[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 103 (Wednesday, June 19, 2019)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3814-S3815]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Prescription Drug Costs
Ms. STABENOW. Mr. President, I rise to talk about something I have
talked about many times on the floor and to reiterate over and over
again that healthcare isn't political; it is personal. It is personal
for people in Michigan. It is personal for every person, every child,
and every family all across our country.
It affects each of us, regardless of our political affiliation or the
State we live in or what kind of car we drive. Hopefully, you are
driving a car made in Michigan.
At some point, just about all of us will need to take at least one
prescription medication in our lifetime. The question is, Will we be
able to afford it?
Brian Hose knows this struggle very well. He owns Sharpsburg
Pharmacy, an independent drugstore in Sharpsburg, MD. He joined me and
some of
[[Page S3815]]
my Democratic colleagues at a press conference last week on the rising
cost of prescription drugs.
As a pharmacist, Dr. Hose works hard every day to make sure the
customers he has have access to the medications they need to stay
healthy and, in many cases, to stay alive.
However, that task keeps getting harder and harder. Between 2008 and
2016, prices on the most popular brand-name drugs rose 208 percent--208
percent during that timeframe. Dr. Hose's customers didn't see their
incomes rise 208 percent during that same time. Certainly people in
Michigan didn't see their incomes rise 208 percent during that same
timeframe.
According to AARP, the average price of brand-name drugs that seniors
often take rose at four times the rate of inflation in just 1 year--
four times the rate of inflation in 2017 alone. That is unsustainable
for people.
Dr. Hose's most vulnerable customers are seniors, of course,
especially those who live on Social Security. As the price of
medications keeps going up and up, Dr. Hose's customers find it harder
and harder to pay for the medications they need.
Dr. Hose said this: ``In no way is the current system looking out for
the best interests of the patient, who ultimately needs to buy their
medications to stay alive.'' Just ask anyone who takes insulin. Insulin
is not a new drug. In fact, it has been around since 1922--almost 100
years--when Canadian scientists treated the first diabetic patient.
Those scientists sold the patent to the University of Toronto for three
Canadian dollars. They said they didn't believe they should make money
off of something that was so important to people's lives. Imagine. They
knew how important their discovery was and how many lives would be
saved. But somewhere between 1922 and 2019, insulin has become less
about saving lives and more about making money. In fact, over the past
15 years, insulin prices have tripled, putting people's health and
lives at risk.
Last summer, I met Nicole Smith-Holt, who lives in Richfield, MN. She
came to Washington, DC, to testify during a hearing on prescription
drug prices. Her son, Alec, was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes when he
was 24 years old. Alec worked hard to keep his diabetes under control,
but one thing he couldn't control was the rising cost of his insulin.
When Alec turned 26, he was no longer qualified to be under his
parents' insurance plan, as we have under the Affordable Care Act.
About 20 days later, he went to the pharmacy to buy his monthly supply
of insulin. The bill for his insulin and supplies came to $1,300. It
was a week from payday, and he didn't have $1,300, so he started
rationing his insulin. Alec never made it to payday.
Nicole said:
I received a call that no parent ever wants to receive or
expects to receive. I was told that my son was found dead in
his apartment, on his bedroom floor all alone.
She added:
We lost an amazing young man. He had so many hopes and
dreams. He left behind a 5-year-old daughter who now has to
grow up without her father. His little brother lost his idol,
his sisters lost a best friend, and my husband and myself
lost our child.
Affordable medication is a life-and-death issue for millions of
Americans like Alec. Unfortunately, we have a pharmaceutical industry
that is more interested in profits right now than in people.
In 2018, there were 1,451 registered lobbyists for the pharmaceutical
and health product industry. That is almost 15 lobbyists for every
Senator. Their job is to stop competition and keep prices high, and
they are doing a very good job. It is the ultimate example of a rigged
system. It has to change.
The No. 1 way we can bring down costs is to let Medicare negotiate
the best price. From the beginning, Medicare Part D has been prohibited
from harnessing the bargaining power of 43 million American seniors to
bring down costs, which is absurd. That didn't make sense back in 2003,
when it was passed as part of Medicare Part D's protectionist language,
and it doesn't make sense today.
We know how negotiation can work. We know how negotiation can work
because it works for the VA, which saved 40 percent compared to
Medicare. We have the VA system for veterans, and we have Medicare for
seniors and people with disabilities. The VA negotiates. Medicare is
stopped by law from negotiating best price--which, by the way, keeps us
with the highest prices in the world. In fact, according to a recent
AARP analysis, Medicare could have saved $14.4 billion on just 50 drugs
in 2016 if that program had paid the same prices as the VA--$14.4
billion. By the way, cut that down, that is hundreds of dollars--
thousands of dollars out of the pockets of seniors and people with
disabilities and, more broadly, people across the country in every
family.
A recent poll found that 92 percent of Americans support allowing
Medicare to negotiate drug prices. I would love 92 percent agreement on
anything. We should be able to act quickly on something that 92 percent
of the American public thinks we ought to do. So what is stopping us?
The pharmaceutical lobby and my Republican colleagues in Congress. It
is time to listen to the 92 percent of Americans who want to allow
Medicare to negotiate with drug companies. It is just plain common
sense.
Negotiating a bulk price is not radical; it is actually something
that is done in industry after industry after industry.
Dr. Hose said:
Seniors in Medicare Part D are one of the largest
purchasers of medication in the world. Yet they are unable to
leverage their buying power to decrease their costs.
It makes no sense. It makes no sense. It is past time that this
should be changed. But we certainly, as we are talking about ways to
lower prices right now--and I commend the chairman and ranking member
of Finance for working on this issue and the chairman for bringing the
top drug company CEOs and the pharmacy benefit managers into committee.
I commend him for that. But this is the moment we need to be totally
focused and totally serious about bringing down prices in the most
effective way. If we want to do it right, we need to allow Medicare to
negotiate on behalf of the American people and put people first.
Mr. President, I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Lankford). The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Texas.
Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the quorum
call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.