[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 23, 2020)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3152-S3153]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                            The JUSTICE Act

  Mr. BROWN. Thank you, Mr. President. Thousands of Americans are 
protesting in communities across our country demanding that our country 
be better. The protests are an expression of grief for Ms. Taylor and 
Mr. Floyd and Mr. Arbery and Mr. Brooks and so many other Black 
Americans murdered by the people who are supposed to protect them. They 
are an expression of frustration and anger. It is 2020. It is the year 
2020, a century and a half after the official end of slavery, five and 
a half decades after the passage of the Civil Rights Act, and still 
Black Americans are fighting the same fight. They are also an 
expression of hope against racism. We demand that our country do 
better. Demanding that we live up to our founding ideals is one of the 
most patriotic things anyone can do.
  We need to listen to the Black voices leading these calls for justice 
and take real action. That is what Democrats want to do, and my 
colleagues Senator Harris and Senator Booker and the Congressional 
Black Caucus in the House have led bicameral efforts and have a serious 
plan, the Justice in Policing Act. Everybody knows it is a serious 
plan--everybody. It would implement real, meaningful reform. It would 
actually hold police accountable. It makes clear: no more choke holds, 
no more unchecked police misconduct, no more militarization of police.
  Of course, we know this isn't the only thing we need to do. Policing 
didn't create institutional racism; it is a product of it and often 
reinforces it. We have a lot of work to do beyond this, but these 
reforms are an important start to making policing in our country more 
just.
  The Justice in Policing Act would create real change in our justice 
system, and communities across the country can't afford for us to not 
act on this meaningful legislation. What we cannot do is pass something 
just called police reform that does so little to actually reform 
policing and then turn around and tell Black mothers and fathers whose 
children who have been slain: See, we solved it. Our work here is done.
  I respect Senator Scott, and I appreciate his coming to the table and 
taking on this issue. I know he is fighting an uphill battle with his 
own caucus. I know that. So many on his side of the aisle don't want to 
do anything, but they think they need to check the box.
  I want to work with Senator Scott and with anyone of either party on 
real solutions. All of us on our side do. But I am not willing to 
participate in a political charade to vote on something that has no 
chance to lead to real change. It just checks a box and provides 
politicians with a talking point. It is an insult to Black families who 
have been fed empty promise after empty promise, year after year, 
decade after decade, generation after generation.
  We need to listen to the communities that suffer the most at the 
hands of police violence. They all agree that the Senate Republican 
bill is simply not serious. It will not fix the problems. We will be 
right back here sooner rather than later. Virtually every major civil 
rights group opposes this bill: the NAACP Legal Defense Fund; the Urban 
League; the Young Women's Christian Association, one of the most 
important civil rights and women's rights organizations in the country.
  It doesn't ban no-knock warrants; the Justice in Policing Act does. 
It doesn't stop the militarization of police departments; the Justice 
in Policing Act does. It doesn't create a national misconduct registry; 
the Justice in Policing Act does. It doesn't ban choke holds; the 
Justice in Policing Act does. These are all steps that civil rights 
groups have said are critical to any reform effort. It is the bare 
minimum.
  All this bill offers is more studies of questions we already know the 
answers to. We don't need more studies. We don't need more task forces. 
We don't need, as Senator McConnell specializes in, more delaying 
tactics. We need accountability. The JUSTICE Act even puts us in danger 
of moving in the opposite direction by providing more funding for 
policing without adequate rules and regulations and without a similar 
investment in community support.
  The NAACP says this bill ``ignores the public demands to reimagine 
public safety by shrinking the purview of law enforcement and providing 
better funding to agencies equipped to address the critical needs of 
communities such as social services, mental health services, and 
education.''
  The Urban League says this Scott bill ``dances around the edges in a 
show of political posturing.''
  We refuse to engage in that political posturing. We refuse to act 
like it is just a box we check and then we can move on. We refuse to 
insult Black Americans by pretending--pretending--this is a serious 
effort. People have suffered too long for that.
  We have been here before. This isn't the first wave of protests or 
the second. In 2014, after the murders of Tamir Rice in my city of 
Cleveland and Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO, President Obama's 
legislation laid important groundwork for reform. They studied what 
reforms would be most effective. They instituted consent decrees with 
cities to hold departments accountable, and they created a roadmap we 
could follow. But President Trump undid much of the progress the Obama 
administration made.
  The Urban League put out a plan for reform around the time of the 
murder of Tamir Rice after Michael Brown's murder in 2014. Since then, 
nearly 1,300 Black men and women--think of that--more than 1,300 Black 
men and women have been fatally shot by the police since the deaths of 
Michael Brown and Tamir Rice 6 years ago. This bill does nothing to 
stop the practices that killed them.
  Black Americans know their lives are put in danger by police every 
day. We must listen to them. People all around the country--Black and 
White and Brown, in small towns and big cities, young and old--are 
listening, waking up, and joining the calls for change. The peaceful 
demonstrations and protests all over my State in Black and White 
neighborhoods and integrated communities and small towns and rural 
Ohio, in big cities, in suburbs everywhere--let's follow their lead. 
Let's actually hear the voices that have been silenced for too long.
  I urge my colleagues to vote no and, instead, to work with us on 
real, meaningful reform to transform our public safety system into one 
that actually keeps people safe
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Jersey.
  Mr. MENENDEZ. Mr. President, I rise today to address the nationwide 
call for reasonable, sensible police reforms. Last month, the American 
people watched in horror as a police officer kneeled down on the neck 
of George Floyd for 8 minutes and 46 seconds, killing him.
  ``I can't breathe.'' It was a slow execution caught on video, a 
metaphor for the systematic racism and injustices Black and Brown 
communities endure every day. But unlike other horrific videos of 
police killings that have sparked protests, this feels different. This 
is a moment when people of all races and walks of life have taken to

[[Page S3153]]

the streets in cities and communities across the country. They are 
crying out: Enough is enough.
  It is time for us to address the institutional racism, economic, 
societal, and environmental inequities and injustice that have plagued 
this Nation since its founding. The American people are demanding real, 
meaningful change--bold, comprehensive action that starts by reforming 
our police system that has historically dealt a heavier hand toward 
communities of color.
  What did the Republican majority do to answer the public's plea? They 
have offered the American people the JUSTICE Act. They call it justice, 
but justice for whom? This bill fails to meet this moment in history 
before us. It offers only lip service to the families of George Floyd 
and Breonna Taylor and Tamir Rice and Eric Garner and all of those 
tragically lost at the hands of the police.
  The Republican JUSTICE Act is nothing more than a glorified 
suggestion box filled with half measures and placations that sound good 
on paper but simply will not deliver the real change the American 
people are demanding from this body. There is no justice in the JUSTICE 
Act; rather, it is a wholly inadequate response to the injustices faced 
by Black and Brown communities at the hands of the police. It merely 
asks, suggests, recommends, and encourages. It says to law enforcement: 
Hey, would you mind? Could you kindly? Do you think you might be able?
  Nowhere in this bill does it compel, require, mandate, or insist upon 
the commonsense structural reforms the American people are demanding. 
The JUSTICE Act calls for reports and a commission, but we have had 400 
years to study the stain of slavery and institutional racism in this 
country. We don't need a study to tell us that too many young Black men 
are dying at the hands of the police or that you are more likely to be 
shot and killed by the police if you are Black than White. A commission 
will not save the life of the next George Floyd.
  My Republican colleagues may think that the American people will 
praise them for passing an empty bill named ``JUSTICE'' that does no 
justice to the deep-seated, systemic failures in our policing system. 
They are mistaken.
  Indeed, I would encourage my Republican colleagues to consider the 
Justice in Policing Act, led by Senators Booker and Harris, which I am 
proud to cosponsor. It requires a comprehensive set of reforms designed 
to increase police accountability, improve transparency, and invest in 
training. The Justice in Policing Act bans no-knock warrants in drug 
cases, the kind that led to Breonna Taylor's death. It establishes a 
national public registry on police misconduct so that the bad actors 
who make it harder for the good cops to do their jobs can't just move 
from department to department. Our bill requires data collection and 
publication on the use of force. The Republican bill does none of those 
things. While the Justice in Policing Act bans deadly choke holds and 
other tactics that restrict blood flow to the brain, the Republican 
bill stops short of any such ban.
  The JUSTICE Act is also silent on racial profiling and the 
militarization of local police departments. It is silent on funding 
independent investigative channels to prosecute police misconduct and 
fails to strengthen pattern and practice investigations. It fails to 
establish national standards for police misconduct. While it would 
provide additional money to law enforcement, it does so without 
actually requiring any substantive change, so it fails us. The JUSTICE 
Act fails to create a system of policing that is about community safety 
and equal application of the law.
  So, again, I ask my friends on the other side of the aisle: Where is 
the actual justice? Where is the justice for Breonna Taylor, George 
Floyd? Where is the justice for those murders that were not captured on 
video? Where is the justice for thousands of Black men sitting in 
prison, victims of overpolicing and racial profiling?
  Senator McConnell would have us think that the JUSTICE Act is our 
only option, that if we don't acquiesce to these half measures, then we 
don't really want reform. That is simply not true.
  It seems to me that the Republicans and the President don't want real 
reform. They want window dressing and fresh paint instead of fixing the 
very foundation on which our policing system stands. They want to say 
that they did something without actually doing anything meaningful. 
They want to blame Democrats for holding out for real justice and 
refusing to play these political games with people's lives.
  The House is going to pass the Justice in Policing Act on Thursday. I 
urge Senator McConnell to take up that bill so that we can have the 
meaningful conversation on police reform our constituents and the 
Nation are demanding.
  We know that reform can work. Camden, NJ, offers us concrete evidence 
about what we can accomplish when we get serious about making real 
changes. With one of the highest murder rates in the Nation, excessive 
force complaints were dramatically reduced, both in terms of homicides 
and excessive force issues.
  So before I close, let me make perfectly clear the profound respect 
that I have for the men and women in law enforcement. Policing is a 
very tough job, and the vast majority of officers go out and perform 
their jobs every day with dignity and professionalism and care for the 
people in the communities in which they serve. I am deeply grateful for 
their service throughout the State of New Jersey and, indeed, 
throughout the Nation. These officers, who do their jobs with dignity 
and respect for the people they serve, share our demands for real 
change. In fact, in Camden itself, a White chief of police joined with 
hundreds of protesters who were marching for change.
  Across the country, tens of thousands of Americans did not brave a 
pandemic and endure being shot at with rubber bullets and tear gas just 
so that Congress could create another commission and mandate another 
report. They demand that their elected officials in Washington meet 
this moment in history and actually do something that lives up to the 
American promise of a nation where every man and woman, regardless of 
their race, ethnicity, gender, or orientation, is treated equally--
equally under the law.
  I will just close by saying that the Nation will rue the day it 
answered the call for reform with business as usual. There will be a 
rude awakening. Who among us--who among us, if this were our daily 
experience, would be satisfied with the counsels of patience and delay? 
Who among us?
  The American people are calling for real justice. We should listen. 
We should act, and we should deliver real justice.
  With that, I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. RUBIO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.