[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 17, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2196-S2197]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Republican Tax Plan
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, today, as millions of Americans in
Illinois and across the Nation finish filing their taxes, I come to the
floor to discuss the most recent tax reform bill considered by the U.S.
Senate and House of Representatives.
Last year, Republicans followed through with their promise and used a
special procedural approach called reconciliation, which allowed them
to bring a tax reform plan to the floor outside of regular order and
without committee hearings and the ordinary amendment-invoked process.
Democrats were not really participants in this but only observers,
under the reconciliation process. That tax plan has now become the law
of the land, and now we know what it is doing. It has created a massive
tax giveaway to the largest multinational corporations, to the
wealthiest corporate CEOs, and to well-connected campaign donors.
In passing this plan, Republicans said that if they could just cut
taxes enough for large corporations, these corporations would invest in
America, give breaks to their employees, and create more employment.
The benefits of these tax breaks to the corporations supposedly would
trickle down to workers in the form of higher wages, and the economy
would explode, creating new jobs.
The tax plan was voted on favorably by every Republican in the U.S.
Senate, and it added $1.5 trillion to the national debt, to fund these
massive corporate tax cuts. So what did the corporations do with their
tax cut benefits? They turned around and took their taxpayer-funded tax
cut and gave their wealthy CEOs and shareholders a raise. So far, in
2018, large corporations have announced over $235 billion in stock
buybacks--far outpacing the rate of companies announcing one-time
bonuses for their workers. Not only that, but more than 100,000
employees in large corporations have actually been terminated. You
couldn't get further from tax relief for working families if you tried.
It gets worse. The Congressional Budget Office reported last week
that the Republican tax plan will actually cost another $300 billion
beyond the $1.5 trillion estimate. Our children and grandchildren will
pay off the cost of this tax cut for the wealthiest people in America
and the largest corporations. So much for the promise that these tax
cuts would pay for themselves. It will cost us roughly $1.9 trillion
over 10 years for these tax cuts for major corporations and wealthy
people. This is a burden our children and grandchildren will bear.
So what are we hearing now when it comes to the budget? Just last
week, after seeing that the plan they voted for was expected to add
$1.9 trillion to the deficit, Republican Tennessee Senator Corker said:
``If it ends up costing what has been laid out here, it could well be
one of the worst votes I've made.''
The so-called fiscal conservatives here in the Senate didn't seem as
concerned about the deficit when they
[[Page S2197]]
were voting for a 10-figure increase that would go to cut taxes for
wealthy people and large corporations. But make no mistake--as
predictably as night follows day, we now have a renewed call in the
House of Representatives for a budget amendment--a constitutional,
balanced budget, ``stop me before I sin again'' amendment. Now that
Republicans have exploded the deficit, the absolutely vital public
assistance programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are
now at risk. If there is a balanced budget amendment, they have said
that we have to get to the basic programs like Social Security,
Medicare, and Medicaid to make up the difference. I think it is
unconscionable to give tax breaks to people who are well off and
comfortable and then to cut the basics of human existence for many
senior citizens in Social Security and Medicare.
The devastating first act of the Republican tax plan and fiscal
conservatives, as they define it, has exploded our Nation's deficit and
provided enormous benefit to those who, frankly, don't need it. We
can't let the second act be a balanced budget constitutional amendment
that will end up pillaging the basic programs that help low- and
middle-income Americans the most in the name of fiscal responsibility.