[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 29, 2020)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4593-S4596]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTION
By Mr. KAINE (for himself, Mr. Young, Mr. Reed, and Mr. Cassidy):
S. 4349. A bill to address behavioral health and well-being among
health care professionals; to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions.
Mr. KAINE. Mr. President, Lorna Breen was a talented and dynamic
physician who served as the medical director of the emergency
department at New York-Presbyterian Allen Hospital. Lorna was from
Charlottesville, VA, and very devoted to her family there. She attended
Cornell University and then the Medical College of Virginia. She was
deeply religious, an avid skier, a volunteer with senior citizens, a
salsa dancer, and a musician.
[[Page S4594]]
Mostly, Lorna Breen was a beloved, compassionate, and demanding
doctor. A colleague said of her: ``She had something that was a little
bit different and that was this optimism that her persistent effort
will save lives.''
Dr. Breen suffered from something very common among health
professionals--the deep stress of dealing with patients day in and day
out--helping them, worrying about them, celebrating with them, praying
for them, and mourning for them.
Healthcare professionals routinely experience high levels of stress.
As many as 45 to 55 percent of this critical workforce suffers from
burnout. Physicians have the highest rate of death by suicide of any
profession in this country, with a suicide rate more than twice that of
the general population. That was the case before COVID-19.
In November 2019, Dr. Breen and three colleagues published a short
article in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine titled:
``Clinician burnout and its association with team-based care in the
Emergency Department.'' The article that she coauthored begins this
way:
Recent work has noted the alarming prevalence of clinician
burnout among providers, particularly among acute care
physicians. Burnout is characterized by emotional exhaustion,
physical fatigue, and cognitive weariness, which may lead to
feelings of depersonalization and reduced accomplishment.
The article went on to describe how staffing models--in this case,
the use of fixed working teams--could mitigate the effects of stress on
staff and also improve patient outcomes. Within just a few months of
the publication of this article, healthcare professionals like Dr.
Breen, already dealing with high stress levels, faced a new foe:
coronavirus.
Dr. Breen's hospital was overrun by the virus in March and April, as
were others in New York, as are others in this country. By late March,
the Allen, a small community hospital serving a low-income population
in Northern Manhattan, was blitzed with an emergency department clogged
with nearly three times its normal number of patients. Dr. Breen shared
the sense of anxiety now understood by the whole country: ``People I
work with are so confused by all the mixed messages and constantly
changing instructions.'' And then Dr. Breen got the virus herself,
coming down with fever and exhaustion on March 18 and quarantining in
her New York City apartment as she tried to recover. While she was
trying to recover, she was texting her colleagues to see if they were
OK. She was trying to help them find supplies that they could buy to
use at the hospital.
Finally, she returned to work on April 1, and the situation in her
emergency room, her hospital, her city, was even grimmer. Her sister,
Jennifer Breen Feist, described what Lorna faced.
When [Lorna] returned to the hospital, she was confronted
by an overwhelming, relentless number of incredibly sick
patients. She and her colleagues worked 24/7 during the peak
in New York with limited personal protective equipment,
insufficient supplies, not enough beds, not enough help. Many
of her colleagues were out on medical furlough. She told me
patients were dying in the waiting rooms and hallways. . . .
There was so much suffering, so much death.
During the peak of the crisis in New York City, nearly a quarter of
all patients admitted to the Allen for COVID-19 would die. Dr. Breen
messaged her Bible study group: ``I'm drowning right now--may be AWOL
for a while.'' She kept right on working.
By mid-April, Dr. Breen reached out for help to deal with the stress
she was feeling by talking to colleagues and family. She admitted that
she had thought about hurting herself. She told one friend:
I couldn't help anyone. I couldn't do anything. I just
wanted to help people and I couldn't do anything.
Dr. Breen was admitted to a psychiatric hospital for 11 days and went
home when she was discharged to be with her family in Charlottesville
to recover, and on April 26, Dr. Breen died by suicide, leaving no
note.
Dr. Breen was a victim of coronavirus, even though her death is not
counted among the 151,000 people who have succumbed to the virus. But
she was also a victim of another condition that is a preventable
condition that affects our healthcare professionals. We place enormous
demands upon our healers. Our society, including the medical profession
itself, does not do enough to recognize the real cost that the work
inflicts upon the mental health of our caregivers. Perhaps even our use
of the term ``hero,'' meant as the highest praise, subtly communicates
an expectation that our healers must be strong superheroes, placed high
on a pedestal by society, thereby making it even more difficult for a
caregiver to admit vulnerability and simply ask for help.
Loice Swisher, an emergency room physician in Philadelphia, puts it
this way:
We don't want to be seen as a weak link. We don't want to
be seen as incompetent or place an extra burden on our
colleagues. It's almost like you're being kicked off the
island--you don't belong any more--if you admit to [needing
help].
It is still common practice in this country for State medical boards
and hospitals to ask doctors seeking licensing and credentialing
whether they have ever been treated for depression or other mental
illness. This heightens the barriers to asking for help when we should
be making it easier to do so. Lorna's sister Jennifer attests to this:
And when [Lorna] became so overworked and despondent that
she was unable to move, do you know what she was worried
about? Her job. She was worried that she would lose her
medical license, or be ostracized by her colleagues because
she was suffering burnout due to her work on the front lines
of the Covid19 crisis. She was afraid to get help.
Lorna's worries were not unusual. A 2019 survey of physicians by the
American Medical Association showed that nearly 40 percent of surveyed
physicians are wary about seeking mental health counseling, while
another 12 percent indicate that they would only do so in secret.
Dr. Breen's family is devastated by her passing, but they are
honoring her by advocating for the cause of a more humane profession,
one in which mental health challenges are acknowledged, mental health
resources are available, and the healer accessing those services is
encouraged.
I am proud today to introduce the Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care
Provider Protection Act, together with my colleagues, Senators Young,
Reed, and Cassidy. The act aims to reduce and prevent suicide, burnout,
and other mental and behavioral health conditions among healthcare
professionals. In particular, the act would establish grants for
training healthcare professionals, students, and residents with
strategies to improve their mental well-being and job satisfaction;
identify and disseminate evidence-based best practices for combating
burnout and suicide; establish a national education and awareness
campaign targeting healthcare professionals to encourage them to seek
support and treatment for mental and behavioral health concerns; create
grants for employee education, peer support programming, and mental and
behavioral health treatment with a priority for providers in COVID-19
hotspots; and initiate a comprehensive study on healthcare professional
mental health needs, including the impact of COVID-19 on our providers,
that can produce recommendations for all levels of government and the
medical professions themselves.
We introduced this bill mindful of the many priorities that are
currently being discussed while we negotiate our continuing response to
the Nation's coronavirus challenge. It is our hope that this bill might
make it into the next COVID-19 bill as a tribute to Lorna Breen and so
many like her.
How should we honor the work and sacrifice of a Lorna Breen? How do
we honor those healthcare frontline workers whom we call heroes every
day? How do we recognize the tremendous work they are doing and also
the tremendous burden that they carry? Let's pass this bill and show
that we care about our healers and are committed to providing them the
resources and the culture they need to keep healing.
______
By Mrs. FEINSTEIN:
S. 4352. A bill to provide for the water quality restoration of the
Tijuana River and the New River, and for other purposes; to the
Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Mr. President, I rise today to introduce the ``Border
Water Quality Restoration and Protection Act of 2020.''
For over two decades, cleaning up the Tijuana River Valley has been
one of
[[Page S4595]]
my top priorities for Southern California. The wastewater, trash and
sediment that continues to flow into San Diego and Imperial Counties is
a danger to public health and our economy and it must be addressed.
This legislation is a key piece of addressing this decades-long
issue.
What the Problem Is
Polluted water from the Tijuana and New Rivers flows north across the
border into the United States causing unsanitary water conditions,
pollution and beach closures across Southern California. It also
jeopardizes military training exercises for Navy Seals in Camp
Pendleton.
Three-quarters of the 1,700-square-mile Tijuana River watershed lies
in Mexico. However, the watershed, along with all its pollutants,
drains into San Diego County and the Tijuana River Valley.
Impacts of the Water Pollution
In addition to jeopardizing human health and safety, two of the most
drastic effects from this cross-border water pollution are harm to
wildlife and damage to the tourism industry, integral to Southern
Californian communities.
Pollution from Mexico harms sensitive areas that provide critical
habitat for more than 300 species of birds as well as marine animals
like leopard sharks and bottlenose dolphins, including: Tijuana River's
National Estuarine Research Reserve, the River Mouth State Marine
Conservation Area and River Valley Regional Park Preserve.
The beaches in the region are vital to San Diego's tourism economy.
Beaches in the communities of Coronado and Imperial Beach have been
closed for more than 200 days this year alone due to pollution.
Health and safety of residents and workers are also at risk. In
recent years, local Border Patrol union officials reported that 80
officers suffered from contamination, rashes, infections, chemical
burns and lung irritation due to toxic cross-border flows.
The harmful effects of pollution in the Tijuana River Valley on our
residents, businesses, economy and environment are simply unacceptable.
Current Status
In February 2020, the Government Accountability Office issued a
comprehensive report, ``International Boundary Water Commission:
Opportunities Exist to Address Water Quality Problems.'' My office
worked closely with the GAO to utilize their findings to craft
meaningful change through this legislation.
Simultaneously, we were able to secure $300 million in the U.S.-
Mexico-Canada trade agreement to address pollution in the Tijuana River
Valley Watershed.
With significant funding and detailed findings by the GAO
investigation, we developed this legislation in concert with federal,
state and local agency input.
What the bill does
The Border Water Quality Restoration and Protection Act includes some
key reforms to advance concrete solutions.
One of the problems is that no one agency is in charge of this
problem. A whole range of agencies--EPA, International Boundary and
Water Commission, State Department, Department of Homeland Security,
Customs and Border Protection, Defense Department--all have
jurisdiction or interest in this international issue.
What we need is one agency in charge, taking input from the others so
decisions can be made. This approach is similar to other large,
regional environmental challenges like the Great Lakes, Gulf of Mexico,
Everglades and Chesapeake Bay. Here in California, we have also seen
great success with this model of interagency coordination at Lake
Tahoe.
Here's how the bill would work:
The EPA would be officially named the agency with overall control of
this effort.
The EPA, along with its federal, state and local partners, would be
directed to identify a list of priority projects. It also would be
authorized to accept and distribute funds to build, operate and
maintain those projects.
Would permanently authorize the Border Water Infrastructure Program
to manage storm water runoff and water reuse projects.
State and local authorities would also be authorized to contribute
funding to federal projects, which is currently not allowed.
The International Boundary and Water Commission would be authorized
to mitigate storm water from Mexico and the pollution that comes with
it and is required to construct, operate and maintain projects on the
priority list developed by the agencies within the U.S. that improve
water quality.
Conclusion
We need a new and comprehensive approach to this issue that has
plagued border communities for too long. This bill creates a formal
process to consider effective, long-term solutions and additional
wastewater infrastructure to mitigate cross-border pollution and I hope
the Senate can move on this bill quickly.
I want to thank California Environmental Protection Agency,
California Natural Resources Agency, San Diego and Imperial counties,
cities of Imperial Beach and Coronado, Mayor of Chula Vista, Mary
Casillas Salas, Mayor of San Diego, Kevin Faulconer, and the Port of
San Diego for supporting this legislation. These communities, and
others, have been negatively impacted by this issue for far too long.
It's past time that we finally solve this problem to safeguard local
health and economic growth.
Thank you, Mr. President. I yield the Floor.
______
By Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. Bennet):
S. 4361. A bill to automatically extend and adjust enhanced
unemployment assistance for the duration of the COVID-19 emergency and
economic crisis, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Finance.
Mr. REED. Mr. President, the unemployment crisis we are facing due to
the pandemic has devastated the lives of tens of millions of
Americans--many of whom may not see their jobs come back for the
foreseeable future. The expanded unemployment insurance we passed in
the CARES Act--especially the coverage for gig workers and the self-
employed and the $600 weekly boost--have enabled workers to keep a roof
over their heads, feed their children, and pay for health insurance.
If these benefits expire or are drastically reduced, it could cause
an eviction and hunger crisis. It could also tank consumer spending
while increasing business closings that will lead to even more
unemployment. Additionally, it could further exacerbate this public
health and economic crisis by forcing more Americans into desperate
situations, instead of ensuring that people can return to the workforce
when it is safe.
And yet knowing this, the Republican have proposed to slash weekly
benefits to $200 a week for the next two months, after which benefits
would be limited to no more than 70% of previous wages. This plan,
which would cut the average worker's unemployment benefits by roughly
43%, would take states months to get up and running. This would further
delay benefits at a time when some workers are still waiting for
assistance.
Instead of this half-baked, inefficient, and disingenuous proposal,
we must work together on a bipartisan basis to enact targeted,
effective, and smart measures that will offer families, businesses, and
the economy the needed stability to get us through this crisis. That is
why I am introducing the Worker Relief and Security Act, along with
Senator Bennet and Congressman Beyer. Our legislation, which reflects
input from top economists, would take politics out of the equation,
basing continued enhanced unemployment insurance benefits on
``automatic stabilizers'' that are tied to the public health emergency
and economic conditions. Specifically, this legislation would
automatically extend the $600 weekly boost and additional benefit
weeks, on top of regular state unemployment, through the duration of
the public health crisis. Once we begin to enter the recovery phase,
this legislation would continue providing supplemental weekly
compensation and additional benefit weeks until national and state
total unemployment rates get closer to pre-crisis levels.
Time is of the essence, so I urge our colleagues to join us in
pressing for immediate action on this legislation. We must extend and
enhance unemployment insurance benefits, tying them to economic and
health conditions--as
[[Page S4596]]
well as expand work sharing as I have discussed previously--to help
keep families, businesses, and states solvent through this crisis.
Mr. President, I yield back.
____________________