corps will work only with a local government entity that currently holds the rights to access water supply storage. Section 351 allows the Corps, at the request of a non-Federal interest, to renegotiate the terms and conditions of deferred payment agreements under Section 103(k) of WRDA 1986 and to accept, without interest, the pre-payment of non-Federal contributions. The Managers anticipate that the non-Federal sponsors of the West Bank and Vicinity, Lake [[Page H6980]] Pontchartrain and Vicinity, and Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Damage Reduction Projects are expected to seek relief under this section in order to continue large-scale investments to support resiliency in both their infrastructure and regional ecosystems. Section 401 authorizes 46 Chief's Reports, including a project for navigation improvements for the Port of Nome in Nome, Alaska. Nome will be America's first Arctic deep draft port, enhancing our strategic and economic competitiveness in the Arctic region. The Managers note the complementary and important role that modest improvements at Port Clarence/Point Spencer can play relative to the project at Nome, Alaska, and for safe Arctic transportation generally, and therefore, the Managers encourage the Corps of Engineers to expedite its consideration of the use of Section 107 Continuing Authorities Program funding to help install and make operational the two 30-ton and one 60- ton industrial grade buoy systems at Port Clarence to serve maritime safety needs for the Bering Strait as well as the greater Arctic region. The Managers also encourage the potential use of unobligated prior-year funds to facilitate the implementation of the mooring buoy project as soon as possible and note that the Corps was instrumental in completing a similar project for the placement and use of commercial- grade mooring buoys in the Columbia River. Various sections under Title 5 of WRDA 2020 protect American assets and resources by working to prevent the spread and promote the eradication of certain invasive species. The Managers intend that work conducted as a result of this Title remain within the jurisdiction of the involved agencies and encourage a collaborative approach to solutions that allows each agency to utilize its expertise. Specifically, under section 508, the Managers intend that, for those authorities which address murder hornets as an invasive species, the Department of the Interior shall work in conjunction with the Department of Agriculture. The Managers believe lessees of recreational and other facilities at water resource development projects should have more predictability and stability with regard to their respective lease agreements with the Corps. The Managers are, in conjunction with enactment of WRDA 2020, requesting the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to analyze Corps of Engineers policies related to the length of commercial concessionaire contracts. In the interim, the Managers believe that the Corps should consider the use of concessionaire lease agreements for a period of not less than 25 years and not more than 50 years, unless otherwise agreed to by the lessee. This effective tool will provide greater predictability and stability in the use of Corps lands by the lessee. Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time. House of Representatives, Committee on Natural Resources, Washington, DC, December 4, 2020. Hon. Peter A. DeFazio, Chair, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Dear Chair DeFazio: In recognition of the goal of expediting consideration of S. 1811, ``A bill to make technical corrections to the America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018, and for other purposes'' the Committee on Natural Resources agrees to waive formal consideration of the bill as to provisions that fall within the Rule X jurisdiction of the Committee on Natural Resources. The Committee on Natural Resources takes this action with the mutual understanding that, in doing so, we do not waive any jurisdiction over the subject matter contained in this or similar legislation, and that the Committee will be appropriately consulted and involved as the bill or similar legislation moves forward so that we may address any remaining issues within our jurisdiction. Our Committee also reserves the right to seek appointment of conferees to any House-Senate conference involving this or similar legislation. Thank you for agreeing to include our exchange of letters in the Congressional Record. I appreciate your cooperation regarding this legislation and look forward to continuing to work with you as this measure moves through the legislative process. Sincerely, Raul M. Grijalva, Chair, House Natural Resources Committee. ____ Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC, December 4, 2020. Hon. Raul Grijalva, Chair, Committee on Natural Resources, House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Dear Chair Grijalva: Thank you for your letter regarding S. 1811, A bill to make technical corrections to the America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018, and for other purposes. I appreciate your decision to waive formal consideration of the bill. I agree that the Committee on Natural Resources has valid jurisdictional claims to certain provisions in this important legislation, and I further agree that by forgoing formal consideration of the bill, the Committee on Natural Resources is not waiving any jurisdiction over any relevant subject matter. Additionally, I will support the appointment of conferees from the Committee on Natural Resources should a House-Senate conference be convened on this legislation. Finally, this exchange of letters will be included in the Congressional Record when the bill is considered on the floor. Thank you again, and I look forward to continuing to work collaboratively with the Committee on Natural Resources on this important issue. Sincerely, Peter A. DeFazio, Chair. Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, some of what I say today is going to be a little redundant, but I think it does bear repeating. I do stand here in strong support of the amended version of S. 1811, which is the Water Resources Development Act 2020 or WRDA. The bill represents a bipartisan, bicameral compromise. It renews our commitment to regularly consider water resources infrastructure legislation. And I remind my House colleagues and reiterate what the chairman said, we unanimously passed a bipartisan WRDA bill out of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and we unanimously passed it on the floor of the House in July. And now, 5 months later, we hope to do the very same thing after successfully negotiating with the Senate. Madam Speaker, WRDA 2020 authorizes--and, again, as has been pointed out--60 critical water resource projects. This is the most authorizations in recent history. These projects are going to strengthen our global competitiveness, they are going to grow the economy, they are going to provide flood protection for our communities, they are going to safeguard the environment, and create jobs. Additionally, WRDA is fiscally responsible and deauthorizes old projects to fully offset new authorizations. It advances inland waterway improvements by adjusting the Inland Waterways Trust Fund cost-share; it includes important considerations and set-asides for rural communities; and it provides relief to communities, such as those in my home State of Missouri that have experienced repetitive losses as a result of flood events. Madam Speaker, I thank Chairman DeFazio, Chair Napolitano, Ranking Member Westerman, and committee members and staff on both sides for their efforts in this very important piece of legislation. On the Republican staff, I particularly want to thank the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment staff: Ian Bennitt, Jon Pawlow, and Victor Sarmiento. These folks have worked over weekends, they have worked over the recent holidays to help ensure that our priorities were intact, and we could move this bill prior to the end of Congress--at least this year's Congress. I thank my general counsel, Corey Cooke, Tara Hupman, Tyler Micheletti, Justin Harclerode, Abby Camp, Nick Christensen, Jack Ruddy, and my full committee staff director, Paul Sass, for their hard work on this and getting it done. Madam Speaker, I strongly urge my colleagues to support this bill, S. 1811, and I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I include in the Record a list of the organizations supporting S. 1811, the Water Resources Development Act of 2020. List of Organizations Supporting S. 1811, The Water Resources Development Act of 2020 American Association of Port Authorities, American Farm Bureau Federation, American Great Lakes Port Association, American Petroleum Institute, American Road & Transportation Builders Association, American Shore and Beach Preservation Association, American Society of Civil Engineers, American Waterways Operators, Associated General Contractors of America, Association of State Floodplain Managers, California Association of Port Authorities, Coastal States Organization, Everglades Foundation, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Grain and Feed Association of Illinois, Growmark, Healing Our Waters-Great Lakes Coalition, Illinois Corn Growers Association, Illinois Farm Bureau, Illinois Fertilizer and Chemical Association, Illinois Soybean Growers, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, Interstate Council on Water Policy, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, National Association of Counties, National [[Page H6981]] Conference of State Legislatures, National Corn Growers Association, National Association of Flood and Stormwater Management Agencies, National Grain and Feed Association, National Governors Association, National League of Cities, National Marine Manufacturers Association, National Parks Conservation Association, National Stone, Sand, and Gravel Association, National Water Resources Association, National Water Supply Alliance, National Wildlife Federation, Northwest Seaport Alliance, Oregon Public Ports Association, Pacific Northwest Waterways Association, Port of Los Angeles, Port of Redwood City, Portland Cement Association, The Fertilizer Institute, The Nature Conservancy, Transportation Trades, Dept., AFL-CIO, United Association of Union Plumbers and Pipefitters, United Steelworkers, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, U.S. Conference of Mayors, Waterways Council, Inc. Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Ohio (Ms. Kaptur), the chair of the Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies. Ms. KAPTUR. Madam Speaker, I thank Chair DeFazio. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of the Water Resources Development Act. There is no question that Chairman DeFazio and Chairwoman Napolitano have worked tirelessly over the last year--and probably longer--to get this bill to the finish line. This bill delivers for our Nation's crumbling water infrastructure. Madam Speaker, S. 1811 enjoys broad bipartisan support because it pays attention to the unique and particular needs of the different regions of our diverse Nation. The package includes provisions to protect 90 percent of North America's surface fresh water on our Great Lakes. This includes a specific authorization of the invasive species control system at Brandon Road Lock and Dam. The project serves a unique national role, and once completed, will serve as a bulwark for preventing Asian carp and other invasive species from threatening the fragile ecosystem of our Great Lakes and its $7 billion fishery. Madam Speaker, today's authorization marks an important milestone for protecting the Great Lakes recreational fishing industry. Our region has advocated to include this authorization for nearly a decade. And since 2010, when Congress authorized the Great Lakes Interbasin Study, our delegation searched for a long-term and basin-wide solution to the predatory Asian carp. I commend the committee for embedding resiliency into the Corps planning processes and for investing to rebuild and advance the Nation's water infrastructure for the 21st century. Finally, the bill adds the words ``Great Lakes'' to the name of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, and I look forward to working with my colleagues to shine a light on the Seaway's unique role in unleashing the economic potential of the region and the Nation. President Dwight David Eisenhower understood that this seaway is the shortest distance to Europe, and we must remember that today. Madam Speaker, I urge support for this bipartisan bill. {time} 1415 Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Madam Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman), the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Water Resources and the Environment. Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, I thank the distinguished ranking member from Missouri for his leadership on continuing the biennial consideration for the Water Resources Development Act. Today, I rise in strong support of S. 1811, the Water Resources Development Act of 2020. WRDA 2020 will strengthen our Nation's ability to withstand severe weather and flood events, authorize the construction of key water infrastructure projects throughout the Nation, create jobs here at home, and directly contribute to our economic growth and competitiveness. All 60 project authorizations contained in WRDA 2020 were proposed by non-Federal sponsors and underwent a rigorous planning process before congressional review. This WRDA bill focuses on building more resilient infrastructure, increasing rural flood protection, addressing the maintenance backlog at our Nation's ports and harbors, and prioritizing our Nation's inland waterways. The House passed WRDA by voice vote nearly 5 months ago, continuing the strong bipartisan tradition that WRDA enjoys. After negotiations with the Senate, I am glad to support this compromise bill, which contains nearly all of our Chamber's priorities. S. 1811 is fiscally responsible, with new project authorizations fully offset by deauthorizations of projects that are outdated or no longer viable. Again, I want to stress that this legislation represents the continuing commitment to regular order for consideration of water resources projects. Regularly overseeing the improvement of our Nation's infrastructure is one of the most important responsibilities of Congress. This is a good, commonsense, and bipartisan bill. I want to recognize the great work of our subcommittee staff, Ian, John, and Victor. I also want to thank Chairman DeFazio and Chairman Napolitano for their partnership in its creation. I urge all Members to support S. 1811. Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from the Virgin Islands (Ms. Plaskett). Ms. PLASKETT. Madam Speaker, I extend my congratulations to the committee leaders for successfully reaching an agreement with the Senate on a final Water Resources Development Act for 2020. This is a wonderful bill. We have $10 billion in new water infrastructure authorizations in this bill. It authorizes all of the pending Chief's reports. That includes two very important flood risk management projects in my district, which has been severely harmed by persistent flooding in recent years, as evidenced by the damage from Hurricanes Irma and Maria. I would like to take this opportunity to remind the Army Corps that it may fund the construction of these projects out of remaining funds provided in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 and that construction of such projects in the Virgin Islands, as well as in Puerto Rico, with funds provided under that act shall be conducted at full Federal expense. This bill also contains a long-sought reauthorization of projects for navigation in the harbors of St. Thomas and Christiansted, St. Croix. The reauthorization of these projects for navigation will provide the harbors access to Federal resources for maintenance dredging and improvements to navigational systems, which will allow them to accommodate more and larger cruise ships over the long term, thereby better competing in a competitive Caribbean market. This is a very strong bill for the ports and harbors of the United States. Lastly, this bill is probably the most progressive bill in a generation in terms of directing the Army Corps toward greater resiliency of future water resources development projects. It includes several provisions to modernize how the Corps develops future projects to make sure that it is better able to deal with issues of climate change and extreme wet weather events. All in all, this is a significant investment in water resources infrastructure, and I urge my colleagues to support this legislation. Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Babin). Mr. BABIN. Madam Speaker, if southeast Texas is going to continue as the global leader in creating reliable, affordable energy, we must modernize and improve our water infrastructure. My district has four ports, including the main terminal of the Port of Houston, as well as the Houston Ship Channel, which is the busiest U.S. deep-draft waterway and the top exporting port in the Nation. The provisions of 2020's WRDA to dredge, widen, and improve two-way traffic on the Houston Ship Channel is a product of hard work and collaboration over the last several years. This major accomplishment is the cornerstone for a more efficient, safe, and productive waterway for everyone. However, I recognize that there is still more work to be done. It is not an exaggeration to say that by spending a million dollars today on hurricane and flood prevention infrastructure, we are saving a billion dollars in damages [[Page H6982]] down the road from another storm like Hurricane Harvey. Thankfully, this bill contains numerous provisions for me and my colleagues on both sides of the aisle that address these critical needs. I wish to thank Ranking Member Graves as well as Chairman DeFazio, Mr. Westerman, and Mrs. Napolitano. Passing legislation like this one today will bring great benefit to southeast Texas and the entire country. Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Cuellar). Mr. CUELLAR. Madam Speaker, I want to thank Chairman DeFazio for his leadership, his staff for working hard on this particular bill, and the ranking member and his staff for doing this. I want to talk about one project that got added, and that is the Chacon Creek in Laredo, Texas. This is a project that we have been working on for many years with the city of Laredo. Now, this will provide the flood control, the work that we need to do, that starts off from Lake Casa Blanca all the way to the Rio Grande, miles of area that will provide not only for the environment but also for the quality of life for Laredo. I want to thank Chairman DeFazio so much for his great work, and we appreciate him in Laredo, Texas. Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Rouzer). Mr. ROUZER. Madam Speaker, I rise in support of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020. Our Nation's inlets, waterways, harbors, ports, and beaches are critical components of our national infrastructure, supporting countless local economies all across the country. My district, which includes the southern portion of the North Carolina coast, relies on this biennial, bipartisan bill to maintain and improve our resource projects. I would like to thank the Army Corps of Engineers for their work in support of the coastal storm damage reduction projects at Wrightsville Beach, as well as Carolina and Kure Beaches. Their team and mine work together constantly to ensure that the right decisions are made and executed. I want to especially thank the chairman and the ranking member for their work and commitment to keep this legislation a good, bipartisan product of the committee. I particularly appreciate their willingness to work with me to address the needs of our coastal communities and the infrastructure so important to North Carolina's economy. I also want to thank the staff of the majority and minority for the many hours they have worked to make this day possible. Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support the bill. Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mast). Mr. MAST. Madam Speaker, I thank Ranking Member Graves and Chairman DeFazio for their work and the committee staff for their work on this piece of legislation. Water is the lifeblood of Florida, and there is not a more important piece of legislation to our State or to our community, my community specifically, because of the work that this bill does. The Water Resources Development Act demands that the Army Corps of Engineers rewrite protocols that they have that allow them to poison my community, demands that they accelerate construction of the hugely important EAA Reservoir, demands that they move more water into Florida's Everglades where it is needed because they are dying because of lack of water. This piece of legislation is vital to our State. I would absolutely argue there is nothing more important to our State, and I couldn't thank enough the chairman, the ranking member, and all the staff for all of their work on this very important piece of legislation. Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Puerto Rico (Miss Gonzalez-Colon). Miss GONZALEZ-COLON of Puerto Rico. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of WRDA 2020. This bill increases the authorized cost of the Cano Martin Pena Ecosystem Restoration Project, representing the fully funded cost estimate at fiscal year 2020 levels. This project was authorized in 2007, prior to completing the feasibility phase and without updated costs. That is the reason it is so important for me. This change reflects the reality of costs and supports the project moving forward. This bill also authorizes flood risk management projects for Rio Culebrinas, Rio Guayanilla, and Rio Grande de Manati in the municipalities of Aguada, Aguadilla, Guayanilla, and Ciales. Authorization is a firm step in the right direction as we work with stakeholders to restore these rivers and improve flood protection and the health and economic opportunities of island residents. I would like to thank Chairman DeFazio and Ranking Member Graves and their staff for working alongside my office to secure those provisions. I also want to thank them for including the current mapping of all coasts that are experiencing rapid change. That means that Alaska, Hawaii, and many of the territories are going to be included in that provision. Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of the bill. Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Zeldin). Mr. ZELDIN. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of this measure, which prioritizes six key projects for New York's First Congressional District, a district almost completely surrounded by water. On the east end of Long Island, we have a unique responsibility to safeguard our local waterways, from bolstering our local maritime infrastructure to managing future storm risks. Working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle and the Army Corps team at its New York district office, this bill prioritizes local projects that are vital to my congressional district. The Fire Island to Montauk Point project includes essential dredging and shoreline projects over 83 miles of coastline. Coastal storm risk management for Hashamomuck Cove in Southold is included, where, right now, local residents, businesses, and first responders are paralyzed even during a severe thunderstorm. Additionally, this legislation authorizes a feasibility study for a project at Wading River Creek in Riverhead and expedites feasibility studies for projects at Reel Point Preserve and Shelter Island, Goldsmith Inlet in Southold, and Lake Montauk Harbor in Montauk. Continuing to safeguard and invest in our maritime infrastructure will help preserve Long Island's way of life for generations to come. Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this legislation, and I thank the chair and ranking member for their leadership in making this a reality. Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Jacobs). Mr. JACOBS. Madam Speaker, I rise in support of the Water Resources Development Act, which is critical to districts with significant shorelines, like mine. I am especially pleased to see the Great Lakes Coastal Resiliency Study included in this bill. High water levels on Lake Erie, and especially on Lake Ontario, are a major concern to communities in our region. Homeowners and business owners along Lake Ontario have suffered significant flooding and devastating property damage over the last few years. This study will inform those projects and policies that will mitigate high water levels and, hopefully, prevent future flooding of the kind suffered recently. I would also like to thank our leaders in the House, Ranking Member Sam Graves and Chairman Peter DeFazio, for the bipartisan work they have done on this legislation. The bipartisan work in the committee on WRDA is always welcome and a strong example of the way business can be conducted here. Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of S. 1811. [[Page H6983]] {time} 1430 Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Madam Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Rodney Davis). Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois. Madam Speaker, I thank my good friend, the ranking member. I didn't realize I was delaying his closing statement. I am interested in hearing it, too. And then we are going to compare beards together after this; right? I am going to lose, I know, because he is the ranking member. That is what happens. Madam Speaker, I do want to say a heartfelt thank-you and congratulations to Ranking Member Graves. This is a testament to his leadership for our side on this committee that we have come here to see such bipartisanship when it comes to the Water Resources Development Act. Madam Speaker, I do also want to thank Chairman DeFazio for his hard work. This is something that we have seen over my time in Congress. My first term, I was blessed enough to be appointed to the conference committee that got us on track for getting WRDA together on a biennial process. Chairman DeFazio and Ranking Member Graves, these are the guys who helped lead the teams to put this successful effort together. And the chairman, I am sure, is probably surprised. I haven't been one to stand up and talk about bipartisanship in this Congress as much as I would have liked, but today is that day to celebrate, and he needs to be commended for his leadership, and I am excited that we see this success when it comes to WRDA. This legislation is important to my district because I represent the Illinois and Mississippi waterways, the navigation projects that make sure that global commerce gets from my district out into the global marketplace. Without proper policies governing the Corps of Engineers and projects that are so important to my district, we wouldn't be able to be as successful, economically. This is the reason why I am so excited that we see this bipartisan effort. Madam Speaker, I urge a hearty ``yes'' vote and passage on this bill, and I thank every one of my colleagues who helped get us to this point. Madam Speaker, I certainly look forward to an overwhelming vote in the House today or later this week. Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, in closing, let me note that WRDA 2020 will make America more competitive, grow jobs, foster a more robust economy, and, very importantly, it is going to protect our communities for years to come. We passed a very similar bill by voice vote earlier this year, and this version reflects negotiations with the Senate that successfully maintained those strong principles and priorities from the House bill. Madam Speaker, I would just like to say, as well, that it has been a pleasure working with Chairman DeFazio and his staff in this process, and this is the way that the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure usually works; and when it does work this way, we produce really good products. This is a good piece of legislation, and, hopefully, we will see much more of that in the future. I know I am committed to it, and I think it makes a big difference. Madam Speaker, I urge all Members to join me in supporting this bipartisan legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time. Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, as has been said and doesn't need to be repeated, this is a fully bipartisan bill, and it does make essential investments in water infrastructure that will impact virtually every State and territory of the United States of America. As a great maritime nation, we can't afford not to make these investments; and hopefully it will be added, without change, to the omnibus year-end deal, or the Senate could perhaps take it up under unanimous consent since I don't think anyone would object to it over there. One way or another, hopefully, it will get done. Madam Speaker, I would like to be more specific in thanking staff for this legislation. There was quite a lengthy negotiation. The Senate never individually passed the bill. We had to negotiate the whole bill with the Senate, and Ryan Seiger led the team--he did a great job--Camille Touton, Navis Bermudez, and Alexa Williams; and on the Republican side, Ian Bennitt, Jon Pawlow, and Victor Sarmiento. Then the unseen heroes behind all the good work here in the House are those who work in the Office of Legislative Counsel, and too often we overlook how critical they are to writing good legislation. Sometimes I am amazed at the things that are introduced and that are gibberish, to put it mildly. Kakuti Lin and all her colleagues, thank you very much for your tremendous work on this, and it will be a great benefit to the Nation. Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time. Ms. JOHNSON of Texas. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of S 1811, the Water Resources Development Act. I would like to thank Chairman DeFazio and my fellow colleagues on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, along with my colleagues in the Senate, for their diligent work to produce this much needed water resources bill. Everyone is the U.S. is impacted by the need for clean water and I believe this bill takes a giant step forward to ensuring this becomes a reality for every American. Within my district, The City of Dallas is appreciative to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for their funding of the Dallas Flood way, Dallas Flood way Extension flood risk management projects and Lewisville Dam repairs and their continued efforts to complete these projects quickly. I look forward to continuing to hear good reports on the progress of these projects. I am pleased that the Corp is moving forward with these projects. Please allow me to note that it is helpful for the Corps to accept input from non-federal sponsors in the development of WRDA guidance. The Corps, working with local non-federal sponsors instead of developing guidance independently, will result in more resilient projects with multiple benefits. The role of resiliency in the construction, operation and maintenance of projects carried out by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) must continue to be a priority. The Dallas area falls within the Southwestern Division of the Army Corps of Engineers. Flooding and flood control continue to be issues that are ever-present on the minds of residents along the Trinity River. I have held several meetings on flooding in the Dallas area to address this issue and hope to continue to work with the Corp to combat flooding in Dallas. Other parts of North Texas have also benefited from projects included in previous versions of WRDA legislation. The projects addressing pump stations and levy heights in Dallas, along with bridge projects in Ft. Worth would not be where they are today without the Corps and this legislation. Madam Speaker, the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex is growing at a quite rapid pace and this updated legislation will help to provide adequate water and wastewater infrastructure to meet the demands, given the rapid pace of growth and development in our area. Furthermore, the bill will help in addressing maintenance needs, replacing aging infrastructure, and help in accounting for human behavior in all aspects of our water system--from sewer overflows, to promoting water conservation through drought tolerant outdoor landscaping. Lastly, I want to thank the committee for working with me to include language in the bill regarding the embankment of Lake Waco, on which Lake Shore Drive is located, so that we may keep the public safe from danger. We were able to work with the Senate on language that was direct and clear. It is very encouraging to know that we can continue to work in a bipartisan way to work with the committee to ensure that Lakeshore Drive is not a safety hazard. Madam Speaker, the projects I just mentioned are a tiny piece of the multitude of projects the Army Corps of Engineers works on to help address the water needs of the United States and its residents. Every American is impacted by this legislation and I urge my colleagues to support it. Mrs. NAPOLITANO. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of S. 1811, the Water Resources Development Act of 2020. Today's vote is on the bipartisan, bicameral WRDA agreement by House and Senate Committee leaders. I want to particularly thank Chairman DeFazio, Ranking Member Graves, Subcommittee Ranking Member Westerman and the Members of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee for their important work over the past 2 years on this bill. The Water Resources Development Act is our legislative commitment to investing in [[Page H6984]] Corps projects that help to protect our communities from flooding events, restore our environment and ecosystems, and keep our nation's competitiveness by investing in our ports and harbors. The projects considered in this legislation are truly from Sea to Shining Sea--from the Unalaska (Dutch Harbor) Project in Alaska, to the Yuba River Ecosystem Restoration in California, the Matagorda Ship Channel project in Texas, to the New York and New Jersey Anchorages. Through biennial enactment of WRDA legislation, the Congress has addressed local, regional, and national needs through authorization of new Corps projects, studies, and policies that benefit every corner of the nation. WRDA 2020 is no exception. I would particularly like to recognize Chairman DeFazio for his continued efforts to unlock the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund and his partnership in ensuring that all ports receive the tools they need in the future. My region is home to the largest ports in the nation, the Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Long Beach. These ports handle over 40 percent of the exports and imports into the United States. Los Angeles and Long Beach have invested billions of dollars of their own money to upgrade their infrastructure for the benefit of the entire nation. But the success of the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach are only as strong as their partnership with the federal government. As part of this legislation, donor ports like the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach will benefit from a greater share of the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund. Expanded in-water uses that are crucial to the navigation of the federal channel are now eligible. Seismic impacts will also be considered as part of the benefit-cost ratio for navigation projects. I am also proud of the provisions in WRDA that look to study water supply as a primary purpose of the Corps. We in the West are in a continuous fight against drought, and we have remarkable Corps reservoirs that were built for flood control but can be used more effectively for local water supply. The Corps is adapting to these local needs in the West, and this bill will give the Corps more ability and focus on addressing long-term water reliability of arid communities. The bill also includes important assistance to socio-economically disadvantaged urban and rural areas by requiring the Corps to work more directly with local leaders and residents on Corps projects and provide positive impacts to these communities. This will build long-term resiliency for economic development, environmental and health improvements, and clean and safe water resource projects. Lastly, this bill includes language necessary for my district and wildfire prone regions of the country to improve efforts by the Corps to remove unauthorized, human-made flammable equipment and materials from Corps property. This year there was an illegal fire on Corps property in my district that led to a major wildfire evacuating hundreds of residents and coming close to damaging property and harming our community. The language in this bill, in addition to efforts to increase Corps funding, will go a long way to helping the Corps remove these fire hazards. I would like to thank the many people who have helped this bill become a reality: Subcommittee Vice Chair Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, for her leadership on WRDA and especially all things Florida. Thank you to the leadership at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ASA James, General Spellmon, Retired General Semonite, Al Lee and the Senior Executive Service team, and Corps Counsel. I would especially like to thank Corps Futures Team--David Wethington, Laura Powell, and Andrea Busch, for their time and partnership in answering our questions to the nearly 1,100 submissions we received for WRDA 2020. I am very fortunate to have some of the best water and port leaders in the country in my district and Southern California who provided valuable input for this bill, including Col. Julie Balten, Col. Aaron Barta and David Van Dorpe of the Los Angeles District, Los Angeles County Supervisor Hilda Solis, Los Angeles County Public Works Director Mark Pestrella, Los Angeles City Mayor Eric Garcetti, Los Angeles Port Director Gene Seroka, Long Beach Port Director Mario Cordero, Metropolitan Water District Board Chair Gloria Grey, and San Gabriel Basin Watermaster Tony Zampiello. Madam Speaker, I would particularly like to thank the Subcommittee Ranking Member Bruce Westerman for his friendship and collegiality through the hearings, meetings and roundtables which led to this bipartisan accomplishment. And most importantly, I would like to thank the incredible water subcommittee staff, including Alexa Williams, Camille Touton, Navis Bermudez, Ryan Seiger, Victor Sarmiento, Jon Pawlow, and Ian Bennitt. I urge my colleagues to support WRDA 2020. Mr. GARAMENDI. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of the final ``Water Resources Development Act of 2020'' (S. 1811). Working with other members of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, I am very pleased to reach agreement with the Senate on a truly bipartisan bill and the fourth biennial Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) to be passed by Congress since 2014. My Congressional district includes 200 miles of the Sacramento River and is adjacent to several major ports. WRDA 2020 includes key provisions for the California Delta and Central Valley to authorize and expedite construction of flood protection and aquatic ecosystem restoration projects, address harmful algal blooms, and give local agencies greater flexibility in using federal Army Corps funds to better meet local needs. Under Chairman DeFazio's leadership, the bill finally fixes the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund to ensure that regional dredging and navigation projects are fully funded. I secured Congressional authorization for the Delta Islands and Levees Ecosystem Restoration Project, Yuba River Ecosystem Restoration Project, and Sacramento Regional Groundwater Bank in WRDA 2020. These projects provide critical flood protection and make local communities across the Central Valley more resilient to climate change. I also secured deauthorization of the Sacramento Riverbed Gradient Restoration Facility and Western Pacific Interceptor Canal, returning these former Army Corps projects to full local control. WRDA 2020 also expedites completion of the Army Corps' feasibility studies needed for the San Francisco Bay to Stockton Navigation Improvement Project, Lower Cache Creek Flood Risk Management Project, and Sutter Bypass and Sacramento River Basin Floodplain Management Project. I look forward to securing Congressional authorization for these projects once the Army Corps completes the requisite feasibility studies. Working with Rep. Doris O. Matsui (CA-06), I secured inclusion of our ``Yolo Bypass System Improvement Act'' in WRDA 2020 to improve coordinated planning for all restoration projects and federal permitting in the Yolo Bypass. Lastly, I am very pleased that the new Army Corps harmful algal bloom program established under WRDA 2020 includes the California Delta as a focus area. This will better protect the Delta's precious ecosystem from toxic algal blooms. The House report for WRDA 2020 includes my amendment directing the Army Corps to report to Congress on implementation of the Small Business Act across all the Corps' missions. This strengthens Congressional oversight over the Corps' contracting process and ensures that the Small Business Act is implemented fully in an equitably distributed manner, as intended by Congress. I want to extend a special appreciation to my colleague Rep. Grace F. Napolitano (CA-32), chairwoman of the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment, for her tireless work in this WRDA for the entire California delegation. WRDA 2020 ensures that Army Corps projects in California requiring earthquake-resistance and other seismic safety costs remain equally competitive for federal funding compared to projects in other states. I urge all Members of Congress to support this bipartisan WRDA 2020, which is expected to be signed into law this year. This two-year authorization bill provides the federal support and certainty needed to keep Army Corps projects across California on time and on budget. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Oregon (Mr. DeFazio) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, S. 1811, as amended. The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed. The title of the bill was amended so as to read: ``A bill to provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United States, to provide for the conservation and development of water and related resources, and for other purposes.''. A motion to reconsider was laid on the table. ____________________