[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 26, 2019)]
[Senate]
[Page S1447]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                                 S. 311

  Mr. McCONNELL. Madam President, the Senate had an opportunity 
yesterday to affirm our commitment to the dignity of human life. We had 
a chance to state plainly that newborn babies who happen to have 
survived abortions are entitled to the same legal protections and 
professional care as other newborns.
  In all honesty, the fact that this legislation even needed to be 
written is a sad reminder of the degree to which our society is at risk 
of losing some crucial moral bearings, and the fact that the U.S. 
Senate could not even vote to advance this bill is beyond dismaying.
  The legislation was silent on the abortion issue. All it would have 
done is to have affirmed the rights of these newborn babies, but 
apparently even that was a bridge too far, not just for the far-left 
fringe--not anymore--but for the vast majority of our Democratic 
colleagues right here in the Senate.
  We are no longer dealing with a normal, traditional Democratic Party; 
we are looking at a party that has been dragged so far to the left, it 
would have been unrecognizable to folks just a few years ago. In 1996, 
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan condemned partial-birth abortion by 
comparing it to infanticide. He was a distinguished, mainstream 
Democratic Senator from New York about 20 years ago. And today? Ninety-
four percent of Senate Democrats could not even vote to protect babies 
after they are born. The only explanations they could offer were 
bizarre euphemisms and vague references to issues that have no bearing 
once a child has already been born alive.
  It was a sorry display, but I can say this: This fight isn't over. 
The Republicans will not let this stunning extremism from our 
Democratic colleagues be the last word on this subject.

                          ____________________