[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 75 (Tuesday, May 7, 2019)]
[Senate]
[Page S2660]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DISASTER RELIEF
Mr. SCHUMER. Madam President, on disaster, last week, the city of
Davenport in Iowa became the site of the latest national disaster to
wreak havoc on our homeland. It has been 8 weeks since the Midwest
began battling major flooding, 6 months since the last major wildfire
in California, 12 months since a volcano erupted in Hawaii, and over a
year and a half since Hurricanes Irma and Maria devastated the island
of Puerto Rico. But because the President has stubbornly and
inexplicably opposed aid to Puerto Rico, a comprehensive disaster
package has failed to get the necessary support of my colleagues on the
other side of the aisle, of a majority in the House, and has languished
in the Congress.
Unfortunately, the President continues to belittle Puerto Rico and
tell flat-out mistruths about the level of support they are receiving.
Just yesterday, the President said the people of Puerto Rico ``should
be very happy'' with what he has done for them so far. Well, don't ask
me. Ask the Governor of Puerto Rico--hardly a left-wing, partisan
Democrat; ask the mayor of San Juan; ask the people of Puerto Rico if
they are happy. Don't put words in their mouths. Ask them if they are
happy with the support they have received from this administration. Ask
them if they are happy with HUD's missing its own deadline to advance
the release of $8 billion in disaster mitigation funding last week. Ask
them, and you will get a much different answer. No one in the Puerto
Rican community is happy with the way this President has treated the
island and its 3 million American citizens. He has treated them with
contempt. It needs to stop.
So, President Trump, if you want to help the farmers in the Midwest,
be fair to everyone. You can't pick and choose.
Some of them say: Oh, but Puerto Rico isn't spending its aid well. I
heard that when we wanted Sandy money for New York. You can say that
about any region. In an emergency, no government program will be
perfect, but that is not a reason to hold back the money. Instead, send
the money and have some oversight, but help the people. They need it.
You can't pick and choose which Americans to help.
I would say this to President Trump: As our President, you must
represent all Americans, not just the ones who voted for you.
I yield the floor.
____________________