[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 169 (Thursday, October 11, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Page S6789]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NOMINATION OF JEFFREY CLARK
Mr. VAN HOLLEN. Madam President, Mr. Clark's nomination is yet
another example of the Trump administration nominating individuals to
lead government offices whose missions they have opposed.
The Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Department of
Justice is uniquely charged with the ``stewardship of the nation's
natural resources and public lands.'' Yet, in the face of the
overwhelming evidence of climate change, Mr. Clark says the science is
debatable. It isn't, and this is not the time to have someone in this
position who refuses to acknowledge facts and confront the costs and
risks of inaction.
In addition, like many Trump nominees, Mr. Clark is skeptical of the
longstanding Chevron doctrine which states that courts must give
deference to agency regulations because agencies are staffed with
subject matter experts and that judges, who are only supposed to
interpret the law, are not qualified to substitute their opinions.
Large corporate polluters frequently challenge EPA regulations designed
to safeguard our waters, endangered species, and natural resources, and
we need a person in this position who will side with the scientists and
public health experts, not big polluters.
Americans deserve an associate attorney who is committed to
protecting their interests and not big-monied special interests. I do
not believe that Mr. Clark is that person, and I will be voting against
his nomination.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, all postcloture time
is expired.
The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the Clark
nomination?
Mr. ROUNDS. Madam President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There is a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. CORNYN. The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator
from Florida (Mr. Rubio).
Further, if present and voting, the Senator from Florida (Mr. Rubio)
would have voted ``yea.''
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from North Dakota (Ms.
Heitkamp) and the Senator from Florida (Mr. Nelson) are necessarily
absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 52, nays 45, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 228 Ex.]
YEAS--52
Alexander
Barrasso
Blunt
Boozman
Burr
Capito
Cassidy
Collins
Corker
Cornyn
Cotton
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Enzi
Ernst
Fischer
Flake
Gardner
Graham
Grassley
Hatch
Heller
Hoeven
Hyde-Smith
Inhofe
Isakson
Johnson
Kennedy
Kyl
Lankford
Lee
Manchin
McCaskill
McConnell
Moran
Murkowski
Paul
Perdue
Portman
Risch
Roberts
Rounds
Sasse
Scott
Shelby
Sullivan
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Wicker
Young
NAYS--45
Baldwin
Bennet
Blumenthal
Booker
Brown
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Coons
Cortez Masto
Donnelly
Duckworth
Durbin
Feinstein
Gillibrand
Harris
Hassan
Heinrich
Hirono
Jones
Kaine
King
Klobuchar
Leahy
Markey
Menendez
Merkley
Murphy
Murray
Peters
Reed
Sanders
Schatz
Schumer
Shaheen
Smith
Stabenow
Tester
Udall
Van Hollen
Warner
Warren
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--3
Heitkamp
Nelson
Rubio
The nomination was confirmed.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the motion to
reconsider is considered made and laid upon the table. The President
will be immediately notified of the Senate's action.
____________________