[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 8, 2020)]
[Senate]
[Pages S87-S88]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Iran
Madam President, I want to commend our brave troopers and our
intelligence officers and the President for the daring strike last week
on Qasem Soleimani. Qasem Soleimani had the blood of thousands of
Americans on his hands, and he was plotting to kill more Americans just
like his terrorist proxies had killed in Iraq on December 27. He even
was picked up, when he landed at Baghdad International Airport, by a
terrorist culpable for the bombing of our Embassy in Kuwait in 1983.
You would think that everyone would celebrate the death of a
terrorist monster, but, no, you would be wrong. You would be wrong. Our
Democratic friends have been criticizing and complaining ever since
Qasem Soleimani died Thursday night.
Two particularly surprising complaints I have heard are that the
Democrats weren't notified in advance and that Qasem Soleimani's plot
wasn't imminent. Let's think about those criticisms.
The Speaker of the House and the minority leader weren't notified in
advance of a target of opportunity against a terrorist mastermind. I am
sorry, but what did you expect? Is the President or Secretary of
Defense or Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff supposed to call hours
in advance when they don't even know if the target will show up where
our intelligence expects?
Were they supposed to call when the missile was in the air? Give me a
break. Give me a break.
I will share what the majority leader told us yesterday about the
raid on Osama bin Laden. Do you think he got notified in advance? No.
Did he expect to be notified in advance? No. He said the Secretary of
Defense called him after the strike to give him a brief summary of what
had happened, and the majority leader, in 2011, simply said:
``Congratulations.'' He put out a public statement to the exact same
effect. Where is that sense of patriotism and pride from the Speaker of
the House and from the minority leader today with the elimination of
Qasem Soleimani?
Second, this critique that, well, Qasem Soleimani wasn't plotting an
imminent attack--I mean, we are talking about how many terrorists can
dance on the head of a pin here. Qasem Soleimani had been killing
Americans for 30 years. He was flying around the Middle East to meet
with his terrorist proxies in Syria and Lebanon and Iraq to plan how to
kill more Americans.
We just had a briefing downstairs with the Director of the CIA and
the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff in which they said: Yes, the plot was
imminent. Intelligence is never ironclad, though. It can rarely say a
strike is going to happen at this
[[Page S88]]
time on this day at this target. That is apparently the standard the
Democrats want to hold the President to--not weeks, not even days, not
even a period of days against a hard target that presented an
opportunity, as Qasem Soleimani did last Thursday night.
Let me say this: Imminence is ultimately a question of judgment that
has to be made by the people we have elected to make those decisions
for our country. It is not a question of intelligence. Our intelligence
officers have great skills and capabilities. They can tell us the best
intelligence they have that suggests the timing of such attacks. But it
is ultimately the people's elected representatives who make those
judgments.
I will just submit that if you are a soldier sitting in Iraq with
Qasem Soleimani flying around trying to decide when to kill you, the
question of imminence probably looks a lot different than if you are a
comfortable Senator sitting behind guarded doors with armed security
details protecting your every movement.
I will simply say yet again that Qasem Soleimani got exactly what he
deserved. All those Americans he killed and their families also got
what they deserved: justice. America and the world are a safer place
because Qasem Soleimani is no longer a part of this world.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Ms. SMITH. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. KAINE. Madam President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
Under the previous order, all postcloture time has expired.
The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the Solomson
nomination?
The yeas and nays were previously ordered.
The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. THUNE. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator
from Tennessee (Mr. Alexander) and the Senator from Georgia (Mr.
Perdue).
Further, if present and voting, the Senator from Tennessee (Mr.
Alexander) would have voted ``yea.''
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Massachusetts (Ms.
Warren) is necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Cramer). Are there any other Senators in
the Chamber desiring to vote or change their vote?
The result was announced--yeas 89, nays 8, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 6 Ex.]
YEAS--89
Baldwin
Barrasso
Bennet
Blackburn
Blumenthal
Blunt
Boozman
Braun
Brown
Burr
Cantwell
Capito
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Cassidy
Collins
Coons
Cornyn
Cortez Masto
Cotton
Cramer
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Duckworth
Durbin
Enzi
Ernst
Feinstein
Fischer
Gardner
Graham
Grassley
Hassan
Hawley
Heinrich
Hirono
Hoeven
Hyde-Smith
Inhofe
Johnson
Jones
Kaine
Kennedy
King
Lankford
Leahy
Lee
Loeffler
Manchin
McConnell
McSally
Menendez
Merkley
Moran
Murkowski
Murphy
Murray
Paul
Peters
Portman
Reed
Risch
Roberts
Romney
Rosen
Rounds
Rubio
Sasse
Schatz
Scott (FL)
Scott (SC)
Shaheen
Shelby
Sinema
Smith
Stabenow
Sullivan
Tester
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Udall
Van Hollen
Warner
Whitehouse
Wicker
Young
NAYS--8
Booker
Gillibrand
Harris
Klobuchar
Markey
Sanders
Schumer
Wyden
NOT VOTING--3
Alexander
Perdue
Warren
The nomination was confirmed.
____________________