[Congressional Record Volume 165, Number 10 (Thursday, January 17, 2019)]
[House]
[Page H700]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                         PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY

  Mr. SCALISE. Mr. Speaker, I am not sure if that is a formal 
objection, the way it was stated. I would ask a parliamentary inquiry.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his parliamentary 
inquiry.
  Mr. SCALISE. Is there any formal motion that would be in order that 
would allow reconsideration of the vote on H.J. Res. 28?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Such an outcome could be achieved by 
unanimous consent.
  Mr. SCALISE. Well, then, Mr. Speaker, is there any procedural motion 
that doesn't require unanimous consent that would be in order to 
request the Chair to reconsider H.J. Res. 28?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair does not give advisory opinion.
  Mr. SCALISE. I would yield the Chair as much time as possible to get 
an answer on that parliamentary inquiry.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. For what purpose does the gentleman from 
Louisiana seek recognition?
  Mr. SCALISE. I seek recognition to see if there was an answer to the 
parliamentary inquiry.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Again, the gentleman can achieve this result 
by seeking unanimous consent from our colleagues.
  Mr. SCALISE. Mr. Speaker, that recognition was sought.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Would the gentleman repeat it, please.

                          ____________________