[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 181 (Wednesday, November 13, 2019)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6569-S6570]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




          STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

      By Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. Leahy, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. 
        Hirono, Ms. Harris, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Stabenow, Ms. Cantwell, 
        Mrs. Shaheen, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. Baldwin, Ms. Warren, Ms. 
        Duckworth, Ms. Hassan, Ms. Cortez Masto, Ms. Smith, Ms. Sinema, 
        Ms. Rosen, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Brown, Mr. Udall, Mr. Wyden, Mr. 
        Durbin, Mr. Reed, Mr. Carper, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Cardin, Mr. 
        Sanders, Mr. Casey, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Tester, Mr. Warner, Mr. 
        Merkley, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Coons, Mr. Blumenthal, 
        Mr. Schatz, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. King, Mr. Kaine, Mr. 
        Markey, Mr. Booker, Mr. Peters, Mr. Van Hollen, and Mr. Jones):
  S. 2843. A bill to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act of 
1994, and for other purposes; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
  Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Mr. President, today, along with every other Senate 
Democrat, I am proud to introduce the Violence Against Women 
Reauthorization Act of 2019.
  This bill passed the House by a vote of 163-158, with 33 Republicans 
supporting it.
  It was written by the people on the front lines helping victims. It 
is not a Democratic bill or a Republican bill, it is a bill crafted by 
and for survivors who know exactly what's need in the real world. In 
other words, it is the survivors' bill. As I stated before, any 
reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act must do two things.
  First, it must preserve the advancements made when it was last 
reauthorized in 2013. And second, it must include meaningful 
improvements to the law.
  The meaningful legal improvements in this bill are particularly 
important, and I would like to highlight three. First, this bill 
preserves the anti-discrimination protections that were made in 2013. 
These protections are particularly important to the LGBT community. 
According to the Center for Disease Control, along with 35 percent of 
heterosexual women, 44 percent of lesbian women, and 61 percent of 
bisexual women experience rape, physical violence, or stalking by an 
intimate partner.
  Similarly, the 2015 U.S. transgender survey found that 47 percent of 
transgender people have been sexually assaulted. Simply put, these 
protections are important and we should not only be preserving them, we 
should be doing more to strengthen them. This bill also makes 
meaningful improvements to the law to address domestic violence in 
Indian country. For example, it expands jurisdiction over non-Indians 
for crimes against children, elders, and law enforcement.
  A 2016 Justice Department report explained that ``more than four in 
five American Indian and Alaska Native women have experienced violence 
in their lifetime.''
  The report also found that 56 percent have experienced sexual 
violence, 56 percent have experienced violence at the hands of an 
intimate partner, and 9 percent have been stalked. For me, these 
numbers are even more upsetting because California has the largest 
Tribal population in the United States. We must continue to respect 
Tribal sovereignty and ensure that we are doing the most to protect the 
most vulnerable among us, particularly children. Finally, this bill 
also keeps guns out of the hands of domestic abusers.
  Guns are the most likely way for domestic violence to take a woman's 
life. Women in the United States are eleven times more likely to be 
murdered by a firearm than in other high-income countries. The presence 
of guns in domestic violence situations increases the chances that a 
woman will be murdered by 500 percent. This bill makes modest, but 
necessary, improvements to the law to keep guns out of the hands of 
domestic abusers.
  For example, the bill amends current law so that people convicted of 
stalking cannot possess firearms.
  Yet, the National Rifle Association opposes it. 33 Republicans still 
voted for the House bill, and I hope my Republicans colleagues in the 
Senate will do the same. It's the right thing to do. The different 
parts of the Violence Against Women Act are all linked.
  For instance, preserving the non-discrimination advancements made 
when VAWA was reauthorized in 2013 will help protect the LGBT 
community, but keeping guns out of the hands of domestic abusers will 
help protect LGBT victims as well.
  This bill takes this sort of comprehensive approach by, for example, 
preserving the advances made to non-discrimination protections and 
improving the law in the areas of Tribal protections and gun safety. 
There is no simple way to stop domestic violence, but we have a duty to 
do all that we can.
  I thank the president, and I yield the floor.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Mr. BLUNT:
  S. 2851. A bill to amend section 442 of title 18, United States Code, 
to exempt certain interests in mutual funds, unit investment trusts, 
employee benefit plans, and retirement plans from conflict of interest 
limitations for the Government Publishing Office; considered and 
passed.

                                S. 2851

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

[[Page S6570]]

  


     SECTION 1. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE.

       (a) In General.--Section 442 of title 18, United States 
     Code, is amended to read as follows:

     ``Sec. 422. Government Publishing Office

       ``(a) Definitions.--In this section--
       ``(1) the terms `diversified', `employee benefit plan', 
     `holding', `mutual fund', and `unit investment trust' have 
     the meanings given those terms under section 2640.102 of 
     title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor 
     thereto; and
       ``(2) the term `printing-related interest' means an 
     interest, direct or indirect, in--
       ``(A) the publication of any newspaper or periodical;
       ``(B) any printing, binding, engraving, or lithographing of 
     any kind; or
       ``(C) any contract for furnishing paper or other material 
     connected with the public printing, binding, lithographing, 
     or engraving.
       ``(b) Offense.--
       ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
     Director of the Government Publishing Office shall not, 
     during his or her continuance in office, have any printing-
     related interest.
       ``(2) Exception for mutual funds, unit investment trusts, 
     employee benefit plans, and retirement plans.--It shall not 
     be a violation of paragraph (1) for the Director of the 
     Government Publishing Office to have an interest in a 
     diversified mutual fund, diversified unit investment trust, 
     employee benefit plan, investment fund under the Thrift 
     Savings Plan under subchapter III of chapter 84 of title 5, 
     or pension plan established or maintained by a State 
     government or any political subdivision of a State government 
     for its employees that has 1 or more holdings that are 
     printing-related interests if the fund, trust, or plan does 
     not exhibit a practice of concentrating in printing-related 
     interests.
       ``(c) Penalty.--Whoever violates subsection (b)(1) shall be 
     fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 1 year, 
     or both.''.
       (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of 
     sections for chapter 23 of title 18, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking the item relating to section 442 and 
     inserting the following:

``442. Government Publishing Office.''.

                          ____________________