[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 201 (Monday, November 30, 2020)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7104-S7105]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
GOVERNMENT FUNDING
Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, on another matter, the Senate has, of
course, returned for a last end-of-the-year legislative dash, and we
have a lot of work to do before we cross the finish line.
As we know, government funding will expire in less than 2 weeks, and
we have to reach an agreement, as the senior Senator from Vermont
mentioned, before the December 11 deadline of the current continuing
resolution. With millions of Americans already facing economic
uncertainty, a government shutdown is, surely, not an option.
We need to pass the National Defense Authorization Act to support
America's brave servicemembers and ensure that our military leaders
have the ability to plan and operate with certainty and provide peace
through American strength. Also, as we move into the winter months,
which the experts have told us will present new challenges in our war
against the COVID-19 virus, it is time to cut the partisanship and
deliver another round of relief to the American people.
It is worth recounting--because people have short memories,
apparently, in Washington, DC--that, over the last several months, our
Democratic colleagues have consistently talked about the need to
bolster our support in the fight against COVID-19. Yet, despite the
repeated rhetoric and calls to action, they have unapologetically stood
in the way of each and every attempt to make real progress.
This summer, we proposed something called the HEALS Act--as the
Presiding Officer knows, for he was instrumental in that work--as a
starting point for negotiations on a new relief package. It was a
starting place, a place to begin bipartisan negotiations in the hope of
crafting a package that could get the requisite number of votes.
Unfortunately, before the election, our Democratic colleagues had
simply no interest in amending the bill or trying to find any kind of
common ground. I think they thought it was to their political advantage
for the American people to be experiencing the anxiety and the pain
before the election. I can't imagine holding them hostage, but that is
what appeared, to me, to be the case.
Instead of trying to find common ground--in particular, the Speaker
made the amazing statement that nothing was better than something when
it came to COVID-19 relief, which is just the opposite of what I have
always believed--she demeaned the bill of half a trillion dollars in
spending as ``pathetic.'' The minority leader called it ``unworkable,''
but then they didn't lift a finger to try to get anything done.
So the next month we took another shot. We attempted to narrow the
scope of negotiations to the most urgent matters--things like
continuing Federal unemployment benefits, which expired at the end of
July. This is last July. This time our Democratic colleagues rejected
what they called a ``piecemeal'' approach.
Well, never mind the fact that the House returned to Washington to
help pass a bill that supported the U.S. Postal Service. We all believe
in supporting the Postal Service, but apparently they thought that
piecemeal bill was acceptable as long as it was a Democratic-authored
bill and didn't provide any additional relief to the American people.
Well, being unsuccessful those first two times, we tried again a
third time. So in September the majority leader tried to bring a bill
to the floor to provide $500 billion for our shared bipartisan
priorities. There weren't any real differences in what was in the bill.
The only difference was that our Democratic colleagues wanted to spend
multiples of that for unrelated activities. We wanted to concentrate
the effort on helping small businesses keep their employees on payroll,
giving schools the resources they needed to keep their students and
teachers safe, strengthening testing nationwide, and investing in the
continued success of Operation Warp Speed, which is going to deliver an
FDA-approved vaccine before the end of the year--not just one, maybe as
many as two or three, and more, perhaps, to come.
Anyone who has spent time watching C-SPAN over the last several
months has heard both Republicans and Democrats talk about the
importance of every single one of these things, but when legislation
that includes all of these priorities came up for an initial vote, our
Democratic colleagues wouldn't even allow us to get on the bill. In
other words, here in the Senate you have to vote to get on the bill
before you can then offer amendments and try to make it better.
So they killed it. Without batting an eye, our Democratic colleagues
voted in lockstep to block the bill and unanimously oppose legislation
that would have invested an additional half-trillion dollars in our
fight against COVID-19.
When the majority leader tried to bring the bill to the floor again
in October, we saw exactly the same thing. It was the same bad movie
all over again. Our Democratic colleagues refused to let us even
debate, much less to amend, the bill.
It is not just these targeted packages that have been blocked by our
Democratic colleagues. They stood in the way of our commonsense
proposals, like the one from the now-former Senator from Arizona,
Senator McSally, which would have extended unemployment benefits for 1
week while we negotiated a larger compromise.
Our friends on the other side of the aisle have repeatedly said that
Congress needs to act, but the reality is their own actions have
prevented us from doing so.
Month after month, they have demonstrated it is either the House's
multitrillion-dollar, leftwing-policy grab-bag wish list or nothing.
They have consistently told the American people: It is our way or the
highway. You don't get an extension of unemployment insurance unless we
get tax breaks for blue-State millionaires and billionaires. You don't
get vaccine funding unless we get diversity studies on the marijuana
industry. You don't get funding for schools unless we get permanent
changes to hijack and take over our election laws and run them out of
Washington, DC.
Well, even rank-and-file Democrats have now understood and criticized
this sort of bogus approach to legislating. It has been the same song
and dance month after month--fiery speeches, press conferences, tweets,
and letters calling for action. But each time our Democratic colleagues
have been given an opportunity to actually do something--to do more
than spout off some meaningless, vapid rhetoric at the nearest
microphone--they have simply stood in the way.
The fact of the matter is our Democratic colleagues have blocked more
COVID relief bills than they have passed. Yet they continue to feign
outrage over Congress's failure to pass a bill--we heard it again here
today--as though they aren't the ones responsible for the impasse.
Our jobs here in the Senate aren't simply to vote against imperfect
bills. If that were the case, no bill would ever pass, because none of
them is perfect. But this body is built on making imperfect legislation
better through a debate-and-amendment process--two processes we haven't
seen much at work this year.
[[Page S7105]]
So the bottom line is Congress needs to act. The American people want
Democrats and Republicans to come to an agreement on the things our
country actually needs to make it through this crisis.
It won't be the last piece of legislation we pass, but we do need to
do this next step, and we need to do it soon--as soon as possible.
It is time for our Democratic colleagues to realize the election is
over and the only real people being hurt by their intransigence are the
people they represent in their various States.
So it is time to start getting back to work for all the American
people on a bipartisan piece of legislation and to quit the partisan
games. I can't say it any more directly than that.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mrs. BLACKBURN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________