[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 186 (Wednesday, November 20, 2019)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6698-S6700]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Unanimous Consent Request--H.R. 2486
Mr. CARPER. Madam President, I rise this afternoon to talk about what
some observers have called one of the best historically black colleges
and universities in our country--Delaware State University in Dover,
DE, home of the Hornets.
For a number of years, I was a naval flight officer in the Vietnam
war and then came back to the United States and moved to Delaware and
got an MBA at the University of Delaware. Right away after that, I went
to work at what became the Delaware Economic Office. We were
headquartered at the campus of Delaware State College.
Delaware State College was an HBCU and was not a well-funded college,
not one that was in the favor, frankly, of the Governor and
legislature, for the most part, and was a bit of a stepchild.
I used to think: Boy, wouldn't it be great to be able to help
transform Delaware State College into something historic, memorable,
and outstanding.
Later on, I would be elected Governor--about 15 years later--and have
the chance to work with the fellow who was the president of Delaware
State University at the time and to transform, with the help of the
Delaware General Assembly, Delaware State College into Delaware State
University.
Today, of all the HBCUs in the country, I think its latest rating is
No. 5, and I think there are 70 or 75 of them in all. They just
reported that their enrollment for the coming year will reach 5,000
students, all in undergraduate, graduate, master's and Ph.D. programs,
which is a record. We are proud of the Hornets and the great job they
are doing educating people.
Last month, in one of my frequent visits to Delaware State, I took a
campus tour unlike any other, from the cockpit of a brand-new Vulcanair
V1.0 single-engine aircraft. We flew all over Kent County, north of
Dover. We had a chance to do some approaches. It was a lot of fun, and
it was basically a reminder that Delaware State provides undergraduate
and graduate programs for all kinds of training and educational needs.
One of the key ones right now and one of the most interesting, at least
for a naval flight officer, is that Delaware State is the largest
producer of pilots and aviation professionals of color in the country.
I believe they have over 100 students and every one of them, when they
graduate, has a job waiting for them. Some are pilots and others do a
variety of work for aviation.
Today, we have about 157 million people who go to work in this
country, and we have about 5 million jobs where nobody will show up.
One of those areas where we need people is in the aviation world, and
Delaware State is providing that. When the plane landed earlier this
year at the airport just north of Dover, I held a roundtable with the
Delaware State University executive vice president and provost, Dr.
Tony Allen. We talked with administrators and students about a
bipartisan bill called the FUTURE Act, which was discussed on the floor
today and in previous days.
The FUTURE Act, as you will recall, was introduced by Senator Jones
along with Senator Scott from South Carolina, and would provide a
little over $255 million annually to minority-serving institutions of
higher education including about $85 million to HBCUs for an additional
2 years through fiscal year 2021.
Almost $900,000 of that money will go directly to Delaware State
University.
[[Page S6699]]
You might ask: What would Delaware State do with that money? They use
this Federal funding to help support STEM and teacher education
programs at the undergraduate and graduate levels and to ensure that
students at Delaware State have access to the best research tools.
Specifically, this funding is used to help modernize classrooms at DSU,
to improve math instruction, and to help recruit young men of color to
teach in K-through-12 classrooms so that all students have mentors they
can look up to.
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, only 2
percent of teachers in the American public school system are African-
American men, but 20 percent or more of the students are African-
American males.
Think about that. A lot of these African-American males, frankly,
haven't had some of the best mentors and role models in their lives
growing up, and we have so few teachers of color that are minority
male. The FUTURE Act funding, I think, is a good step for Congress to
take to bridge that gap. I think it is a good example of how the
Federal Government supports this critical mission at Delaware State and
at HBCUs across the country.
Back in early September, the House of Representatives did its job and
voted to reauthorize this funding through the bipartisan FUTURE Act.
Unfortunately, the Senate has not followed the lead of the House in
this critical funding for HBCUs which lapsed on September 30.
Before I yield to Senator Coons, I just wanted to say that my
recollection is--and I might have this wrong, but I am looking for my
staff, who would be sitting right here in front of me telling me if I
had the right numbers--that 2 percent of teachers who are in public
schools in America and I think in Delaware are men of color. They are
African American. Almost 20 percent, maybe 25 percent, of the students
in the public school system are people of color and about half of those
are male. We need to do a better job.
As Governor, I started a mentoring program. We recruited, when I was
Governor, 10,000 mentors--a lot of them to work with children of color.
A lot of them have grown up in homes where they didn't have a positive
male role model in their life. That is why the mentoring program is so
important. That is why we especially need minority male teachers who
are African American. That is not all we need, but it is a big part of
what we need. Over half of the minority male teachers that we have in
Delaware in our schools were educated at Delaware State University--
over half--and we need more of them.
Senator Coons has joined me on the floor. I am enormously proud of
Delaware State University and the leadership they have today and in the
past, and proud to have been an honorary Hornet, and proud to yield to
my colleague, Senator Coons, who has been right there fighting for
Delaware State University.
I yield the floor.
Mr. COONS. Madam President, I would like to thank my colleague from
our home State of Delaware. I come to the floor to join a number of my
colleagues who are speaking on a pressing issue, the critical lapse in
funding for hundreds of colleges and universities across our Nation.
On September 30, $255 million in annual Federal funding for
historically black colleges and universities and minority-serving
institutions expired.
Since this fund was first created, it has supported 400 HBCUs and
MSIs, historically Black colleges and universities and minority-serving
institutions, across our country, including 97 HBCUs last year. This
lapse has created real uncertainty and harm to these organizations and
these universities, their students, their employees, and the public.
I just wanted to join my colleagues in highlighting the importance of
this funding. I want to speak specifically to the HBCU of which
Delaware is so proud--Delaware State University.
Delaware State is an engine for educational equity and access, for
innovation and for leadership in our State, our region, and our Nation.
Delaware State University is one of the country's top public HBCUs.
Its graduates go on to successful careers in all sorts of industries.
Graduates from Delaware State have become some of our State's best
nurses, teachers, business leaders, social workers, and Senate staff.
DSU's research programs are important drivers for innovation in a
State with a proud history of invention and innovation. It is home to
the Delaware Center for Neuroscience Research, a partnership of
institutions across our State working to advance our understanding of
how our brains form thoughts and memories and feelings, and how they
change over time as we age.
It is also home to OSCAR, the Optical Science Center for Applied
Research, where research that is in part federally funded is helping to
speed early detection of disease, supporting our soldiers in better
deterring and detecting threats, and equipping NASA missions, including
the Mars Rover, with improved sensors.
To put it simply, we are very proud of Delaware State, and there is a
lot of which to be proud. DSU grads are so impressive that I have asked
several of them to join my staff here in Washington. Their commitment
to equity and excellence is why we can't allow HBCUs around the
country, such as Delaware State, to lose out on vitally needed Federal
funding.
Last year, this program provided nearly $1 million--$887,000--to
Delaware State, which is about 20 percent of their title III funding.
These funds have a direct impact on students and funds critical
science, math, and educator preparation programs.
There is no good reason for the Senate to ignore our HBCUs and MSIs
and deny them the funding they deserve. In September, the House passed
a bipartisan, budget-neutral, 2-year extension of this critical
funding, which is known as the FUTURE Act. While I share Senator
Alexander's commitment to permanently extending this funding, we must
not ask institutions to put their budgeting and planning on hold while
we here in the Senate negotiate over many other pressing issues in
higher education.
I urge my colleagues to pass the FUTURE Act immediately, and with
that, I would like to make a motion.
Madam President, as in legislative session, I ask unanimous consent
that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar No.
212, H.R. 2486. I ask unanimous consent that the Murray amendment at
the desk be agreed to; that the bill, as amended, be considered read a
third time and passed; and that the motions to reconsider be considered
made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or debate.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
Mr. ALEXANDER. Madam President, reserving the right to object--and I
will object--I am disappointed that my colleagues are offering such a
short-term, piecemeal approach toward resolving the problems of our
historically Black colleges and minority-serving institutions, when I
have repeatedly offered a much better idea, and they have blocked it. I
will offer it again in just a moment. I know the Senator from North
Carolina is here to speak on the same subject.
Compared to what I have offered, they are offering a short-term, 2-
year, budget gimmick-supported idea that will have a difficult time
passing the Senate. What I have offered and they have blocked is
permanent funding of historically Black colleges and minority-serving
institutions--permanent funding--at the level of $255 million a year,
properly funded. That is No. 1. There is assurance from the U.S.
Department of Education that every single historically Black
institution--there are 97 of them--have enough funding to go until next
October. Even the Senate ought to be able to do its job in that period
of time.
At the same time, I have offered the Alexander-Jones bill offered by
the distinguished Senator from Alabama, which would simplify the
Federal aid application form called the FAFSA for 8 million minority
students, among 20 million families in this country.
Why would anybody want to take a short-term, piecemeal approach that
is based on a budget gimmick that couldn't pass the Senate compared
with permanent funding for historically Black colleges and a bipartisan
proposal to change the hated, dreaded FAFSA by reducing the number of
questions you have to answer from 108 questions to between 18 and 30?
This
[[Page S6700]]
document is the single biggest impediment to minority students going to
college in America today, and the Democrats are blocking the passage of
a bipartisan bill.
I object.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard.
The Senator from North Carolina.
Mr. BURR. Madam President, I want to thank the chairman of the
committee for objecting. I want to tell my colleagues on the other side
of the aisle that I appreciate their being here giving the passionate
speeches they have because they made the case for Senator Alexander's
bipartisan bill.
You see, incorporated in this legislation is an initiative by Senator
Jones and Senator Baldwin. Anybody who makes this out to be a partisan
piece of legislation is just flat wrong. I have more historical Black
colleges in North Carolina than any State can claim. When those
chancellors and presidents have been presented with the question: Do
you want 2 years or permanent, they all said permanent. They didn't
know there was a permanent option.
I say this to my three colleagues because none of them are on the
committee: There is a permanent option for funding historically Black
colleges. It is in the chairman's bill. We have been told that the
FUTURE Act needs to be passed. The FUTURE Act is 2 years long. There is
not much of a future there. We ought to match its title with the
chairman's bill because this really does address the future.
The No. 1 concern of historically Black institutions is
predictability of funding. The chairman's bill is permanent. We are not
going to come in here in 2 years and seek another reauthorization, but
the benefit is that we are passing good legislation.
Let me point out to my colleagues that it is important to read
legislation. The FUTURE Act is funded by whacking the funding for the
State guaranty agencies. By taking away the account maintenance fees
that these State-based organizations receive to administer loans, we
are robbing Peter to pay Paul. These same students who are probably
going to go to historically Black universities are also seeking State-
based loans to do it, and we are providing the institutions 2 years of
predictability on one side, and we are taking away the fees that are
needed to administer the loans to allow them to be able to afford it.
This is when it is important to look at the details.
The way the FUTURE Act is funded, it actually hurts all institutions
in North Carolina. Just today, I heard from the North Carolina State
Education Assistance Authority about how important this funding is for
their daily functions in administering student loans. So I believe
there is a better way to extend HBC funding but also not to hurt
students.
At the end of the day, our focus--the human face we see is the
student who benefits from the educational opportunity they have been
given. I would tell you that the FUTURE Act flunks on all counts. It is
not permanent. It takes away from some because of how it is funded. We
have an opportunity with Chairman Alexander's bill, the Student Aid
Improvement Act, which would extend this title III funding permanently,
but it would also include other bipartisan support changes in higher
education, like expanding Pell grants. Every Member of the Senate has
sat on this floor and said we have to do something on Pell grants. Here
is your opportunity.
It doesn't fit in the timeframe of passing a bill that passed the
House that provides 2 years of funding, but we have a bipartisan piece
of legislation. It simplifies the financial student financial aid
process. You saw the chairman hold up the form. There is nobody who can
defend the continuation of that form. It should be one page. The
chairman of the Education Committee has tried for now 5 years to
transition that to one page. You might look at us and say: Well, we can
do this very quickly, but we need time to talk about this. We have
taken 5 years to do this, and the people on the committee know this.
This is the sixth time you have come to the floor and asked unanimous
consent to do the exact same thing: Pass this; don't look at anything
else.
No, that is wrong, but it is not wrong because we are in the
majority. It is wrong because it is not serving the students for whom
we are supposed to be here setting policy. It simplifies aid award
letters to students. It is actually easy to tell them they got their
student aid. It is cumbersome. If you are on the committee, you
understand the agony they go through. We are wiping all of that away.
I believe Chairman Alexander has a better path. I also would like to
remind my colleagues that while this funding should be extended, there
has been no lapse. Let me state that again. It should be extended, and
there has been no lapse.
Madam President, I ask unanimous consent to have a letter I received
from Secretary DeVos, stating that the title III funding in question is
available through September 2021, be printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
The Secretary of Education,
Washington, DC, October 9, 2019.
Dear [Redacted] I write to clarify the status of grants
under Title III, Part F of the Higher Education Act of 1965,
in light of the enactment of the Continuing Appropriations
Act, 2020, and Health Extenders Act of 2019 (Pub. L. No. 116-
59), signed on September 27, 2019.
Initially, I want to note that the new law has no effect on
funds that we recently awarded in the Title III, Part F
programs. Funds obligated in fiscal year (FY) 2019 have
already been made available to grantees under all Part F
programs in the Department of Education's (Department) G5
System for the project period beginning on October 1, 2019,
and ending on September 30, 2020. Those funds will remain
available to grantees for allowable uses during this period.
In addition, in the Part F programs that award grants
competitively, the Department has carried over FY 2019 funds
into FY 2020 to support noncompeting continuation awards and
supplements for project periods from October 1, 2020, through
September 30, 2021.
The Department's ability to make additional formula grants
in FY 2020 under Part F for Historically Black Colleges and
Universities (HBCUs) and Tribally Controlled Colleges and
Universities, and to conduct new competitions for FY 2021,
depends on the availability of congressionally appropriated
funds. However, this will have no bearing on the grant funds
that have already been made available to grantees for the
next 12 months.
This Administration is committed to each and every HBCU and
other minority-serving institutions and the important work
they do in educating historically underrepresented student
populations. If you have any questions about these programs,
please reach out to your program officer in the Department's
Office of Postsecondary Education.
Sincerely,
Betsy DeVos.
Mr. BURR. On that basis alone, there is not the sense of urgency that
some have come to the floor six times and suggested. I don't disagree
with any of my colleagues that this is something we need to do now, but
a 2-year temporary bill that doesn't accomplish any of the other
reforms when we have had 5 years of bipartisan work--why would we not
take this option? Why would we not sit down and find a way for Chairman
Alexander's bill--which has many Democratic initiatives in it--to pass
and provide historically Black colleges and universities with permanent
funding, provide students with a one-page form to fill out for student
aid, provide an expedited way for the notification when their loans
have been approved? We are there, but for some reason, some want us to
do a 2-year temporary fix. It is wrong. I thank the chairman for
objecting.
I yield the floor.
Mr. ALEXANDER. Madam President, I see the Senator from Ohio. I intend
to offer my alternative to which, I gather, someone plans to object. I
will go ahead and do that unless he wants to speak at this point.
Mr. BROWN. Go ahead, Senator Alexander.