[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 185 (Tuesday, November 19, 2019)]
[House]
[Pages H8962-H8963]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MOVING IMPEACHMENT GOALPOSTS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Alabama (Mr. Byrne) for 5 minutes.
[[Page H8963]]
Mr. BYRNE. Mr. Speaker, unfortunately, I must rise again because,
like so many times before, the goalposts for impeaching President Trump
have moved. At this rate, Nancy Pelosi must be any field goal kicker's
worst nightmare.
Since literally day one, it has been abundantly clear that the far-
left members of a so-called squad have been moving this Democratic
majority closer to impeaching the President. They don't care why or
how. They don't care what evidence, real or imagined, is used. They
care only about the end result: impeaching President Trump so that he
will not win reelection.
As this radical faction gains dominance in the Democratic Party,
Speaker Pelosi has tried every justification in the book to impeach
this President.
We were told for years that we would get to impeachment from the
Mueller report. They said just wait, wait till the report. It is going
to show Russian collusion.
Well, 2 years and millions of dollars down the drain, Mueller showed
no collusion.
{time} 1015
The Democrat narrative quickly turned towards ``obstruction of
justice,'' but that, too, fell flat.
But then, Mr. Speaker, the majority got a new gift, the
whistleblower. Never mind he had no firsthand knowledge of what he blew
the whistle on; never mind he is a partisan Democrat; never mind he
worked with Adam Schiff on his new allegations against President Trump.
It was campaign finance violations. Well, that didn't work. So then
it was quid pro quo. For weeks, that is all the majority talked about.
Not anymore. Apparently, Mr. Speaker, some highly paid political
consultants warned Speaker Pelosi that quid pro quo did not resonate
with the American people. So now it seems they have moved on to another
version of impeachment that tested best in their focus groups, the
nefarious-sounding ``bribery.'' It is bribery. That is what we will
impeach President Trump on.
Well, Mr. Speaker, I think my friends on the other side need to dust
off their law books because, unfortunately for their latest impeachment
fantasy, bribery isn't just some word. It is a real crime with a real
definition, and it is one this majority cannot prove.
You see, bribery occurs when an individual ``corruptly'' links
receiving something of value in exchange for an official government
action.
I say to the majority, show me how asking Ukraine to look into the
2016 election and into the sketchy dealings of Hunter Biden is acting
corruptly. Because I will tell you what: I will show you evidence that
Ukrainian officials were working to boost Secretary Clinton, and I will
show you evidence that the Obama administration itself was concerned
about Hunter Biden's deals.
I think most Americans will say maybe the President of the United
States should be looking into these things. I think they will say we
want the President looking into possible corruption in our government
and interference in our elections.
More importantly, I say to the majority, show me how President Trump
linked aid to these investigations.
Mr. Speaker, President Trump's phone call with Ukraine's President
Zelensky--you know, the one that the whistleblower blew the whistle
on--it is on the internet. Everyone can read it, and I hope that they
will, because nowhere in that call did President Trump ever link any
aid to Ukraine in exchange for anything. The President did not one
time--not one time--even mention any kind of hold on the aid, not once.
This is not bribery. This is not impeachable conduct. Yet here we are
trying to remove the President of the United States, the leader of this
country, the man chosen by the voters, over these newest allegations.
Mr. Speaker, the American people see past this charade. They know
that this is a partisan political scheme. And at this point, I think
most people who are paying attention, those who haven't tuned out, know
this is just the latest effort by Democrats to throw something at the
wall and see it if sticks.
President Trump has committed no ``bribery, treason, or high crimes
and misdemeanors'' the only offenses that the Constitution says warrant
impeachment.
I ask the majority, when do we stop and get back to the business of
the American people?
____________________