[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 203 (Wednesday, December 2, 2020)]
[Senate]
[Page S7155]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Coronavirus Relief
Madam President, now, regarding another COVID bill, we seem to be
caught in a familiar pattern. We all know that successfully passing
legislation through Congress means that a bill must get through the
Democratic House and get Democratic votes in the Senate.
Passing the law takes a measure of bipartisanship and compromise.
That is why Speaker Pelosi and I sent the Republican leader a new offer
on the COVID bill. It was an effort to jump-start serious negotiations,
but, yesterday, Leader McConnell announced that rather than respond to
our offer or the bipartisan offer of the so-called Gang of 8, he will
pursue another partisan proposal before the end of the year. He said he
was going to talk to the Republican leader in the House, the Republican
President, and that is it--not a word with Democrats.
From early reports in the press, the latest Republican offer will be
even more insufficient than the previous two attempts--so insufficient,
that according to one press report, a Republican Senator said it was
``offensive''--his word--to struggling Americans for the Republican
majority to focus on another messaging bill.
Apparently, the latest Republican proposal will not include another
dime of unemployment assistance because, according to the Republican
whip, it was likely something the President wouldn't sign.
Let's be clear. The latest Republican offer on COVID will include
immunity for corporations that put their workers at risk of COVID-19
but not a dime for workers who lost their jobs because of the pandemic.
The Republican leader should not waste the Senate's time on another
inadequate, partisan proposal and, instead, sit down with Democrats to
begin a true bipartisan effort to quickly meet the needs of the
country.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, all postcloture time
has expired.
The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the Hauptman
nomination?
Mr. BARRASSO. I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk called the roll.
Mr. THUNE. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the
Senator from Georgia (Mrs. Loeffler) and the Senator from Arizona (Ms.
McSally).
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from California (Ms.
Harris), the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders), and the Senator from
Hawaii (Mr. Schatz) are necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 56, nays 39, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 245 Ex.]
YEAS--56
Alexander
Barrasso
Blackburn
Blunt
Boozman
Braun
Burr
Capito
Cassidy
Collins
Cornyn
Cotton
Cramer
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Enzi
Ernst
Fischer
Gardner
Graham
Grassley
Hassan
Hawley
Hoeven
Hyde-Smith
Inhofe
Johnson
Jones
Kennedy
King
Lankford
Lee
McConnell
Moran
Murkowski
Paul
Perdue
Portman
Risch
Roberts
Romney
Rounds
Rubio
Sasse
Scott (FL)
Scott (SC)
Shelby
Sinema
Sullivan
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Warner
Wicker
Young
NAYS--39
Baldwin
Bennet
Blumenthal
Booker
Brown
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Coons
Cortez Masto
Duckworth
Durbin
Feinstein
Gillibrand
Heinrich
Hirono
Kaine
Klobuchar
Leahy
Manchin
Markey
Menendez
Merkley
Murphy
Murray
Peters
Reed
Rosen
Schumer
Shaheen
Smith
Stabenow
Tester
Udall
Van Hollen
Warren
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--5
Harris
Loeffler
McSally
Sanders
Schatz
The nomination was confirmed
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the motion to
reconsider is considered made and laid upon the table, and the
President will be immediately notified of the Senate's action.
The Senator from Ohio.
Mr. PORTMAN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the
mandatory quorum be waived.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________