[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 68 (Thursday, April 26, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Page S2450]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Special Counsel Legislation
Mr. SCHUMER. Madam President, I watched the President on TV this
morning, and like most Americans, so many Americans, I was aghast. The
President seems to live in an alternative reality. He says things that
are patently false, and he thinks that just by saying them, they become
true. With the number of 180-degree turns--direct contradictions to
what he has said before--the name-calling, and blaming, if you watched
the President this morning and the way he acted, it was so unbecoming
of a President, unbecoming of a democracy.
We believe in truth. People may have different value systems, but to
just make up things as he goes along and to, without blinking an eye,
contradict things that he said that were exactly the opposite a few
hours, a few days, a few weeks ago is not who any President of any
party of any ideology should be.
What the President said this morning was embarrassing to America, to
democracy, and to any American who prizes truth.
One of the things the President said this morning was that he has
decided not to be involved in the Russia probe but may change his mind.
That is why it is so good this morning that the Judiciary Committee is
marking up bipartisan legislation that will protect Special Counsel
Mueller from political interference.
From the very beginning, Special Counsel Mueller's investigation has
been about following the facts of how a foreign, hostile power
interfered with our free and fair elections--the wellspring of our
democracy. That investigation must be allowed to proceed safely from
the President's heavy hand. The President can't make this go away by
name-calling. He can't dispute facts. He can't dispute the fact that
Russia's interfering in our election is very dangerous and must be
investigated no matter where it leads.
It is so abundantly clear from the President's remarks this morning
and from so many other things he has said that he has little regard for
the rule of law. He seems to have this view that the purpose of the
Justice Department is to protect his interests and persecute his
enemies. That is not a democracy. The purpose of the Justice Department
is to defend the rule of law, and no man or woman is above the law. It
is not, simply, to go after his friends. He is angry when the Justice
Department does something he doesn't like even though it is following
the law. Again, that is not the hallmark of our democracy.
I am so proud of our Judiciary Committee and Chairman Grassley in
their rising to the occasion--proposing and hopefully passing
legislation that says we will protect the rule of law and that we will
protect our democracy by not allowing the President to fire the special
counsel at will because he simply doesn't like the results he comes up
with.
Again, the Judiciary Committee, this morning, makes us proud. It
rises to the occasion to tell the President that he cannot tamper with
the very wellsprings of our democracy and that he will pay a bipartisan
price if he does.
I particularly praise Chairman Grassley. We have worked together on
many things, and we have had our differences on many things, but this
morning he is rising to the occasion. History regards such moments very
favorably. I hope we will get a large vote this morning.