[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 18, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2251-S2252]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Coast Guard Authorization Bill
Mr. BROWN. Mr. President, I thank both Senator Thune and Senator
Cantwell for their exchange back and forth. I especially appreciate
Senator Cantwell's work. I grew up an hour and a half away from Lake
Erie and saw, in the 1960s, what that lake looked like. For 10 years, I
lived in a home near Lake Erie, and I saw the improvements we made.
This bill, unfortunately, with that amendment sets us back.
We need to keep invasive species out of Lake Erie, and we need to
pass a Coast Guard bill. There is no reason we can't do both. I want to
speak to that in a moment.
First, I want to speak on how vital Lake Erie is to my State. Fifty
percent of the fish in all the Great Lakes consider Lake Erie their
habitat. The water is critical to farming, clean energy development,
industry, and regional economic competitiveness. From tourism in
Catawba and Put-in-Bay, to fishing in Marblehead, to vacations and
family reunions at Maumee Bay State Park, Lake Erie benefits our
communities and creates jobs in Ohio.
For more than half a century--I am going back to when I was a kid in
the 1960s and saw what Lake Erie looked like--keeping our lake healthy
has been a constant struggle. Where I lived on Lake Erie, the lake was
about 50 to 60 feet deep. Moving west toward Toledo, the lake is about
30 feet deep. Contrast that with Lake Superior, which is 600 feet deep,
and you can see the challenge of keeping Lake Erie clean, and you can
see the vulnerability of that lake. That is the reason for the algal
blooms. That is the reason that Lake Erie has had the most difficult
issues facing its aquatic life. Runoff that causes harmful algal blooms
and invasive species are threats we battle every year.
That is why Senator Portman and I came to this floor and fought back
against the President's budget 2 years in a row when the President was
going to cut close to $300 million from the Great Lakes Initiative. Two
years in a row, Senator Portman and I fought back against it because we
know that cleaning up Lake Erie is something we did in the sixties, but
keeping Lake Erie clean is something we do in the seventies, eighties,
nineties, into this century, and into this millennium.
The Great Lakes are home to more than 185 non-native species. By some
estimates, invasive species cause $5 billion in damages to the Great
Lakes every single year. A provision that would make our fight against
invasive species harder has been added to the bill to reauthorize our
Coast Guard. That is why I voted no earlier today.
As much as I want Coast Guard reauthorization, my first
responsibility, other than looking out for working families in Ohio
every day, is to keep the greatest natural resource in the country
clean--my part of the Great Lakes, Lake Erie, the part that borders
Ohio.
This provision would make it easier for invasive species to enter our
lakes, harm our drinking water, and threaten local jobs that depend on
boating and fishing. Every year, I meet with the Lake Erie sea
captains, boat captains. They talk about the beauty of the lake and the
importance of the lake to their businesses and to all of us in Northern
Ohio. This provision doesn't belong in the Coast Guard bill. The Senate
did the right thing by blocking it.
Again I say I strongly support the Coast Guard reauthorization. I
want to see it passed. I agree with Senator Thune. I want it to be law.
That is why it is critical that this provision be removed from the bill
so Congress can move forward with supporting our Coast Guard without
threatening the Great Lakes. Members of the Coast Guard surely think
the same thing.
This provision would eliminate the ability of Great Lakes States,
such as Ohio, to set separate water quality standards to keep out
invasive species. Tankers and cargo ships carry something called
ballast water with them to help with stability and smooth sailing.
[[Page S2252]]
When they load on more cargo, they let out some of the water, and it
flows out into whatever body of water they happen to be in at that
time.
Think about these ships. In some sense, they are luxury liners for
invasive species. They might be picked up off the coast of Japan. They
might be picked up in the Indian Ocean. They might be picked up in the
South Atlantic Ocean. They end up coming down the Saint Lawrence Seaway
carrying this water with invasive species from around the world, and
they release them into Lake Erie or into Lake Ontario or Lake Michigan
or Lake Superior or Lake Huron.
It may not sound like a big deal if a ship takes on water with zebra
mussels in the Caspian Sea off the coast of Russia and lets them out in
Lake Erie, but those little mussels do major damage to our lakes and
our economy. Local governments and taxpayers end up paying the price.
This affects the beauty of Lake Erie and the cleanliness of its water.
That is so important. It affects the economy because it costs local
taxpayers money to clean up from these invasive species. They clog up
water intake pipes. They spike costs for local ratepayers. They make
toxic algal blooms worse. When drinking water gets contaminated, the
local water utility has to clean it up, and they pass on the cost. The
fishing and tourism industries rely on Lake Erie and feel that pain.
As I said, I remember how polluted Lake Erie looked when I was
growing up. The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative has made a real
difference. We have made real progress cleaning up the lake's
tributaries, from the Black River, to the Cuyahoga River, to the
Ashtabula River, to the Grand River, to the Maumee River, the largest
tributary feeding into any of the Great Lakes, draining 4 million acres
west and south of Toledo. It has been a bipartisan success story.
The Great Lakes region contains 84 percent of North America's surface
freshwater and provides drinking water to tens of millions of
Americans. It generates billions in economic activity. Why would we
risk that? Why would we risk that by voting for this bill? That is why
Senator Cantwell was right. We need to pass a Coast Guard bill. We need
to keep invasive species out of Lake Erie. We can do both by stripping
this provision from the bill right away and move it forward and pass
it.
Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.