[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 195 (Tuesday, December 11, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7393-S7395]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                            Border Security

  Mrs. CAPITO. Madam President, we are faced today with an escalating 
crisis on our southwest border. We all know it. We see news of it every 
day, and it is very real.
  As the chairman of the Appropriations Committee's Subcommittee on 
Homeland Security, I would like to present some facts to the Senate 
that make the case for increased investment in our border security.
  In the fiscal year 2018, Border Patrol apprehensions at the southwest 
border were up more than 30 percent compared with fiscal year 2017. In 
real numbers, over 396,000 people were apprehended.

[[Page S7394]]

  It is getting worse because, if you look at October of 2018 compared 
to October of 2017, apprehensions were up 88 percent. The numbers are 
going up.
  The facts I have laid out don't tell the entire story. Border Patrol 
estimates that it could be catching as little as half of the traffic 
that is illegally crossing our southwest border between the ports of 
entry, so we really don't know who we are catching, and we don't know 
what they are carrying.
  Border Patrol apprehensions of gang members is up 50 percent from 
fiscal year 2017 to fiscal year 2018. Mexico is a primary source for 
narcotics entering the United States. This is extremely important to me 
as a representative from the State of West Virginia. Fentanyl seizures 
by Border Patrol were up 115 percent over the past year, from 2017 to 
2018.
  We know that a significant portion of opioids enter our country 
through ports of entry, but we cannot ignore the fact that we are 
seeing opioid smuggling between the ports of entry increase at alarming 
rates as well.
  Similarly, methamphetamine seizures by Border Patrol have increased 
75 percent since the year 2015. In more populated areas along the 
border, aliens and smugglers are crossing the border unimpeded and 
quickly vanishing into our neighborhoods, into our commercial areas, 
and onto highways, headed to places like Mississippi and West Virginia.
  A single load of fentanyl, walked across our land border in an 
unassuming backpack, could threaten the lives of several thousand 
Americans. Failure to better secure our border will have consequences 
for all American communities.
  I am very sad to say that my home State is an acutely affected area. 
In the year 2017, drug overdoses were responsible for more deaths per 
capita in West Virginia than in any other State. Listen to this. This 
is so sad. Overdoses tragically took the life of 1 out of every 1,700 
West Virginians and 1 out of 46 Americans in this country. We saw a 
500-percent increase in meth overdoses in West Virginia from the years 
2013 to 2017. What I have learned about this is that we have gone from 
prescription drugs to heroin, to heroin laced with fentanyl, and now it 
is synthetic methamphetamines that are the threat. This is occurring 
while we are seeing an uptick in meth that is mass produced in places 
like Mexico, trafficked across our border, and then distributed across 
the United States. Even more troubling, these types of meth are also 
being laced with the synthetic and dangerous opioid, fentanyl.
  In this current debate, it is easy to forget that just over a decade 
ago, on a bipartisan basis, Congress--and I was over in the House of 
Representatives at the time--was making significant investments in our 
border security infrastructure. What we have seen from these past 
investments is that physical barriers actually work at the border. The 
statistics show that.
  In the 1990s and 2000s, we built physical barriers in four sectors: 
the San Diego sector, the El Paso sector, the Tucson sector, and the 
Yuma sector. In each of these places, the number of apprehensions 
dropped by more than 90 percent after the infrastructure was installed. 
In these areas, investment in border security has enhanced the safety 
and the security on both sides of the border.
  Neighborhoods that were once overrun with illegal activity are 
vibrant. Commercial areas that were once considered dangerous and 
unprofitable are now flourishing with economic development. Nature 
preserves that were once trashed and trampled are again full of our 
native plants and animals.
  The cartels on the other side of the border profit in places where we 
haven't invested. Criminals aren't going to stop smuggling humans and 
narcotics into the United States because we have invested in certain 
key places; they have simply changed their routes and shifted their 
tactics to areas where we haven't yet built infrastructure.
  If we fail to better secure our border, we are inviting vulnerable 
migrant populations, many of whom may be fleeing danger in their own 
home communities, to subject themselves to dangerous journeys through 
rugged terrain. They are often doing so under the thumb of cartels who 
profit from the illegal human trafficking, just as they profit from 
drug trafficking.
  We need to secure our borders and encourage these migrants to instead 
seek entry legally at the designated ports of entry.
  This past summer, I traveled for several days to the southwest 
border, both in California and in Texas. I witnessed the needs that we 
have there firsthand. I saw the open pathways across the border and 
into our communities. I saw the gaps in our border security. I also saw 
communities that have become safer because we have provided border 
security. I didn't just see those things; I heard from the men and 
women who patrol our border each and every day. It is a tough job. It 
is a tough job. They expressed the need for and the value of the 
investments I am talking about here today.
  While the need for additional investment in border infrastructure may 
be obvious to some, Congress has recognized that we need to be 
strategic in these investments. It was said on the Senate floor last 
week that there is no plan for these investments. I am here to tell you 
that is not the actual, true story.
  In fact, the bipartisan fiscal year 2017 appropriations bill required 
Customs and Border Protection to provide us with a comprehensive border 
security plan, an improvement plan, to ensure that we get it right. 
This plan was developed sector by sector by agents in the field, and it 
was weighted by illegal activities that are occurring in those sectors. 
It was written from the bottom up by career law enforcement 
professionals who walk the line every day, sometimes on boats on the 
Rio Grande--we did that too--and know where new infrastructure is 
needed most.
  The plan was delivered in January of 2018 and provided us with a 10-
year roadmap for border security investment based on operational 
requirements. Here is what we learned from this plan.
  As traffic slowed in San Diego, in Arizona, and in El Paso, we have 
seen it shift to South Texas, to the Rio Grande Valley sector. This 
sector covers just 17 percent of the mileage of the entire border, but 
it now sees 40 percent of the illegal border traffic. This sector also 
accounts for an outsized number of narcotic seizures and a significant 
portion of the assaults on our Border Patrol agents.
  Through the fiscal year 2018 appropriations bill enacted in March, 
Congress provided a downpayment of nearly $1.4 billion toward this 
plan, this improvement plan.
  Despite claims on the Senate floor last week to the contrary, Customs 
and Border Protection is executing this funding at an astounding rate. 
About one-third of it is already under contract. Another third will be 
under contract in the next several weeks, and the entirety of this 
funding will be under contract within a year of enactment of this 
legislation. They are spending it where it is needed most and as fast 
as we can get it to them.
  In June, the Appropriations Committee, led by my subcommittee, 
produced a bill that recommended border security funding in line with 
this plan. Specifically, the bill recommended significant funding for 
new physical barriers along the southwest border. This is a very good 
bill, but over the summer and over the fall, this crisis on the 
southwest border has escalated.
  I believe we in Congress must demonstrate that we are flexible enough 
to respond when the situation calls for it. The statistics I cited 
certainly make a compelling case.
  Providing additional resources in fiscal year 2019 and fiscal year 
2020 for border security infrastructure would be consistent with the 
border security improvement plan when viewed through the lens of an 
escalating crisis. This funding would go straight to the places in 
South Texas where we are seeing the most illegal traffic.
  It is important to note that providing an appropriate level of 
funding is possible without exceeding any of our budget caps and 
without shortchanging any of our other very important programs, as long 
as we get serious about finding a bipartisan way forward.
  I will take a time out here to recognize that Senator Schumer and 
rising Speaker Pelosi are going to be meeting with the President on 
this very issue today, so I urge them to reach a bipartisan way 
forward.

[[Page S7395]]

  I urge my colleagues here in the Senate to take a long, hard look at 
the undisputable facts, which demonstrate that the crisis on the border 
is escalating. Our law enforcement personnel have provided us with a 
plan to work toward improving and solving that problem, so let's work 
together and get this done.
  I yield back my time.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Washington.

                          ____________________