[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 164 (Thursday, October 17, 2019)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5857-S5858]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TURKEY AND SYRIA
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, on Syria, yesterday, the U.S. military
carried out airstrikes to destroy what only a few weeks ago had been
the headquarters of the American campaign to destroy ISIS in Syria.
Nothing encapsulates the failure of President Trump's decision to stand
aside for Erdogan more than the fact that we are now bombing our own
bases rather than allow them to fall into the hands of Assad, Erdogan,
or Putin.
If Erdogan, Putin, and Assad are such great allies or no problem, as
President Trump told us yesterday at the White House, then why do we
have to bomb our own headquarters after American troops evacuated so it
doesn't fall into Syrian or Turkish or even Russian hands? That one
thing encapsulates the absurdity, the awfulness of President Trump's
lack of policy and erratic, impulsive, and whimsical movements on the
Syrian front.
Yesterday the President said this withdrawal was a ``strategic
move.'' It certainly is not that because this is not the action of a
military that carried out a deliberate withdrawal. It is the action of
a military that was given a fly-by-the-seat-of-his-pants decision of
the President contrary to the recommendations of the commanders on the
ground.
Donald Trump has the nerve, the gall, to think he knows more about
the military than these generals who have served our country for
decades. It is appalling. How does America put up with this? How do our
Republican colleagues put up with this? He doesn't consult the
generals. What a blunder, and it seems to be the result of the
President's inability to say no to dictators. He seems to like a Putin
and an Erdogan and even a Kim more than our allies. This is also a
clear demonstration of the President's fecklessness and recklessness,
both, or as my colleague Senator Lindsey Graham, and one of the
President's staunchest allies in Congress, said, ``I fear that this is
a complete and utter national security disaster in the making.''
Yesterday afternoon, congressional leaders went to the White House,
at its request, to meet with the President about the rapid
disintegration of the situation in northern Syria. Speaker Pelosi and I
talked about it ahead of time, and we talked about it with Senators
Reed and Menendez as well. We had a serious purpose: to find out if the
President actually had a plan to contain ISIS and fix the mess
precipitated by his decision to green-light Erdogan's military
incursion into Syria.
Alarmingly--alarmingly--President Trump had no plan. The greatest
insult that occurred in that room was not any of the name-calling that
Trump did. A far greater insult to America, to all of us, was the lack
of any policy guidance, any policy decisions, any direction from the
President and his top national security advisers on how to contain
ISIS.
I reminded the President that as two New Yorkers, we probably knew
better than most the damage a small band of terrorists can do, even
from a half a world away. I asked: What is your plan to prevent ISIS
from regrouping and resurging? He didn't have one. Secretary of Defense
Mark Esper didn't have a plan.
After we pushed them and pushed them, I said: Who is going to take
care of all these prisoners? The President said there were 70,000 ISIS
prisoners and their families. Who is going to take care of them, make
sure they don't escape, as some have already?
They finally said: Well, the Syrians and the Turks will do that. So I
asked the group if they had any intelligence or assurances that the
Turks and Syrians would do a decent job. Secretary Esper himself said
there was no evidence of that.
This is amazing. Terrorists whom we have spent a decade fighting--we
have spent billions of dollars and lost lives to fight them--are
finally in prison. The Kurds are guarding them. The Kurds are leaving,
understandably, because they have to fight the Turks now. What is the
plan? There isn't any, except to rely on Syrians, Turks, who have not
even close to the interest we have in curbing ISIS.
Assad is much more interested in gaining back his Syrian homeland.
Erdogan is focused on hurting the Kurds, whom he is fanatically
against. So they are not going to pay much attention to ISIS.
It was appalling, just appalling. President Trump has stepped aside
for Putin, Assad, and Erdogan. Our allies, the Kurds, are being
slaughtered as a result of our betrayal. Most importantly, as Secretary
Mattis said, ``if we don't keep the pressure on [in Syria], ISIS will
resurge. It's absolutely a given that they will come back.''
The President didn't like hearing Mattis's words, but all of America
should. He is one of the most respected military minds, one of the most
respected leaders on both sides of the aisle--liberals, Independents,
conservatives. Here is what he said, again repeating:
[[Page S5858]]
[I]f we don't keep the pressure on [in Syria], ISIS will
resurge. It's absolutely a given that they will come back.
So make no mistake, the President's incompetence, his impulsiveness,
his erraticness has made Americans less safe--Americans here in our
homeland. Congress, today, must make the fact clear to the President in
a bipartisan fashion.
We have the opportunity, my colleagues. The House passed a resolution
condemning the President's decision by an overwhelming vote of 354 to
60. That means the vast majority of House Republicans--129 to be
exact--condemned the President's decision in Syria. Leader McCarthy,
Whip Scalise, and No. 3 Cheney all voted for it. They are as loyal to
President Trump as anybody, but they saw the danger, the real danger.
Today the Senate should, and I hope will, follow suit. We can quibble
about the language, but I have no doubt we can agree on the basic
message, and there is no reason we can't vote on a Senate resolution
today.
Time is of the essence. To say, well, I would like to add this word
or add this sentence, as Kurds are being slaughtered, as ISIS
terrorists are escaping--no, no, no. No, no, no. We should move to the
House bill immediately because we all know there is only one person who
can reverse this, and that is the President. The greatest ability to
make him reverse is an overwhelming message from the Republican side--
House and Senate--that this is wrong. He doesn't hear that publicly too
often from our Republican friends. He has heard it from the House,
correctly and courageously.
Please, my friends, my Republican friends in the Senate, let's put
politics aside. Today let's vote the House bill passed yesterday by
them. There is no time to waste. Time is of the essence because the
President still doesn't get it. Our meeting at the White House
demonstrated that to all who were present. Hopefully, an overwhelming
bipartisan vote in the Senate will break through to him. I strongly,
strongly--in the strongest of terms--urge my friend Leader McConnell
and our Republican colleagues to allow a vote on the Syrian resolution
today. Security, justice, fairness demand no less.
____________________