[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 126 (Thursday, July 26, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5426-S5427]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Mr. KAINE (for himself, Mr. Gardner, Mr. Reed, and Mr.
McCain):
S.J. Res. 62. A joint resolution formalizing congressional opposition
to any withdrawal from the North Atlantic Treaty, requiring the advice
and consent of the Senate to modify or terminate the North Atlantic
Treaty, and authorizing litigation to advance the Senate's
constitutional authority; to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Mr. KAINE. Mr. President, I regret it is necessary to introduce
legislation that prevents a President from withdrawing from NATO. Our
allies with whom we have fought alongside since World War II and
earlier in some cases, are seriously questioning our allegiance for the
first time in the history of the modern international order. President
Trump has chosen to call our European allies ``foes'' while aligning
himself with a brutal and repressive authoritarian, Vladimir Putin,
over the professional assessment of the U.S. intelligence community.
Troubling news continues to flow from the President's disastrous trip
to Europe for the NATO summit and his meeting with President Putin in
Helsinki. And for the first time ever, we are forced to ask what
options we have to preserve U.S. membership in the primary tool of
peace and stability for the last 70 years, the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization.
[[Page S5427]]
In response to the only invocation of Article 5 of the NATO Treaty,
more than 1,100 servicemembers from our NATO allies have given their
lives fighting alongside the United States. This is a sacrifice that
should not be so easily cast aside by our President who continues to
inaccurately depict the alliance as a protection racket and
``obsolete.'' While we must continue to press every country to continue
increasing defense spending to meet the agreed upon goal of 2 percent
of GDP by 2024, it is disconcerting to watch the President disparage
these allies and make threats to withdraw the U.S. from NATO.
Unfortunately, without action from Congress, this President might try
to terminate U.S. membership in NATO. For this reason, we must
affirmatively pronounce our legal position with regards to NATO, use
our constitutionally required power of advice and consent to block any
withdrawal and we must preemptively authorize legal proceedings to
challenge any future decision to withdraw.
This legislation I am introducing today along with Senators Gardner,
Reed, and McCain, is a bipartisan message to the President and the
necessary tool needed to block the President from terminating the NATO
treaty. It is the affirmative position of the United States Senate,
supported by this Bill, and previous resolutions passed by this
Congress, including and by the original vote of 82-13 in 1949 to give
the Senate's advice and consent to join NATO, that the United States of
America through their elected officials are unequivocally opposed to
the U.S. withdrawing from NATO. This legislation also asserts our
constitutional responsibility to provide advice and consent to U.S.
membership in treaties. Just as the President sought and received the
advice and consent to enter into NATO, the President must also receive
the advice and consent to terminate treaty membership--especially when
such a decision would be at odds with the opinion of the Senate and the
American people. Finally, this Bill will authorize Senate Legal Counsel
to represent the Senate in challenging any decision to withdraw from
NATO and specifically grant Federal courts jurisdiction to consider the
case.
I am proud to have bipartisan support for this bill to ensure that
the opinion of the Senate is upheld and the safety of the American
people prioritized through our continued membership in NATO. I strongly
encourage my colleagues in both the Senate and the House of
Representatives to support this legislation.
____________________