[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 150 (Wednesday, September 18, 2019)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5551-S5552]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Nomination of Robert A. Destro
Mr. President, on one final issue, the Destro nomination, today the
Senate will vote on the confirmation of Robert Destro to serve as the
Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor,
responsible for the State Department's promotion of democracy, civil
rights, and fair working standards across the world. Typical of the
Trump administration, they have nominated someone whose record is
diametrically opposed to the mission of the job to which he is
nominated.
Mr. Destro has vocally opposed the movement for LGBTQ equality and
has been a staunch supporter of State-level religious freedom laws that
have acted as backdoors to discriminate against LGBTQ Americans. He has
a long record of opposition to a woman's constitutional right to make
her own healthcare decisions. When asked about the requirement that
insurance plans cover contraception, his response was ``the idea that
you're entitled to have someone pay for your birth control pill is kind
of ridiculous.''
[[Page S5552]]
If confirmed, Mr. Destro--this very same Mr. Destro who is opposed to
the rights of women, who is opposed to the rights of LGBTQ people--will
be in charge of promoting civil rights around the world. What message
would that send to women and members of the LGBTQ community who
struggle under intolerant and oppressive governments? The answer is
obvious. That is why yesterday every single Democrat, and even one
Republican, voted against proceeding to his confirmation. I urge my
Republican colleagues to study Mr. Destro's record, consider the job he
is supposed to do, and join us in voting no on his nomination.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Sasse).
The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the Destro
nomination?
Mr. BLUNT. I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. THUNE. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator
from Tennessee (Mr. Alexander), the Senator from Kansas (Mr. Roberts),
and the Senator from South Dakota (Mr. Rounds).
Further, if present and voting, the Senator from Tennessee (Mr.
Alexander) would have voted ``yea.''
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Jersey (Mr. Booker),
the Senator from Minnesota (Ms. Klobuchar), the Senator from Vermont
(Mr. Sanders), and the Senator from Massachusetts (Ms. Warren) are
necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 49, nays 44, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 289 Ex.]
YEAS--49
Barrasso
Blackburn
Blunt
Boozman
Braun
Burr
Capito
Cassidy
Cornyn
Cotton
Cramer
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Enzi
Ernst
Fischer
Gardner
Graham
Grassley
Hawley
Hoeven
Hyde-Smith
Inhofe
Isakson
Johnson
Kennedy
Lankford
Lee
McConnell
McSally
Moran
Murkowski
Paul
Perdue
Portman
Risch
Romney
Rubio
Sasse
Scott (FL)
Scott (SC)
Shelby
Sullivan
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Wicker
Young
NAYS--44
Baldwin
Bennet
Blumenthal
Brown
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Collins
Coons
Cortez Masto
Duckworth
Durbin
Feinstein
Gillibrand
Harris
Hassan
Heinrich
Hirono
Jones
Kaine
King
Leahy
Manchin
Markey
Menendez
Merkley
Murphy
Murray
Peters
Reed
Rosen
Schatz
Schumer
Shaheen
Sinema
Smith
Stabenow
Tester
Udall
Van Hollen
Warner
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--7
Alexander
Booker
Klobuchar
Roberts
Rounds
Sanders
Warren
The nomination was confirmed.
____________________