[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 96 (Thursday, May 21, 2020)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2577-S2578]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Coronavirus
Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, over the past couple of months, our
country has gone into a lockdown but then slowly but surely has begun
to adjust to the new normal brought on by COVID-19.
Many of us have been working safely from home, as kitchen tables have
been transformed into makeshift office spaces and, in many cases,
classrooms as parents and students navigate the challenges of remote
working and learning. But many of the most critical jobs in our country
can't be done with a laptop and an internet connection--defense
contractors, for example, the intelligence community, law enforcement
agencies, and, of course, our heroic healthcare workers. They have to
be on the frontlines doing their job each and every day no matter what
the risk is because their work is considered to be essential.
Our healthcare workers continue to fight this virus on the
frontlines, delivering lifesaving care and comfort to those isolated
from their loved ones. Our farmers and ranchers are producing the food,
truckers are transporting it, and grocery store employees are stocking
shelves so that amidst all of this uncertainty, we don't have to worry
about not having enough to eat. Then there are the postal workers, the
delivery drivers, the waste collectors, and an entire network of people
we depend on who are keeping the cogs of our society running.
Whether working from home or heading out the door each morning, these
men and women are doing their jobs, even when it isn't easy or
convenient, and they expect their elected officials to do the same
thing.
Just because a pandemic has brought our society to a screeching halt
doesn't mean the U.S. Congress should pack up shop. Just as the men and
women across the country continue to show up for work each day,
Congress should do the same. After all, our responsibilities during
this crisis have become more important, not less. That is why we moved
quickly to pass four coronavirus response bills, totaling nearly $3
trillion--something none of us imagined we would do just a couple of
months ago--and provided vital support for our country amidst so much
uncertainty.
This, of course, came in the form of additional resources, including
equipment for our healthcare workers and funding for ongoing research
into vaccines and treatments. We also sent aid for what I consider to
be a lifeline to those workers who, through no fault of their own, had
no job and no paycheck, and then we have also provided serious
resources to help small businesses and their workforce stay afloat.
A financial investment in our fight against this virus was
desperately needed, and that is precisely what we delivered on a
bipartisan basis, but our response to this crisis cannot begin and end
with blank checks. We need to ensure that taxpayer dollars are being
spent responsibly and that we are making the changes needed to recover
from this crisis.
Every day I hear--usually through a videoconference--my constituents
in Texas telling me how these bills are being implemented, what is
helpful, what isn't, and what is needed from Congress. This feedback
has been incredibly valuable as we look for more effective ways to
strengthen our response and speed our recovery. So the Republicans in
the Senate believe it is wise--it is prudent--to take stock of
everything we have done before passing another relief bill.
I believe the Presiding Officer and I heard the same report at lunch
today; that only about half of the money that we have appropriated is
actually out the door, and yet here people are clamoring for more and
more money. And Speaker Pelosi, in really an unfortunate act of
showmanship, rammed through a $3 trillion bill that has no prayer of
being passed or becoming law. It is safe to say that House Democrats
are taking a different approach than we are here in the Senate.
They passed the $3 trillion bill, and they call it the HEROES Act,
expressing their support for our Nation's healthcare heroes. We would
join them in that sentiment, but the fact is, their priorities are much
different. This bill mentions cannabis more times than it mentions
doctors, hospitals, and nurses combined. It is an interesting tribute,
if you ask me.
If this bill were to become law, taxpayers' money wouldn't be going
to coronavirus response; they would be funding a range of completely
unrelated pet projects like environmental justice grants, soil health
studies, and not one, but two studies on diversity and inclusion--
again, in the cannabis industry. It is interesting: two more studies on
diversity and inclusion in the cannabis industry. The list of
absurdities in this legislation is as big as this bill itself.
Here is another one. They want to make sure that the wealthiest
Americans pay less in taxes. This is from our Democratic friends who
say that the top 1 percent don't pay enough, yet they present them with
a huge tax cut for the wealthiest people in America.
It also would complicate the hiring that our struggling businesses
are already facing and rapidly dig our Nation deeper and deeper into
debt. Is this all to attack the coronavirus, to come up with a
treatment or a vaccine? No. This is a liberal wish list that has
consumed all the time and energy of House Democrats over the last
several weeks. This is what they think is more important.
Rather than returning to Washington for more than a drive-by, which
is what they did last Friday, to work on bipartisan legislation that
might actually have a chance of becoming law, they chose to put
together this partisan bill without consulting with the White House or
the Senate. It doesn't address the crisis at hand, let alone the
national security challenges that cannot be ignored.
The threats we faced before this virus ever reached our shores, both
on land and in cyber space, have not gone away. From Beijing to Tehran,
Moscow to Pyongyang, and in nearly every corner of the globe, our
enemies and adversaries are watching and continuing their efforts to
work against our interests. They are not going to politely pause their
efforts so that we can focus our efforts on COVID-19; if anything, they
are doubling their efforts. We cannot afford to be caught flat-footed.
Unfortunately, our counterintelligence and counterterrorism experts
are already without some of the key tools they need in order to carry
out their duties. In mid-March, the House refused to vote on a clean,
short-term extension of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act under
section 215 that would preserve these tools while we discuss long-term
changes that might need to be made. Had they agreed at that time in
mid-March, these authorities would still be intact through the end of
this month. Instead, House Democrats chose to let those authorities
lapse. For 2 months now, our counterintelligence and counterterrorism
experts have been forced to work without some of the most powerful
tools in their toolboxes.
Fortunately, last week, the Senate was able to pass a bill to
reauthorize these critical provisions that expired in mid-March. This
legislation would not only restore those authorities but
[[Page S2578]]
strengthen oversight of our Nation's intelligence activities at a time
when it is desperately needed.
This bill passed the Senate with broad bipartisan support, but we are
still waiting for the House to show up for work and to take it up and
pass it. They are not coming back until the 27th, I think, of this
month, after what can only aptly be described as a drive-by vote last
Friday after not having been in town for 2 weeks and leaving promptly
thereafter.
Now that they have completed their work on their $3 trillion wish
list, I hope we will see some action soon on things that will keep our
country safe.
That is only part of the critical national security work we have done
here in the Senate since we returned to Washington earlier this month.
I applaud Majority Leader McConnell for bringing us back. People are
hearing all sorts of scary things on social media and cable news and
even conscious disinformation campaigns by some of our adversaries
about this virus and about how we ought to conduct ourselves. The best
thing we can do as Members of the Senate is to demonstrate that with a
little bit of personal responsibility and respect for others--
maintaining social distancing, masking when you can--we can actually
still function. We can show up for work like those healthcare workers,
those law enforcement officers, and others I mentioned a moment ago.
One of the things our majority leader likes to say is that the Senate
is in the personnel business. Today, we confirmed a fellow member of
the Texas congressional delegation, Congressman John Ratcliffe, to be
the Director of National Intelligence. I have known John for about 10
years--or more maybe. He is prepared to continue the legacy of
outstanding leadership we have come to expect and count on in our
Director of National Intelligence. I am confident in his ability to
serve as a leader and advocate for the intelligence professionals in
the intelligence community.
We also confirmed other important nominees for critical positions,
including the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the National
Counterintelligence and Security Center, and the Department of Homeland
Security. Just as the work of the country has waged on in the face of
these challenges, so must our work.
The American people are not just counting on healthcare workers and
first responders and farmers and deliverymen and grocery store
employees to do their jobs--as important as they are. They are counting
on us, too, not only to continue to respond to this pandemic--to stay
nimble and adapt, to watch and listen and learn on how we can do
better--but also to strengthen our national security, keep an eye on
our national debt, and do it all on a bipartisan basis.
Like workers across America, Congress needs to show up, especially
when it isn't easy or convenient. This pandemic may have temporarily
halted the daily functions of many people in this country, but it
cannot stop the critical work of the U.S. Congress on behalf of the
people we are privileged to represent.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
(The remarks of Senator Collins pertaining to the introduction of S.
3833 are printed in today's Record under ``Statements on Introduced
Bills and Joint Resolutions.'')
Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.