[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 181 (Wednesday, November 13, 2019)]
[House]
[Pages H8796-H8797]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
REAUTHORIZING SECURITY FOR SUPREME COURT JUSTICES ACT OF 2019
Mr. STANTON. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (H.R. 4258) to authorize the Marshal of the Supreme Court and the
Supreme Court Police to protect the Justices, employees, and official
guests of the Supreme Court outside of the Supreme Court grounds, and
for other purposes.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 4258
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Reauthorizing Security for
Supreme Court Justices Act of 2019''.
SEC. 2. PROTECTION AUTHORITY OF MARSHAL OF THE SUPREME COURT
AND SUPREME COURT POLICE.
Section 6121 of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) in paragraph (2), in the matter preceding subparagraph
(A), by striking ``any State'' and inserting ``any
location''; and
[[Page H8797]]
(B) in paragraph (3)--
(i) by striking ``violation of federal or state law'' and
inserting ``violation of Federal or State law''; and
(ii) by striking ``regulation under federal or state law''
and inserting ``regulation under Federal or State law''; and
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) by striking paragraph (2);
(B) by striking ``Additional Requirements'' and all that
follows through ``Duties under'' and inserting
``Authorization To Carry Firearms--Duties under''; and
(C) by striking ``any State'' and inserting ``any
location''.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Arizona (Mr. Stanton) and the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Collins) each
will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arizona.
General Leave
Mr. STANTON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include
extraneous material on the bill under consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Arizona?
There was no objection.
Mr. STANTON. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I would like to thank Chairman Nadler and Ranking Member Collins for
moving H.R. 4258, the Reauthorizing Security for Supreme Court Justices
Act of 2019, through the Judiciary Committee in a swift manner.
I would also like to thank my friend and fellow member of the
Judiciary Committee, Congressman Steube, for joining me in introducing
this important piece of legislation.
The Supreme Court Police currently has permanent authority to protect
Justices on Supreme Court grounds; however, its authority to protect
them outside of the Supreme Court grounds is temporary and has been
reauthorized in a bipartisan manner since 1928. H.R. 4258 is a
bipartisan bill that will permanently reauthorize the ability to
protect the Justices outside of the Supreme Court grounds.
With the increase of potential threats against the Justices of the
Supreme Court in recent years and the current authorization set to
expire on December 29 of this year, this bill is needed to remove the
threat of disruptions and security gaps caused by the temporary
authority.
I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 4258. I hope the Senate acts
swiftly and considers this bill. It is critically important that we
protect the Justices of the highest court in our land.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. COLLINS of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 4258.
The gentleman has spoken well of what it actually does and what it will
not do. I support that.
I would like to congratulate Congressmen Stanton and Steube on their
work on this legislation.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. STANTON. Mr. Speaker, I have no further speakers, and I yield
back the balance of my time.
Mr. COLLINS of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my
time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Stanton) that the House suspend the rules
and pass the bill, H.R. 4258.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________