[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 169 (Thursday, October 11, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Page S6792]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Nomination of Eric Dreiband
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I rise to oppose the nomination of Eric
Dreiband to be the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights
Division of the Justice Department.
Mr. Dreiband has no experience working on many of the most important
duties of the Civil Rights Division, such as protecting voting rights,
combating hate crimes, and ensuring that police departments respect the
Constitution and civil rights laws.
Instead, he has extensive experience representing corporations who
have been accused of employment discrimination and advocating against
legislation to protect civil rights.
In his personal capacity, he has testified against the Lilly
Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act and against legislation to protect
older workers from discrimination.
We need a head of the Civil Rights Division who will demonstrate
independence and a willingness to preserve the right to vote and civil
rights laws in the face of this administration's regressive agenda.
I am not confident that Mr. Dreiband will be the independent leader
that the Civil Rights Division needs. I cannot support his nomination.
Mr. VAN HOLLEN. Mr. President, I rise to oppose the nomination of
Eric Dreiband to serve as Assistant Attorney General of the Civil
Rights Division. His nomination is an affront to the mission of the
Civil Rights Division, the career attorneys, and to everyone in our
country dedicated to advancing civil rights.
Created in 1957, the mission of the Civil Rights Division is to
``enforce[e] federal statutes prohibiting discrimination on the basis
of race, color, sex, disability, religion, familial status and national
origin.'' The Civil Rights Division has been indispensable in helping
our country combat housing discrimination, voting rights abuses, and
hate crimes. It has also intervened in cases of police misconduct in
certain situations.
Mr. Dreiband is the wrong person to lead the Civil Rights Division.
He has spent his entire career advocating for weaker antidiscrimination
laws. He has testified in Congress against the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay
Act, the Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act, and ban-
the-box regulations.
Looking at this record, Mr. Dreiband will do more to undermine than
to protect efforts to prevent discrimination. How can someone devoted
to fighting against antidiscriminatory laws now be charged with leading
an agency that enforces antidiscrimination laws? It is almost as if the
Trump administration is ``trolling'' the agency itself with Mr.
Dreiband's nomination.
Unfortunately, under Attorney General Sessions, the Department of
Justice has already rolled back Obama-era guidance that terminated the
Federal Government's use of private prisons, helped protect vulnerable
transgender students, and the Cole memo which allowed prosecutorial
discretion in sentencing for drug cases. Mr. Dreiband's record suggests
he will continue these attacks on civil rights.
The Assistant Attorney General of Civil Rights Division should be
someone that will vigorously protect minority rights and aggressively
expand civil rights for all Americans. Mr. Dreiband has shown that he
is not that person.
THE PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, all postcloture time
has expired.
The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the nomination
of Eric S. Dreiband, of Maryland, to be an Assistant Attorney General?
Mr. CASSIDY. I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk called the roll.
Mr. CORNYN. The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator
from Florida (Mr. Rubio).
Further, if present and voting, the Senator from Florida (Mr. Rubio)
would have voted ``yea.''
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from North Dakota (Ms.
Heitkamp) and the Senator from Florida (Mr. Nelson) are necessarily
absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Tillis). Are there any other Senators in
the Chamber desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 50, nays 47, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 230 Ex.]
YEAS--50
Alexander
Barrasso
Blunt
Boozman
Burr
Capito
Cassidy
Collins
Corker
Cornyn
Cotton
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Enzi
Ernst
Fischer
Flake
Gardner
Graham
Grassley
Hatch
Heller
Hoeven
Hyde-Smith
Inhofe
Isakson
Johnson
Kennedy
Kyl
Lankford
Lee
McConnell
Moran
Murkowski
Paul
Perdue
Portman
Risch
Roberts
Rounds
Sasse
Scott
Shelby
Sullivan
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Wicker
Young
NAYS--47
Baldwin
Bennet
Blumenthal
Booker
Brown
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Coons
Cortez Masto
Donnelly
Duckworth
Durbin
Feinstein
Gillibrand
Harris
Hassan
Heinrich
Hirono
Jones
Kaine
King
Klobuchar
Leahy
Manchin
Markey
McCaskill
Menendez
Merkley
Murphy
Murray
Peters
Reed
Sanders
Schatz
Schumer
Shaheen
Smith
Stabenow
Tester
Udall
Van Hollen
Warner
Warren
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--3
Heitkamp
Nelson
Rubio
The nomination was confirmed.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Georgia.
____________________