[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 151 (Thursday, September 19, 2019)]
[House]
[Pages H7783-H7785]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4378, CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS
ACT, 2020, AND HEALTH EXTENDERS ACT OF 2019
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Rules, I
call up House Resolution 564 and ask for its immediate consideration.
The Clerk read the resolution, as follows:
H. Res. 564
Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be
in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4378) making
continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2020, and for other
purposes. All points of order against consideration of the
bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All
points of order against provisions in the bill are waived.
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the
bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority
member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion
to recommit.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Massachusetts is
recognized for 1 hour.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, for the purpose of debate only, I yield
the customary 30 minutes to the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Cole),
pending which I yield myself such time as I may consume. During
consideration of this resolution, all time yielded is for the purpose
of debate only.
General Leave
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
be given 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, today the Rules Committee met and reported
a rule, House Resolution 564, providing for the consideration of H.R.
4378 under a closed rule. One hour of general debate has been provided,
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on
Appropriations.
Mr. Speaker, before I begin my formal remarks, let me just take this
moment also to recognize the leadership of the ranking member on the
Rules Committee, Mr. Cole. He is not only a friend, but he is a fair
and evenhanded appropriator that can work with both sides. I know if
the gentleman could control this entire process, we would not be having
continuing resolutions; we would be actually voting for funding for the
entire year.
As my colleagues know, funding for the Federal Government runs out on
September 30, and that is less than 2 weeks from now. I had hoped that
we would have finished all of our work by now. Certainly, the House has
done its lion's share of work, but instead of prioritizing that,
President Trump has been obsessed with drawing on weather maps and
Twitter fights and cozying up to dictators.
{time} 1230
And the Republican Senate is completely dysfunctional. It seems like
we have a better chance of getting struck by lightning than seeing them
pass a bill.
The House has passed bills that fund 96 percent of the government.
Again, 96 percent of the government is funded by the actions in this
House. But the Republican Senate has passed zero. Nothing. What are
they doing over there, Mr. Speaker?
The Senate is just starting to get its act together, but where have
they been all summer?
This House is the only adult in the room. That is why we are acting
today to keep the lights on. This continuing resolution will keep the
government funded through November 21. It is bipartisan and it is
drafted as cleanly as possible to encourage the Republicans in the
Senate and the White House to finally negotiate on a long-term deal.
I know my Republican colleagues on the other side of the Capitol are
afraid to stand up to the President. They have stood by as President
Trump ransacked funding for military construction projects in their
States and diverted it, instead, to pay for his ineffective border
wall, a border wall that I am now being told you can fry an egg on.
The President is hurting our brave servicemen and -women, their
families, and their communities, but still Senate Republicans do
nothing. They won't be able to shirk their responsibilities here
because any compromise will require bicameral support and the
President's signature.
Someone over there is going to have to deliver some bad news to
Donald Trump: that he is going to have to log off Twitter and actually
govern. It may not make for good television but keeping the government
open for business is the most basic responsibility that we have.
Make no mistake, Mr. Speaker, when we finally do go to conference,
this majority is going to defend our values. That means fully funding a
fair and accurate census, securing our elections from foreign
interference, and supporting Federal research into our Nation's gun
violence epidemic, all while working to fund education, healthcare, and
infrastructure.
This is what responsible governing looks like. I know that may be a
radical concept for some of my friends on the other side, who enabled
this President to launch the longest shutdown in American history, but
we don't believe in shutting down the government. The last Trump
shutdown cost us $3 billion in economic activity that can never be
recovered. That is according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget
Office.
We cannot afford a repeat at a time when Moody's has found the
President's disastrous trade war is already resulting in 300,000 fewer
jobs created. That is a figure that could increase to 450,000 fewer
jobs by the end of the year if he continues these policies.
It is tough to know what will happen because it seems like the
President can't make up his own mind. You would have better luck at a
casino than betting what President Trump will do next. That is not
master negotiation, that is madness.
Our farmers are hurting. I am glad that this bill lessens the impacts
they are facing as a result of the President's trade war. These
families need our help, and I stand with them.
[[Page H7784]]
Someone has to lead here to keep our government funded, and we are.
No gamesmanship, just the cleanest possible plan to keep the lights on
for another month.
So I encourage all my colleagues: let's say enough to this
uncertainty. Enough with the shutdowns and enough with the President's
inaction. Let's pass this short-term CR and finally make bipartisan,
bicameral negotiations on a long-term deal a reality.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. COLE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I thank my good friend, the gentleman from
Massachusetts, the chairman of the Rules Committee, for yielding me the
customary 30 minutes.
Mr. Speaker, I thank my friend for his kind words, and I mean that
with all sincerity. We, obviously, have different opinions, we
represent different parties, but we do work together well. I appreciate
the manner in which my friend runs his committee and discharges his
responsibility on that committee and to this entire House.
We are here today, Mr. Speaker, on a bill that represents one of the
most fundamental roles of the United States Congress. That is to fund
the government to keep it open.
Today's bill is a bipartisan continuing resolution ensuring that
critical government funding will remain in place through November 21.
The extension of funding is necessary to ensure that the House and the
Senate have the time to reach a deal for full year appropriations for
fiscal year 2020.
Mr. Speaker, I call this bill a continuing resolution, but I think
the other word I used is much more important. That word is bipartisan.
That is what this bill truly is: a bipartisan compromise between the
two parties. It is amazing what we can get done when we agree to work
together and move towards a common goal. In putting forward this bill,
that is exactly what we have done.
H.R. 4378 is a bipartisan compromise that ensures that we will keep
the government open and operating through November 21. The American
people deserve no less.
H.R. 4378 not only funds the government and keeps it open, but it
also provides critical authorization extensions for some important
government programs. Without passing this bill, crucial programs
impacting millions of Americans in every district of the country would
expire. These include programs like community health centers, the
Commodity Credit Corporation, the National Flood Insurance Program, the
Special Diabetes Program, and the Special Diabetes Program for Native
Americans.
Every one of these programs is one of great importance to my
district, but the same could be said of every other Member of the
House. All of us have constituents who use these and other important
programs every day. All of us have constituents whose lives are changed
for the better because these programs are there. And if they were to
expire and stop working, all of us--every last Member--would, rightly,
hear about it from our constituents the following day.
The bill before us today is not a perfect bill, but that is the
nature of a compromise. When the two parties agree to work together,
both sides have to give up some things for the greater good. That is
the nature of compromise and the nature of what we can do when we agree
to set aside partisanship for the good of all those we are privileged
to represent.
Mr. Speaker, while I cannot support the rule, I do support the
underlying measure. I think it represents a real bipartisan achievement
that every Member of the Chamber, Republican and Democrat alike, can
and should support.
Mr. Speaker, I urge opposition to the rule, but urge support for the
underlying legislation, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I don't have any other speakers on this
side of the aisle, and I am prepared to close.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. COLE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, if we defeat the previous question, I will offer an
amendment to the rule to immediately bring up H.R. 4261, a bill to
prohibit taxpayer funding in support of campaigns for the offices of
Senators or Representatives.
Earlier this Congress, my Democratic friends passed H.R. 1, which
included a public funding scheme for congressional elections that would
transfer hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to congressional
candidates, most particularly to incumbents. That bill included an
astonishing 6-1 match for campaign contributions under $200. For every
dollar a congressional candidate raised, taxpayers would kick in an
additional $6 if that contribution was less than $200. If the goal is
to fix the campaign finance system and level the playing field,
throwing even more money into the system--especially taxpayer dollars--
makes zero sense.
As an appropriator, I find it hard to think of a worse use of
taxpayer dollars than creating a government-funding campaign ATM. At a
time when we could be funding the National Institutes of Health to help
find a cure for cancer, or fund needed infrastructure projects across
the country, or bring broadband internet to rural areas, Democrats in
the House of Representatives have, instead, made clear that they want
to spend taxpayer dollars on themselves. Congress should take immediate
steps to ensure that taxpayer dollars are never spent on congressional
campaigns, and H.R. 4261 would accomplish that goal.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to insert the text of my
amendment in the Record, along with extraneous material, immediately
prior to the vote on the previous question.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Oklahoma?
There was no objection.
Mr. COLE. Mr. Speaker, in closing, while I certainly oppose the rule,
I want to urge support for the underlying measure. H.R. 4378 is a
bipartisan continuing resolution that will fund the government and keep
it open for the American people while we complete our work on
appropriations for fiscal year 2020. It will also provide extensions
for critical programs impacting constituents in every district in the
Nation.
I want to associate myself with my friend's remarks. While I haven't
voted for very many of the appropriations bills--I don't think I voted
for any of them that this Chamber has passed because I have some strong
disagreements--the House has largely done its work. We have largely
completed the appropriations process here.
I am glad our friends in the Senate--and they had a reason to do
this--they waited until we had a bipartisan deal with the
administration in both chambers on the top-line spending level. But I
agree with my friend that it is time to get to work. It is time for
these bills in the Senate to start moving and get passed. Then we can
sit down, have the appropriate negotiation between the two chambers,
hopefully arrive at a bipartisan agreement, and present the legislation
to the administration that, hopefully, the President will be willing to
sign.
Again, I think buying the time we need here, without inconveniencing
the American people, is a wise thing to do. I urge all my colleagues on
both sides of the aisle to support that and vote no on the previous
question, no on the rule, but yes on the underlying legislation.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote yes on the previous
question and, obviously, yes on the rule.
Let me just say that we need to do something about campaign finance.
I think our current system is corrupt. I think people wonder why this
institution has enacted tax bills that favor billionaires and
millionaires at the expense of the middle class. Well, I think you can
tie that to the money. When people want to know why we can't get the
United States Senate to take up sensible gun control legislation, like
universal background checks, I tell them to follow the money. I think
we need to even the playing field so that middle class families, and
those struggling to get into the middle class, are heard on this Hill
as much as corporations and special interests have been over the past
several years.
H.R. 1, which we passed in this House, I think is a step in the
direction
[[Page H7785]]
toward giving government back to the people and taking it away from big
corporations, ending the practice of tax bills that just favor the very
well-off and the well-connected, so I disagree with the gentleman's
amendment.
But let me say this in conclusion. As my good friend, Mr. Cole,
pointed out, this is a bipartisan compromise continuing resolution. I
thank Chairwoman Lowey and Ranking Member Granger, as well as my
colleague from Oklahoma (Mr. Cole) who I know worked so hard on the
Appropriations Committee, for getting us to this point.
I wish we did not have to do continuing resolutions. In the future
that would depend on whether our colleagues in the United States Senate
want to get their act together and deliberate and legislate in a timely
fashion. We need to pass this because our farmers are hurting. Our
retailers, our small businesses, and our local manufacturers are
hurting.
Virtually, anyone who sets foot into a store is forced to pay more
for products today than before he took office because President Trump's
tariffs are causing the typical U.S. household $1,000 a year. That is
$1,000, Mr. Speaker.
None of us can control the President's haphazard so-called
negotiation with China, but we can control whether Congress acts to
lift the threat of another shutdown. The Senate may be in disarray and
the President may be focused on his latest Twitter feud or talking
about how many mountain climbers couldn't climb over his new wall, or
whether you can fry an egg on it, but this majority is focused on the
American people. We are doing our job to prevent a shutdown to provide
necessary funding that benefits all people in this country and buying
some time so that we can work out a long-term deal.
So I urge all my colleagues to join with us today. Let's encourage
the Senate Republicans and the President to finally do the jobs they
were elected to do and keep this government funded. We are doing our
job, and in here, today, we will bring a bipartisan product to this
floor--this bipartisan continuing resolution--that deserves a strong
vote on both sides of the aisle.
The text of the material previously referred to by Mr. Cole is as
follows:
Amendment to House Resolution 564
At the end of the resolution, add the following:
Sec. 2. That immediately upon adoption of this resolution,
the House shall resolve into the Committee of the Whole House
on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill (H.R.
4261) to prohibit the use of federal funds for payments in
support of campaigns for election for the offices of Senator
or Representative of Congress. The first reading of the bill
shall be dispensed with. All points of order against
consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority
member of the Committee on House Administration. After
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment
under the five-minute rule. All points of order against
provisions in the bill are waived. When the committee rises
and reports the bill back to the House with a recommendation
that the bill do pass, the previous question shall be
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to
recommit with or without instructions. If the Committee of
the Whole rises and reports that it has come to no resolution
on the bill, then on the next legislative day the House
shall, immediately after the third daily order of business
under clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the
Whole for further consideration of the bill.
Sec. 3. Clause l(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to the
consideration of H.R. 4261.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time, and I
move the previous question on the resolution.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on ordering the previous
question.
The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that
the ayes appeared to have it.
Mr. COLE. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further
proceedings on this question will be postponed.
____________________