[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 163 (Wednesday, October 16, 2019)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5829-S5830]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
S.J. Res. 53
Mrs. CAPITO. Mr. President, with the election of President Trump in
2016, it was reasonable to believe that the war on coal was settled, or
at least we had a lasting cease-fire. This administration's policies,
supported by the Congressional Review Act resolutions, undid many of
the excesses of the Obama administration's regulatory
[[Page S5830]]
assault on coal country. Congress and the President overturned the so-
called stream protection rule, which would have made it nearly
impossible to mine coal in Appalachia.
The Trump administration has returned sanity to the clean water
permitting process in section 404 and is in the process of restoring
the Waters of the United States rule to align with congressional intent
of protecting Federal waters and not every stream, ditch, and gully
across this country, but the jewel of the War on Coal's crown was
always the Clean Power Plan.
A sweeping rule to limit the use of coal in our power generation mix,
the Clean Power Plan ran roughshod over utility investments and States'
rights to protect their taxpayers and ratepayers. In a moment of
clarity, then-Candidate Obama acknowledged that under his vision for
our power system ``electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.''
The Clean Power Plan, if implemented, would have made that vision a
reality. Energy is a topline item in many of our families' budgets and
very expensive, and this policy would have grown these costs
significantly. This plan was so disastrous and so clearly beyond the
scope of EPA's authority that 24 States--with West Virginia in the
lead--sued to stop it. The Supreme Court--our Supreme Court--heard the
call and placed a stay on the rule while a lower court weighed the
merits.
This June, the Trump EPA finalized its replacement for this unlawful
CPP with the Affordable Clean Energy rule. This commonsense alternative
acknowledges the need to reduce carbon emissions from our power sector
but ensures that EPA targets are actually achievable and will not kill
jobs in the utility and energy sectors, nor crush American families
with higher electric bills.
Fully implemented, the ACE rule will reduce the CO2
emissions by as much as 35 percent from 2005 levels. This
administration understands that protecting our environment need not
come at the expense of a growing economy. The result has been a growth
in our national GDP that the Obama administration's economic
projections predicted would be unachievable.
The unemployment rate of my own State of West Virginia is now 4.6
percent, after it had peaked in 2010 at 8.8 percent. This week, many
Democrats in this body want to put all this progress in jeopardy and
reopen the War on Coal with a Congressional Review Act resolution to
block the ACE rule.
Senate Democrats and their Presidential candidates have doubled down
on policies that would destroy our jobs, hammer consumers, and burden
future generations with staggering amounts of debt.
Refusing to learn the lessons of Hillary Clinton's 2016 failed
campaign promise, which was to put a lot of coal miners and coal
companies out of business, the former Vice President has taken it a
step further: pledging on a Detroit debate stage in July to ``make
sure'' that coal and natural gas that comes from fracking are
``eliminated.''
There is much support on the other side for the Green New Deal's
energy and environmental components, which would cost between $8
trillion and $12 trillion, and that is before adding other extreme
visions for the government takeover of healthcare, education, and
agriculture.
The Democrats' energy agenda will lead to fewer jobs, more expensive
utility bills, and less reliable electricity. We already see the lack
of reliability of our electricity grid in California right now. I hope
the Senate will refuse to go down this path toward impoverishing the
very people who power the country and make our quality of life
possible.
Passage of this resolution would serve as the starting point for a
resumption of the War on Coal and a march to the extremist excesses of
the Green New Deal. I urge my colleagues to heed the voice of the
American people and vote no on the resolution disapproving the ACE
rule.