[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 161 (Thursday, September 17, 2020)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5698-S5699]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
INTERNATIONAL DAY OF DEMOCRACY
Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, today I rise to commemorate the
International Day of Democracy. Since 2007, September 15 has offered an
opportunity each year to reflect on the democratic values that we
cherish and to recommit ourselves to promoting them around the world.
The democratic project is especially important at this moment.
Although some communities are experiencing greater rights and freedoms
than ever before, there is also an alarming trend of democratic
backsliding in many corners of the globe.
Countries that were becoming increasingly open and egalitarian are
moving back toward authoritarianism under unlawful, oppressive leaders.
Meanwhile, countries that were already unfree are suffering even more
disturbing civil and human rights abuses.
If we turn a blind eye to these developments, it will embolden bad
actors to continue undermining freedom, peace, and equality. The United
States must lead all democracy-loving people in calling out subversions
of democratic rights wherever they exist and holding those responsible
to account.
One country that requires our urgent attention is China. The
Government of China has not adhered to democratic norms for a long
time, but we should never allow that failure to normalize ongoing human
rights abuses such as the vicious opposition to the Uighurs.
International nongovernmental organizations have documented China's
mass surveillance, arbitrary detention, torture, and political
indoctrination of these communities for no reason other than their
religious and cultural differences.
We must do everything possible to fight for the freedom and equality
of the Uighurs to help end this atrocity.
We also need to stand up for the rights of the people of Hong Kong.
Beijing's attempt to circumvent Hong Kong's independent legal system
with a far-reaching, oppressive national security law is dangerous and
in complete disregard of the one-country, two-system principle. I am
likewise disturbed that the Hong Kong government inexplicably postponed
the September regional elections for another year. The people of Hong
Kong deserve to see their democratic aspirations realized and
protected. I am pleased that there is bipartisan, strong support in the
U.S. Senate and in the House for the people of Hong Kong, and I joined
with Senator Rubio in introducing legislation to make that clear.
China is certainly not the only place where democratic rights are
threatened. We need to look closer to home, as well, to countries like
Venezuela. In Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro's illegal regime has produced
one of the worst humanitarian crises by plundering the country's
resources for personal gain and using the distribution of food as a
tool for social control. Maduro has completely ignored the Venezuelan
people's call to return to democracy and is using the current global
pandemic as an opportunity to consolidate his own power.
In addition to addressing quasi-dictatorships in the Western
Hemisphere, we must maintain pressure on the so-called ``last
dictator'' of Europe, Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko. While
Lukashenko's near three-decade rule has been full of corrupt power
grabs and crackdowns and dissent, his behavior surrounding the recent
Presidential election demonstrates a new level of lawlessness.
Lukashenko refused to certify opposing candidates and then imprisoned
them. He claimed victory through clearly fraudulent election results.
He restricted the free flow of information by shutting down the
internet and targeting journalists. And he oversaw the brutal
repression of protesters, including many instances of Belarusian
security forces repeatedly torturing detained civilians. Lukashenko
knows that the Belarusian people are ready for a new democratic chapter
that does not include him. Instead of stepping aside to serve the
interests of his country, he has abandoned the rule of law in order to
protect his own power.
It is no surprise that Lukashenko has appealed to Vladimir Putin to
endorse this tyrannical approach. President Putin is, after all, a
veteran when it comes to destabilizing democracies. He has done so not
only in his own country of Russia, where he overcomes dissent by
changing the constitution to secure his rule and poisoning political
opponents, but also in other parts of the world. That includes his
continuous attempts to undermine our democracy here in the United
States.
President Trump has completely failed to hold Vladimir Putin
accountable for abusing his own people's human rights and attacking the
United States. Even worse, President Trump appears to have taken a page
out of Putin's book, suggesting that if he were not reelected this
November, he may not accept the results of that election. It is a sad
commentary on the state of our domestic affairs that we have to take
such a ludicrous statement seriously. We know that global democracy is
in trouble when the leader of the United States is copying undemocratic
heads of state instead of condemning them.
These are but a few snapshots of what is happening in many countries
around the world. If there is anything that I have learned in my many
years of public service, it is that we can never take democracy--and
all the freedoms, rights, and opportunities it entails--for granted. My
work in the House and the Senate on the Helsinki Commission really
embodies that commitment to stand up for human rights. The Helsinki
Final Act made it clear that all States in Europe, the former Soviet
Union, United States, and Canada embraced not only democratic
principles and human rights of good governance but also the principle
that we have a right to challenge the compliance with those commitments
in any other member state. It is not interfering in their internal
matters; it is holding them to the commitments they made in the
Helsinki Final Act.
Democracy is fragile. It must be constantly tended to and protected
to survive and flourish. Therefore, while we have a responsibility to
monitor the status of democracy in other parts of the world, we have a
parallel duty to safeguard and tend to our democracy here at home. I
cannot remember a more dangerous time for American democracy since the
Civil War.
To protect our democracy, we must protect the ability of every
individual to exercise her or his right to vote. In the middle of a
pandemic, that means expanding the ability to vote by mail so that we
do not force people to choose between participating in our democracy or
protecting their health.
We need to make sure that State and local election boards get the
resources they need to cover the costs of mail-in voting, and we need
to defend the strength, integrity, and impartiality of the U.S. Postal
Service.
Our President also openly invites foreign powers to interfere in our
election, and his encouragement has been effective. The same external
factors that we know influenced the elections in 2016 are once again
actively planning to interfere in the upcoming election. Regardless of
party affiliation, we should all be able to unite in pursuit of a
healthy, functioning democracy. That requires us to take action against
the foreign actors seeking to spread misinformation and divide
Americans for their own benefit.
When we fail to protect democracy in the United States, it has
consequences all over the world. After he was confronted about his
recent brutal crackdown on protesters, journalists, and opposition
members, Belarus President Lukashenko said that the United States
``should sort out their own affairs'' before attempting to interfere in
Belarus. His statements made clear that President Trump and his
administration and supporters' undemocratic behavior is eroding our
credibility on the global stage as a voice for human rights. Let today,
International Day for Democracy, be a reminder for us to stand up in
defense of democracy, whether we are talking about China, Venezuela,
Belarus, or here in our own backyard. The world is counting on us.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Braun). The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I be
allowed to use, during my remarks, two
[[Page S5699]]
exhibits of the Federal aid application form.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________