[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 194 (Monday, December 10, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7373-S7375]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BORDER SECURITY
Mr. CORNYN. Madam President, I have spoken on the Senate floor on a
number of occasions recently about the migrant crisis on our southern
border and tried to shed a little more context and light on what is
happening there and why this is so important not only to the United
States but to our neighbors to the south, as well as Central America.
I know there is this idea out there that all we need to do is build
more infrastructure along the border, and somehow this problem will be
resolved. I am here to say that is not the case. The border
infrastructure that some people such as the President call a wall,
others call a fence, is certainly a critical piece of the puzzle, but
it is much more complex than that, and it affects not only public
safety in the United States, it affects our economy and jobs in the
United States.
While the focus happens to be on what is happening in Tijuana or
another flash point across the border, what I would encourage us all to
do is not just take a narrow focus but pull back to, let's say, a
30,000-foot perspective and try to understand all this in context. We
know, unfortunately, sometimes in the political arguments that are
given, the facts get missed or misconstrued, and sometimes political
expediency is inconsistent with our need to do the hard work necessary
to find a right solution. This, of course, is part of the general
debate we have about what should be our immigration policies in the
United States.
I, personally, believe legal immigration has been to the benefit of
our country. Virtually all of us came from somewhere else at some point
in our family history, but the important point is, legal immigration is
very different from uncontrolled illegal immigration, which is what we
are seeing still flooding across our southern borders, when the public
is paying attention and when things like the migrant crisis in Tijuana
has occurred. The fact is, this is a daily occurrence. It is not just
large caravans of migrants from Central America. We have minicaravans
showing up on a daily basis, and these problems certainly aren't going
away.
I have the honor of representing about 28 million Texans, 40 percent
of whom are Hispanic, but I also represent a large number of Indian
Americans, Vietnamese Americans, Chinese Americans, and Korean
Americans. In
[[Page S7374]]
other words, we are a very diverse State. I know many people are not
aware of that, but it is absolutely true. When I tell people the third
most commonly spoken language in Texas is Vietnamese, it usually
surprises people. Of course, like every Member of the Senate, I consult
with my constituents on a regular basis to try to learn from them what
they think we ought to be advocating for on their behalf. The border
communities I represent have experienced very real consequences--
negative consequences--from the migrant crisis, and they have also seen
the humanitarian consequences of people making this treacherous journey
across Mexico, up from Central America, traveling up to the United
States. Of course, it should be no surprise, in some cases, that
journey is simply too strenuous and proves to be too much, and a number
of these migrants actually lose their lives. They die trying to make
their way to the United States.
In Brooks County, which includes Falfurrias, which is a border
checkpoint about 50 or so miles north of the Rio Grande River, these
communities don't have the resources to recover all the remains from
those migrants who die in their counties, causing the costs to be
placed on local government and, in turn, local taxpayers. For example,
the burden falls on them to come up with forensic experts and medical
examiners who are already overburdened and understaffed. This is a real
problem for many of our border communities, and this is why I joined
with Senator Cruz and Congressman Hurd and Congressman Gonzalez to pass
a bill to help local jurisdictions improve the recording and reporting
of missing persons and unidentified remains found along the U.S.-
Mexican border.
My hope is, this bill will help our local communities identify those
who have gone missing, process those unidentified remains, and invest
in forensic expertise to provide closure to the families in the United
States and abroad who have lost loved ones.
Texas, I understand, is unique in many respects, given our long
common border with Mexico, but both of our nations benefit from the
commerce and trade that comes across that 1,200-mile border. As a
matter of fact, Mexico is one of our closest trading partners. That
shouldn't surprise any of us. That also means, our border communities
are on the frontlines with some of the challenges that go with an
unsecured border, like drug trafficking and gang violence.
Recently, I talked about the many complex facets of the migrant
crisis as well as the way we can combat violence and exploitation by
the gangs, cartels, and transnational criminal organizations. I have
talked about the fact that the very same organizations that charge
migrants $8,000, for example, to transport them from Central America,
across Mexico, and into the United States are the very same
organizations that transport the heroin that is grown in Mexico,
processed there, and brought into the United States--the poison that
unfortunately has killed far too many Americans who died from
overdoses.
These criminal organizations are commodity-agnostic. They really
don't care about the human beings. The only thing they care about is
the money. So they will transport the migrants, traffic in children and
women for sex--sex slaves in the United States--and they also traffic
in illegal drugs that kill thousands upon thousands of Americans every
year.
I mention the fact that we need to focus on strengthening our
partnerships in Mexico and Central America in order to address this
crisis, but I want to focus on one aspect of this relationship in my
remaining time and talk about why trade remains such an important piece
of the puzzle. The lack of sufficient resources at the border,
including outdated ports of entry, including lack of personnel,
technology, and equipment, have been a contributing factor to the
crisis. In fact, look at how most of the high-value drugs get into the
United States. It is through the ports of entry, and we need to upgrade
those ports of entry and make sure they are staffed not only to monitor
this trade as it comes across the border but also to identify the
heroin and other illegal drugs coming into the United States so we can
stop them. The only way we are going to be able to do that is by
investing in our ports of entry, the antiquated infrastructure and
inadequately staffed ports of entry.
Then, again, I have heard people say that what we ought to do is just
cut off our border--close it all down. Can you imagine what that would
do to the legitimate trade and commerce that comes across our border to
support millions of American jobs?
About 5 million American jobs depend on trade with Mexico. About 8
million American jobs depend on trade with Canada. This idea that we
can somehow close down the border is unrealistic. Even if it were
attempted, it would be economically harmful to many millions of people
in the United States.
My State has the second largest State economy in the United States,
with Mexico being our top import and export partner. So closing off the
border would have a significant negative impact, as I said, not only
for Texas but nationwide. We have about 29 air, land, and sea ports of
entry into Texas, more than any other State in the Nation. That
includes the busiest inland port along the entire U.S.-Mexico border in
terms of total volume.
The border communities in Texas know that when our ports are tied up
with migrants and migrant families or illegal drugs and contraband,
legitimate trade can slowly grind to a halt. Any disruption of
legitimate international commerce has a swift impact on the pocketbooks
and livelihoods of all of our border residents and, indeed, of many
people beyond those people living on the border.
Congress has taken some steps to protect and increase the volume of
trade across our ports of entry. That includes my Cross-Border Trade
Enhancement Act, which is now law, to permanently authorize a public-
private pilot program that will ultimately lead to staff efficiencies
and allow for infrastructure improvements to our ports of entry.
More than 10 Texas land ports--including the Paso del Norte Bridge in
El Paso and the World Trade Bridge in Laredo--have taken advantage of
the opportunities this program provides. Many Texas air and sea ports
have begun to utilize this valuable program as well.
In addition, last week I joined the junior Senator from Michigan to
introduce a bipartisan bill that would require the Department of
Homeland Security to conduct a threat and operational analysis at all
of our U.S. ports of entry, because the same ports that let in
legitimate trade and commerce can also be points of exploitation and
access for people who wish to do us harm.
This analysis will then become the basis of an implementation plan to
ensure our ports can improve wait times for legitimate trade and
prevent illegal contraband from crossing our borders. As I said, we
have long thrived on international trade and travel through our many
ports, but we need to take a hard look at the vulnerabilities and
inefficiencies in the system.
It is important that we find targeted solutions to enhance legitimate
trade and travel while ensuring that bad actors have fewer
opportunities to thwart our protections. It is a message that says
``first, do no harm''--a Hippocratic oath of sorts. That is the same
advice I gave Ambassador Lighthizer as he negotiated a modernized trade
deal with Mexico and Canada, which I was glad to see was signed by
those three countries in Argentina at the G20 at the end of last month.
I look forward to reviewing the agreement with my colleagues in the
Senate to ensure it is a good deal, and I stand ready to work with the
administration and my colleagues on implementing this important
legislation.
But the new USMCA agreement is not just for the Texas economy. A
modernized pact will help to provide long-term stability for the
Mexican economy and strengthen our two countries' trade relationship.
This is an important point when discussing the ways that Mexico and the
United States can work together. This is a partnership that I hope to
see continued, especially under Mexico's new President.
I was fortunate to attend President Lopez Obrador's inauguration a
little over a week ago, along with Vice President Pence, Secretary
Nielsen, Secretary Perry, and other members of the administration,
including Ivanka Trump, representing her father.
[[Page S7375]]
To me, the future of the U.S.-Mexico relationship is important. It is
one that we all ought to care about. I think the opportunities are
there for us to engage in strategic partnerships with Mexico in a
number of ways--for example, dealing with the asylum problem that
Secretary Nielsen has already begun to negotiate.
Through our partnership, we can work together to solve this migrant
crisis by improving the economy and the opportunities that people have
to live and work in their home country, as well as to protect trade,
which supports so many jobs here in the United States.
I yield the floor.
____________________