[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 12 (Saturday, January 19, 2019)]
[Senate]
[Pages S312-S315]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ORDER FOR ADJOURNMENT
Ms. MURKOWSKI. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that
following the remarks of Senator Warner, the Senate stand adjourned
under the previous order.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so
ordered.
The Senator from Virginia is recognized.
Government Funding
Mr. WARNER. Madam President, let me thank the Senator from Alaska for
her comments and my dear friend from Virginia for his comments. I am
going to somewhat echo what has already been said, but what I don't
understand--and for those who are listening or viewing, the four of us
and many others on both sides of the aisle have been working in good
faith to try to say: How do we get out of this?
The question I have is--I wonder if all of our colleagues have
actually gone out and sat with Federal workers or folks who are
affected. How could anyone sit with anyone who is affected by this
self-imposed personal, financial, and economic disaster and not say:
Let's not talk about money; let's get the government reopened. We can
figure this out, but let's get this government reopened.
I will recount some similar stories, and I appreciated the Alaska
stories of the Coast Guard in Kodiak. In Virginia, we have a major
Coast Guard facility down at Hampton Roads. But, as the Senator from
Alaska has mentioned, it is not just Federal employees; it is
contractors and private businesses and a host of other folks.
The Presiding Officer is part of the group who has been trying to
say: How do we get to yes? How do we get to reopen?
Maybe we can renew our efforts and urge all of our colleagues. Many
of them have gone home, but I hope they will sit down and have these
kinds of sessions.
I don't know how anybody can look at people who are out of work and
without pay due to nothing they have done individually and not say that
no matter who is winning the inside-the-beltway battle of the day, we
owe it to them to get this government reopened.
Madam President, I rise today out of deep frustration with the
administration's treatment of Federal workers during this government
shutdown. I will come back to this again, but I wish--I wish there were
some indication that the President, the Vice President, or any of his
top advisers would actually go out and do a listening session with
Federal workers. That doesn't seem to be too much to ask. I want them
to look those Coast Guard spouses or those TSA employees or those air
traffic controllers in the eye and tell them why they are being held
hostage on an issue that, frankly, has nothing to do with their work as
public servants.
We are now on day 29 of what I call the President's shutdown--the
longest shutdown in U.S. history. In many ways, we are creating the
legacy of this administration, a legacy that--the President claimed in
mid-December that he was ``proud'' to have initiated the shutdown that
is plunging so many Americans' lives into chaos.
More than 800,000 Federal workers have missed a paycheck, and that
number, I think the Senator from Alaska has alluded to and the Senator
from Virginia has alluded to, is actually a fraction of the folks who
are actually being affected. That doesn't count the countless
contractors--I will come back to that in a moment--or the host of
businesses, like the brewery in Kodiak. They are not Federal workers.
They are absolutely being affected, and let's recognize that. Even when
we are reopened and those Coast Guard workers are paid back, that
brewery is never going to make back its lost revenue.
The President has found time for an Oval Office address, he has found
time for a trip to the border, and he has found time for a tit-for-tat
with Speaker Pelosi, but what he has not found time for--or, for that
matter, anybody else in the White House--is to sit down with the
Federal workers who are being affected, and I believe that is a
national disgrace.
Again, I appreciate the Presiding Officer and your colleagues
listening. I know you have made efforts, and you are continuing to work
with other colleagues on both sides of the aisle to try to hopefully
find some sense in this disaster, but the truth is, people's time is
running out.
Over the last couple weeks, Senator Kaine and I have heard from so
many Virginia families who are shouldering the burden from this
shutdown. I wanted to share some of the stories.
The Senator from Alaska told a story about a 13-year-old who couldn't
cash a Christmas check. At least for me--I can't speak for Senator
Kaine--the most compelling story, heartbreaking story--and I am going
to tell a number of them, but this is the one I have kept coming back
to. Senator Kaine and I, with the press, had a series of Federal
workers tell their stories. One of the Federal workers didn't want to
come and do it on camera, but he came up and talked to Senator Kaine
and me afterward. He was a relatively young guy, about 35. He was a
veteran. He was an air traffic controller. He has now gone 4-plus weeks
without a paycheck. His wife had served in the Air Force in an intel
capacity and was suffering from pretty significant PTSD. Because he
hadn't had a paycheck, he couldn't pay the $90 copayment for his wife
to continue to see her psychiatrist and continue to pay for her drug
treatment. Not unlike the story the Senator from Alaska told, he said
he has his wife to take care of and their two kids, a 4- and 5-year-
old. The 4- and 5-year-old kids came to their parents and brought their
piggy banks and said: Mom and dad, can we give you what we have in our
piggy banks to help our family?
This is the United States of America. These are two veterans. We say
we honor their service. This is somebody who is still going to work and
working overtime without pay to keep our air safe. This shouldn't be.
A few days earlier, we met with other workers. A young father whom we
met works with the Department of Justice. He brought his 7-week-old
daughter to this session. He said when his daughter was born, he wanted
to make sure he could get his daughter on his Federal insurance plan.
That is his right. But the person who was supposed to submit the form
to the insurance company had been furloughed. He went to the doctor and
his infant daughter had an illness and had to get a prescription. He
didn't have the money to pay for the prescription, and his daughter
wasn't registered on his insurance company, not because of any fault he
had made. He wasn't able to pay for the insurance. In this case, thank
God, the insurance company actually worked with him, and they brought
extra proof and went through other hoops, and he was able to get the
medicine. How many other
[[Page S313]]
young families are going through that same stress right now?
Eric, a Federal law enforcement agent and father of three, wrote me
an email this week. He said missing a paycheck caused ``a tremendous
amount of strain'' on his family. This is a law enforcement officer.
Eric said he had some money saved up in a rainy day fund, but he
continued to tell me, in terms of his rainy day fund:
It's raining extremely hard right now. At some point, I am
going to have to make some tough decisions to ensure that my
family has a roof over its head and food on the table.
Unfortunately, a lot of the employees Senator Kaine and I have been
talking to don't have that rainy-day fund.
One of the things I think we all knew, maybe intellectually--and we
have all seen the statistics--is that half of Americans couldn't afford
an unexpected $400 bill without going into financial ruin. We are
seeing that play out right now--again, not because somebody has been
mismanaging their funds, but because they expected if they worked for
the United States of America and if they were willing to continue to do
that work, they would get paid.
We are now into this crisis 29 days, and if we think we have seen the
stuff hit the fan so far, wait until this coming Thursday when families
go through that second pay period where, adding insult to injury, they
get a paycheck that says zero, or in the case of one air traffic
controller, a penny, as you get into the new month when all their bills
come due.
Yesterday, I volunteered at a food bank in Arlington where Federal
contractors and furloughed workers were coming because their families
were running out of money. Some of these folks came up to me and said:
I viewed myself always as middle class. I have been working for the
Federal Government for double-digit years. They felt an enormous amount
of shame to come to the food bank. You shouldn't feel shame to come to
the food bank, but their appeal was to get the government reopened.
The President, who has never worked for a paycheck in his life, says
he can relate. He says he is sure that the Federal workers ``will make
adjustments.'' This is the very same President who has not had the
common decency to sit down with any Federal workers and listen to their
stories.
Here is what some of those adjustments look like.
Lisa in Arlington wrote me an email that says:
I am forced to look for multiple part-time jobs to make
ends meet and my savings will soon run out. Creditors and
landlords have only so much patience with us.
Another worker whom Senator Kaine and I met on Thursday broke down
crying when she said how hard it was for her to send her infant child
away up for a week to 10 days to stay with relatives because her mom,
who had been taking care of that child, had to go up and deal with her
own personal business, and she couldn't afford daycare. That is
dispiriting and disheartening.
The Presiding Officer has already pointed out the problem in terms of
recruitment and retention. Those people who are actually trying to
serve others now suddenly see their livelihoods in jeopardy through no
fault of their own.
The truth is that this shutdown is having a devastating effect--not
only on the short-term morale but on the long-term morale of all our
Federal workforce.
The fact is, since we have already agreed to pay them when we reopen,
why shouldn't we at least go ahead and, even if we are shut down, pay
these Federal workers come Thursday so they don't have to incur
additional pain and suffering? I commend so many of us, particularly my
friend the Senator from Virginia, along with Senator Cardin, who led
the effort so that we are giving Federal workers backpay when we
reopen.
Backpay alone doesn't make up for the hurt if you had to draw down
from your IRA and have a tax penalty. It doesn't make you whole if you
have taken an advance against your credit card and you have to pay
those fees in paying those dollars back. It doesn't make you whole, as
the Presiding Officer indicated, if you get dinged on your credit
rating or if you are in the process of trying to get a security
clearance and that security clearance is withheld because it appears
you have bad credit, not because you did anything wrong but because the
Congress and the President can't agree on how to pay you when you are
still asked to do your job.
The number of current Federal employees who are eligible for
retirement is supposed to be about 30 percent over the next few years.
How many of those Federal employees, whom we have trained and worked
with and who bring enormous expertise, are not going to wait until they
have to retire but actually say: I am going to get out of this job now.
The last thing we need to do is further undermine the competitiveness
of our Federal workforce.
The Presiding Officer made this point and Senator Kaine has made this
point that it is not just the Federal employees, but Federal
contractors. I heard from one Federal contractor from Ashburn who says
the shutdown has ``rocked the financial stability of my family.''
You see folks in the Gallery. We probably have a few more tourists
than we might normally have on a Saturday because the Smithsonian shut
down. I heard from someone who is in leadership in the Smithsonian,
begging me, saying those folks who work at the Smithsonian, on one
level, may get reimbursed, but all the folks who pick up the trash,
clean the bathrooms, and serve the cafeteria food are all contractors.
They are not direct employees of the Federal workforce. So even when we
reopen, even when the Federal workforce gets reimbursed, they are out.
This is one of the things Senator Kaine and I have been working on,
and I hope the Presiding Officer will look at this, and I hope some of
our other colleagues who want to work toward a solution will work on
this. It is complicated. In all the previous shutdowns, we never found
a way to reimburse contractors. We have a piece of legislation that may
not be perfect, but it says that for those workers who make less than
$50,000, we ought to find a way to make sure they get reimbursed and,
then, for those above, some small percentage. If not, these folks will
never be made whole.
Again, think about some of the tourists. Normally, there are a whole
lot of food trucks surrounding the Smithsonian and elsewhere around
downtown. We heard from a number of those folks as well. They can't
continue because if the Smithsonians aren't open, the tourists aren't
coming. If you have taken out a loan to buy a food truck to try to
employ a few folks, once that business is shut down, once your loan is
pulled, once you lose that truck--even when we come to a solution--they
can't reopen.
Again, I know it is unprecedented. We have not looked at Federal
contractors in the past, but at least for the folks in low or moderate
incomes who cannot make back the 29 days of pay--Lord knows that we
listen to the President who says he doesn't mind if it is weeks, months
or even years--I hope we find a way to somehow make them whole.
We have also seen small businesses. In Virginia, we have
disproportionately a lot of small contractor businesses. A small
business owner and contractor in Arlington wrote me and said:
My disabled-veteran-owned small business will have to shut
its door after serving the Federal Government for the last 2
decades. . . . I am going to have to put 72 families out of
work because our reserves aren't big enough to support the
payroll expenses of $35,000-$40,000 per day during this
political impasse.
It doesn't take a lot of math to figure out that if you are closed
roughly 30 days, you are talking about over a million dollars in
payroll that this veteran-owned small business can't meet. When they
reopen, there is no guarantee that this business comes back.
It is not just the small businesses that actually serve the
government. It is the brewery in Kodiak. It is the restaurants around
the battlefields in Richmond, near Senator Kaine's home. It is some of
the campgrounds that surround the Shenandoah National Park in our
Commonwealth. I think there may be a number of our colleagues who maybe
don't have the same concentration that Alaska or Virginia or Maine has.
If they think this problem hasn't gotten to them and isn't spreading
like the plague, it will come to their States as well.
[[Page S314]]
Why do we have to put all of these families and our economy through
this kind of turmoil?
Senator Kaine and I have worked really hard recently. Those of us who
live in the national capital area know the Metro is an important way we
commute. The Metro has had its share of problems the last couple of
years. Actually, in a good-news story, Virginia, DC, and Maryland came
together and ponied up more resources so Metro could make some of the
improvements--safety improvements and operating improvements--trying to
improve quality of service for our Federal workforce and for tourists
in our Nation's Capital. Every day--every weekday--that the Federal
Government is shut down, Metro loses $400,000 in lost fares per day.
Metro can't get a break. Where is that money going to rematerialize
from? I am not sure we are going to appropriate millions of additional
dollars.
We have had debates before, but if there has ever been one that the
American public has a right to be frustrated with in terms of the
shutdown--historically, the longest shutdown ever--it is this one. The
President says he wants money for a border wall--a border wall that he
promised the American people was going to be paid for by Mexico, a
border wall for which he says that before he will reopen government,
give him $5 billion. I think it is up to almost $5.9 billion. There are
some arguments that now it is up to $7 billion or $8 billion.
The truth is--and let me be clear--if the President and his White
House allies are listening, this Senator is willing to look at any
reasonable investment in additional border security, but it ought to be
done in a way in which we are not holding these hundreds of thousands
of families and--literally, indirectly--millions of Americans hostage.
Rule No. 101 of hostage taking is you don't not negotiate with the
hostage taker. You don't reward a bully. As I think some of my
colleagues on the other side have at least acknowledged privately, if
we allow this tactic to work today, it will be reused in April when we
have the debt ceiling, and it will be reused at the end of the fiscal
year when the next year's appropriations are due.
Again, I hope the people of good will will also try to see if we can
commit to putting enough of a poison pill in place so that this tactic
can never, ever be used again by any Congress or any President without
inflicting some damage, frankly, on the legislative branch and on the
office of the White House. That is part of the remarkable thing. Our
offices--and I say this to the good folks who work for us in Congress--
are not feeling any of the pain. The White House staff is not feeling
any of the pain.
I do wonder, as the President starts to selectively decide based on
one's ability to lobby and promote, who is going to come back and what
will get reopened. Frankly, I am more than a little disappointed, while
it is important that mortgages get processed, that he has decided to
bring back certain folks to process mortgages and certain folks in the
Department of Agriculture to process farmers' loans and that they have,
suddenly, mysteriously, found some money in the State Department to
reopen part of the State Department. I would love to see that same
priority for the folks who process food stamps. I wonder what kind of
Federal buildings we will go into where the toilets haven't been
cleaned and the trash hasn't been taken out and the food services
haven't been provided.
I say to the White House that we will negotiate, that we will work
through this process. Some of us have even said--and I know the Chair
has been part of this effort--that we will put it through regular
order. We will consider his proposal in a reasonable way, but let's do
it with the government open and with people getting paid.
I thank my friend Senator Kaine from Virginia. I know and
acknowledge, as somebody who actually lives only 20 minutes away in
Virginia, that it is a little bit easier for me than being a Senator
from Alaska or a Senator from a host of other places around the
country, but I think it is proper and right that we are here today, and
I will be back this coming week to continue to raise this point. When
we heard from some Federal workers that Congress was taking a break for
another 10 days when they were supposed to reach another pay period but
that they were going to make it goose eggs and when they have the
beginning of February looming when their rents and mortgages and
tuition bills will be due, I thought it was appropriate. I thank him
for forcing us to be back here to continue to raise these issues.
The last point I want to make is that I think we owe a huge debt to
our Federal workers--the TSA, the air traffic controllers, the Coast
Guard, and, for that matter, the folks who process food stamps and the
lady we saw who was supposed to investigate chemical spills who is
desperate to get to Houston where there was a spill 10 days ago, but
they still haven't been able to investigate. Without pay, whether you
are furloughed or, in many cases, are being asked to work overtime
without pay, they are still showing up. They are still being asked to
commute to work--some from a distance--as has been mentioned by the
Presiding Officer. If you put a bill on a credit card that has your
name on it, your credit rating is at risk. Whether you are a prison
guard and have to commute an hour and a half in your car and may not
have money for gas, you are still finding a way to show up for work.
As somebody who worked longer in the private sector than I have in
the public sector, I wonder how many folks who work in the private
sector--if you work for Facebook or Google or if you work for Ford or
Northrop Grumman--would continue to show up week after week after week
without pay or how many folks in the private sector would show up and
work overtime without pay and still perform.
In a moment in which I was looking straight at the press pool that
was with me yesterday at the Arlington food bank, I asked all of the
press folks--when the cameras were off--how many of them would show up
tomorrow if they had gone 4 or 5 weeks--with no end in sight--without
any payment. The press was supposed to cover this, but there was not a
single reporter or camera person who didn't at least acknowledge to
me--and I wish we had had it all on tape--that, no, they wouldn't be
showing up to their jobs.
For those of us who are policymakers or who are, candidly, visitors
in the gallery, sometimes it is easy--and there have been politicians
who have made careers out of this--to trash Federal employees. I think
it is wrong. I think it is disgraceful. I think now, more than ever, we
owe them a debt of gratitude. I know there are at least reports of
people at airports and others who have said thank you or who have tried
to slip somebody food or something else. The remarkable thing is,
because of our rules that in conventional times are appropriate, we
can't even, in many cases, give additional compensation to these
Federal workers, but we can give them a personal thanks.
My hope would be, in going forward, for a commitment from folks on
both sides of the aisle to think twice before we come to the floor of
this Senate and berate and degrade Federal workers. I would hope, on a
going-forward basis, when we get the government reopened, we could find
a bipartisan way to actually make sure that what this Senate passed in
terms of a relatively meager 1.9-percent Federal pay raise increase for
this year would override this administration's spiteful Executive order
that tries to take away that pay raise. If not--maybe not next week but
the next time this happens--I don't know if those TSA workers will show
up. I don't know if those air traffic controllers will keep working. I
don't know if those Coast Guard employees will still sign up for
service in places as remote as Kodiak, AK.
We have it within our power to end this. If the President of the
United States will not end this, we have a bill that is at the desk
that 96 of us agreed to in mid-December when there was not this crisis.
Now, when we hear these stories--when we hear of this pain--if the
President will not act, then the Senate must act and put that
legislation on the President's desk. Let him choose to not, simply,
postulate but to then make a decision as to whether he will sign or
veto it.
I thank the Presiding Officer. I know that she and others will be
back. Part of the burden on the majority is of showing up to that
presiding space. We, as the Virginia Senators, disproportionately had
that opportunity during
[[Page S315]]
these kinds of circumstances. Regarding her stories, the Senator from
Virginia's stories, the Senator from Maine's stories, and our other
colleagues' as well, I hope that the White House is listening and that
we can find that common agreement to get this government reopened and
demonstrate to the workers, the contractors, and the folks who depend
upon the Federal Government that we value their service and that never
ever again will they have to be put through this kind of tragedy.
I yield the floor.
____________________