[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 82 (Thursday, May 16, 2019)]
[House]
[Pages H3917-H3920]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ENSURE FULL PROTECTION FOR LGBTQ COMMUNITY THROUGH THE EQUALITY ACT
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 3, 2019, the gentlewoman from Michigan (Ms. Tlaib) is
recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the majority leader.
Ms. TLAIB. Madam Speaker, I rise today to uplift my LGBTQ neighbors
at home in the 13th Congressional District. I want them to know that I
uplift them today, and always, as their unwavering advocate in the
United States Congress.
There are ideals and values we all should attempt to live up to in
this country. I know many of us ran to be in this Chamber to ensure
that our laws match those values and ideals as well.
When I think of these issues we confront as people and as a
representative body, I always feel that we must use an approach that is
rooted in values that uplift our whole communities. The values of
equality, justice, and acceptance come to mind when I think of the need
to pass the Equality Act.
Far too long, our LGBTQ neighbors have been forced to live a life of
fear, a life in hiding, a life of oppression, and a life of
instability.
We have come a long way in the LGBTQ rights community, but we have a
long way to go. The Equality Act is a step in the right direction on
this important path toward justice.
I think of the right side of history, when the right to marriage was
afforded to same-sex couples, the moment when our LGBTQ neighbors in
Michigan were able to create that special bond with their loved ones.
But I am also reminded of the stark reality that they faced being in
States where they could still be fired from their jobs the day after
their wedding for being gay.
I think of the trans community across the country that still faces
discrimination and violence, especially trans women of color who are
disproportionately targeted and killed. Our laws still do not protect
them.
LGBTQ Americans remain vulnerable to discrimination on a daily basis
and, too often, have little recourse. Fifty percent of the national
LGBTQ community live in States where, though they have the right to
marry, they still have no explicit nondiscrimination practices in other
areas of their daily life.
One's identity could still mean deep harm and even death for some
communities in this country, and we must change this.
I think of our LGBTQ neighbors who are denied public accommodation
just because of who they are and whom they love. I think about how we
are failing them by not living out our values rooted in justice.
This week, we have a chance to begin to change with the Equality Act.
We now have a pro-equality majority,
[[Page H3918]]
Madam Speaker, in this Chamber, and I am so glad we can change the fact
that LGBTQ folks are being denied housing, services, and employment in
the majority of our States.
I am so glad to be part of ensuring that everyone has full protection
in our civil rights laws, regardless of who they are and whom they
love.
Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from the great State of
Massachusetts (Ms. Pressley), my colleague.
Ms. PRESSLEY. Madam Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 5, the
Equality Act.
I rise on behalf of non-cisgender Americans, on behalf of QPOC
Americans, on behalf of drag kings and drag queens, on behalf of all
non-heteronormative Americans.
I rise today to let you know that you are seen and you are heard, and
I am proud to stand in solidarity with you.
It is our mandate as legislators to protect all Americans, yet we are
failing entire communities. In my home State, the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, a leader in marriage equality, we have the second
largest LGBTQ population of any State in the country. Even though our
queer pride extends far and wide, 61 percent of transgender Bay Staters
experienced housing discrimination in the greater Boston area, and 65
percent of LGBTQ Bay Staters experienced discrimination in public
spaces, from public transportation to retail establishments, places of
worship, restaurants, and healthcare settings.
As we consider H.R. 5, we must remind ourselves of our values. My
forever President Barack Obama once said: ``When all Americans are
treated as equal, no matter who they are or whom they love, we are all
more free.''
It is true. When we defeat hate with love, we all win.
During a time filled with fear, bigotry, and public turmoil, it is
unconscionable that we are still debating the liberties of people who
ask only to be received as their full selves. It is our fundamental
right as Americans to live happily, peacefully, and unapologetically.
It is our fundamental right to live free of harassment and
discrimination. It is our right to pursue happiness.
I extend my deepest gratitude to Congressman Cicilline, the author of
the Equality Act who has worked tirelessly for years to affirm the
rights and liberties of LGBTQ Americans.
Thanks to the leadership, H.R. 5 takes a comprehensive approach to
making the pursuit of life, love, and happiness a reality for all of
us, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. The Equality
Act ensures that LGBTQ people are protected by a nationwide standard
for nondiscrimination.
It is time for us to live up to our values. It is time for us to
strike out against injustices that devalue our humanity.
Together, we can affirm that our diversity is our strength and that
our collective safety is nonnegotiable.
Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote in support of H.R. 5.
Ms. TLAIB. Madam Speaker, I also would love to recognize the fact--it
is pretty historic--that Madam Speaker who is presiding over this
Chamber right now is a member of our beautiful community, of the LGBTQ
community. That, to me, is pretty historic as we now are debating and
putting forward the Equality Act. That is Congresswoman Angie Craig.
Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Green), my
colleague.
Mr. GREEN of Texas. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman for
yielding.
Before getting into my message, I would like to acknowledge that I am
an ally of the LGBTQ community. I do this and announce my support for
H.R. 5 because of a debt I owe.
I haven't always had the privileges that I enjoy now. Someone stood
and suffered so that I could come in the front door of, probably, this
very facility. Someone suffered so that I would have the opportunity to
go to some of the schools that I attended.
I believe that there is reciprocity in life and that you don't get
where you are and fail to appreciate those who have suffered so that
you could have the opportunities that you enjoy.
I support H.R. 5 for a multiplicity of reasons, the least of which is
not the fact that I am repaying a debt. I am going to help make sure
that others don't endure the pain and suffering that I endured and that
my predecessors endured. No one should be punished or treated with
disrespect because of how you look or who you are.
{time} 2045
Every person's dignity is given to them from a higher authority, and
we all should respect the dignity and humanity of every individual. So
I support H.R. 5, and I do so proudly because of a debt I owe.
I thank my friends for bringing this to my attention. It was not to
be a part of my message this evening, but it is a part of my life, to
make sure others are treated properly.
Madam Speaker, and still I rise tonight to address a crisis that our
country finds itself engulfed in, a crisis that, if we are not very
careful, will cause the Congress of the United States to be seen as a
``less than'' when it comes to the coequals that it is supposed to be
on the same plane with.
This crisis is a constitutional crisis. And while there are some who
would differ with me and say that this is not a constitutional crisis,
remember this: There is no hard and fast definition of what a
constitutional crisis is, so whenever I give my thoughts or someone
else gives their thoughts, we are giving opinions.
Tonight, I would like to share my opinion about this constitutional
crisis. Remember, all of these thoughts are opinions; just as the
thoughts of persons who hold themselves out to be constitutional
scholars, they are opinions.
There are some who say that you don't have a constitutional crisis in
the circumstance that we are dealing with with the President, who has
refused to honor subpoenas by and through his various administrators.
There are some who say that this will not be a constitutional crisis
until the case gets to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court has to
rule on whether or not the subpoena must be honored. And if the Supreme
Court rules that the subpoena must be honored, and then the members of
the administration refuse to obey the Supreme Court, there are persons
who conclude that this, now, is a constitutional crisis.
I would conclude that if the President of the United States fails to
honor a subpoena, after having been so ordered by the Judiciary, that
this is more than a constitutional crisis; you now have a
constitutional collapse.
The crisis occurs when the President is at odds, meaning the
executive branch, with the legislative branch; and currently, the
legislative branch and the executive branch are at a stalemate.
The executive branch is declining to cooperate, declining to allow
the legislative branch to fulfill its constitutional responsibilities
associated with oversight and investigation. And, as such, there is a
crisis, and that crisis, clearly, is rooted in the Constitution,
because the legislative branch has this responsibility pursuant to the
Constitution.
So this is a constitutional crisis, and we have a duty to address it,
and we must do so, or we will have failed on our watch to take up our
responsibilities as Members of Congress.
This is our watch, and we have a responsibility to make sure that
this House takes its proper place in the annals of history, with
reference to the question of impeachment.
Impeachment is something that we should not take lightly; but it is
also something that we have to take seriously, and we have to take it
seriously because, if we fail to do so, we will have allowed this
august body to become minimized.
You see, there are checks and balances in the system. The check on
the executive branch is impeachment. That is the check. That is the
sword of Damocles that hangs above the head of the executive. And if we
fail to exercise this duty when it properly should be, we, then, do not
provide the checks to make sure the balance of power remains as it
should be.
I fear for what is happening to this Congress. I am gravely concerned
because I don't see us aggressively pursuing the checks so as to make
sure the balance of power remains in place.
[[Page H3919]]
Checks and balances are in place to make sure that there is no
concentration of power in any branch of government. If we don't become
the last line of defense with reference to the President, if we fail to
do so, we then say that there are no guardrails; that there are no
rules that the President has to obey. He doesn't become just another
president. He metamorphoses into a monarch.
The Framers never intended for us to have a monarchy. The Framers
intended for the President to be checked by the Congress.
My hope is that we, in this Congress, will take up our
responsibilities, and we will provide the checks necessary to make sure
that this President, and no other President, is above the law.
I hear many Members of Congress say that the President is not above
the law. No one is above the law. And they go on to say, however, this
President, notwithstanding his actions, we should not impeach.
How can we say that he has committed impeachable acts, and then
conclude that he should not be impeached? We, literally, are saying he
is above the law when we say that he has committed impeachable acts,
but then decline to impeach.
Anyone else breaking the law will have to answer to the bar of
justice, except the President. We know that he has done it. The Mueller
report is replete with examples, yet we have not exercised our
constitutional responsibilities and, as a result, we, the Congress of
the United States of America, are allowing the President to be above
the law.
This is unacceptable. I refuse to allow this to continue. And I say,
as I have said, that the President will have to come before the bar of
justice, which is the House of Representatives. If we fail to do so, we
will have literally allowed him to be above the law. Not in this
country, and not on my watch.
I take my oath seriously, and I assure you that this will not be the
final word; that the President is not impeachable, because he is, and
we will have to have a vote on it.
Tomorrow will be the second anniversary of the date that we initially
called for the President's impeachment. I believe that we cannot have
another anniversary without another vote.
There will be one. My hope is that it will come through the
appropriate committees of the House of Representatives. But, if not, it
will come. And I don't know that there will be others who will vote to
impeach him, but I do know that I will.
And there are times when you may have to stand alone; but I know that
it is better to stand alone than not stand at all.
Madam Speaker, I am grateful for the time that I have had. I thank
you all for allowing it to take place, and I assure you, I love my
country, and I only speak these words because I see a country in peril
because of a reckless, ruthless, lawless President that we are allowing
to be above the law.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Members are reminded to refrain from
engaging in personalities toward the President.
Ms. TLAIB. Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from New Mexico
(Ms. Haaland).
Ms. HAALAND. Madam Speaker, I rise today in support of the Equality
Act. America must live up to its values by treating everyone as equals
and ending discrimination once and for all.
The Equality Act is about making sure all Americans, regardless of
sexual orientation or gender identity, can participate in our society
without fear.
New Mexico is home to diverse religious and traditional communities
and has stood up for its LGBTQ population for a very long time. The
Equality Act allows us to adhere to our faiths, while prohibiting
harmful and isolating acts of discrimination against the LGBTQ
community.
No one should have to worry about being discriminated against when
interviewing for a job or struggling to find a healthcare provider that
will treat them.
Tomorrow morning, when I vote for the Equality Act, I will be proud
to stand with my colleagues, with New Mexicans, and with my daughter,
who is a proud LGBTQ American. The time for equality is now, and we
must pass the Equality Act to live up to our values.
Ms. TLAIB. Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from California
(Ms. Porter).
Ms. PORTER. Madam Speaker, despite the enactment of marriage equality
in 2015, same-gender couples continue to experience persistent and
pervasive discrimination when it comes to home ownership.
A recent study by Iowa State University found systemic discrimination
against LGBTQ borrowers. The study found that, despite having a lower
credit risk overall, same-sex borrowers are 73 percent more likely to
be denied a mortgage loan. And when they are approved, they face
mortgage interest rates that are 0.02 to 0.2 percent higher, on
average, translating to tens of thousands of dollars in extra
repayment.
Twenty-six States across the United States do not have statewide
housing protections for the LGBTQ community, and the Fair Housing Act
does not protect lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals.
The Equality Act would change this.
This bill would not only improve the lives of members of the LGBTQ
community, it would make neighborhoods across the country more diverse.
And making our neighborhoods more diverse means more Americans get to
know and understand their neighbors who are gay, trans, or queer; and
with that understanding and the friendships and the neighbor
relationships, we hope to get tolerance. This is how we magnify the
wave of LGBTQ acceptance this country has experienced in the last
decade.
Imagine growing up in a community where you never have any LGBTQ role
models; where students in your school were harassed for even being
perceived as gay.
Imagine growing up in a neighborhood where you never met someone who
expressed themselves like you; where you were taught that your sexual
orientation or gender identity was wrong or immoral.
Imagine what it would be like to have waited years for your country
to recognize your loving relationship as legal and equal under the law.
Now, you are finally able to get married, and if you choose to, start a
family.
You have saved enough money for the downpayment on your first home.
You find that dream house in an area with good schools, plenty of parks
for your dogs, and friendly neighbors.
You and your spouse go together to fill out a loan application at the
local bank and wait eagerly for it to be granted. However, despite
doing everything right, you are outright denied for that loan without
reason.
You go to another bank, assuming that this is a mistake, because both
you and your spouse have great credit. You apply for a mortgage loan
again.
Maybe this time you are approved, but the interest rate would amount
to tens of thousands more dollars than you had anticipated; tens of
thousands more dollars than your credit risk should have you pay.
You found your dream home, but now you can't buy it because of an
artificially, discriminatorily-inflated interest rate.
{time} 2100
The Equality Act is vital. By amending existing civil rights laws to
explicitly include sexual orientation and gender identity as protected
characteristics, no person may be lawfully discriminated against for
their sexual orientation and gender identity in housing, education,
employment, public accommodations, and so much more.
Not only would it protect LGBTQ families who want to buy a home or
take out a loan, but it would allow individuals who identify as gay or
trans or queer to see people who look and love like them in their
communities, and it would allow their neighbors to see that LGBTQ
families are like them: They care about their neighborhoods; they care
about their communities; they love and want the best for their children
like anyone else; and they take the same pride in home ownership.
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere, and
discrimination against the LGBTQ community is a deep injustice.
Allowing that discrimination to continue in our country flies in the
face of the principles of equality and opportunity that form the basis
of our democracy.
Madam Speaker, I am proud to support the Equality Act, and I urge my
[[Page H3920]]
colleagues on both sides of the aisle to do the same.
Ms. TLAIB. Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Wisconsin
(Ms. Moore).
Ms. MOORE. Madam Speaker, I want to thank the gentlewoman from
Detroit, Michigan, for yielding time to me.
Madam Speaker, you heard it just a moment ago, those words from the
Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.: ``Injustice anywhere is injustice
everywhere.'' That is why I am so proud to support this historic
legislation that will be on this floor tomorrow, H.R. 5, the Equality
Act, that will truly provide equality for members of the LGBTQ
community.
Now, many people might argue, Madam Speaker, that we have made
important strides against prejudice over the last few years, and it has
been amazing. We have had States pass legislation outlawing
discrimination based on a person's sexual orientation. Likewise, we
have had Federal courts that have ruled that discrimination based on
someone's sexual orientation or gender identity is illegal under
existing laws. Yet tens of millions of Americans live in areas where
these laws have not been passed and Federal courts have not made the
same determination.
H.R. 5 is the remedy for making sure that we don't have this
checkerboard of rights and checkerboard of discrimination among our
LGBTQ community.
My district of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, the Fourth Congressional
District of Wisconsin, is notable to mention here. LGBTQ youth, in
particular, face significant obstacles and barriers because of their
LGBTQ identification.
We have 500 youth in my district who are homeless, and more than 40
percent of them identify as LGBTQ, many permanently homeless because
they have been abandoned by their families and turned out onto the
streets.
To add to their distress, the overly represented LGBTQ youth in the
foster care system in Milwaukee and around the country face huge
disparities in treatment and higher rates of harassment than their non-
LGBTQ peers.
There are many foster care organizations that are turning away
potential loving families and homes based on discriminatory practices
even though LGBTQ couples are seven times--did you hear me, Madam
Speaker?--seven times as likely to adopt and are more likely to adopt
minority children or disabled children as compared to heterosexual
couples.
Here is what we know. Every child wants a loving home. Trans people,
like all people, just want to be treated like people.
For these reasons, and so many others, I fully support H.R. 5, and I
look forward to voting for it tomorrow.
I applaud our leadership's commitment to protecting our LGBTQ
community and all communities from pernicious forms of hate and harm of
discrimination.
We are all in this together, Madam Speaker. And in order to protect
all of our rights, we ought to remember the oath that we take as we
stand under this ``e pluribus unum''--``out of many, one.''
Ms. TLAIB. Madam Speaker, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, who
puts this Special Order together every week, has truly been committed
to the rights of our LGBTQ neighbors, and I am very pleased that many
of my colleagues tomorrow, in a very bipartisan way, are going to be
supporting a historic, historic bill: the Equality Act.
Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
____________________