[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 22, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2811-S2812]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Accomplishments of the Republican-Led Congress
Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, I am sure I am not unique in the fact that
when I go home, my constituents ask: What in the heck is going on up
there?
The truth is, amid the polarization, the misinformation, the
arguments, the disagreements we naturally will have--because we
represent different parties, different regions, and different points of
view--it is really important to occasionally reflect on what it is we
have actually done because, as I learned a long time ago as a
journalism student, good news is not news.
What makes news is when there is conflict and disagreement. That is
what people pay attention to. That is what reporters write about, that
is what the cable TV channels run because they know people will watch
it. They can sell advertising. That is sort of the way the system
works.
Good news needs to be told and needs to be spread. So what I would
like to do is just reflect for a few minutes on the last 17 months and
what has been accomplished during that year and a half by a Republican-
led Congress and by the Trump administration working together.
I think, perhaps, the single biggest accomplishment that has
benefited the most people broadly across this great land of ours is the
new energized state of our economy. During the last administration,
following the great recession of 2008, we had this ahistorical idea
that slow economic growth was the new norm; that sub-2 percent economic
growth each year--which isn't fast enough to create enough jobs to keep
people employed--was something we were just going to have to live with.
The fact is, since World War II, the economy has not grown at 2 percent
or less; it has grown at about 3.2 percent.
What we are beginning to see is the slumbering giant of the American
economy wake up and grow. People have confidence again and optimism in
the future, which is a good thing. Unemployment fell to 3.9 percent
recently, which is the lowest in 17 years, and 14 States hit record-low
unemployment as well.
As I said, consumer confidence is high. As a matter of fact, it is at
an 18-year high, and the tax reform package we passed last December has
been the biggest, single game-changer. Although, I want to talk about
regulations in a minute, the tax reform package got America back in the
game. It made us more competitive globally as a place where people who
want to invest money and create a business or grow their business--it
is attractive, finally. We aren't chasing people off, having to move
offshore in order to compete globally. They now see America as a
favorable place to invest, and that benefits all of us.
Nearly 800,000 jobs have been created, 164,000 in April alone. To me,
one of the most encouraging statistics is, in February, we saw more
than 800,000 people rejoin the workforce. Unemployment statistics, as
the Presiding Officer knows, can be a little bit misleading because
sometimes when people quit looking for work, they are not reflected in
the unemployment statistics, even though they are obviously unemployed.
The fact that 800,000-plus Americans decided to rejoin the workforce
because they thought there was a real chance they could get a good-
paying job ought to be enormously encouraging to all of us. It is to
me.
In addition to the new jobs, in addition to more people joining the
workforce, we have seen people who are working receive pay raises, more
take-home pay. The retirement contribution their employers made to
their 401(k) plan went up in hundreds of different cases.
We have also seen people see a reduction in their utility rates--the
amount of money they pay for electricity--because the for-profit
utilities saw a cut in their taxable revenue, and because they are
utilities they had to lower the rates in order to meet the requirements
of the regulators. We have seen bonuses being paid by large companies,
like AT&T in Texas, and commitments made to invest in more
infrastructure. We have seen benefits across the board. The National
Association of Manufacturers says that 77 percent of manufacturers in
America intend to increase hiring, and 93 percent of them have a
positive outlook for their companies. That is the kind of optimism I
feel and hear when I travel back home.
In visits to Amarillo, College Station, Austin, and elsewhere, I have
had the chance and taken the opportunity to sit down and talk to my
constituents in those places and ask: How is it going? How are we
doing? How are you doing? What I hear from small business owners
regularly is the benefits they are seeing from the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act.
I have also had constituents write to my office, explaining how the
boost in their monthly paychecks is making a big difference when it
comes to making ends meet, buying groceries, paying their bills, or
affording health insurance.
I alluded to this a moment ago, but one recent piece of news had the
Southwestern Electric Power Company announce it had requested its
utility rates be lower. Actually, it probably didn't request it be
lowered, but they were lowered as a result of their lower overhead as a
result of their tax bill going down.
Southwestern has more than 180,000 Texas customers and attributed the
rate decreases directly to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. I would say that
is a good thing. When seniors and people on fixed incomes actually see
their utility rates go down, it helps them make ends meet. Entergy
Texas, another electric utility, has similar plans to return tax
savings to customers and support continued investment. Those two
companies are just the tip of the iceberg.
The economy is booming, so much so that employers tell me it is hard
to find qualified workers. We need to double down on our commitment to
make sure we provide people access to the education and training they
need to qualify for the new, high-paying jobs that exist. But, simply,
those jobs can't always be filled because there are not enough trained
workers to perform them.
It is not just the economy that deserves our mention. One of the most
significant things that the Trump administration has done is nominate
and see the Senate confirm a record number of judges--judges who, by
the way, are committed to faithfully interpreting the Constitution and
not legislating from the bench because of their personal preferences.
If you want to pursue a personal agenda or political agenda, you
ought to run for Congress, not seek the Federal bench. We expect and
demand
[[Page S2812]]
something different out of judges, which is faithful adherence to the
law, not imposing their personal policy preferences. That is what
President Trump has prioritized in his nominees and the nominees we
have confirmed.
Twenty-one circuit court judges have been confirmed so far. That is
roughly one-eighth of the appeals court judges in the United States.
These circuit courts hear appeals from Federal district courts, trial
courts, and, as the Presiding Officer knows, set binding precedent on a
wide range of issues. I like to say that for all practical purposes,
the circuit courts are the Supreme Court because the Supreme Court of
the United States hears roughly 80 cases a year. They obviously set the
precedent, but there are a lot of cases that never reach the Supreme
Court, and their final court of last resort is the circuit court. That
means the men and women presiding over those courts--the way they
approach their judicial decision making--is making a real difference.
As I said, with the help of the Senate, President Trump has secured
confirmation for 21 circuit court nominees. It is worth pointing out
that President Obama's 21st circuit court nominee was not confirmed
until he was in office for 33 months. It is not just that we are
confirming good judges; it is that we are doing so at a good clip,
comparatively speaking.
These judges include people like Don Willett, former justice of the
Texas Supreme Court; Jim Ho, the former Texas solicitor general; and
soon, Andy Oldham, the general counsel to Governor Greg Abbott, who has
been nominated to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
That is not to mention the very talented district court judges we
have confirmed as well. Two of them, Karen Scholer and David Counts,
are Texans, and both my State and the entire Federal judiciary are
lucky to have them.
The third thing I want to mention in terms of the economy is
regulations because of what we have been able to do, working with the
President when it comes to the regulatory state--the bureaucracy, the
nameless, faceless entities that make life either easier or more
difficult for small businesses. We have had a big impact. Specifically,
we have repealed burdensome Obama-era regulations through the
Congressional Review Act. It has been said before--and I will say it
again--that in all of Senate history, it had been used only one time
before; that is, to repeal the ergonomics rule. We have used it 16
times to eliminate agency rules that had found their way into law
during the waning hours of the previous administration.
This effort--the Congressional Review Act effort--has been
spearheaded by people like the junior Senator from Pennsylvania, among
others. It has eliminated rules like coal mining regulation that would
have put more than 100,000 jobs at risk and another one enacted by the
Department of Education that undermined local control of schools and
directly violated a Federal statute at least 7 times.
Our use of the Congressional Review Act has been referred to as a
``regulatory wrecking ball'' and the ``most ambitious regulatory
rollback since [President Ronald] Reagan.''
I don't agree it has been a wrecking ball. I think it has been more
of a surgical operation. It has provided a signal to businesses, as
well as real regulatory relief in those 16 specific cases. I think that
is another reason for optimism in the sense that the Federal Government
is no longer tying one hand behind the backs of our job creators.
Another important development has been finally rolling back some of
the overregulation of Dodd-Frank. You will recall this was legislation
that passed following the great meltdown recession of 2008. Like most
things that happen in Washington, DC, the pendulum swung way too far.
I tell my community bankers and the credit unions in Texas: You
weren't the target, but you were the collateral damage. They didn't
cause the great recession of 2008, the subprime mortgage lending
crisis; that was the big boys on Wall Street.
Thanks to Senator Crapo and the Banking Committee and a bipartisan
effort in the Senate, we finally pulled back some of the
overregulation. If small community banks were going to be able to stay
in business, they were required to hire people just to fill out the
paperwork--not to make more loans but to fill out the paperwork. Many
of them couldn't survive at all, so they had to merge or just go away.
The people who got hurt the most were the people who needed access to
credit--again, our small businesses.
Thankfully, this bill is now expected to pass the House this week,
and it will be a big win for smaller financial institutions and make it
easier for them to serve their communities by providing mortgages,
providing credit, and lending to small businesses.
That is the past. Let's take a peek forward to this next week. This
week, we will keep our commitment to our veterans--people who have worn
the uniform of the U.S. military and who have served us so well and to
whom we have a moral obligation, I believe, to keep our commitments to
them--the promises we made to them when they were on Active Duty that
when they left Active Duty, we would keep our commitments. We will do
that when we vote on the VA MISSION Act this week.
This is a bipartisan, bicameral bill that will make significant
reforms to the Department of Veterans Affairs. It will strengthen the
healthcare and community care options that are available to America's
veterans. It will provide $5.2 billion to the much needed Choice
funding program to prevent interruption of access to needed care for
veterans.
In other words, we have said: If you are a veteran and can't get to a
designated VA healthcare facility--a hospital or clinic--you can get
treated in your community by a hospital or other healthcare provider,
and we will pay the fee. If you have to wait too long in line, if you
have to drive too far, you will have healthcare options. That is why
funding the $5.2 billion for the Choice Program is so important.
This bill will also provide caregiver assistance and consolidates the
VA's seven community care programs into one streamlined program and
will allow veterans, as I said, to seek care when and where it makes
the most sense for them.
On the caregiver program, I can't help but remember when I visited
Walter Reed, visiting some of our warriors injured in the line of duty
in places like Afghanistan and Iraq. Frequently, the spouse of a
wounded warrior has to quit his or her job to care for their loved one.
It is an important aspect of the continuum of care necessary for them
to recover and get back on their feet. We are going to provide greater
access to caregiver assistance so that spouses and family members can
do exactly that. It is the right thing for us to do.
Our VA MISSION bill also authorizes access to walk-in community
clinics, removes bureaucratic redtape by authorizing local provider
agreements, and eliminates barriers for VA healthcare professionals to
practice telemedicine. In this new technological age, it makes no sense
to have restrictions on the ability of people to get access to care
through telemedicine, when and where appropriate.
I want to conclude by saying that I appreciate Chairman Isakson,
Senator Moran, and others working with the President and Acting
Director Wilkie to get this done before funding runs out. I appreciate
all of our colleagues who have worked on this on a bipartisan basis.
Last week, the House passed the bill, so now it is our turn. What a
great sign of appreciation to our veterans it will be to get this bill
passed and to the President's desk and have it signed before Memorial
Day.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Alabama.