[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 185 (Tuesday, November 19, 2019)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6645-S6646]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                  Unanimous Consent Request--H.R. 2486

  Mr. CASEY. Mr. President, I rise today to urge immediate passage of 
the bipartisan FUTURE Act, which is H.R. 2486, to restore critical 
funding for historically Black colleges and universities, known by the 
acronym here in Washington as HBCUs, as well as minority-serving 
institutions, so-called MSIs.
  The $255 million in funding that HBCUs and MSIs rely on lapsed on 
September 30 of this year. Both the historically Black colleges and 
universities and the minority-serving institutions are underresourced 
and don't have the flexibility to operate in the red in the hopes of 
potential reimbursement later on.
  Campuses are already feeling this impact. Just 2 weeks after this 
program expired, some campuses notified employees that their positions 
and programs may be terminated. We are talking about real people losing 
their jobs and programs being cut that play a critical role in 
graduating and retaining students in the STEM field--science, 
technology, engineering, and math fields. All of this is impacting 
students across the country. Presidents of some of these institutions 
have told us that planning has ``all but stopped.'' This funding lapse 
is urgent, and it must be addressed now.
  From the perspective of my home State of Pennsylvania, we have two of 
the oldest historically Black colleges and universities--two of the 
oldest in the whole country--Cheyney University, as well as Lincoln 
University, and, in addition to that, a growing Hispanic-serving 
institution, in this case, the Reading Area Community College.
  We know that the investment made by the FUTURE Act will support 
college completion and academic opportunities at these and all 
historically Black colleges and universities and minority-serving 
institutions across the country. The FUTURE Act is fully paid for. It 
would not add to the deficit. It has strong bipartisan support in both 
Chambers.
  My colleagues in the majority are holding this funding hostage in an 
effort to pass what I would argue is a partisan bill. That is not just 
my argument or my opinion; some of my Republican colleagues have said 
this is the reason they are holding up this critical legislation.
  Instead of passing a bipartisan comprehensive reauthorization of our 
future higher education law, which my colleague Senator Murray is 
pushing for, some Republicans want to force Democrats to support a 
partisan bill.
  Instead of working in a bipartisan fashion to fix our current system 
so it works better for students, families, and teachers, they want us 
to support a so-called micropackage, the Student Aid Improvement Act. 
This act, in my judgment and the judgment of others, fails to address a 
number of critical areas, including improved campus safety and access 
to higher education affordability and accountability. Because of that, 
it maintains the status quo.
  Make no mistake, the Student Aid Improvement Act is a partisan bill. 
The bill fails to address the challenges students are facing in 
obtaining a college degree--including childcare, housing, food and 
mental health, among others--nor does it address the needs of first-
generation students, students of color, and students with disabilities.

[[Page S6646]]

  Let's debate these issues. Let's come to the table to negotiate on a 
bipartisan overhaul, but let's not hold historically Black colleges and 
universities and minority-serving institutions hostage in the meantime. 
We can get something done in the short run that would be beneficial to 
these institutions.
  We need to ensure that colleges and universities have the resources 
to provide support to all students they serve, including students with 
disabilities. A couple of examples of some of my bills--the Higher 
Education Mental Health Act, which is supported by over 250 college and 
university presidents, including 15 of the historically Black colleges 
and universities--would help institutions of higher education identify 
the resources and services needed to support their students with mental 
health needs.
  A second bill of mine, the RISE Act, would make it easier for 
colleges to provide support to students with disabilities by accepting 
student assessments from high school and smoothing the transition to 
higher education.
  A third bill, my Expanding Disability Access to Higher Education Act, 
would increase the funding for TRIO Programs that serve first-
generation students with disabilities and make higher education more 
accessible.
  These bills would provide the resources needed for students to be 
successful as they pursue higher education, but without a comprehensive 
bill, the needs of these students will continue to go unmet. Rather 
than blocking vital resources from flowing to our Nation's historically 
Black colleges and universities, we should immediately pass the FUTURE 
Act. This would restore funding, while providing us time to work on a 
comprehensive reauthorization that addresses the needs of all students.

  Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that as in legislative 
session, the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar 
No. 212, H.R. 2486. I ask unanimous consent that the Murray amendment 
at the desk be agreed to; that the bill, as amended, be considered read 
a third time and passed; and that the motions to reconsider be 
considered made and laid upon the table.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Tennessee.
  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I am reserving the right to object.
  I have a better idea, which I am going to offer to the Senate once 
again. It is permanent funding for historically Black colleges at the 
level of $255 million a year. The distinguished Senator from 
Pennsylvania has stated he doesn't want a piecemeal bill. He wants a 
more comprehensive bill. I have offered such a bill and introduced it 
in the Senate. I will describe it in a few moments when I ask unanimous 
consent to pass it, and it will include not a 2-year short-term fix 
based upon a budget gimmick, which will have difficulty passing the 
Senate, but permanent funding of historically Black colleges and 
minority-serving institutions.
  It will include simplification of the FAFSA, the form that 8 million 
minority students fill out every year, which in our State is the 
biggest obstacle to minority students having an opportunity for higher 
education and a variety of other bipartisan proposals.
  I am ready to pass a comprehensive bill. I offered one before. It was 
blocked by my Democratic friends. I am going to offer it again in a 
minute, and we will see if they agree to it, but I don't think we 
should pass a piecemeal bill. I agree with the Senator from 
Pennsylvania. I think we should be more comprehensive, and not only 
that, we should do permanent funding of historically Black colleges.
  The last point I will make before I object is that the U.S. 
Department of Education has written all the presidents of the 
historically Black and minority-serving institutions and said there is 
sufficient funding in the Federal Government for the rest of the year--
fiscal year--until October 1 of next year. So while we need to finish 
our work, there is no crisis at the moment, so let's do the job right.
  I will offer, in just a moment, the way to do that, which is 
permanent funding of historically Black colleges and minority-serving 
institutions. I object.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The objection is heard.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Tennessee.