[Congressional Record Volume 166, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 8, 2020)]
[Senate]
[Pages S84-S86]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Iran
Mr. UDALL. Mr. President, I begin by saying that my prayers are with
our Armed Forces and their families. They stand watch despite the
threat of danger, and they rely on their leaders to make wise
decisions. I am grateful that there were no casualties during last
night's missile attack.
For well over a year, I have been sounding the alarm that this
President could bring us to war with Iran through mistake, misjudgment,
or miscalculation. I have urged this body to assert our constitutional
authority and pass our bipartisan bill to prevent a war with Iran.
In 2018 and 2019, I introduced the Prevention of Unconstitutional War
with Iran Act. In June of last year, my amendment to prevent
unauthorized war earned bipartisan majority support in the Senate, and
it passed in the House of Representatives. It may not have become law,
but the Constitution has not changed. Now, on the brink of war with
Iran, it is long past time for Congress to step up to its
constitutional responsibilities and stop the march to an unauthorized
war.
Americans oppose another war in the Middle East. Despite the
President's claim to the contrary, war with Iran would certainly not
``go very quickly.'' That is what the President has said--``go very
quickly.'' Any war with Iran would be prolonged, bloody, and costly.
Yet, even if you support a war with Iran, we all swore an oath to
uphold the Constitution, and Congress--and Congress alone--has the
authority, under article I of the Constitution, to declare war.
Any country would consider the President's strike on one of Iran's
highest ranking military commanders--someone whom many consider to be
the second most powerful person in Iran's Government--to be an act of
war. Now, predictably, Iran has
[[Page S85]]
responded. So Congress must no longer hide from its constitutional
responsibility.
If Congress does not stop the military conflict with Iran, this
President will continue to take a wrecking ball through the Middle
East, making one impulsive decision after another while having no long-
term plan or strategic goal in sight. The President's speech made it
clear he has no strategy to defuse the situation or to achieve a
diplomatic result. He will continue the provocative warpath we are on.
While we may now be in a period of relative calm, the position we are
in is untenable, and it is because the President abandoned diplomacy
and created this crisis. The administration did not consult Congress
before carrying out the strike, which is something that, typically, an
administration would do before carrying out a strike like this; it
would have a true consultation with the top leaders in the Congress.
The administration did not consult our allies or try to form a
coalition around what is clearly a highly provocative action that has
ramifications for international security.
This is kind of a reminder of the run-up to Iraq. What did that look
like, the run-up to the Iraq war? Sketchy evidence, bad intelligence,
outright misrepresentations, and a call for vengeance against Saddam
Hussein are what got us into the war in Iraq. This is where we are
today in our conflict with Iran. The administration's vague assertions
of an imminent threat, without its having concrete evidence, and its
ever-changing story are too reminiscent of the origins of the war in
Iraq. The echoes of Iraq are chilling.
Congress, step up. Do your constitutional duty. Rein in this reckless
course we are on.
Let me say this, not just to those of us in this body who are
speaking up but also to the thousands across the country who are
marching against a rush to war: To speak out against a war with Iran is
a patriotic activity, a patriotic duty. It is the right action to take,
and it is the right thing to do. We are speaking up to stop this Nation
from repeating the grave mistakes of the Iraq war. We are speaking up
because we love this country, because we do not want to see another
military family mourn a loved one who loses his life in a war that does
not need to be fought and that we have the power to stop and to avoid.
President Trump set this disastrous course in motion in May of 2018
when he unilaterally withdrew from the Iran nuclear agreement. This was
a deal the international community stood firmly behind. It reminded
everyone--European countries, Russia, and China--that we were all a
part of this deal. That agreement took the single greatest threat to
the U.S. and international security--that being Iran--off the table. It
prevented Iran from developing nuclear weapons. According to the
International Atomic Energy Agency and President Trump's military and
national security experts, Iran was complying with the agreement when
the President withdrew.
The nuclear agreement did not solve all of the problems with Iran,
but it is clear that the diplomatic effort reduced tensions with a
longstanding adversary and reduced the threat of hostilities. Yet,
instead of working to build on this progress, the President
precipitously withdrew from the agreement and began his maximum
pressure campaign to force Iran to capitulate to a long list of
impossible demands. The President promised he would get us a ``better
deal.'' That is what he said--get us a ``better deal.'' He has not.
There is no better deal in sight.
I call on the President and his administration to use all of their
diplomatic tools to deescalate this threatening situation--a situation
that risks American lives. I call on them to work with our allies to
find a path back to the nuclear limits the international community
agreed to, to develop channels for productive communication and
diplomacy, and to work toward stabilizing an unstable Middle East.
Leader McConnell and the Republican leadership must bring this debate
to the Senate floor. Senator Kaine's recently filed War Powers
Resolution is one step in that direction. Senator Paul and I have
called upon all Senators to support our Prevention of Unconstitutional
War with Iran Act. We must keep up this fight and block funds for any
war with Iran in the absence of congressional authorization, and we
must repeal the outdated authorizations of force that are being
abused--the one from 2001 and the one from 2002.
I strongly support our oath to defend our Nation and the Constitution
from any enemies, foreign and domestic, including against a President
who would take us to war without his having constitutional authority.
If we do not act now to preserve our constitutional structure and to
assert our constitutional authority, we fail the men and women in
uniform whose lives we put at risk; we fail our oath to defend and
protect the Constitution; and we fail the American people, who sent us
here to represent them on the most consequential decision our country
can make.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. PORTMAN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. Blackburn). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
Mr. PORTMAN. Madam President, I would like to take a few moments
today to talk about the current situation with regard to Iran.
First, the decision to take out Qasem Soleimani. Let's remember who
he was. He was leader of the Quds Force and the Islamic Revolutionary
Guard Corps--both of these groups, by the way, having been designated
as terrorist organizations.
He was responsible for providing the Shia militias in Iraq with
explosively formed penetrators. What does that mean? These were the
extremely deadly improvised explosive devices--so-called roadside
bombs--that were responsible for killing over 600 American soldiers and
injuring many more, at least a couple thousand.
Some of those maimed or killed were from my home State of Ohio. My
heart goes out to their families for their sacrifice.
I got a chance to see some of these brave Americans in visits to the
Landstuhl military hospital in Germany and the Walter Reed Hospital
here in Washington, DC. We must never forget their courage and the
sacrifices they and their families have made.
Over the past 2 months alone, Soleimani helped direct more than 11
attacks against our forces in Iraq. In fact, he was found recently to
be plotting more. When he was killed, he was plotting additional and
imminent attacks with the commander of the Shia militia--the same
commander who directed both the rocket strikes that killed the American
contractor and wounded four American service personnel in Erbil and the
demonstration and assault against the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.
Thankfully, that commander was taken off the battlefield as well.
For reasons I have outlined, the killing of Qasem Soleimani was both
legitimate and justified. His history of fomenting terror and murdering
innocents goes back decades, and the world is a better place without
him.
Some of my Democratic colleagues have been critical of the
President's actions against Iran, to include the killing of Soleimani.
Some argue that our actions have been unwarranted and belligerent. In
fact, given the facts, I believe President Trump has shown restraint in
the face of continued Iranian aggression over these past 18 months.
By authorizing the killing of the leader of terrorist organizations
that were actively plotting more violence against our brave men and
women, I believe President Trump reset the concept of deterrence and
fulfilled his duties as President.
As GEN David Petraeus said after the Soleimani action, ``This was a
significant effort to re-establish deterrence.'' I would call that
peace through strength.
Last evening's Iranian missile attacks against our forces and air
bases at Erbil and Al-Asad was a continuation of the reckless and
provocative approach. Thanks to the professionalism and capability of
our Armed Forces, despite over a dozen Iranian missiles aimed their
way, there were, fortunately, no American or allied troop or Iraqi
casualties--amazing--
[[Page S86]]
and there was only minimal damage to our bases. For that, of course, we
are very thankful.
I listened to President Trump this morning, and I agree that the
maximum pressure campaign against Iran must continue, and it should
include additional sanctions.
There is a way forward for Iran to rejoin the international community
rather than continue to be a pariah and the top sponsor of state
terrorism in the world. President Trump has said on many occasions he
is willing to negotiate with Iran if they cease their belligerent
actions in the region and come to the table.
We do not desire war with Iran, but we cannot and will not stand idly
by as they continue to attack Americans, continue to kill our forces in
the Middle East.
I have been in meetings with top administration officials today and
yesterday, and I look forward to continued discussions on their
strategy moving forward.
I will continue to pray for the safety of our men and women in
uniform who are forward deployed, who put their lives in danger for all
of us and do so for the sake of peace and stability.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mrs. MURRAY. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mrs. MURRAY. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent to speak as in
morning business.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mrs. MURRAY. Madam President, I first want to say how relieved I am
by reports that no lives were lost in last night's missile strikes in
Iraq and how grateful I am for all those serving in the region and
around the world.
The fact remains, however, that this is a volatile and frightening
moment for our country. In a matter of days, the President of the
United States has, without any authorization or notice, taken steps
that have sent tensions soaring with Iran, threatened the fight against
ISIS, jeopardized relationships with key allies, risked the safety of
U.S. servicemembers and civilians, and brought us perilously close to
war.
I have heard from so many people in my home State of Washington, and
I know my colleagues have as well, about just how scary and uncertain
this feels and the many questions it raises.
While there is no question Qasem Soleimani was a sworn enemy of the
United States, people want to know whether the President's initial
order was truly necessary to our safety and why right now in this time
of already heightened tensions in the Middle East. They want to know
elected officials here in the Nation's capital are prioritizing their
safety and our country's safety. Most of all, they want to know what
comes next and what can be done to prevent things from getting worse.
Like so many Americans, I have watched these events unfold with
increasing concern. As the daughter of a World War II veteran and
Purple Heart recipient, I make decisions about the safety and security
of our Nation with deep concern for our brave servicemembers and their
families, a personal understanding of the sacrifices they make for all
of us and our Nation, and an unwavering commitment to ensuring they
have the support they need while they serve and when they come home.
To that end, while I firmly believe we must do everything possible to
keep America safe and go after terrorists wherever they are, I also
believe that, except in the most dire of circumstances, we should do
everything possible to exhaust all of our diplomatic avenues and
coordinate with our allies and our partners before taking military
action all on our own.
I believe we should not enter a conflict without a very strong
understanding of what we are trying to accomplish and what it will cost
and that while America has every right to defend itself, striking
another country preemptively, without the strongest evidence of
immediate danger, is a dramatic step with significant long-term
implications that should not be done without a full debate and
congressional support.
Madam President, based on what we know now, the administration's
actions in Iraq failed on each of these counts. It has not made us
safer, and our allies feel blindsided, especially because this strike
puts them at risk too.
There is no clear goal or clear-eyed understanding of the risks we
have assumed. There was absolutely zero debate in this Congress and--
unless you happened to be on the golf course with the President--
absolutely no notification that he planned to massively escalate
tensions with a foreign power overnight.
While, unfortunately, this is exactly the type of scenario many of us
feared would arise from this President, I can't say it is surprising.
President Trump's repeated reckless actions in the region, beginning
with his decision to pull out of the Iran nuclear deal, have
jeopardized critical objectives, leaving us without any clear strategy
for restoring peace or protecting our troops and allies. We cannot
assume Iran is done retaliating, and we must assume ISIS or other
terrorists will take full advantage of the increased instability in the
region.
In the face of challenges as serious as these, none of us in
Congress, regardless of party, should be willing to just stand by and
accept that our Nation's foreign policy and safety could be up-ended by
an impulsive late-night tweet. I certainly won't. Instead, I will
continue to demand that the President provide us his legal
justification for his order, commit to coming before Congress in
advance of any further escalating steps as this now plays out, and
explain how he will manage the consequences of his decision, with the
goal of protecting Americans, our allies, and our interests.
I will continue to advocate for strategies that lead us toward safety
and security rather than fan the flames. In the coming weeks, I look
forward to voting in support of my colleague from Virginia, Senator
Kaine's War Powers Resolution, and I am very glad to be a cosponsor.
This resolution would reassert congressional authority, block President
Trump's ability to start a war with Iran, and allow us to hear whatever
case he may have before taking a vote on whether this is really the
path we want our Nation to go down.
I hope every one of our colleagues listens to the people across this
country who do not want to find themselves in an avoidable war and who
sent us here to act as an independent branch of government, not a
rubberstamp for an increasingly volatile administration. I hope they
join us and support this resolution.
Madam President, finally, I will say that I voted against the war in
Iraq because I felt the administration was asking us to send our brave
men and women into harm's way without clear plans or goals. Today, this
President isn't even asking. The goals and plans are even less clear,
and the path ahead of us is very uncertain.
Congress has the power to ensure a debate, press this administration
for a strategy, and check their power if they do not present a
compelling one. It is well past time we used it.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Arkansas.