[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 117 (Thursday, June 25, 2020)]
[Senate]
[Page S3504]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  SA 2043. Mr. MARKEY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by 
him to the bill S. 4049, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 
2021 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military 
construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, 
to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for 
other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

       At the appropriate place in title XII, insert the 
     following:

   Subtitle __--Matters Relating to Treaty Withdrawal and Termination

     SEC. ___1. SHORT TITLE.

       This subtitle may be cited as the ``Preventing Actions 
     Undermining Security without Endorsement Act'' or the ``PAUSE 
     Act''.

     SEC. ___2. FINDINGS.

       Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) The COVID-19 global pandemic has highlighted the need 
     for United States leadership to address the full range of 
     international security challenges, which the Government of 
     the United States can do by reaffirming its steadfast 
     commitment to those mutually beneficial treaties and 
     agreements forged with its European and Indo-Pacific allies, 
     along with other states parties.
       (2) For more than 70 years, the United States has shown a 
     bipartisan commitment to the North Atlantic Treaty 
     Organization (NATO), specifically to the principle of 
     collective defense enshrined in Article 5 of the North 
     Atlantic Treaty, signed at Washington April 4, 1949.
       (3) Section 1242 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116-92) prohibited the use 
     of funds for the United States withdrawal from the North 
     Atlantic Treaty in recognition that the NATO alliance remains 
     a cornerstone for peace and prosperity throughout the world.
       (4) On January 22, 2019, the House of Representatives 
     passed H.R. 676 (116th Congress) on a 357-22 vote, 
     prohibiting the use of funds for the United States withdrawal 
     from the North Atlantic Treaty, and on December 17, 2019, the 
     Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate reported out 
     S.J.Res. 4 (116th Congress), which if enacted into law, would 
     require approval of two-thirds of the Senate, or both Houses 
     of Congress, before the President could withdraw the United 
     States from the treaty.
       (5) The Treaty on Open Skies provides a critical 
     confidence-building measure for Euro-Atlantic security to the 
     mutual benefit of the 34 States Parties to the treaty, and 
     the Open Skies Consultative Commission (OSCC) is one of the 
     few remaining operational diplomatic forums from which the 
     United States can engage with the Russian Federation.
       (6) Although the Government of the United States is right 
     to diplomatically press the Government of the Russian 
     Federation to return to full compliance with its obligations 
     under the Treaty on Open Skies, withdrawal or termination of 
     the treaty would deprive United States allies and partners of 
     the benefits derived from observation missions over Russian 
     territory and Russian occupied Eastern Ukraine, missions that 
     have vastly outnumbered Russian overflights of United States 
     territory since entry into force of the treaty.
       (7) On May 22, 2020, President Trump submitted notice of 
     the decision to withdraw the United States from the Treaty on 
     Open Skies, and, in doing so, failed to comply with section 
     1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2020 (Public Law 116-92), requiring the President to 
     provide notification to Congress 120 days before the 
     provision of notice of intent to withdraw the United States 
     from that treaty.
       (8) The Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and 
     the Republic of Korea, signed at Washington October 1, 1953, 
     the ratification of which the Senate advised and consented to 
     on January 26, 1954, was born from mutual sacrifice during 
     the Korean War, is based on shared values and interests, and 
     remains critical to the national security of the United 
     States nearly 7 decades after its signing.
       (9) A February 2020 report from the Department of State 
     confirmed, in part, that verifiable limits on ``Russia's 
     strategic nuclear force'' under the New START Treaty 
     ``currently contribute to the national security of the United 
     States''.
       (10) A decision by the President to allow the New START 
     Treaty to expire on February 5, 2021, without the United 
     States having first successfully concluded a verifiable and 
     binding agreement in its place, would lead to the United 
     States losing visibility into the location, movement, and 
     disposition of the strategic arsenal of the Russian 
     Federation to the detriment of the national security of the 
     United States and its allies.
       (11) The Constitution of the United States provides 
     Congress an important role in the treaty process, requiring 
     the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate for 
     approval of a resolution of ratification.

     SEC. ___3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the President should refrain from taking any action to 
     withdraw or terminate any international treaty to which the 
     Senate has given its advice and consent to ratification 
     without proper consultation with, and affirmative approval 
     from, Congress;
       (2) the 1979 Supreme Court decision in Goldwater v. Carter, 
     444 U.S. 996 (1979), is not controlling legal precedent with 
     respect to the role of Congress in the withdrawal or 
     termination of the United States from an international 
     treaty, as the Court directed the lower court to dismiss the 
     complaint and did not address the constitutionality of the 
     decision by President Carter to terminate the Mutual Defense 
     Treaty between the United States of America and the Republic 
     of China, signed at Washington December 2, 1954 (commonly 
     referred to as the ``Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty''); 
     and
       (3) the United States should take every action to reinforce 
     its global reputation as a country that fully complies with 
     its obligations under the international treaties to which it 
     is a party.

     SEC. ___4. JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL FOR TERMINATION OR 
                   WITHDRAWAL FROM AN INTERNATIONAL TREATY.

       No action to terminate or withdraw the United States from 
     any international treaty to which the Senate has given its 
     advice and consent to ratification may occur unless--
       (1) the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State 
     meet the requirements under section ___5; and
       (2) there is enacted into law a joint resolution that 
     approves such action.

     SEC. ___5. SUBMISSION ON NOTICE OF INTENT TO TERMINATE OR 
                   WITHDRAW THE UNITED STATES FROM AN 
                   INTERNATIONAL TREATY.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 120 days before the 
     provision of notice of intent to terminate or withdraw the 
     United States from any international treaty to which the 
     Senate has given its advice and consent to ratification, the 
     Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State, in 
     consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, 
     shall each submit to the appropriate committees of Congress--
       (1) a detailed justification for the withdrawal from or 
     termination of the treaty;
       (2) if the justification described in paragraph (1) 
     includes that a state party to the treaty is in material 
     breach of one or more obligations under the treaty, a 
     detailed explanation of the steps taken by that state party 
     to return to compliance with such obligations;
       (3) a certification that--
       (A) all other state parties to the treaty have been 
     consulted with respect to the justification described in 
     paragraph (1);
       (B) withdrawal from or termination of the treaty would be 
     in the best national interests of the United States; and
       (C) all steps taken for withdrawal from or termination of 
     the treaty are in compliance with the treaty; and
       (4) a comprehensive strategy to mitigate against lost 
     capacity of benefits, including plans for a superseding 
     treaty or potential new bilateral or multilateral confidence-
     building measures.
       (b) Form.--The submission required by subsection (a) shall 
     be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a 
     classified annex.
       (c) Applicability to New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.--
     This section shall apply to a decision by the President to 
     not renew the New START Treaty for up to an additional 5 
     years.

     SEC. ___6. APPLICABILITY TO TREATY ON OPEN SKIES.

       Sections ___4 and ___5 shall apply with respect to the 
     Treaty on Open Skies.

     SEC. ___7. DEFINITIONS.

       In this subtitle:
       (1) Appropriate committees of congress.--The term 
     ``appropriate committees of Congress'' means--
       (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
       (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
       (2) New start treaty.--The term ``New START Treaty'' means 
     the Treaty between the United States of America and the 
     Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and 
     Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed at Prague 
     April 8, 2010.
       (3) Treaty on open skies.--The term ``Treaty on Open 
     Skies'' means the Treaty on Open Skies, signed at Helsinki 
     March 24, 1992.
                                 ______