[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 169 (Thursday, October 24, 2019)]
[Senate]
[Page S6176]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DEEPFAKE REPORT ACT OF 2019
Mr. SCOTT of Florida. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the
Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar No. 197, S.
2065.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title.
The senior assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
A bill (S. 2065) to require the Secretary of Homeland
Security to publish an annual report on the use of deepfake
technology, and for other purposes.
There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the bill,
which had been reported from the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs, with an amendment to strike all after the
enacting clause and insert in lieu thereof the following:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Deepfake Report Act of
2019''.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) Digital content forgery.--The term ``digital content
forgery'' means the use of emerging technologies, including
artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques, to
fabricate or manipulate audio, visual, or text content with
the intent to mislead.
(2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary
of Homeland Security.
SEC. 3. REPORTS ON DIGITAL CONTENT FORGERY TECHNOLOGY.
(a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 5 years,
the Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science
and Technology, shall produce a report on the state of
digital content forgery technology.
(b) Contents.--Each report produced under subsection (a)
shall include--
(1) an assessment of the underlying technologies used to
create or propagate digital content forgeries, including the
evolution of such technologies;
(2) a description of the types of digital content
forgeries, including those used to commit fraud, cause harm,
or violate civil rights recognized under Federal law;
(3) an assessment of how foreign governments, and the
proxies and networks thereof, use, or could use, digital
content forgeries to harm national security;
(4) an assessment of how non-governmental entities in the
United States use, or could use, digital content forgeries;
(5) an assessment of the uses, applications, dangers, and
benefits of deep learning technologies used to generate high
fidelity artificial content of events that did not occur,
including the impact on individuals;
(6) an analysis of the methods used to determine whether
content is genuinely created by a human or through digital
content forgery technology and an assessment of any effective
heuristics used to make such a determination, as well as
recommendations on how to identify and address suspect
content and elements to provide warnings to users of the
content;
(7) a description of the technological counter-measures
that are, or could be, used to address concerns with digital
content forgery technology; and
(8) any additional information the Secretary determines
appropriate.
(c) Consultation and Public Hearings.--In producing each
report required under subsection (a), the Secretary may--
(1) consult with any other agency of the Federal Government
that the Secretary considers necessary; and
(2) conduct public hearings to gather, or otherwise allow
interested parties an opportunity to present, information and
advice relevant to the production of the report.
(d) Form of Report.--Each report required under subsection
(a) shall be produced in unclassified form, but may contain a
classified annex.
(e) Applicability of FOIA.--Nothing in this Act, or in a
report produced under this section, shall be construed to
allow the disclosure of information or a record that is
exempt from public disclosure under section 552 of title 5,
United States Code (commonly known as the ``Freedom of
Information Act'').
(f) Applicability of the Paperwork Reduction Act.--
Subchapter I of chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code
(commonly known as the ``Paperwork Reduction Act''), shall
not apply to this Act.
Mr. SCOTT of Florida. Mr. President, I further ask unanimous consent
the committee-reported substitute amendment be agreed to, the bill, as
amended, be considered read a third time and passed, and the motion to
reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no
intervening action or debate.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The committee-reported amendment in the nature of a substitute was
agreed to.
The bill (S. 2065), as amended, was ordered to be engrossed for a
third reading, was read the third time, and passed.
____________________