[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 68 (Thursday, April 26, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Page S2474]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                            BORDER SECURITY

  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, many of us were shocked when the 
President tweeted that he was deploying the National Guard to the 
border.
  The President's claim that we face a crisis at our Southwest border 
is simply false, and it is particularly ironic when the President 
himself has repeatedly bragged--again, falsely--that illegal border 
crossings are at an alltime low.
  I remain concerned that the Trump administration is diverting Defense 
Department resources to the border to help carry out its deportation 
agenda. The Department is unable to tell Congress how much these 
deployments may cost our Nation--paid for with money diverted from 
other, critical defense programs. So far, the Department of Defense has 
provided a preliminary estimate that these deployments will cost $182 
million in fiscal year 2018, but there is no end in sight.
  I am also concerned that these deployments may harm the readiness of 
our National Guard by disrupting training for core missions. As one 
local elected official in New Mexico noted in the Albuquerque Journal, 
``We're going into forest fire season. A big percentage of the state is 
in drought right now, and if National Guard folks are continuously 
rotated down to the border for a problem that doesn't exist, are they 
going to be available for a real problem when it happens?''
  Well, yesterday, Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson issued a 
surprising report, which inadvertently agreed with these concerns.
  Last year, Congress required the Department of Defense to examine 
past deployments of National Guard troops to the border and to analyze 
those experiences for whether they had been beneficial for those Guard 
members. As Vice Chair of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, I 
received the Department's report yesterday.
  It is fair to say that its conclusions are probably not what the 
President wanted to hear from his own political appointees.
  The report notes that several States have conducted training and 
operations along the Southwest border. It concludes that training and 
operations by California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas Guard units 
``does not directly contribute to collective core Mission Essential 
Task readiness'' of those units. In other words, we are diverting them 
from their most important missions.
  It was even harsher in its conclusions for National Guard units from 
other States traveling to the border for similar training. It describes 
a pilot program to send 250 National Guard personnel to the border. Not 
only did the pilot program cost a half a million more than that unit's 
regular, scheduled training, but it also resulted in only 22 more 
apprehensions than normal, while contributing almost nothing to the 
unit's training.
  The report also notes that these kinds of deployments ``comes at a 
cost to the individual soldier, his/her family, and her/his employer, 
as well as to overall united readiness.''
  Is that what we want? To impose costs on our volunteer Guard 
personnel, their families, their employers supporting their service?
  The report goes on to say, ``Such tasking could also potentially 
impact support to validated Global Force Management Allocation Plan 
requirements.'' That is a mouthful, but it means that these deployments 
could make our National Guard less prepared to respond to a natural 
disaster back home or, God forbid, a war.
  Is that what we want? No. There's an old adage that goes, when you 
find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is to stop digging.
  We all know that the President wants to build a wall on the border, 
but he has failed to convince Congress that spending $25 billion on a 
campaign promise is the right thing to do. Instead, he is sending the 
outstanding women and men of the National Guard to the border, as if to 
compensate for his inability to work with Congress.
  I have met a great number of members of the National Guard, and I 
know they will carry out their assigned duties as well as they can. 
Many will view their deployments as a chance to serve the country they 
love, but we owe it to them to send them on a mission that is worth it, 
and the Pentagon's own study raises serious questions about that.
  I hope that we end National Guard deployments to staff the crisis 
that the President invented and get them back to their core job: 
protecting their States and protecting this country.

                          ____________________