[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 173 (Monday, October 5, 2020)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6034-S6035]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                              CORONAVIRUS

  Mr. KAINE. Mr. President, I would like to add, on behalf of my 
Democratic colleagues, the concerns expressed for the President and 
First Lady, that they recover quickly and fully.
  Having had coronavirus--likely contracted here when we were working 
on the CARES Act in March--I understand how tricky this can be and, 
knowing four people who died of coronavirus, how serious it can be. Our 
prayer is that this is a mild case, and it passes quickly.
  I also extend the same concern on behalf of my Democratic colleagues 
for the Members of the Senate who have recently tested positive and 
hope that they either have no symptoms or the symptoms pass quickly.
  I couldn't help but notice, as I came into the Senate today on the 
subway from the Russell building, that there is an advisory that has 
been posted for months down at the entrance to the Senate that says 
that we are trying to follow CDC guidelines, but the advisory placard 
says nothing about masks--nothing.
  I have wondered about that as I passed before it in the past, but in 
light of the experience over the last few days, I think in order to 
fairly follow science-based guidelines and give people warnings about 
what they should do to protect their health, we might consider a 
different placard.
  Briefly, with respect to the majority leader's comments--I would love 
to be working on a COVID bill. The House passed a Democratic preferred 
COVID bill--the Heroes Act--in May. I understand the majority leader 
and his colleagues find things about it they don't like.
  There is no expectation that they would just take up the House 
Democratic bill and pass it, but we waited through May and then June 
and then July and then August, until finally, in mid to late September, 
the majority put a bill on the floor that we viewed, frankly, as 
insufficient.
  It contained no funds for State and local government aid, no funds 
for rental or mortgage assistance, no funds for SNAP benefits or food 
aid. It would have stricken State laws, such as those that had been 
passed in Virginia to try to provide a workplace safety standard for 
people returning to work in the days of COVID.
  We voted the bill down, as the majority leader knows, but we did so 
with the expectation that that no vote would function much like the no 
vote in March functioned when we came in on a Sunday and we voted down 
a partisan proposal, and a few days later, we had a bipartisan 
proposal--the CARES Act--that has helped millions and millions of 
Americans, small businesses, hospitals, families.
  We hope that no vote would lead to the same negotiation that could 
potentially find a solution for Americans who are still looking for 
relief, but the majority wants to now move to a different topic. They 
want to now speed through a Supreme Court nomination with an 
unprecedented speed and, indeed, an unprecedented process.
  I understand that the majority leader might categorize the Democrats' 
concerns about proceeding at a time of great sickness as a procedural 
trick, but I don't think there is any unreasonableness to a Judiciary 
Committee member's request that a hearing on the single most important 
appointment that the Senate might make should be done in person. If it 
is done in person, it should be done in person in a way that is safe. 
That is the request the Democrats would have and that we continue to 
believe would be in accord with the institution's norms but also the 
best thing for the safety of all Members.
  I yield the floor.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader.

[[Page S6035]]

  

                          ____________________