[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 79 (Monday, May 13, 2019)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2779-S2780]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CLOTURE MOTION
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Pursuant to rule XXII, the Chair lays before
the Senate the pending cloture motion, which the clerk will state.
The legislative clerk read as follows:
Cloture Motion
We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the
provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate,
do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the nomination
of Michael J. Truncale, of Texas, to be United States
District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas.
Mitch McConnell, Johnny Isakson, Roger F. Wicker, John
Boozman, John Cornyn, Mike Crapo, Shelley Moore Capito,
Pat Roberts, Roy Blunt, Deb Fischer, David Perdue, Todd
Young, John Thune, Mike Rounds, Steve Daines, John
Hoeven, Thom Tillis.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. By unanimous consent, the mandatory quorum
call has been waived.
The question is, Is it the sense of the Senate that debate on the
nomination of Michael J. Truncale, of Texas, to be United States
District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas, shall be brought to a
close?
The yeas and nays are mandatory under the rule.
The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. THUNE. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator
from North Carolina (Mr. Burr), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Scott),
and the Senator from Pennsylvania (Mr. Toomey).
Further, if present and voting, the Senator from Florida (Mr. Scott)
would have voted ``yea.''
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Jersey (Mr. Booker),
the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Brown), the Senator from New York (Mrs.
Gillibrand), the Senator from Hawaii (Ms. Hirono), and the Senator from
Massachusetts (Ms. Warren) are necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The yeas and nays resulted--yeas 49, nays 43, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 107 Ex.]
YEAS--49
Alexander
Barrasso
Blackburn
Blunt
Boozman
Braun
Capito
Cassidy
Collins
Cornyn
Cotton
Cramer
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Enzi
Ernst
Fischer
Gardner
Graham
Grassley
Hawley
Hoeven
Hyde-Smith
Inhofe
Isakson
Johnson
Kennedy
Lankford
Lee
McConnell
McSally
Moran
Murkowski
Paul
Perdue
Portman
Risch
Roberts
Rounds
Rubio
Sasse
Scott (SC)
Shelby
Sullivan
Thune
Tillis
Wicker
Young
NAYS--43
Baldwin
Bennet
Blumenthal
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Coons
Cortez Masto
Duckworth
Durbin
Feinstein
Harris
Hassan
Heinrich
Jones
Kaine
King
Klobuchar
Leahy
Manchin
Markey
Menendez
Merkley
Murphy
Murray
Peters
Reed
Romney
Rosen
Sanders
Schatz
Schumer
Shaheen
Sinema
Smith
Stabenow
Tester
Udall
Van Hollen
Warner
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--8
Booker
Brown
Burr
Gillibrand
Hirono
Scott (FL)
Toomey
Warren
The PRESIDING OFFICER. On this vote, the yeas are 49, the nays are
43.
The motion is agreed to.
The Senator from Pennsylvania.
Mr. CASEY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak as in
morning business.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Recognizing the 54th Anniversary of Head Start and the 25th Anniversary
of Early Head Start
Mr. CASEY. Mr. President, I rise to celebrate the 54th anniversary of
Head Start and the 25th anniversary of Early Head Start on May 18.
We know that in January of 1964, President Lyndon Baines Johnson
declared the War on Poverty in his State of the Union Address. Sargent
Shriver, who was the then-Director of the Office of Economic
Opportunity, assembled a panel of experts to develop a comprehensive
child development program to help communities meet the needs of
disadvantaged preschool children. It resulted in Project Head Start's
launching in the summer of 1965.
Over 50 years later, Head Start and Early Head Start have served
hundreds of thousands of children with high-quality, comprehensive
early learning and wraparound services. Just to give the Senate a
reminder of what Head Start is in terms of the ages, Head Start serves
children who are ages 3 to 5. Early Head Start serves children who are
up to the age of 3--so under the age of 3.
We know that these early learning experiences provide children with
the tools they need to develop and succeed in school. When children
learn more earlier in life, they earn more later in life. It is not
just a rhyme. All the evidence and research show that there is a direct
connection between early learning and later earning. A study of Head
Start children in Harrisburg, PA, found that they had higher scores in
the fifth grade than a control group on all academic and executive
functioning outcomes.
These benefits stay with children through adulthood. Research shows
Head Start children have a higher likelihood of graduating from high
school and receiving postsecondary degrees. These benefits even flow to
the next generation. The children of Head Start graduates are
significantly more likely to finish high school and enroll in college,
and they are significantly less likely to become teen parents or to be
involved in the criminal justice system.
One of the core tenets of Head Start that has made it so successful
is its responsiveness to local community needs. In Pennsylvania, for
example, as in many other States, the opioid epidemic has hit far too
many communities, and Head Start has responded to that crisis with
innovative programming.
For example, the SafeStart Program in Allentown, which is an Early
Head Start program, provides early intervention to assist the
development of infants and toddlers who have suffered abuse or neglect.
After having completed SafeStart--the new program in Allentown--68
percent of 3-year-olds were on age developmentally, and 100 percent of
the children showed significant improvement in their drug-impacted
symptoms, with 53 percent having shown resolution. Of the women who
became pregnant while their substance-impacted children were enrolled
in SafeStart, 88 percent gave birth to full-term, drug-free, and
healthy second children.
The whole family approach and integration with local community
partners
[[Page S2780]]
have created not just better outcomes for families but have resulted in
significant savings. Through this program, 91 percent of the children
achieved stable, permanent homes and caregivers, and it is estimated
that the SafeStart Program has resulted in nearly $1.5 million in
foster care savings and in over $9.5 million in child welfare
involvement by stabilizing 106 families. So we are grateful for those
results from the SafeStart Program in Allentown.
Head Start is a critical program for lifting families out of poverty,
obviously, and providing children with the early learning experiences
they need to start kindergarten and to be ready to learn.
Unfortunately, only about a third of eligible children still have
access to Head Start, and less than 10 percent--these are national
numbers--have access to Early Head Start. Again, Early Head Start
serves those who are up to 3 years old, and Head Start serves those who
are 3 to 5 years old. So funding for these programs is critical.
To give you an example of those numbers in Pennsylvania--and the
numbers are even a little lower--just 27 percent of eligible 3- to 5-
year-olds have access to Head Start, and only 7 percent of eligible
children under 3 years old have access to Early Head Start. Even with a
lot of children being eligible but not being served, this is purely a
question of funding.
As we celebrate over 50 years of Head Start on May 18, we must work
to ensure these programs receive robust funding and continue to serve
low-income children and families across the Nation.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Order of Business
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that all
postcloture time on the Truncale nomination expire at 10:45 a.m.,
Tuesday, May 14. I further ask unanimous consent that, if confirmed,
the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table and
the President be immediately notified of the Senate's action.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________