[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 163 (Wednesday, October 16, 2019)]
[House]
[Pages H8187-H8189]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CHINA: ONE WORLD, TWO SYSTEMS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 3, 2019, the Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr.
Hill) for 30 minutes.
Mr. HILL of Arkansas. Mr. Speaker, I certainly enjoyed my colleague's
dissertation there, much of which was a criticism of the Chief
Executive of our country, when many of the same comments she made could
be directed at this House and its investigation of the President--not
following the precedents set, not following the precedents set in the
Nixon impeachment or in the Clinton impeachment.
The Speaker has not had a vote of this House to commence an
impeachment inquiry. That is an open system. That is the transparency
my friend was talking about. That is the kind of accountability the
American people would like to see. That should be the policy of this
House. Sadly, it is not.
She talks about contacts with Russia by political campaigns. Many of
us look forward to the investigation by the Attorney General and by the
U.S. attorney in Connecticut on exactly that in the 2016 campaign and
how the opposition party, the Clinton campaign, was, in fact, the one
digging up activities about the Trump campaign.
So, anyway, I enjoyed that comment about Ukraine, the importance of
Ukraine, and the importance of democracy in Ukraine. But all throughout
that presentation, one had to endure a lot of supposition and fiction.
Tonight, Mr. Speaker, I would like to talk, not talk about Ukraine,
not talk about Syria, but talk about China and where we are in this
very important, critical bilateral negotiation between the United
States and the People's Republic of China to end China's mercantilistic
trade environment, their lack of openness, their failure to police the
terrible intellectual property theft that has gone on for over two
decades there that has hurt not only American businesses but those
elsewhere in Asia and also in Europe.
I commend the President for calling out the challenge that we have
had and faced in the West on how to obtain China as a better player for
trade. President Trump has worked for nearly 3 years now to change
China's outlook, to end its mercantilistic protectionism and join the
world trading system truly, not just on paper, Mr. Speaker, but, in
fact, completely, and be one with the developed world as it has grown
its economy so mightily over those two decades.
I commend the President's point men on this issue: Larry Kudlow at
the National Economic Council; Secretary Mnuchin, the Secretary of the
Treasury; and Ambassador Robert Lighthizer, who is his U.S. Trade
Representative who has the point on trying to work out something that
is a major change in that relationship between the U.S. and China, but
also China and the rest of the developed world.
At the heart of this trade dispute is the fact that we live in an
integrated global economy with deeply connected, multicontinental
supply chains. This integrated global economy is based on the
extraordinary foundation of the post-World War II reductions in trade
barriers, the expansion of the rule of law, and the extraordinary
success of the free-market capitalist system that has lifted so many
out of poverty around the world since World War II and enlivened the
capitalist spirit throughout the world.
Beginning slowly in the 1970s and 1980s, the People's Republic of
China was encouraged to open its domestic market, increase economic
freedom, better respect human rights and religious tolerance, and join
the global family of nations.
Following the fall of the Berlin Wall and the reunification of
Germany, as that freedom breeze finally blew away the shroud of the
Iron Curtain, reform in China remained the next great touchstone of the
post-World War II agenda.
The 1989 crackdown in Tiananmen Square sidetracked this progress, but
China's integration into this world economy began in earnest in the
1990s. That is where this story gets complicated, and that is where the
concern of President Trump really begins.
European and American leaders who shared values of economic freedom,
religious tolerance, and common national security goals witnessed the
historic and extraordinary transition of post-war Japan and the Asian
Tigers, those countries of Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and South
Korea.
Over the decades, the Asian Tigers had been authoritarian, condemned
for their rampant theft of intellectual property and spurning of
democracy, so much so that, in 1976, when Jimmy Carter was elected
President of the United States, he campaigned on pulling American
troops out of South Korea, ending aid to South Korea and writing off
South Korea as a failed experiment, that it was going to be an
authoritarian dictatorship and never adapt to democracy, never stop
stealing intellectual property. Basically, write it off as a failure.
{time} 1730
Fortunately, this initiative was shelved and, instead, we witnessed
Japan and the Asian Tigers expand their economies, really begin to open
their markets, fully embrace democracy and the rule of law, and join in
the world global progress.
Policymakers considered China to be next, and they believed that,
while a much larger country, under a much more authoritative communist
regime, the economic benefits of greater freedom and global
transparency would penetrate even the Middle Kingdom.
In 1996, in a column in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette offering
suggestions to the Clinton administration on how to have a more
directed China policy, I argued that China, too, must change. I said:
``China, as a world power, for her part must recognize that bilateral
and multilateral treaties are to be enforced. Lack of compliance with
international treaty obligations must produce a known and delivered set
of sanctions by the world community. China must clearly understand the
consequences of noncompliance.''
So, Mr. Speaker, that is what I wrote back in 1996 as a private
citizen, former Bush administration official, thinking about what
needed to change in America and Chinese relations, China's multilateral
relations.
So, despite encouragement and best intentions, China has not changed,
Mr. Speaker, but, instead, has grown more
[[Page H8188]]
aggressive; hence, the challenge of one world, two systems is market-
based capitalism versus state-controlled communism. They are not
compatible when it comes to this complex, integrated global capital
market I described.
In the 1990s, the epicenter of the fight was to reign in rampant
theft of intellectual property. At the time I uttered those words in
1996, the U.S. computer software industry, music CDs, and Hollywood
videos all were being ripped off by the People's Republic of China. In
1992, the Business Software Alliance testified before the U.S. Senate
that Chinese piracy was costing the U.S. an estimated $225 million in
software sales.
The reality is, despite efforts in 1992 at the end of the Bush 41
administration and vigorous efforts by President Clinton's negotiators
Charlene Barshefsky and Mickey Kantor, essentially nothing happened.
President Clinton threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on select
imports if Beijing didn't enforce Mr. Clinton's new 1995 intellectual
property rights deal.
So, what happened? Does this sound familiar? Is this not the exact
conversation we are having today in 2019?
What happened in 1995? Meeting after meeting was held, agreement
after agreement was signed, and still the piracy continued. And to my
point about the world delivering a known set of sanctions that China
must clearly understand the consequences of noncompliance, instead,
China was rewarded and admitted to the World Trade Organization, the
WTO, in December 2001.
Sadly, pirated goods have only increased. Recently, the Business
Software Alliance, the same folks I quoted back in 1992, now estimate
that 70 percent of PC software installed in China in 2015 was
unlicensed, and the U.S. trade representative estimates that
intellectual property theft costs between $225 billion and $600
billion, annually.
Thus, the world has not banded together and offered clear and known
sanctions for not following the global trade rules. In fact, global
trading partners have rewarded such behavior with the admission to the
WTO and continue to tolerate IP theft, closed domestic markets, and
dependency on frequently dominant Chinese supply chain participants.
This is why President Trump has elected to go forward with a more
aggressive, direct manner and deliver the message that lack of
compliance with international treaty obligations must produce a known
and delivered set of sanctions by the world community. However, the
President's success in this endeavor may well be diluted by the opening
up of trade disputes all over the world simultaneously, including
disputes with America's allies.
Specifically, I am talking about across-the-board unilateral steel
and aluminum tariffs, for example, or trying to renegotiate every trade
treaty that we have all at the same time, while we are trying to press
China.
Now, that is not to take anything away from the extraordinary work of
the President and Ambassador Lighthizer to update the North American
Free Trade Agreement with the new USMCA, updating the U.S.-South Korea
Free Trade Agreement, and initiating and completing an agricultural
agreement with Japan. But I have to say that doing all that at once and
not engaging our allies fully and publicly to be at our side impressing
China, I think, makes it more difficult, because, as I have traced over
the past 25 years the lack of success with China, the one thing that I
would argue that will make it different this time--always dangerous
words to utter--would be if we had the European Union, Japan, Malaysia,
Vietnam, the Philippines, South American countries all at our side as
we tried to get a concrete change in China's mercantilistic behavior.
In my view, the President would be more successful if he focused on
this Chinese challenge and rallied the world to a common purpose of
focusing China on that important point to clearly understand the
consequences of noncompliance. We have done many things in this country
that are improving that relationship and fighting, but we must have
full global support in order, I think and I believe, to ultimately
lever China into compliance.
Not successful in Bush 41, not successful with President Clinton, not
successful with President George W. Bush, little effort by President
Obama, so I admire President Trump for identifying this challenge that
benefits the whole world, not just the United States; but it is going
to take a sustained multiyear, multilateral effort to do that, and I
wish him well, and those of us in this House stand by him as he tries
to get a quality, substantive deal to bring China truly into
compliance.
Congratulating Carl Carter
Mr. HILL of Arkansas. Mr. Speaker, I want to recognize some Arkansans
who have done extraordinary things in my home district in central
Arkansas.
I rise today to recognize Carl Carter for being awarded the 2019
Community Service Award by the Real Estate Educators of America for
exceptional spirit of service.
Carl is a second-year student attending the University of Arkansas
Clinton School of Public Service in Little Rock. Carl credits his
strong community service to his mom, Beverly Carter, who lost her life
at the hands of two people posing as real estate clients.
Carl founded the Beverly Carter Foundation in her memory, an
organization dedicated to the cause of helping real estate agent
safety.
Through the Beverly Carter Foundation, Carl works to improve agent
safety through traveling and talking to escrow agents, lenders, agents,
and brokers all over the United States on how to avoid being the
victims of crime.
I know this is only the beginning for Carl, and I am excited to see
where his ambition and his kind heart take him, and I congratulate him
on this good work.
Recognizing Searcy Fire Department
Mr. HILL of Arkansas. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the
Searcy Fire Department and the firefighters from Station 1 for going
above and beyond the call of duty.
Earlier this summer, firefighters responded to a call for a fire
alarm at a resident's home in Searcy, Arkansas. Fortunately, the
resident was not in immediate danger, but they did notice one issue:
The resident could not leave his home without assistance, as there was
not a wheelchair ramp.
The firefighters at Station 1 took it upon themselves to fix this
situation. They reached out to the community for help, including the
local Lowe's Home Improvement store. They got discounted supplies. The
Searcy Fire Department Ladies Auxiliary provided funding, and these
firefighters were able to build a ramp for this resident.
This is just a small example of how the Searcy Fire Department and
central Arkansas law enforcement officers go above and beyond the call
when keeping Arkansans safe. I thank them for their continued hard work
and service.
Congratulating Ryan Davis
Mr. HILL of Arkansas. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate Ryan
Davis for receiving the Arkansas Emergency Medical Technician
Association Air Medical Award of Excellence. This award honors those
who help the air medical industry continue to see growth.
Ryan grew up in Quitman, Arkansas, and is currently the fire chief
for this community. Ryan is a nationally registered emergency medical
technician and paramedic and is flight paramedic certified.
Ryan has served his community since 2003 and also works for Air Evac
Lifeteam 30 in Morrilton. Ryan has served on numerous State-level
boards and committees, including the American Heart Association, the
National Association of EMTs, and also the Arkansas Air Medical
Society, where he serves as president.
I would like to extend my congratulations to Ryan Davis for receiving
this prestigious award.
Recognizing Jamie Cheney
Mr. HILL of Arkansas. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor Jamie Cheney
of Greenbrier, Arkansas, for her outstanding service to our community
and the State of Arkansas.
Jamie serves as a local medical technician and also as a volunteer
firefighter on her day off. She gained her EMT skills at the University
of Arkansas Community College at Morrilton, where she juggled school
while working at the Greenbrier Nursing and Rehab Center.
Jamie received the Phoenix Award while serving as an EMT in North
Little Rock. This award is bestowed onto
[[Page H8189]]
first responders who successfully revive a patient who has suffered
from cardiac arrest.
I am proud to have such a dedicated member of my district
volunteering and assisting those in need, and I join all Arkansans in
thanking Jamie Cheney for her selflessness and wish her continued
success.
Recognizing Lindsay Henderson
Mr. HILL of Arkansas. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize and
congratulate an emerging leader from the Conway Area Chamber of
Commerce, Lindsay Henderson.
Lindsay is a Bald Knob resident and serves as the chief revenue
officer for the Conway Area Chamber of Commerce. Lindsay was awarded
the Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives' 40 Under 40 award.
The 40 Under 40 award honors young professionals who have
demonstrated significant success in their career, as well as having
made noteworthy accomplishments in their community.
The Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives recognizes emerging
leaders from chambers across the country and honors 40 such chamber
professionals who exemplify creativity, dedication, and innovation in
their work towards their chamber's mission.
I congratulate Lindsay on achieving this 40 Under 40 award and wish
her continued success.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
____________________